Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II) 1of 11 Craig T. Furlong
&Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars for (9/11 Truth) @ 2006
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II) by Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross.
There
is an appointed time for everything
And
there is a time for every event under heaven
Ecclesiastes
3:1
SUMMARY
On
September 11, 2001, the seismic stations grouped around New York City recorded
seismic
events
from the WTC site, two of which occurred
immediately
prior to the aircraft impacts upon the
Twin
Towers. Because these seismic events preceded the collisions, it is clear they
were not
associated
with the impacts and must therefore be associated with some other occurrence.
None of
the authorities charged with the responsibility for
the
investigation of the events of 9/11 have
proposed
a source for these seismic events, nor
have
they given a valid reason for the difference
in times
between the seismic events and the aircraft impacts. Only by consideration of
the evidence of
basement explosions before the aircraft impacts, as experienced
by William Rodriquez and 36 others, can an explanation be found for the fact
that the seismic stations recorded seismic events originating from the WTC
sites prior to the aircraft impacts. It seems unlikely that Middle Eastern
terrorists could have overcome the WTC security and managed this kind of
high-level, technological coordination.
Do the facts presented here, simple
and
few, raise the possibility of inside
involvement
in 9/11/01, both before and after the attack?
OVERVIEW
This
paper is primarily concerned with the factual data surrounding the exact impact
times of the two aircraft that hit WTC1 and WTC2. This is neither theory nor
hypothesis, but a statement of publicized facts regarding the timing of the
aircraft impacts. There exist two separate precision data time sets that
address when the aircraft crashed into the Towers. Both data time sets are
based on UTC (Coordinated Universal Time, the world’s atomic clock system) and
the sources that determined these times were prestigious, reliable and
credible. There is no question regarding the precision and accuracy of the
instruments used to record both data time sets, since their entire function
depends and relies upon temporal accuracy,and therefore there can be no doubt
that both data time sets are correct. The time data sets represent objective
scientific data recorded by two
separate,
independent entities.
The
problem is the data sets have different impact times. These times were given out years ago but
at different times. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University
(LDEO) gave its findings around the time of the event with what it thought were
impact times based upon the seismic data recorded, while the 9/11 Commission
published its impact times, based upon FAA radar data and air traffic control
software logic, years later in its Final Report.
The
Commission no longer exists.
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)
2 of 11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars for 9/11 Truth) © 2006
Original
seismic and Commission times.
Table 1
AA Flt
11
2001
LDEO
8:46:26
Original
seismic
2004
Commission
8:46:40
(14
seconds difference)
UA Flt
175
2001
LDEO
9:02:54
Original
seismic
2004
Commission
9:03:11
(17
seconds difference)
SEISMIC
DATA AND TIMES
LDEO
Published Findings 2001
Link:
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_wtc.h
tml
LDEO
confirmed its data as accurate:
Link:
http://www.mgs.md.gov/esic/publications/download/91
1pentagon.pdf
9/11
COMMISSION DATA AND TIMES
Commission
Timeline Link:
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/index.html
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Ver
sion
II)
3 of 11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars fo
r 9/11
Truth) © 2006
The
Commission’s times are based upon: "We have determined that the impact
time was 9:03:11 based on our analysis of FAA radar data and air traffic
control software logic." [9/11Commission Report, pg 460, Note 130]:
Link:http://www.insightful.com/infact/911/corpus/report_470_460.html
(Note
130 is the basis for WTC1 & WTC2 precision impact times to the second)
It is
known that the FAA followed the aircraft using the four northeast ARTCCs (Air
Route Traffic Control Centers) of Boston, New York, Washington DC, and
Cleveland; there was also Air Traffic Control for the local air space of New
York City. All of this radar and
accompanying Air Traffic Control data was recorded to UTC timestamping. These
stations utilized primary radar return tracking with all times to the second.
Also, an AirTraffic Controller replied to this investigation stating that a
time-check is done daily by all stations to make sure that all radar tracking
is precisely coordinated to UTC. Radar is based upon microwavesthat travel at
the speed of light, so error variance is not stated.
The
Commission Report has the impact times. Their data set is based upon actual
flight data that ended when the Towers were struck. There is no question: AA
Flight 11 died
at
8:46:40 and UA Flight 175 at 9:03:11 [UTC – 4 hrs]. Since the planes crashed at
those times, the question is: What caused the LDEO times 14 and 17 seconds
earlier? What caused those seismic spikes?
BASEMENT
EXPLOSIONS
On the
face, it seems tenuous that the spikes were "impact times". How does
an aircraft impacting the WTC near the 90th floor result in sufficient energy
transference that travels all the way down to the earth, even through the
massive multi-level, 6-story sub-basement structure, and be picked up by
LDEO as
a seismic spike? Energy from the crash should have mostly been absorbed by the
building’s
immense structure and mass.
The
following is an excerpt about an eyewitness at WTC1 by the name of William
Rodriguez (he
worked
at the WTC complex for 20 years, was acknowledged a hero for the many lives he
saved that day, and he was the last person out of the buildingbefore it came
down):
Link:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Spingola/deanna17.htm
-------
Arriving
at 8:30 on the morning of 9-11 he went to the maintenance office located on the
first
sublevel,
one of six sub-basements beneath ground level. There were a total of fourteen
people in the office at that same time. As he was discussing the day’s tasks
with others, there was a very loud massive explosion which seemed to emanate
from between sub-basement B2 and B3. There were an additional twenty-two people
on B2 sub-basement who also felt and heard that first explosion.
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)
4 of 11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars for 9/11 Truth) © 2006
At
first he thought it was a generator that had exploded. But the cement walls in
the office cracked from the explosion. "When I heard the sound of the
explosion, the floor beneath my feet vibrated, the walls started cracking and
everything started shaking." said Rodriguez, who was crowded together with
fourteen other people in the office including Anthony Saltamachia, his
supervisor for the American Building Maintenance Company. Just seconds later there was
another explosion way
above
which made the building oscillate
momentarily.
This, he was later told, was a plane hitting the Tower at about the 90th floor.
Upon hearing about the plane, he immediately thought of the people up in the
restaurant. Then there were other explosions just above B1 and individuals
started heading for the loading dock to escape the explosion’s resulting
rampant fire.
When asked later about
those first explosions he said: "I would know if an explosion was from the
bottom or the topof the building." He heard explosions both before and
after the plane hit the Tower.
-------
The
number of witnesses who presented evidence of explosion and explosion damage,
and particularly the injuries that some witnesses received, again leaves no
room for doubt that there wereexplosions in the basement of WTC1.
The
following video link is powerful testimony by William Rodriguez and is evidence
thatcorroborates the facts of this paper; also, these facts corroborate the37
eyewitnesses in the WTC1 basement: Link:
http://www.jonhs.net/911/william_rodriguez.htm
BASEMENT
AND LOBBY DAMAGE
It is
noted that the damage caused by these explosions had previously been attributed
to aircraft impact. However, refutation of this is provided by both the
testimonies of William Rodriguez in the above link, and by NYFD Lieutenant
William Walsh inthe below link. This concerns specifically the middle, local
elevators that were blown off their hinges
from
below, as evidenced by the doors
resting
outward at 45 degree angles that met in themiddle near the bottom. These local
elevators
serviced
only Floors 34 down to the lowest level ofthe building, Level B6 in the
basement. They
could
not have been the result of aircraft impact
:
Link:
Testimony,
Lt. William Walsh NYFD, Jan 11, 2002.pdf
WTC
Building Layout Link:
World
Trade Center Building Layout, Floors and Elevators
----------------------------
Lt.
Walsh- Answer:
What
else I observed in the lobby was that – there’s basically two areas of
elevators. There’s elevators off to the left-hand side which are really the
express elevators. That would be the elevators that’s facing north. Then on the
right-hand side there’s also elevators that are
express
elevators, and that would be facing south.
In the
center of these two elevator shafts would
be
elevators that go to the lower floors. They were blown off the hinges. That’s
where the service elevator was also.
Chief
Congiusta- Question:
Were
these elevators that went to the upper floors?They weren’t side lobby
elevators?
Answer:
No, no,
I’d say that they went through floors 30 and below.
Question:
And
they were blown off?
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II) 5
of 11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars for 9/11 Truth) © 2006
Answer:
They
were blown off the hinges, and you could see the shafts. The elevators on the
extreme
north side and the other express elevator on the extreme south side, they
looked intact to me from what I could see, the doors anyway.......
......
.So I
headed for the B stairway. I did not want to
deal
with elevators. So Ladder 1—
Question:
Were
there any elevators working or no? Probably no, I assume.
Answer:
I
couldn’t tell about the express elevators. The elevators that I mentioned
before that were
on the
extreme north end and the extreme southend, I don’t know about those elevators.
But I headed for where the service elevator was, which was in the center where
the lower floor elevators were, the ones where the doors were blown off them.
----------------------------
Lieutenant
Walsh makes an extremely relevant point when he shows that the local elevator
shafts acted as a conduit for the explosive effects and thereby limits the
source of the explosion to the area covered by those shafts. His evidence shows
that the elevator shafts affected by the explosions
served
only the lower floors and not those at the impact levels, thereby ruling out
jet fuel from the
aircraft
as being involved in the explosions.
Additional
corroboration of the elevators being blown out is provided by Lt. Brian Becker
&
Firefighter
Robert Byrne, NYFD: Link:
Lt.
Brian Becker, NYFD, Elevators Were Blown Out Link: Firefighter Robert Byrne,
NYFD: Core Elevators (Blown Apart)
Since only
one elevator shaft was continuous from the aircraft impact level to the
basement level, we can further rule out the aircraft impact as being the cause
of the basement explosions by using additional testimony of William Rodriguez.
In direct response to a question which postulated that the explosion was caused
by aircraft fuel traveling down the elevator shafts, he stated, "Very
strange
indeed,
since there were only one elevator shaft (the 50A car) that went all the way to
B6, the
operator
was inside, Mr. Griffith and he survived with a broken ankles. He should have
died burnt
since
on this theory the ball of fire went down. Heis alive and well and I will
interview him in the
future
to clear the disinformation."
Link:
William
Rodriguez | 08.18.06 - 12:20 am
When
talking about the lobby damage and his experiences, Rodriguez added, "I
said many times that when I got back to the basement after escorting a person
totally burnt and 14 people from my office out of the building, there were sprinklers
going off on the basement and not on the upper floors. Also when I got to the
lobby, the passenger elevators in the field of view, their doors were popped
open sideways like a pyramid, from the bottom up."
The
evidence of William Walsh and William Rodriguezshows that there were explosions
that
affected
the basement and lobby levels, and these were not caused by the jet fuel.
TIME
DELAY FROM BASEMENT EXPLOSIONS TO AIRCRAFT IMPACT
The
authors have located evidence that possibly shows how long the time was between
the initial
explosion
and the later impact of AA Flt 11 at WTC1. Jenny Carr was at a business meeting
with others on the morning of 9/11 at 1 Liberty Plaza, and a recording was
being made of that meeting. During
this recording a first explosion is heard, and then a second one about 9
seconds later. This data still needs to be corroborated, and both authors and
the Scholars for 9/11 Truth are involved in
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)
6 of 11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars for 9/11 Truth) © 2006
this;
however, it is worth presenting at this time.
This
was found inside a movie compendium, "9/11 Controlled Demolitions of
September 11, 2001". To repeat, this needs further corroboration.
Link:
Jenny
Carr, Video - 9 Seconds
and go
in 14 minutes, 30 seconds.
FAA
TIMES
Within
the Federal Aviation Administration’s “Summary of Air Traffic Hijack Events
September 11, 2001” are found the impact times of 8:46:35 and 9:0
3:14.
Link:
FAA
Summary of Air Traffic Hijack Events September
11,2001
What is
interesting is, when the 9 seconds found on
the
Jenny Carr tape are added to the original
LDEO
seismic time of 8:46:26, the result is 8:46:35
, the
exact FAA impact time for AA Flt 11
.
And
although anecdotal, it is also intriguing that
the
FAA’s 9:03:14 for UA Flt 175 matches closely
to the
time of 9:03:17 found in the recent Vanity F
air
article by Michael Bronner.
Link:
Vanity
Fair article by Michael Bronner
This
9:03:17 time occurred when NEADS received
the
call notifying them of a 2
nd
possible
hijacking while “almost simultaneously” p
eople
in the
NEADS
control room watched Flt 175 crash into WTC2
on CNN,
including Colonel Marr, the
commanding
officer. This adds credibility to the C
ommission’s
impact time of 9:03:11.
Nevertheless,
although the 9/11 Commission referred
to this
FAA Summary many times in its Final
Report,
it still based its impact times upon all th
e data
they had and issued impact times of 8:46:40
and 9:03:11.
NTSB
TIMES
Within
the flight path studies by the National Tran
sportation
Safety Board are found approximate
impact
times of 8:46:40 and 9:02:40.
Link:
NTSB
report, "Flight Path Study-American Airlines F
light
11," Feb. 19, 2002
Link:
NTSB
report, "Flight Path Study-United Airlines 175
,"
Feb. 19, 2002
These
reports, as a matter of course, state times o
f
impact as approximate, this done with an
understanding
that higher authority will review all
data in
determining actual times of impact.
The 9/11
Commission’s impact time of 8:46:40 for AA
Flt 11
is the same as is found in the NTSB
report
that the Commission referred to in its Note
39.
The
Commission referred to the NTSB report for the
impact
time of UA Flt 175 in its Note 51, but
even in
doing so, it rejected the NTSB’s approximat
e
9:02:40 time and issued instead 9:03:11 as the
official
time.
When
one examines the radar graph from the study on
AA Flt
11, it can be seen there was one last
radar
position-plot at the end. This coincides wit
h
testimony by Controller Dave Bottiglia who
tracked
AA Flt 11 that morning: This is from an art
icle
that covers this: “
It was
now being tracked
by New
York Centre, where a controller, Dave Bottig
lia,
saw it disappear from his screen just before
8.47.
It had ploughed into the World Trade Centre's
north
tower.”
Link:
Controller
Dave Bottiglia, AA Flt 11 Disappears Fro
m Radar
Reference
is now made to the original source data u
sed by
the 9/11 Commission when analyzing the
impact
time supplied by the NTSB flight path study
for AA
Flight 11. Examination of this and
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Ver
sion
II)
7 of 11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars fo
r 9/11
Truth) © 2006
particularly
the radar graph supplied by magnificat
ion of
the ending point area shows the last radar
return
from the aircraft before impact at 08.46.40.
AA Flt
11 crashed at 8:46:40 EDT.
FAA
& NTSB times added.
Table 2
AA Flt
11
2001
LDEO
8:46:26
Original
seismic
2001
FAA
8:46:35
Rejected
by Commission
2002
NTSB
8:46:40
2004
Commission
8:46:40
UA Flt
175
2002
NTSB
9:02:40
Rejected
by Commission
2001
LDEO
9:02:54
Original
seismic
2004
Commission
9:03:11
2001
FAA
9:03:14
Rejected
by Commission
NIST
TIMES
NIST
(National Institute of Standards and Technolog
y)
developed its own times over the years
regarding
the plane impacts of AA Flt 11 and UA Flt
175,
and these were made available in the
progress
report of June 2004. Link:
NIST
Interim Progress Report June 2004 - Appendix H
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Ver
sion
II)
8 of 11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars fo
r 9/11
Truth) © 2006
So,
what are these NIST times? NIST had around 14,
000
photos and videos of the events of 9/11
and
wanted to bring this information into a chronol
ogical
timeline to better understand the events of
that
day. They first had to determine a standard o
r
baseline to use in order to bring all the data in
to
temporal
alignment. They decided to use the impact
time of
UA Flt 175 crashing into WTC2 at
9:02:54
because of the many TV stations and cameras
trained
on WTC1 at the time, as it had just
been
hit by AA Flt 11 moments before. This 9:02:54
time is
seismic data from LDEO. NIST later
claimed
that the actual impact time of UA Flt 175 w
as not
9:02:54 but 9:02:59 ± 1 sec. Their basis
for
this were four TV stations with timestamped tra
nsmissions,
times that are presumed to have been
accurately
updated to UTC at the time of the event.
The
difference between 9:02:54 and 9:02:59 is 5
seconds.
NIST then took this 5 second differential
to make
the other 4 major events “relative
”;
i.e.,
they
added 5 seconds to each time they had for the
other 4
major events (the impact into WTC1, and
the
collapses for WTC2, WTC1, and WTC7). This mean
t they
took the supposed time of “impact”
for AA
Flt 11 into WTC1 of 8:46:25 [seismic] and ad
ded 5
seconds to it to come up with their new
supposed
time of “impact” of 8:46:30. (Please reca
ll that
the facts put forth in this paper bring int
o
question
the causes of the seismic spikes, and this
is why
these seismic times are referred to as
“supposed”
times of “impacts”.)
NIST
used false logic in doing this 5-second addition. It is wrong. Adding 5 seconds
is sleight-of-hand statistics, a non sequitur that is meaningless. The 9:02:59
is from a discrete event with a timeset derived from TV stations (one type of
source).
The
other time of 8:46:25 is from another distinct
event
derived from seismic data (another type of source). These then are two detached
time sets for two separate events from two different source types. Therefore,
the adding of 5 seconds can not be done according to either logic or
statistics. (In accounting this type of error is known as “mixing apples with
oranges”.) Therefore, the NIST 8:46:30
“Adjusted
Time from Television Broadcasts”,
for
their first aircraft “impact”, is not real. To
reiterate:
the NIST 8:46:30 a.m. time labeled as “
First aircraft
impact” under the column “AdjustedTime from Television Broadcasts” is
artificial
.
NIST
times added.
Table 3
AA Flt
11
2001
LDEO
8:46:26
Original
seismic
2004
NIST
8:46:30
Artificial
2001
FAA
8:46:35
Rejected
by Commission
2002
NTSB
8:46:40
2004
Commission
8:46:40
UA Flt
175
2002
NTSB
9:02:40
Rejected
by Commission
2001
LDEO
9:02:54
Original
seismic
2004
NIST
9:02:59
Adjusted
per TV
2004
Commission
9:03:11
2001
FAA
9:03:14
Rejected
by Commission
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Ver
sion
II)
9 of 11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars fo
r 9/11
Truth) © 2006
NIST
SPONSORED RE-ANALYSIS SEISMIC TIME STUDY
Additionally,
NIST contracted in 2005 for the servi
ces of
Dr. Won-Young Kim of Lamont-Doherty
Earth
Observatory (LDEO) to re-analyze the original
seismic
data and times that were issued by
LDEO
back in 2001 (Kim was instrumental in the issu
ance of
the original times). This new study
resulted
in Kim issuing revised seismic times in 20
05 that
added three seconds to both of the 2001
originally
calculated times for aircraft “impacts”.
The
revised times were 8:46:29 and 9:02:57.
[Reference
report: “NIST NCSTAR 1-5A, WTC Investiga
tion,
Chapter 3, pages 22-24]
See
Table 3-1 Link:
NIST
NCSTAR 1-5A, Chapters 1-8
NIST's
determination of 8:46:30 time of first “impa
ct” is
artificial. It is not only erroneous, but m
ay
be
specious if time manipulation is the motive. This phony time for AA Flt 11 is
directly
contradicted
by the statement made by the NTSB and is not supported by the radar data
supplied by the NTSB. The last radar signal from the aircraft before impact was
received at 8:46:40, ten seconds afterthe time that NIST now says is when the
aircraft impacted the Tower. One wonders again if the
NIST
2005 contract with Dr. Kim to re-analyze the seismic times is also an attempt
at time
manipulation
in order to find credibility for the b
ogus
8:46:30 NIST time. An audit by independent
seismological
experts to determine the authenticity
of the
revised seismic times would be in order to
resolve
this matter. It would be worth doing as th
is
concerns the mass murder of nearly 3,000
people.
NIST
sponsored revised seismic times added.
Table 4
AA Flt
11
2001
LDEO
8:46:26
Original
seismic
2005
LDEO
8:46:29
Revised
per NIST contract
2004
NIST
8:46:30
Artificial
2001
FAA
8:46:35
Rejected
by Commission
2004
Commission
8:46:40
2002
NTSB
8:46:40
UA Flt
175
2002
NTSB
9:02:40
Rejected
by Commission
2001
LDEO
9:02:54
Original
seismic
2005
LDEO
9:02:57
Revised
per NIST contract
2004
NIST
9:02:59
Adjusted
per TV
2004
Commission
9:03:11
2001
FAA
9:03:14
Rejected
by Commission
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Ver
sion
II)
10 of
11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars fo
r 9/11
Truth) © 2006
The first
aspect of these times that must be commen
ted
upon is the fact that, after three major
enquiries,
we are still left without answers, even
on such
basic questions as when the various events
occurred.
It must be seen as an indictment of thes
e bodies
that most people would probably regard
the
best evidence as having come from television ra
ther
than the official investigations. Are we to
understand
that NIST, FEMA and the 9/11 Commission
did not
have access to exactly the same,
many,
television sources of the event? It is a sad
commentary
that the words “9/11 Commission” are
not
found once throughout both NIST reports [NCSTAR
1-5 and
NCSTAR 1-5A]. And if a word
search
is done on the Final Report of the 9/11 Comm
ission
for the words “Lamont” or “LDEO” or
“8:46:26”,
the answer is the same: nothing. This a
ppalling
lack of attention to detail is inexcusable
and can
be viewed by some as highly sinister.
NIST
suffers a lack of credibility for its issuance
of the
false 8:46:30 “impact” time for AA Flt 11.
It
is an
unreal time and is not an impact. What is ne
eded
from NIST are: (1) the names of the four
television
stations whose data was used, (2) the ac
tual
times of impact from these four stations, and
(3) the
procedures used by each station in the regu
lar
synchronization process to UTC.
Regarding
UA Flt 175, a question remains: What are
the
main specifics that the Commission based
its
time of 9:03:11 on, those that go to the heart
of
their Note 130? The Commission based it on
something,
as one doesn’t just come up with such a
precise
number out of thin air. “FAA radar data
and air
traffic control software logic” needs to be
elaborated
upon. Something is behind this time,
and if
this something is credible, this would confi
rm once
and for all the large time-gap between
seismic
and impact, and would be another conclusive
demand
for a new investigation. Nevertheless,
until
the specifics become known, the 9:03:11 remai
ns the
official time of impact, and this by itself
demands
a new investigation
.
Regarding
AA Flt 11, there still remains a huge 11
- 14
second time-differential between the
precision
times of seismic & impact. This time-gap
, along
with the many corroborating WTC1
basement
eyewitnesses and fire department personnel
, demands
a new investigation now, and this
can not
be emphasized or stressed any stronger
.
CONCLUSION
Several
seismic stations recorded seismic signals o
riginating
from two events which occurred at the
WTC
site, immediately prior to both aircraft impact
s.
Because these signals preceded the impacts
there
can be no doubt that the seismic signals reco
rded
were not those associated with the aircraft
impacts
on the Towers. These signals were in fact
the
seismic spikes associated with the huge
basement
explosions reported by witnesses. Only by
a
revision of the previously well-regarded
seismic
times has NIST been able to attempt to say
the
times of the aircraft impacts coincide with the
seismic
signals, and even then, their 8:46:30 first
impact
time is a fake. Meanwhile, the evidence of
basement
explosions prior to the impact of AA Flt 1
1 has
not been explored or examined at all, even
with so
great a cloud of witnesses.
The
inescapable conclusions drawn from this analysi
s and
the facts contained herein, cast extreme
doubt
on the government's claim that these attacks
were
carried out solely by Middle Eastern
terrorists,
who would not have had the ability or o
pportunity
to plant the explosive devices, nor
to
detonate them so as to be masked and partially h
idden
by the aircraft impacts. The real
perpetrators,
those who actually did plant these de
vices,
clearly had free access to the Towers. The
Seismic
Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Ver
sion
II)
11 of
11
Craig
T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars fo
r 9/11
Truth) © 2006
total
number of people who had this opportunity was
small
and a list of these people should be easily
available.
Middle Eastern terrorists alone could n
ot have
been responsible as they do not have the
wherewithal
of this kind of scale. It is more than
remarkable
that the 9/11 Commission, although it
had
heard the testimony of William Rodriguez regard
ing the
explosions in the basements, did not
deem it
important enough to be included in the Fina
l
Report. In Rodriguez’s testimony he says
many of
his fellow witnesses wanted to give their t
estimony
to the Commission, and tried repeatedly
to
bring this about, but the 9/11 Commission never
called
any of them. Rodriguez said the only
reason
he was able to appear out of all of them was
because
he was instrumental in bringing about
the
actual formation of the Commission (he was heav
ily
involved with many of the families of the
victims
who were trying to get a commission formed
to
investigate 9/11).
This
analysis has examined the evidence of basement
explosions
as given by William Rodriguez and
others
and has shown by the evidence given by Willi
am
Walsh, and by examination of the Tower’s
elevator
layout, that it is not physically possible
that
these could have the aircraft impact as their
source.
The
analysis has identified further information fro
m Jenny
Carr and shown that this confirms the
evidence
of William Rodriguez that the basement exp
losions
preceded the first aircraft impact by
nine
seconds. Examination of the various times giv
en for
the seismic events and aircraft impacts,
detailed
by the FAA, the NTSB and the LDEO original
seismic
analysis confirm that there was a
time
delay between the basement explosions and the
aircraft
impact.
THEREFORE,
the facts in this paper, which pertain
directly
to the greatest crime and conspiracy of
modern
times, demand a new independent, quasi priva
te/public,
non-politicized 9/11 investigation
(a
real
one this time, one with teeth) be formed immed
iately
to pursue
this crime investigation until the
murderers
/ conspirators are identified, apprehende
d, and
brought to justice
. All
Americans,
especially
the NYPD, the Attorney General for the S
tate of
New York, Congress, and the Bush
Administration
need to work in answering this quest
ion:
Who are the ones responsible for the
explosions
before the planes hit the buildings
?
To
ignore the facts of this paper would be intellec
tual
dishonesty at best, and if the government and
the
media do not respond, it is like an admission o
f guilt
and/or continued coverup.
Five
years is long enough.
Now is
the time for justice
for
those who died that day, justice
for
their families and friends who
grieve
to this day, justice
for all
the victims who survived, and that those w
ho did
this heinous act
receive
the full measure of justice befitting their
crime
.
No
stone should be left unturned until these murder
ers are
caught.
Now
is the
time for the new 9/11 investigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment