|
The war against the people: fear and loathing in NY and DC |
|
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)
|
|
The war against the people: fear and loathing in NY and DC
Thank you for your support. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
By Jon Rappoport
Vladimir Putin is the secret president of the United States.
Yep. That's it. The US is now the USSR. It's all over. Trump
is a Communist who took orders from Putin. Trump is a Red. That was his
game all along. He's a billionaire Commie.
Here is how this would play out in a reasonable court, in the judge's chambers---
Prosecutor: Your Honor, we're prepared to offer proof that Putin personally influenced the election in favor of Trump.
Trump's Lawyer: Nonsense. This is a ruse.
Judge: Mr. Prosecutor, what is the nature your proof?
Prosecutor: We will bring several CIA people to the stand and they will say they have proof.
Judge: Will they back up those statements with evidence, so Mr. Trump's attorney can cross-examine them?
Judge: Not in my court.
End of story.
Think about this: what will the major media do when their
latest fiction about the Russians and Trump sinks below the waves?
They're lying so hard and so often...is there any end to it?
The answer is no. They're committed. They can't turn back.
They're committing slow suicide in full view of the public.
It almost feels like they want to go down.
"Stop me before I kill again."
Men and women of the news, whose whole act depends on
securing trust and admiration from the public, are squandering whatever
is left of it in the space of a few months.
"Well, they didn't believe that outrageous lie. Let's try one that's even more ridiculous."
Now they want to censor news which fails to fit their
picture. And if they don't watch out, they'll take down Facebook,
YouTube, and Twitter---their enablers---with them, as people find new
social-media outposts.
Trump---love him, hate him, whatever---is playing his role.
He's virtually winning a new election every time the major media slam
him and he comes back with a tweet that simply announces, "You're full
of it."
Influential papers like the NY Times and the Washington Post
have gotten a free pass for as long as they've been in business. Their
staffs have developed a massive sense of their own importance, their own
infallibility. They're like popes---who've suddenly been exposed, in
leaked documents, for falsely claiming Jesus wanted the Catholic Church
built in his name.
George Orwell: "A totalitarian state is in effect a
theocracy, and its ruling caste, in order to keep its position, has to
be thought of as infallible."
Recognize we're in a unique situation here. This has never
happened before---certainly not in a highly sophisticated civilization
where the official means of communicating information were limited to a
few basic sources. Those sources have lost now faith with the people.
Instead, huge numbers of new outlets have emerged.
The mainstream is beginning to realize how great the shift is.
A centralized reality splitting up equals a centralized and hypnotized perception of reality splitting up.
Centralized reality, by its very nature, presents a false
picture. In the absence of that monopoly, many new true stories emerge
that were previously hidden. Each of these stories is, in effect, a new
reality holding a candle in the dark.
Virtually all major news sources agreeing on the substance of
virtually all important stories, over the course of decades, is
completely unnatural and absurd. That agreement must be engineered.
Concocted. Invented.
The "consistent concoction" is dissolving in the minds of the public. It no longer holds sway.
Hillary Clinton and her supporters should be thanked for
contributing to this break-up. The public is viewing their actions as
those of a child who refuses to admit she herself is at fault, and
instead throws blame in every possible direction: thousands of "fake
news" sites; the Russians; Putin; pollsters who failed to warn of
impending doom; the Electoral College system; the "deplorables";
WikiLeaks; the FBI.
"It's not our fault. It's everybody else's fault."
Thank you, thank you.
Keep finding new people to blame. How about the Chinese, the
Brexit supporters, some guy who owns a gas station in Death Valley, a
massive tribe who live on the dark side of the moon and illegally voted
for Trump?
Don't stop now.
Interestingly, the big donors to Hillary Clinton's failed
campaign, who are shocked and irate after forking over their money,
aren't eagerly drinking the Putin Kool-Aid. They're hard-headed, and
they want real-life answers. As Politico writes (12/15):
"...the wealthy Democrats who helped pump over $1 billion
into Clinton's losing effort have been urging their local finance
staffers, state party officials, and campaign aides to provide a more
thorough explanation of what went wrong. With no dispassionate,
centralized analysis of how Clinton failed so spectacularly, they
insist, how can they be expected to keep contributing to the party?"
"'A lot of the bundlers and donors still are in shock and
disbelief by what happened. They're looking for some introspection and
analysis about what really happened, what worked and what didn't,' said
Ken Martin, chairman of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party and a
top campaign bundler himself. 'It may take some time to do that, but
people are still just scratching their heads'."
"Or, in the words of a Midwestern fundraiser who's kept in
touch with fellow donors, 'A lot of people are saying, "I'm not putting
another fucking dime in until someone tells me what just happened".'"
The CIA-connected Washington Post can pump out as many
"Putin-did-it" articles as they want to. But the big Clinton donors are
unimpressed.
Don't look for major media outlets to give those donors much face time. It would explode the blame-game narrative.
The NY Times is now calling Trump a threat to democracy.
Translation: Trump is a threat to the NY Times, and by extension, all
major media---because the Times is usually the first voice that sounds
in the news echo chamber that bounces fake stories among hundreds of
outlets from shore to shore.
I'm waiting for the term "Russian denialist" to pop up in the
press, as a label for reporters who "ignore a mountain of evidence"
that Putin hacked the election and handed it to Donald Trump.
"Stay with us. Coming up after the break, a list of Russian
denialists who refuse to believe what's in front of their eyes, say
government officials. Some of the names will shock you. But first, six
commercials for medical drugs you don't need that could put you in the
hospital..."
"The media bubble is the ultimate symbol of what's wrong with
this country. It's just a circle of people talking to themselves who
have no f-ing idea what's going on. If The New York Times
didn't exist, CNN and MSNBC would be a test pattern. The Huffington Post
and everything else is predicated on The New York Times. It's a closed
circle of information from which Hillary Clinton got all her information
- and her confidence. That was our opening." ---Steve Bannon, Trump's
chief strategist and senior counselor
The major media's depth of hatred for Donald Trump is beyond
most people's understanding. Most people can't fathom it, because they
believe they know who these media personages are. They see them on
television or read their words every day. How bad could these reporters
be?
Very, very bad. The media personages see themselves as
12th-generation feudal barons who are suddenly surrounded by the
peasants stealing their land, crops, animals, homes, and royal titles.
Here is what Paul Krugman of the NY Times recently wrote
about Trump: "Thought: There was (rightly) a cloud of illegitimacy over
Bush, dispelled (wrongly) by 9/11. Creates some interesting incentives
for Trump." ---As if Trump might secretly provoke another huge terror
attack on US soil and, by his response, improve his status in the eyes
of the public. Heavy, heavy malevolent conspiracy theory from a baron at
the Times.
Back in February, WND reported on a tweet from another NY
Times writer: "A columnist with the New York Times caused a social media
stir with a tweet that joked of billionaire businessman and GOP
presidential front-runner Donald Trump's assassination."
"'Good news guys,' wrote Ross Douthat in his tweet, as found
by Infowars.com. 'I've figure out how the Trump campaign ends.' Douthat
is a foreign-policy expert who supports Marco Rubio and John Kasich. He
then included a link to a YouTube video of the 1983 movie, 'The Dead
Zone,' a flick that features Christopher Walken as a character who tries
to shoot to death a politician played by Martin Sheen. Sheen's
character uses a human baby to shield himself from the assassination
attempt."
Suppose, as rumored, Trump decides to re-cast the whole White
House Press Office? Suppose, for example, he intends to deny many
veteran reporters their press credentials, and instead welcomes
independent journalists?
Suppose Trump decides to establish his own Web channel, and
live- streams many fireside chats directly to a global audience, without
even letting the press know his schedule?
Suppose the New York Times and the Washington Post fall to the bottom of the pile, left to scramble for crumbs?
Yes, things could get much worse for major media. And they
should, because they have been lying to the public ever since the first
brick was laid on their first office building.
Trump's war on the media should become a centerpiece of his
presidency. If not, they will shatter his term in office. I hope he
understands that fully.
Suppose Trump's inside man, Steve Bannon, puts his head
together with a few deep-pocket investors and shows them how to create
strong social-media alternatives to Twitter and Facebook, who are now
trying to censor and bury independent online media operations?
Suppose Julian Assange and Project Veritas' James O'Keefe vault to the top of the press hierarchy?
Suppose the American people laugh the Times and WaPo and CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, and FOX out of court?
Suppose their echo chamber falls apart?
The major media's fear and loathing of Trump knows no bounds.
Their loyalty to Hillary Clinton, who played a central role in the
inhuman decimation of Libya, and whose Foundation set up a parallel
government stop-and shop for global greedheads, is without conscience.
If you think independent media need your support now, watch
what is going to happen in the coming months and years. Big media will
keep throwing nasty conspiracy theories like cakes of dreck at the wall,
hoping something, anything sticks to "fake news" sites.
These "liberals" are so firmly in the Globalist camp, they
wouldn't know how to escape even if they wanted to. The very notion that
America might reassert itself as a sovereign nation is a silver bullet
aimed at their vampire hearts.
They've been sucking all the blood they can out of this
country, with their "kind and gentle" "share and care" con job. It pays
for their lifestyles, and they fully intend to maintain their status.
Not quite on the level of George Washington's Farewell
Address or Eisenhower's last warning to America about the
military-industrial complex, here is Obama at his final press
conference---tortured logic, generalized garbled garbage, and veiled
threats of censorship---looking for scapegoats after the election put a
cap on his failed presidency:
"If fake news that's being released by some foreign
government is almost identical to reports that are being issued through
[domestic] partisan news venues, then it's not surprising that that
foreign propaganda will have a greater effect. It doesn't seem that
farfetched compared to some of the other stuff folks are hearing from
domestic propagandists."
"To the extent that our political dialogue is such that
everything is under suspicion, everybody's corrupt and everybody is
doing things for partisan reasons and all of our institutions are, you
know full of malevolent actors and if that's the story that is being put
out there, then when a foreign government introduces that same
argument, the facts are made up, voters who have been listening to that
stuff for years, who have been getting that stuff every day from talk
radio or other venues, they're going to believe it."
"So, if we - if we want to really reduce foreign influence on
our elections, then we better think about how to make sure that our -
our political process, our political dialogue is stronger than it's
been."
Then Obama basically characterized the totality of the WikiLeaks emails as "gossip." That was his overheated swan song.
He message for the media was: stick to the script; you know what it is; why did you cover material detrimental to The Plan?
---So, dear reader, you can choose to obtain your news from
purveyors of the Plan, or you can explore and keep exploring independent
sources.
What is The Plan? Aiding and abetting the descent of America
into a nation swallowed up in a global management system, where the
Constitution, freedom, and the individual are relics of a discarded
past.
Donald Trump is not The Answer. He never was. A declaration
of independence can take many forms, articulated by many individuals,
and backed up in different ways.
What's your way?
|
 |
|
|
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment