 |
Remove fluoride with reverse osmosis water filter Top fluoride expert apologises for pushing fluoride Suppression of facts Illegal to challenge fluoride in Australia
FLUORIDATION
Mind Control of the Masses by Ian E. Stephen http://www.ivanfraser.com/articles/health/fluoride.html
Use of Sodium Fluoride for mass behaviour
control in Nazi Germany
http://www.greaterthings.com/Lexicon/F/Fluoride.htm
In an "Address in
Reply to the Governor's Speech to Parliament", Mr. Harley Rivers Dickinson, Liberal Party Member of the Victorian Parliament for South Barwon,
Australia [In Australia, parliamentarian Mr. Harley Dickenson raised the issue in the
Victorian Legislative council, which is recorded in the official Hansard
report on August 12th, 1987] made a statement on the historical use of fluorides for
behaviour control.
Mr. Dickinson reveals that,
"At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government
sent Charles Elliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry,
physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants
in Germany. While there, he was told by German chemists of a scheme which
had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General
Staff.
"This scheme was to control the population in any given area through
mass medication of drinking water. In this scheme, sodium fluoride
occupied a prominent place.
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride
will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination by slowly
poisoning and narcotising a certain area of the brain, and will thus make
him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him.
"Both the Germans
and the Russians added fluoride to the drinking
water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile."
It is interesting that Dr. George Estabrooks, an advisor to the
United States Government on hypnotism and psychological behaviour
control,
later became chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University.
Internationally, Colgate was and remains today the most ardent producer and
advocate for fluoridated toothpaste. The use of chemicals by the government to
modify behaviour of select population groups is not new. During the first two
World Wars, bromides were administered to service men to dim the libido in an
attempt to inhibit forays into local bordellos.
Today, in Australia, the military fluoridates the drinking water of the
soldiers, ostensibly to protect the teeth. However, since the mythical ability
of fluorides "to prevent tooth decay" only exists for those under
the age of 12, it is certain that the real purpose is less altruistic. In
volume one of Matrix III, we discussed the role of Alcoa Aluminium in the
production of fluoride, the role of Alcoa lawyer
Oscar Ewing, who eventually gained control of what was to become the United
States Public Health Service, his promotion of fluoridation and the use of
advertising and false propaganda in an attempt to sell water fluoridation to
an unsuspecting public. Interestingly, it turns out that Alcoa transferred its
sodium fluoride production technology to Germany
in 1939 under the Alted Agreement, and Dow Chemical Company transmitted its
experience and technology to Germany during the same period.
So, we have the U.S. transmitting technology to Germany before the war that
allows Germany to experiment on select elements of the European population,
and then after the war Nazi scientists and the results of experiments are
brought back to the United States under Operation Paperclip. Curious, isn't
it?
A little research turned up the fact that I.G. Farben developed
organophosphate nerve agents, Zyklon B cyanide-based extermination gas used on
the Jews during the war, and many other interesting substances. I.G.
Farben,
financially supported by the United States, was the first to develop and
process heroin and cocaine. They also developed fluorinated nerve gases Sarin
and Soman. Farben had many interconnections with companies in the United
States and Britain. Consult the illustrative chart in this book.
In a letter
abstracted from Fluoridation and Lawlessness, published by the Committee for
Mental Health and National Security (with obvious implications) from the
aforementioned Charles Perkins, U.S. appointed post-war head of I.G. Farben,
to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, October
2, 1954, we read the following:
Furthermore,
When Major
General Racey Jordan was in charge of the massive lend-lease airlift
operations from Great Falls, Montana to Russia, via Alaska, he queried the
trans-shipment of considerable amounts of sodium fluoride.
He was told frankly that it was to put into the drinking water of the prisoner
of war camps to take away their will to resist. It is also interesting that
former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who has a background in
academic chemistry, initiated a program involving astronomical expenditures of
UK revenue on a fluoridation campaign in Northern Ireland.
The Truth About 'Fluoride'
http://www.greaterthings.com/Lexicon/F/Fluoride.htm
(or what every Mother should
know)
by A. True Ott
tott@mountainwest.net © August 2000
First of all, it needs to be stated that the
'substance' referred to as 'Fluoride' is a misnomer - there is no such
substance listed in the periodic chart of the elements, nor in the prestigious
CRC handbook, nor in the sacred 'bible' of the pharmaceutical industry - the
illustrious 'Merck Index'. Instead, we find a GAS called Fluorine - and from
the use of this gas in various industries such as aluminium manufacturing and
the nuclear industry -certain toxic by-products are created which have
'captured' fluorine molecules. One such toxic, poisonous 'by-product' is called
sodium Fluoride - which according to the Merck Index is primarily used as rat
and cockroach poison and is also the active ingredient in most toothpastes and
as an "additive to drinking water". But sadly, there is much more to
this sordid tale.
Did you know that sodium Fluoride is also one of the basic ingredients in
both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin Nerve Gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl
FLUORIDE) - (Yes, folks the same Sarin Nerve Gas that terrorists released on a
crowded Japanese subway train!).
Let me repeat: the truth the American public
needs to understand is the fact that Sodium Fluoride is nothing more (or less)
than a hazardous waste by-product of the nuclear and aluminium industries. In
addition to being the primary ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, it is
also a main ingredient in anesthetic, hypnotic, and psychiatric drugs as well
as military NERVE GAS! Why, oh why then is it allowed to be added to the
toothpastes and drinking water of the American people?
Historically, this substance was quite expensive for the worlds' premier
chemical companies to dispose of - but in the 50's and 60's - Alcoa and the
entire aluminium industry - with a vast overabundance of the toxic waste -
SOMEHOW sold the FDA and our government on the insane (but highly profitable)
idea of buying this poison at a 20,000% markup and then injecting it into our
water supply as well as into the nation's toothpastes and dental rinse. Yes
that's right folks, a 20,000% markup. Consider also that when sodium Fluoride
is injected into our drinking water, its level is approximately 1
part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink ½ of one percent of the total
water supply, the hazardous chemical literally 'goes down the drain' and voila
- the chemical industry has not only a free hazardous waste disposal system -
but we have also PAID them handsomely in the process!!
Independent scientific evidence over the past 50 plus years has shown that
sodium fluoride shortens our life span, promotes various cancers and mental
disturbances, and most importantly, makes humans stupid, docile, and
subservient, all in one neat little package. There is increasing evidence that
aluminium in the brain is a causative factor in Alzheimer's Disease, and
evidence points towards sodium fluoride's strong affinity to 'bond' with this
dangerous aluminium (remember it is a by-product of aluminium manufacturing) and
also it has the ability to 'trick' the blood-brain barrier by imitating the
hydrogen ion thus allowing this chemical access to brain tissue.
Honest scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on sodium
fluoride's mega-bucks propaganda campaign have consistently been given a large
dose of professional 'black-listing' and thus their valid points disputing the
current vested interests never have received the ink they deserve in the
national press. Just follow the money to find the 'control' and you will find
prominent American families to be prominent 'players' in the scandal. In 1952
a slick PR campaign rammed the concept of 'fluoridation' through our Public
Health departments and various dental organizations. This slick campaign was
more akin to a highly emotional "beer salesman convention" instead
of the objective, scientifically researched program that it should have been.
It has continued in the same vein right up to the present day - and now sodium
fluoride use has now become 'usual and customary'.
To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just
look at the response given by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the
subject of fluoridation comes up. You need to ask yourself, "Is this
particular response based on EMOTIONS born of TRADITION, or is it truly
unbiased and based instead on thoroughly researched objectivity?" There
is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific
"know-it-all" emotions attached to the topic of 'sodium fluoride'
usage - but I personally have yet to find even ONE objective, double blind
study that even remotely links sodium fluoride to healthy teeth at ANY AGE.
Instead, I hear and read such blather as "9 out of 10 DENTISTS recommend
'fluoride' toothpaste" etc. etc. etc. Let me reiterate: truly independent
(unattached to moneyed vested interest groups) scientists who've spent a large
portion of their lives studying and working with this subject have been hit
with a surprising amount of unfair character assassinations from strong
vested-interest groups who reap grand profits from the public's ignorance as
well as from their illnesses. (Just follow the money!)
Do you have diabetes and/or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than
11 million Americans with diabetes. If it is true that diabetics drink more
liquids than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference
these 11 million people are at much higher risk drinking fluoridated water
because they will receive a much deadlier dose because of their need for
higher than normal water consumption. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers
the efficiency of the kidneys, which of course is the primary means in which
fluoride (or any other toxic chemical) is eliminated from the body. Does it
not make sense that these people shouldn't drink fluoridated water at all?
Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where ill kidney patients on
dialysis machines died because they ingested relatively small amounts of
SODIUM FLUORIDE from unwittingly drinking the 'fluoridated' city water supply?
Will adequate warnings be given to people with weak kidneys, or will the real
cause of such deaths be 'covered up' in the name of 'domestic tranquility'?
Concerning the 'practice' of putting sodium fluoride into drinking water,
where did this insanity begin and WHO tried it first? From personal research,
the very first occurrence of purposefully putting sodium fluoride into
drinking water was in the German ghettos and in Nazi Germany's infamous prison
camps. The Gestapo you see had little concern about sodium fluoride's
'supposed' effect on children's teeth; instead, their reason for
mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to STERILIZE HUMANS and force
the people in their concentration camps into calm, bovine, submission. (See
for reference: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" written by
Joseph Borkin.) Kind of shocking isn't it folks!! Ah, but it gets even better.
The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional
Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from a research chemist by
the name of Charles Perkins. He writes:
To Whom It May Concern:
I, Oliver Kenneth Goff was a member of the Communist Party and the Young
Communist League, from May 2, 1936 to October 9, 1939. During this period of
time, I operated under the alias of John Keats and the number 18-B-2. My
testimony before the Government is incorporated in Volume 9 of the Un-American
Activities Report for the year 1939.While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist underground training schools outside the City of New York: In the Bues Hall, and 113 East Wells Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The East Wells Street School operated under the name of the Eugene Debs School. Here, under the tutoring of Eugene Dennis, M. Sparks, Morris Childs, Jack Kling and others, we were schooled in the art of revolutionary overthrow of the established Government. We were trained on how to dismantle and assemble mimeograph machines, to use for propaganda purposes during the revolution; how to work on guide wires and fuel lines of airplanes so that they would either burst into flames or crash to the ground because of lack of control; how to work on ties and rails to wreck trains; and also the art of poisoning water supplies. We discussed quite thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would bring-about a spirit of lethargy in the nation; where it would keep the general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism. We also discussed the fact that keeping a store of deadly fluoride near the water reservoir would be advantageous during the time of the revolution, as it would give us opportunity to dump this poison into the water supply and either kill off the populace or threaten them with liquidation, so that they would surrender to obtain fresh water. We discussed in these schools, the complete art of revolution: the seizure of the main utilities, such as light, power, gas, and water; but it was felt by the leadership, that if a program of fluoridating of the water could be carried out in the nation, it would go a long way toward the advancement of the revolution. The above statements are true. /s/ Oliver Kenneth Goff STATE OF COLORADO ) ) S5 COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE ) OLIVER KENNETH GOFF, being first duly sworn upon his oath, deposes and says that he has the above and foregoing instrument and knows the contents thereof, and that the same are true of his own knowledge except as to those matters stated on the information and belief as to those he believes them to be true. (SEAL)subscribed and sworn to before me this 22rd day of June A.D., 1957. The above information was faxed to APFN on Aug. 6, 1993 from ULTRA LIFE From FAX: 618-594-7712. This FAX included the following page:
FLUORIDE UPDATE. AUGUST 1993
RECENT DISCLOSURES SHOW THE DANGER OF FLUORIDE AND THE SUPPRESSION OF
DAMAGING INFORMATION FROM THE PUBLIC.FRIDAY MAY 15, 1992, WILLIAM MARCUS, Ph.D, CHIEF TOXICOLOGIST AND SENIOR ADVISOR AT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, (EPA) WAS FIRED FOR HIS DISCLOSURES OF HIP FRACTURE, CARCINOGENIC, AND OTHER HEALTH AND LIFE THREATENING EFFECTS OF FLUORIDATION. JUNE 3, 1993, NEW JERSEY ASSEMBLYMAN JOHN V. KELLY, 242 WASHINGTON AVE. NUTLEY, NJ 07110, MADE A STATEMENT BEFORE THE STATE ASSEMBLY, PARTS OF WHICH ARE HEREIN QUOTED. "WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY DEFINES SODIUM FLUORIDE AS A COLORLESS CRYSTALLINE, WATER SOLUBLE, POISONOUS SOLID, USED CHIEFLY IN THE FLUORIDATION OF WATER, AS AN INSECTICIDE, AND AS A RODENTICIDE. THE NJ HEALTH DEPT RELEASED A STUDY LAST NOVEMBER SHOWING AREAS WITH FLUORIDATED WATER SUPPLIES IN NJ HAD FOUR TIMES MORE OSTEOSCAROMA, A RARE FORM OF BONE CANCER, THAN AREAS NON-FLUORIDATED." "THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS RECOMMENDED PRESCIPTION FLUORIDE SUPPLEMENTS FOR CHILDREN--FLUORIDE DROPS FOR NEW BORNS AND TABLETS FOR OLDER CHILDREN." "MY OFFICE CONTACTED AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY FOR STUDIES OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVINESS OF THESE SUPLEMENTS" "THEY WERE NOT IN POSSESSION, ADVISED THESE COULD BE OBTAINED FROM NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL RESEARCH IN WASHINGTON, THEY DID NOT HAVE THEM AND ADVISED THESE STUDIES ARE IN DOMAIN OF U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION." FDA HAS HAD NO DRUG APPLICATION, NO STUDIES SHOWING SAFETY OR EFFECTIVENESS OF FLUORIDE DROPS OR TABLETS, ACCORDING TO FRANK FAZZARI, CHIEF OF FDA DRUG COMPLIANCE BRANCH, THESE ARE UNAPPROVED NEW DRUGS.!!! THESE POISONOUS DRUGS HAVE BEEN PRESCRIBED FOR OVER 30 YEARS TO MILLIONS OF CHILDREN. IT IS IRRESPONSIBLE TO PERMIT THESE PRODUCTS TO BE PRESCRIBED TO THE MOST VULNERABLE SEGMENT OF OUR POPULATION, OUR CHILDREN. THE UNION REPRESENTING EPA SCIENTISTS HAS BEEN VERY CRITICAL OF FLUORIDE, CHARGING THAT MANY STUDIES LINKING FLUORIDE TO A WIDE RANGE OF HEALTH PROBLEMS INCLUDING CANCER, HIP AND OTHER BONE FRACTURES, ARE SUPPRESSED. ASSEMBLYMAN KELLY THEN REQUSTED DR. D. KESSLER, COMMISSIONER, FDA IMMEDIATELY REMOVE THESE FROM THE MARKET, LETTER DATED JUNE 3, 1993. AT THIS DATE NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE TO STOP THIS NATIONWIDE POISONING. FOR MORE INFO CONTACT: FRANK FAZZARI AT FDA 301-295-8073 - DR. WM. MARCUS (301) 972-0707, DR. ROBT. CARTON, (301) 874-2948 OR (301) 619-2004, FORMER PRESIDENT EPA SCIENTIST UNION. COULD THERE BE A DEEPER, MORE SINISTER REASON FOR FORCING FLUORIDE ON THE PUBLIC? READ THE NOTORIZED STATEMENT FROM OLIVER KENNETH GOFF. YOU DECIDE IF FLUORIDATION IS ONE MAJOR REASON WHY WE ARE A NATION OF "SHEEPLE" AND "COUCH POTATOES". http://www.peg.apc.org/~nexus/fluoridebomb.html
Another letter needs to be quoted at length as well to help corroborate Mr.
Perkin's testimony. This letter was written by a brilliant (and objectively
honest) scientist named Dr. E.H. Bronner. Dr. Bronner was a nephew of the
great Albert Einstein, served time in a WWII prison camp and wrote the
following letter printed in the Catholic Mirror, Springfield, MA, January
1952:
Apparently, the public outcry by Dr. Bronner and others precluded the
fluoridation of public water systems for a season - but soon thereafter, the
Food and Drug Administration allowed this deadly poison to be put in
'toothpaste', and our dentists were systematically brainwashed into providing
'fluoride treatments' to their many patients. Of course, today many major
metropolitan areas have a minimum of 1 parts per million sodium fluoride
systematically added to their water supply and more areas are seeking to add
this poison every year. Add to this the fact that bottling companies (soft
drinks, juices, etc.) use fluoridated water to make their products - is it any
wonder that people can no longer think clearly and ask pertinent questions of
their elected and ecclesiastical leaders? Is it also a mystery why so many top
Nazi mind control scientists were brought to America by the CIA and their
infamous 'Operation Paper Clip'?
If you believe all of this is 'just a coincidence' - go ahead and keep
brushing your teeth with your 'fluoride' toothpaste and sucking on your sodium
fluoride enhanced Coke or Pepsi product - for ignorance truly is bliss and you
truly deserve what you get.
Mothers, if your little ones are having trouble concentrating at home or in
school, or have been diagnosed as 'attention deficit' - perhaps you would be
well advised to look for the culprit (and the solution to the problem) no
further than your home medicine cabinet (your tube of toothpaste) and your
friendly neighbourhood school's water fountain!!
Fluoride the Modern
Day DDT
“This information is important because this substance may harm
you”
[From a document about fluorides] [Prepared by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry,] [A subsidiary of the U.S. Public Health Service] [1997-8]
DDT was once thought to be a wondrous substance.
Troops were being
sprayed from the air during World War II with it, The Australian
government
was advising the population to spray it onto window ledges to stop
those nasty
flies, just at the height that a small child could reach. Old
newsreels show
trucks driving down the streets spraying it onto children and passers
by. With the power of hindsight, these actions were, to say the least,
moronic.
DDT has now been found to be a VERY hazardous substance, and in turn
has been
banned from use or its use restricted.
Fluoride
is still thought of by the mainstream, TV dulled population to be a
non-hazardous, helpful substance. For far to long it has been thought the mass medication of the
population by the fluoridation of drinking water is something that every government
for
its people. In reality, 96% of the world’s population does not have
fluoridated water. The remaining 4% of the world’s population who have
fluoridated are in America (currently 62% fluoridated), 10% of England,
Australia, New Zealand and Europe (currently only 2% [2]).
There are many countries that once had fluoridated water supplies, but have
since stopped - in most cases because the toxicity of the substance has come to
light [1].
The Beginning of Fluoridation 1940: Both Germany and The Soviet
Union added sodium fluoride
to the drinking water in their Prisoner Of War (POW) camps.
A Belgian
gentleman called Joris who was active during the war in shipping sodium fluoride
to the Soviet Union told a fluoride
researcher, Dr. Hans Moolenburgh, that “they [the ‘Soviets’] said it
kept the Germans calm.” [2 + 3]
1945, The end of World War II: The United States Government immediately
sends a chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology research worker by
the name of Charles E. Perkins to Germany (with an entourage of staff) to take
charge of the I.G. Farben Chemical plants.
During his time there, Mr Perkins learned of a scheme developed by German chemists during the war, and adopted by the German General staff, to medicate the populations of the occupied countries by introducing sodium fluoride to the drinking water. The German chemists had discovered that fluoride slightly damages the Hippocampus. This caused, over time with repeated dosages, the effected person to become more submissive. On a larger scale, making the populations of fluoridated areas easily governable and less likely to defend their freedom. [4 + 5]
1945, Shortly
after World War II: The Grand Rapids Study, U.S. Experimental fluoridation
plants were established in selected areas, one of those being the City of
Grand Rapids. A 10-year study was undertaken between the fluoridated city of
Grand Rapids and a non-fluoridated control city. After 5 years, it was found
that the population of the control city had better teeth than that of Grand
rapids. The Control City was quickly fluoridated to stop any further
comparison. [1]
1945 + Onwards, during The Presidency of Harry S. Truman: Oscar Ewing, who
was the legal counsel to ALCOA aluminium, was appointed director of Social
security, in charge of the U.S. Public Health System (P.H.S.). Soon after
this, Mr. Ewing was appointed to President Truman’s cabinet. Mr. Ewing
committed the P.H.S. to the promotion of (read: creating propaganda about)
fluoride.
[4]
It is very interesting also to note that not only was fluoridation being
pushed publicly by a man who had obvious links to Alcoa Aluminium, but behind
the scenes fluoridation was being pushed along by the aluminium smelting
industry in America (Alcoa, Alcan and others) [1+ 2] As we delve deeper into
the fluoridation issue, it will become apparent why it is so suspect that a
major aluminium manufacturer was linked to fluoridation in America and why the
events surrounding its insertion correlate in such a disturbing way.
Why Fluoride Isn’t
a Pair Of Rose Coloured Glasses
FLUORIDE HAS A
CUMULATIVE EFFECT [8]. A lot of the proponents of water fluoridation will say
that at the recommended levels, fluoride
does not cause any side effects, which may be the case for a singular isolated
dose. (The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has set a maximum at 4mg/L of
drinking water or 4ppm [Parts Per Million] and recommends that fluoridation of
drinking water be limited to 2mg/L, or 2ppm)[9]
What we are talking about here
however is continuous repetitions of dosage, each time you have a glass of
water, or ingest any other substance that contains fluoride.
Fluorides accumulate in the bones and in the brain (as discussed earlier with
the hippocampus) [1+7]. As people get older, their kidney efficiency
decreases, causing fluoride
to be stored more and more in the body, in effect making the cumulative nature
of fluorides increasingly dangerous as people age [1]. Fluoride
is not biodegradable and as such it accumulates in the biosphere, resulting in
a continual increase of fluoride
levels [7].
There is NO VERIFIABLE PROOF THAT FLUORIDE
STOPS TOOTH DECAY [1].
There has been absolutely no correlation found between the level of fluoride
in drinking water, and the reduction of tooth decay [10].
Inversely, a study involving 26 000 primary school students done during
1992 in Tuscan, Arizona in the US found that the more fluoride
a child consumes, the more cavities appear [5].
The study was headed by Professor Emeritus Cornelius Steelink, and was
conducted by the University of Arizona [5].
On the home front, Australia’s own governmental figures show that
children’s teeth in Brisbane (currently non-fluoridated) are BETTER than
children in the fluoridated cities of Melbourne, Perth and Adelaide [1]
DENTAL
FLUOROSIS appears as mottled opaque white spots or stained enamel on the teeth
and is the first sign of fluoride
poisoning [2].
According to the U.S. Public Health Service [P.H.S.] “high fluoride
exposure can cause dental fluorosis” [9], but then, the National Research
Council (US) has found that in America, fluorosis effects 8% to 51% of
children growing up in areas in which water supplies contain only 1ppm of fluoride
[7]. It seems that what the U.S. P.H.S. would like people to believe is a
“high fluoride
exposure” is in reality the dosage that their government sets. In Melbourne,
varying levels of dental fluorosis effect at least half the children [1].
In what is hopefully the first in a long line of compensation cases
involving fluorosis, in Essex, England the parents of a 10 year old boy, who
was diagnosed with Dental Fluorosis, were given a “good will” payment of
1000 pounds from Colgate-Palmolive after the mother phoned the company. This
case is directly related to fluoride
toothpaste as the area the family lives in does not have fluoridated water and
the mother never used fluoride
tablets [2]. Already, more than 200 parents in England are attempting to sue
toothpaste manufacturers [2].
FLUORIDE BRITTLES
AND STRUCTURALLY EFFECTS BONES by attacking calcium [1]. In high doses, fluoride
causes the mass of the bones to increase, while it decreases the strength [1].
This coupled with joint pain and limited join movement is sometimes referred
to as skeletal fluorosis [9]
At the recommended level (1ppm), fluoride
thins and brittles the bones [1] and it doubles the number of hip fractures in
older men and women in fluoridated communities [10]. Increases in hip
fractures are found at even 1/10th the recommended level [7].
The occurrence of CANCER HAS INCREASED BY 5% IN FLUORIDATED COMMUNITIES
[7]. The U.S. National Cancer Institute Toxicological program found fluoride
to be an equivocal carcinogen [10]. The New Jersey Health Department did
further studies and found that cases of osteosarcoma (cancer of the bone)
increased dramatically by 6.9 fold in men 20 years old or younger in
fluoridated communities [3+10].
FLUORIDE SETTLES IN
THE BRAIN WHERE IT CAUSES LISTLESSNESS, DROWSINESS, AND CONFUSION [2].
The net result of this, and the reason why Nazi Germany so liked the idea, is that it turns the person into a virtual couch potato, not caring too much about anything and less likely to resist authority. Fluoride is known to be able to numb tooth pain [6].
When it gets into the bloodstream, either by ingestion or entering the
gums via toothpaste or mouth rinses, it then moves its way to the brain where
it settles. Could it be that this numbing effect also happens to the brain?
[6] (In scientific terms, fluoride
blocks acetylcholine. When in the brain it could do the same by interfering
with acetylcholine neuron communication [6]) In recently declassified
documents brought to light on October 24th, 1996, Scientists in America have
known about the mental side effects of fluoride
since 1944 [2].
In Australia, parliamentarian Mr. Harley Dickenson raised the issue in the
Victorian Legislative council, which is recorded in the official Hansard
report on August 12th, 1987 [4].
FLUORIDE INCREASES
THE INFANT MORALITY RATE.
Chile abolished fluoridation in 1976 after Professor Albert Shaltz showed that infant mortality rates had significantly increased in fluoridated areas [4].
FLUORIDE ADVERSELY
EFFECTS FERTILITY RATES IN MOST SPECIES OF ANIMAL, INCLUDING HUMANS [10].
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.) reported a very close correlation between increasing infertility in women aged 10 to 49 and increasing fluoride levels [10]. Even Americas own Public Health Service stated “We don’t know the effects of fluoride on reproduction or developing foetuses” [9]. Again, we see governmental bureaucracy at it’s finest, the F.D.A. says fluoride is lowering fertility rates, then the health service says “I dunno…”, the left hand doesn’t know what the right is doing.
IT SEEMS THE ARMY HAS FOUND A USE FOR FLUORIDE
AS WELL.
The Australian Journal of Public Administration reported in Vol. 38, No.3 in 1978 reported that Puckapunyal army camp had been fluoridated since 1972 “Under directions of the Commonwealth Government”. Another army camp at Bandiana has a fluoridated water supply, although it draws its water from the non-fluoridated Wodonga [4]. These are only a few examples; most of the main bases in the U.S. and Australia are supplied with fluoridated drinking water [4]. This is interesting when one takes into consideration the “dociling” effect of fluoride, and how much this would help when training/ brainwashing new recruits.
UNCONTROLLED DOSAGES.
Exact measurements and dosages closely control the administration of other drugs. To administer fluoride however, governments put it into the water and allow people to take as much as they want. It is a dosage measured by thirst. [1]
Apart from fluorosis, FLUORIDE
ADVERSELY EFFECTS CHILDREN in other ways. Fluoride
ingestion in children is extremely hazardous to biological development and
lifespan [6]. It can also have a deleterious effect on bone growth [7]. Professor
Carlson, professor of pharmacology at the University of Sweden, stopped
fluoridation in Sweden after he showed that the learning capabilities of
children were effected and the I.Q. levels of children were much lower in
fluoridated areas [1].
Sources and Levels of Fluoride
The fluorides that occur in nature are at low levels. This fluoride
is taken up into plants and stored. When superphosphate is applied to edible
plants ( fluoride levels
are about 3% in superphosphate), these levels increase dramatically. Celery
has a high fluoride
content because high levels of superphosphate are used during its growth. Tea
also has naturally occurring high levels of fluoride
[1]. However, these levels are always on the increase. Fluoride
accumulates in the environment, it doesn’t biodegrade, and levels are now on
the increase in the food chain. The more we put in, the higher the levels get.
People who support fluoridation seem to think that they have a watertight
argument when they say that 1ppm in the drinking water doesn’t hurt you.
This may be true if it was only one dose, they seem to neglect the fact that
we ingest fluoride
everyday in our diet, which adds up over time. Grape Juice for example may
have up to 6.8ppm of fluoride
[7].
Store bought juices can contain up to 2.8ppm. In total, exposure to dietary
fluoride can easily
exceed 100ppm [8]. The fluoride
that is put into drinking water, the fluoride
your dentist smears you teeth with, the tablets kids are forced to eat and the
fluoride put into salt
(salt fluoridation occurs in Mexico and 6 other parts of the world [5]) all
contain manufactured fluoride.
This fluoride comes
from the aluminium industries and also the superphosphate industries as a
waste product [1]. Because of the toxicity of fluoride,
these industries are not allowed to dump the fluoride
into the environment [1].
The main sources and levels (in Parts Per Million)
of manufactured fluoride
are given below:
- Fluoridated Drinking Water 1ppm Dental Fluoride 20 000ppm [1] - Fluoride Toothpaste 500ppm -1500ppm [1+8] - Mouth Rinses 230ppm – 900ppm [8] - Anaesthetics used in hospitals are mostly fluoride based [1] - Any beverage or food which contains water from fluoridated areas will also contain fluorides (ie. beers, soft drinks, tinned soups etc.)[7]. - Distilled water doesn’t contain fluoride, however filtered water usually does (depending on the source) [6]. - The only way to successfully remove fluoride from water is to use a reverse osmosis filter [11].
Discussions about fluoridating water supplies in Sydney, Canberra and
Hobart began in the 1960’s. Beaconsville just outside Hobart was the first
area in Australia to be fluoridated. Hobart followed soon after. [1] Currently
every major city in Australia except Brisbane is fluoridated. All up, 86% of
Australia’s population drinks fluoridated water. Tasmania has one of the
most intensive fluoridation schemes, with 48 fluoridation plants for ½ a
million people in comparison to Melbourne’s 6 plants for 4 million people.
The fluoride for the
Melbourne metro area comes from China (as does the fluoride
for some other areas in Australia), costing us AU$500 per Tonne. It’s fairly
ironic that we pay for another countries industrial waste to put into our
water supples. China doesn’t fluoridate it’s own water supplies. [1]
In Tasmania during 1995, the state government's Lower House put a
bill through that would prohibit public meetings and groups of people
gathering
and talking about fluoridation. When it got to the upper house, they knocked
it back and pretended nothing ever happened as it had caused a bit of a panic
throughout the Tasmanian government. In the words of Glen Walker (see
references) “Why would they go to these extremes if it’s safe?” [1]
Brisbane is one of the only major cities in Australia that doesn’t have a
fluoridated water supply, yet [11]. On Thursday 30th of January 1997, the
Brisbane city council announced it would set up a committee to decide if
Brisbane’s water supply was to be fluoridated. This announcement was made
after Liberal candidate Cr. Bob Mills announced earlier that week that if the
Liberal party won the local government elections that were held on March 15th,
they were going to fluoridate Brisbane’s water. Suffice to say that Mr Mills
didn’t win, but the committee still exists.
It is very strange that electioneering on the fluoridation of Brisbane’s
water supply instantly turned into a committee which was going to come up with
a one-and-for-all “yes” or “no” answer. Soon after the announcement of
the committee was made, the local council called for public opinion on the
subject by placing a singular advertisement in The Courier Mail. At the date
of this writing (Saturday, March 29, 1997) not a word has been heard from the
committee. It seems as though the committee has been stacked so that the
decision will be for fluoridation. The committee is going to include
representatives from The Australian Dental Association (everybody should know
their point of view, and anyone who saw the TV propaganda stirred up from this
will defiantly know their point of view), The Australian Medical Association
(tending towards fluoridation), Natural Health Practitioners and parent groups
(who would have jumped on the fluoridation bandwagon after seeing TV the
propaganda turn fluoride
into a godsend). It’s strange how a local council can get what they want
by stacking committees. The final nail in the coffin is that Mr Mills himself
will be asked to be deputy chair for the committee. [11]
Under The Thin Yellow Veil of Fluorine Gas
But why would our wonderful governments be doing something like this that
is so bad for the people? The more fluoride
they pump into us, the more docile we become and easier we are to control, as
if TV wasn’t enough. A low birth rate means fewer people that governments
have to control. The more cancer they can create means that people die younger
stopping all these old people from clogging up the system and draining
resources, why do you think smoking hasn’t been banned? (Apart from the
money it generates in taxes). Conspiracy theories aside, one of the main
reasons is money. Whole empires have been built upon fluoridation, people are
getting very rich off of it and their money will make sure that they stay
where they are [1].
The only way it will ever be stopped is if the truth gets out to the larger
population. The one power that Governments still fear is that which lies in
the people. “They are still guilty, and can be found guilty of poisoning
the community” [Glen Walker] References: (Please note: Original articles
contain full referencing)
1. Taped interview done with Glen Walker on 12.8.96. for 4ZzZfm 102.1 in
Brisbane. Glen is the Chairperson for the Freedom From Fluoridation Federation
of Australia. Ph: 03-95925444 Fax: 03-95925088
2. Search Net’s mailing list (email)from the Santiago Business Wire Nov.
29, 1996. Original email titled “ Fluoride
and IQ’s. Original sender may be contacted by email at: rlawler@dfw.net
3. Search Net’s mailing list (email). Part 2 of article described in
reference # 8
4. Original article titled “Fluroides and Population Behaviour
Modification in Literature and Government.”. Original sender was Steve
Wingate, who can be contacted by email at steve@linex.com Original posting
date was: Sunday 28th of July 1996.
5. Search Net’s mailing list (email). Part 3 of article described in
reference # 8
6. Original article titled “The Biological Effects of Fluorides”.
Original sender was Steve Wingate who can be contacted by email at: steve@linex.com
Original posting date was: 4th of August 1995.
7. Extracted from the World Wide Web Site:
< http://emporium.turnpike.net/P/PDHA/fluoride/blunder1.htm > Original article was titled “Blunder”. Date of extraction was March 10th, 1997
8. Original article titled “Behavioural Effects of Fluorides on Mass
Populations”. Author: Valdamar Valerian. Written: July 20th 1996. Extracted
from the World Wide Web site of “Leading Edge International Research
Group” at: <http://www.cco.net/~trufax/>.
Part 1 of article, parts 2 and 3 are references #3 and #5
9. Original article titled “Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride,
and Fluorine”. Extracted from the World Wide Web site of the “Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry”. Original date: April 1993. Further
contact: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Division of
Toxicology, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop e-29, Atlanta, GA 30333.
10. Extracted from the World Wide Web Site:
< http://emporium.turnpike.net/P/PDHA/ fluoride/blunder1.htm > Original article was titled “Adverse Health Effects Linked to Fluoride”. Originally posted by Search Net’s mailing list (email).
11. The Courier mail, January 31st 1997, page 4. Article titled “Soorley
sets up fluoride
inquiry” Document info – Written By: BELGRAVE zarkon Finished On: Sunday,
March 30, 1997 Word Count Before References: 2989 (not including this) Word
Count After References: 3333
WHY I CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT WATER FLUORIDATION by JOHN COLQUHOUN* Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 41, 1, Autumn 1997 http://www.fluoridation.com/colquhoun.htm
Why Americans Are SHEEPLES: FLOURIDE
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/sheeples.htm While a member of the Communist Party ...we were trained on how to dismantle and assemble mimeograph machines, to use for propaganda purposes during the revolution; how to work on guide wires and fuel lines of airplanes so that they would either burst into flames or crash to the ground because of lack of control; how to work on ties and rails to wreck trains; and also the art of poisoning water supplies. We discussed quite thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would bring-about a spirit of lethargy in the nation; where it would keep the general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism. see also psychopolitics by the same author. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/sheeples.htm Friday May 15, 1992, William Marcus, PHD, chief toxicologist and senior advisor at the Environmental Protection Agency, (EPA) was fired for his disclosures of hip fracture, carcinogenic, and other health and life threatening effects of fluoridation.
Fluoride - The Lunatic Drug
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/water.htm The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in Germany`s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride`s supposed effect on children`s teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission. (Ref. book: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" by Joseph Borkin.)
FLUORIDATION
Everything you need to know about the dangers of fluoride and water fluoridation. http://www.mercola.com/2002/jan/30/fluoridation_facts.htm http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/2/fluoride_safety.htm http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/6/fluoride_safety2.htm http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/9/fluoride_safety3.htm http://www.nofluoride.com/a_bomb_%26teeth.htm
Scientific Facts on the
Biological Effects of Fluorides ©1996
Val Valerian's
Chronologies of FluorideVal Valerian, Leading Edge Research Group http://www.lef.org/fda-museum/8_water/intarticles/fleffect.html 1931-1997 http://crash.ihug.co.nz/~dcandmkw/fluoride/vchron2.htm Nutritionl Almanac 3rd ed., Lavon J. Dunne Description FLUORINE is an essential trace mineral that is present in minute amounts in nearly every human tissue but is found primarily in the skeleton and teeth. Fluorine is found primarily in the skeleton and teeth. fluorine occurs in the body in compounds called fluorides. There are two types of fluorides: sodium fluoride is added to drinking water and is not the same as calcium fluoride [essential cellsalt], which is found in nature. Fluorine inhibits the activities of other important enzymes and appears to be especially antagonistic toward brain tissues. Fluoridated water supplies are by far the most common source of this mineral, although this form (sodium fluoride) may be toxic. Toxic levels occur when the content of fluorine in drinking water exceeds 2 parts per million. Calcium is an antidote for fluoride poisoning. Other rich sources of fluorine include seafoods, cheese, meat and tea. The fluorine content in plant foods varies according to environmental conditions such as type of soil, intensity of prevailing winds, and use of fertilisers and sprays that contain fluorine.
Largest double-blind study in the world shows no
correlation
http://www.trunkerton.fsnet.co.uk/fluoride_fantasies.htm (dead link)
A computer analysis of the data from the largest dental
survey ever done - of nearly 40,000 school children - by the National Institutes
of Dental Research revealed no correlation between tooth decay and fluoridation.
In fact, many of the non-fluoridated cities had better tooth decay rates than
fluoridated cities. The city with the lowest rate of tooth decay was not fluoridated.
Of the three with the highest rate of decay, two were partially fluoridated.
The Missouri State Bureau of Dental Health "had
conducted a survey of more than 6,500 lifelong resident second- and sixth-grade
children in various parts of Missouri and found that overall.. 'there were no
significant differences between children drinking optimally fluoridated water
and children drinking suboptimally fluoridated water."
Albert W. Burgstahler, PhD., Professor of Chemistry,
University of Kansas
* * *
As one who has been examining this subject closely since
1964, when I first became aware of adverse health effects that can result from
1-ppm fluoride in drinking water (see "Fluoridation:
The Great Dilemma," Coronado Press, 1978), 1 can well appreciate the
difficulties and pressures the author must have encountered in preparing her
report,
Albert W. Burgstahler
Professor of Chemistry University of Kansas, Lawrence
NEWS TO CHEW ON:
DENTISTS AWARD THE TOOTHLESS
http://doctoryourself.com "Fluoridation honors" were bestowed upon many communities (1), which happen to have the highest cavity and tooth loss rates, by the American Dental Association (ADA), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the American Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors (AASTDD). Fluoride added to water supplies, usually at taxpayers' expense, is publicized to save money and prevent tooth decay. Conspicuously absent are data supporting these claims.(2) In fact, government statistics reveal worse or less teeth in residents of fluoridation-honored communities than in their non-fluoridated counterparts. For example: A) Dentists gave Fifty-Year Awards to fluoridating water systems including: * Seven West Virginia and Five Kentucky water districts. Yet, 42% of mostly fluoridated (3) West Virginians and Kentuckians are edentulous (completely toothless) - the country's worst toothless rates.(4) * The Tulsa, Oklahoma, water department, where 19% of residents lost six or more teeth.(5) Compare that to New York State's two largest non-fluoridated counties, Suffolk and Nassau, where only 16% lost six or more teeth. Nassau and Suffolk received no kudos for retaining their natural choppers. Further, an Oklahoma Department of Health Report reveals an "Alarming Prevalence of Tooth Decay Among Oklahoma's Children," where nearly 70 percent of third graders have cavities (6) although 75% drink fluoride-laced water. * Nashville, Tennessee, where 20 lost 6 or more teeth. Contrast: Wichita, Kansas refused fluoridation repeatedly over the years (7)(8). Results: more teeth for Wichita - only 14% lost 6 or more, less than most fluoridated cities. Yet, no awards for Wichita! B) "State Fluoridation Quality Awards" were given to: * 96% fluoridated Indiana, where 25% have lost all their teeth; 45% have lost 6 or more teeth.(4) * 96% fluoridated North Dakota where 5,262 children participate in fluoride mouth rinse/tablet school programs and 44% of eight-year-olds participate in sealant programs. Yet, 51% of 6 to 8-year-olds and 70% of 14-year-olds olds have tooth decay. (9) C) "State Fluoridation Reaffirmation Award" given to Monticello, Arkansas. "The state of Arkansas children's dental health is in crisis and needs immediate attention" reports the Arkansas Department of Health (10). 72% of Arkansas third-graders have cavities despite 60% state-wide fluoridation (11). D) "Community Initiative Awards" given to recently fluoridation-adopting communities, such as Pinellas County, Florida, over the strong objections of its citizens. (Citizens for Safe Water http://www.aquasafe.us/AquaSafe-Action.htm ) E) The "State Fluoridation Initiative Award" to Utah with the most teeth but least fluoridation of all the states (2%), not for their good dental health, but because "Utah has the most new systems fluoridating." This despite vigorous citizen opposition. (http://www.stopfluoridation.homestead.com ) "The Surgeon General declared tooth decay a silent epidemic (12). Yet, two-thirds of Americans drink fluoridated water," says lawyer Paul Beeber, President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation. "The truth is, most American children are fluoride over-dosed (13), and the poorly nourished get more cavities (14) regardless of fluoridation." http://www.fluorideaction.org/fan-contacts.htm Contact: Paul Beeber, President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc., PO Box 263,Old Bethpage, NY 11804 nyscof@aol.com http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof http://tinyurl.com/ad9k References: 1) 2003 COMMUNITY WATER FLUORIDATION AWARDS, ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL DENTAL DIRECTORS, ANNUAL MEETING and NATIONAL ORAL HEALTH CONFERENCE, May 3, 2004. http://www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/fluoridation_awards.pdf 2) "What the 'York Review' on the fluoridation of drinking water really found," 28 October 2003, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/fluoridnew.htm 3) February 2002, CDC: Populations Receiving Optimally Fluoridated Public Drinking Water, United States, 2000. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5107a2.htm 4) CDC: Public Health and Aging: Retention of Natural Teeth Among Older Adults --- United States, 2002 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5250a3.htm 5) CDC: SMART: Selected Metropolitan/Micropolitan Area Risk Trends, Oral Health: Lost 6 or more teeth due to decay or gum disease http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss-smart/ListMMSAQuest.asp?yr2=2002&MMSA= All&cat=OH&qkey=6605&grp=0 6) COMANCHE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, February 26, 2004 http://www.health.state.ok.us/chds/comanche/Press-Media/2004/Tooth%20Decay%20 and%20Oklahoma%20Children.htm 7) "The Ayes Have It! Wichita Water Department: A History 1882-1982", chapter 8, page 098 http://www.wichita.gov/CityOffices/WaterAndSewer/WWDHistoryBook/Chapter8/8-98.htm 8) The Wichita Eagle, May 9, 2004, "What the Legislature Did" http://www.kansas.com/mld/eagle/news/local/8625104.htm 9) Overview of Oral Health in North Dakota Power Point Presentation http://www.health.state.nd.us/ndhd/prevent/mch/dental/summit2000/Oral%20Health% 20Access%20in%20North%20Dakota.ppt 10) Dentl health of state's children said 'in a crisis.' By Anthony Childress, 4/20/2004 http://www.jonesborosun.com/archivedstory.asp?ID=9010 11) CDC: "Percentage of 3rd Grade students with Caries Experience (treated or untreated tooth decay) " http://www.cdc.gov/nohss/caries_experience/byState.htm 12) "First-ever Surgeon General's Report on Oral Health Finds Profound Disparities in Nation's Population" http://www.nidr.nih.gov/news/052500.asp 13) J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Feb, Prevalence and trends in enamel fluorosis in the United States from the 1930s to the 1980s, Beltran-Aguilar ED, Griffin SO, Lockwood SA. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids= 11868834&dopt=Abstract 14) "The relationship between healthful eating practices and dental caries in children aged 2-5 years in the United States, 1988-1994," Journal of the American Dental Association, January 2004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list_uids=14959875=3>
Links
The fluoride file - poisoning humanity
http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/health/fluoridefile.htm
Fluoride causes cancer
http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/index_fr.html?content=articles/water.html
Chief chemist of the National Cancer Institute, Dr. Dean
Burk when confronted with mountains of data, stated before Congress:
"In point of fact, fluoride causes more human cancer death, and causes it faster than any other chemical." -- Congressional Record 21 July 1976
TOXIC SECRETS,
http://www.nexusmagazine.com/fluoridebomb.html During the ultra-secret Manhattan Project, a report was commissioned to assess the effect of fluoride on humans. That report was classified "secret" for reasons of "national security". Relevant pages of fluoride report missing. Reference to missing classified version of a fluoride safety study by bomb program scientists reveals a cover-up:
Suppression of effects http://www.fluoridation.com/censor.htm Suppression of data documenting fluoride's adverse health effects and lack of benefit is wide-spread. Scientists and professionals have been persecuted, censored, or harassed when they oppose water fluoridation. http://www.fluoridation.com/brain.htm The carefully designed animal experiment which they report revealed subtle but very real changes in behavior patterns following fluoride ingestion: hyperactivity after prenatal exposure, and cognitive deficits after weanling and adult exposure. Fluoride accumulation in important regions of the rat brain, especially the hippocampus, was found to increase as the drinking water fluoride levels increased. These effects, and the sex differences observed, corresponded to those observed in other studies of hippocampal brain damage. |
No comments:
Post a Comment