Tuesday, January 6, 2026
5696-5698: Brits at the Bottom of Every Dog Pile .... Again and Again and Again. from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
We
are not the only ones who early on identified the actual Enemies of
Humanity, those who are consistently and always at the bottom of every
dog pile, every act of violence, every war-for-profit, every colonialist
oppression.
There was Susan Kokinda (sp?) and Promethean Action zoned in on the same realization.
We
know about Venezuelan oil and why the USA, Inc. needs closer crude oil
to maintain its market in refined oil products. We know that in the
short term, Venezuelan oil can make a strategic difference for the
Western Hemisphere, which, after all, includes Venezuela. We know that
Venezuelan silver is at least an equal prize in the so-called "resource
war".
But
there is something else going on, the quiet dismantling and
rearrangement of an offshore banking empire that began prior to the
American Civil War, and which has been the means of promoting a criminal
mercantile syndicate that has killed millions of people and has aimed
at killing billions more.
If Suzie Q. is right, Trump has just bitten the Big One right in the butt:
And
yes, we do agree with her that Venezuela is a "node" in the web of
international piracy, money laundering, drug trafficking, and human
trafficking that the British offshore banking cartel supports:
Quite
apart from any commodity-based resource hoarding or monopolization
scheme, there's the offshore banking scheme that is the foundation and
Mother of Them All.
If
we can penetrate the records in Venezuela, we will shortly have the
whole story, front to back, bottom to top, from the World's Fair to the
British Throne. And back again.
Please
stay tuned in and follow the threads covering all aspects of this
story. Stay open, stay alert. Set your Shinola Sensor on "High" and
join the daily Rat Watch 2026 effort!
Granna
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: What is "the Fourteenth Amendment"?
By Anna Von Reitz
Most
people think that the so-called Fourteenth Amendment is a legitimate
amendment to the service contract known as The Constitution of the
United States of America issued in 1789.
This
idea is understandable, especially as it was calculated and presented
in a manner to give that impression and promote that assumption.
However,
closer examination shows that the "Fourteenth Amendment" was a by-law
amendment added to a very similar document also calling itself "The
Constitution of The United States of America" that was issued in 1868 as
the Articles of Incorporation for a foreign commercial corporation
registered in Scotland.
That
is, the "Fourteenth Amendment" was a By-Law Amendment of a corporation
charter. It had nothing to do with the Constitution issued by our
government in 1789.
As
a corporate by-law amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment did not require
ratification by the States of the Union, and that is exactly what we
observe. The Fourteenth Amendment, like the Sixteenth, was never
ratified by the States of the Union.
We
have thus established --- importantly --- what the Fourteenth Amendment
was not and is not. It is not a ratified amendment to the actual
Constitution of the United States of America issued in 1789. It's a
different kind of amendment, a by-law amendment, being applied to a very
different kind of "constitution" which was never fully disclosed to nor
adopted by the American public, and which was never ratified by our
States of the Union.
The
Fourteenth Amendment should have disappeared in 1907, together with its
Corporate Constitution, when the underlying corporation went bankrupt.
Instead, the constitution of this defunct commercial corporation and
its equally defunct fourteenth by-law amendment continued to be
circulated and published and took on a life of its own.
Amid
the endless discussions about what the "Fourteenth Amendment" means and
requires, people have forgotten to ask what it fundamentally is --- and
that is unfortunate, because a by-law amendment to a corporation
charter issued to a defunct and bankrupt corporation means little or
nothing at all.
It's
a historical artifact. The only possible legitimate interest in
the Fourteenth Amendment is as an example of large-scale criminal
commercial fraud in the nineteenth and early twentieth century.
So,
having determined both what the Fourteenth Amendment is and what it is
not, we are prepared to make some additional observations.
It is not possible to "confer" citizenship obligations on people.
Municipal
"citizenship of the United States" is a contractual obligation that the
Fourteenth Amendment purportedly created and arbitrarily conferred on
freed plantation slaves, using the argument that these same former
slaves were "stateless" and in need of a political status that would
allow them to stay in this country.
Everyone
born on the land and soil of an American State is automatically a
national of that State regardless of race, creed, or color, regardless
of land ownership, economic condition, or age.
The
only American Negroes who could be considered "stateless" were those
born in geographical areas outside the borders of any State of the Union
-- in the Territories, precisely the areas under the control of the
British Territorial U.S. Government and Congress, a responsibility of
theirs under the Northwest Ordinance.
Thus,
the Fourteenth Amendment was a corporation by-law amendment reflecting a
corporate Public Policy allowing the British Territorial U.S.
Government to latch onto American Negroes born in the then-Territories
and arbitrarily presume that they were Municipal citizens of the United
States.
Why wouldn't they be considered U.S. Citizens, if the U.S. Congress was so concerned about them being "stateless"?
U.S.
Citizens were "winners" in the illegal mercenary conflict known as "the
American Civil War", and they were intent on collecting "war"
reparations from the losers in the conflict --- the Municipal citizens
of the United States who sided with the Southern Confederacy.
By
presuming that freed black people born in the Territories were citizens
of the United States, the U.S. Congress could claim they were
"criminals" and therefore "slaves" and attach them as chattel property;
instead of being private property, the victims became public property.
Not only that, the citizens of the United States could be taxed to pay
war reparations, denied trial by jury, denied habeas corpus protection,
and be subjected to a foreign legal system that presumed they were
guilty until proven innocent.
Of
course, the men charged with enforcing the Fourteenth Amendment -- then
as now -- were mostly ignorant workers, taking directions from experts
they trusted to interpret the law and determine which form of law
applied to individuals. As a result, the presumptions applied to Negroes
born in the Territories were also liberally applied to Negroes born in
the States, so that as a practical matter, all people of color were
disadvantaged by a foreign citizenship obligation imposed on them
without their knowledge or consent.
The
Fourteenth Amendment was a By-Law Amendment adopted by a foreign
corporation operating under conditions of deceit and criminal
self-interest; although it was never ratified by the States of the
Union, and never a part of the actual Constitution of the United States
of America (1789), it was and is often confused with and misrepresented
as an actual Constitutional Amendment.
No
such honor may be accorded the Fourteenth Amendment, which has instead
served to undermine and deny the actual protections owed to all
Americans and to obfuscate the nature of the actions undertaken by the
U.S. Congress in the wake of the civil war --- actions used to promote
unlawful political conversion, aggravated identity theft, and deliberate
denigration and impersonation with intent to defraud.
Instead of arguing about what the Fourteenth Amendment means, we need to recognize what it is and isn't.
It
is our implacable position that the Fourteenth Amendment was and is
evidence of crimes committed against humanity, and especially against
people of color; that this historical evidence of crime has no existing
source of power or authority, that it was never a Constitutional
Amendment applicable to any actual Federal Constitution, never ratified
by the States of the Union, and was instead a By-Law Amendment attached
to a deceptively named and presented corporation charter for a British
Crown entity dba "United States of America" --- Incorporated.
We are not deceived.
We
prohibit any continued misapplication of the Fourteenth Amendment on
our shores and all similar so-called Amendments, such as the Sixteenth
Amendment, which were never ratified by the States of the Union and
which do not represent valid Amendments to any actual Federal
Constitution issued by the American States.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
January 5th 2026
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: About "the Monroe Doctrine", Etc.
By Anna Von Reitz
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
As
we have noted, we have an venerable service contract known worldwide as
"The Constitution of the United States of America" with the British
Territorial company/corporation doing business initially as "the United
States of America (a Trading Company)" (1789 -1843) and various
iterations of "the United States of America, Incorporated" acting as
Successors ever since.
Recently,
we have heard that a new version, the "United States of America, LLC"
has been drummed up by Trump and his pals at Palantir and Black Rock, et
alia, and may be substituting itself as another Successor. If so, they
are again acting under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure.
These entities are British and/or British Territorial commercial corporations.
Donald J. Trump is President of the British commercial corporation undertaking the constitutional service contract.
The British commercial corporation operates under contract in maritime and Admiralty jurisdiction.
It operates as a "ship made of paper", with Trump as the captain.
Hence, Mr. Trump holds the Naval Office of "Commander in Chief".
Are you a British Subject? Are you at sea?
USA,
Inc. has delegated powers and authority to exercise those powers on the
High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. This is the result of old
Naval Treaties that recognized the British Monarch as the Trustee of
Americans on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways.
Briefly,
note that in the wake of the War of Independence, we were left with a
huge commercial fleet and no navy; we needed protection on the High Seas
and Navigable Inland waterways, so we hired the British Navy, then the
most formidable naval force on Earth, to defend American merchant
shipping.
A
special form of United States Flag known as the Title IV Flag which is
defined according to specific proportions was set aside for the use of
the USA, Inc. when it is exercising our delegated powers on the High
Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways or in the Territories and
Possessions of the United States.
This
British Crown corporation acting as USA, Inc. or Successors thereof, is
a mercantile entity and has no actual powers of government on its own
and only strictly limited delegated powers as a services vendor, as
stipulated by The Constitution of the United States of America.
The
ownership interest in this corporation is privately held and is most
likely highly influenced by the Zionist AIPAC lobby, similar to the
undisclosed ownership interests involved in fronting the Federal
Reserve, Inc.
The
principal role and responsibility of the USA, Inc. is to protect our
commercial shipping, and to regulate interstate commerce, so as to
promote the free flow of commerce in these designated jurisdictions.
It
also has a responsibility to develop new "United States" Territories
under the Northwest Ordinance, and provides a (supposed to be) temporary
government for these territories while under development to become
full-fledged States of the Union.
The
USA, Inc. and any Successor to Contract also serves as a more-or-less
permanent government for the Commonwealth nation of Puerto Rico, and the
other "Insular States" considered to be Possessions of the United
States, such as Guam, American Samoa, the American Virgin Islands,
Mariana Islands, and so on.
The
USA, Inc., and any Successor to Contract, has no delegated authority of
its own to declare martial law within any State of the Union nor to
otherwise declare war or to set any policy related to our country and
people so as to allow or engender any permanent state of war or
mercenary conflict or permit occupation by foreign armed forces,
including mercenary forces.
The
Insurrection Act of 1792 refers to insurrection against our States of
the Union and their governments. The Insurrection Act of 1807 extends
those provisions to insurrection against the Territorial Government and
its territorial "State" franchises, while the Insurrection Act of 1871
extends these protections to the Municipal Government and its STATE
franchises.
These
Insurrection Acts do not provide authority to maintain any
quasi-military occupation of this country nor do they allow for
imaginary rebellions or rebellions against foreign entities, rulerships,
or monarchs
None
of these Acts provide for action against the sovereign nation-states
employing the federal or federal franchise instrumentalities.
There
is no granted contractual authority for the USA, Inc. or its President
to create or defend the so-called "Monroe Doctrine" which is a private
policy of a foreign commercial corporation acting at its own behest, not
associated with the actual government of this country nor with its own
duties owed under The Constitution of the United States of America.
Our
service contract clearly stipulates "defense" of our actual country and
borders, and self-evidently does not extend to any corporate "policy"
such as the Monroe Doctrine which allows chronic, routine
extra-territorial meddling and expense related to the defense of other
countries or other ill-defined material interests of the USA, Inc.
Our
country has been incorrectly charged for the expenses that these
Federal Service Vendors incurred in two World Wars and countless lesser
conflicts that they willfully participated in with no authorization from
the American Government to act on our behalf or otherwise serving to
rewrite our meaning of "defense".
The
participation of the Federal Service Vendors in all or any of the wars
or conflicts against other countries has taken place without any grant
of governmental authority from us and without any obvious connection to
the actual defense of this country and without any formal declaration of
war from our Congress.
This
morning we are being peppered with correspondence asking our position
on President Trump's attacks against locations within Venezuela and
reports that "Jesuit" agencies are claiming that this action was
undertaken in pursuit of the Monroe Doctrine.
Trump does have reasonable capacity under Article II to act extraterritorially in pursuit of felons -- which has nothing to do with the Monroe Doctrine, and everything to do with police powers under international law.
We
have not seen the evidence that President Trump acted upon, but it is
to be expected that this action in Venezuela is a police action, not a
political one.
Accordingly,
it cannot legally or lawfully result in any destruction of Venezuela's
sovereign nation status, any occupation of Venezuela, or any theft of
Venezuelan resources.
It certainly does not mean that President Trump is now "President" of Venezuela.
Police actions inhabit a grey area of international law.
We
are not bound to suffer the abuses and activities of criminals simply
because they are foreign; they are subject to prosecution, arrest, and
in the case of capital crimes, some crimes, like piracy on the High
Seas, are punishable by death.
This is agreed upon, traditional, customary, and a known hazard undertaken by foreign nationals engaged in such activities.
Any government supporting such criminal activities also assumes a risk for doing so. Think: Ukraine.
If
the puppet regime in Ukraine hadn't hosted and provided safe harbor for
every repugnant criminal activity on Earth from money laundering and
human trafficking to organ harvesting and biowarfare research, there
would have been no Ukrainian war with Russia.
Russia
might have exercised its treaty provisions and acted to protect ethnic
Russian populations in Ukraine; it might have taken advantage of other
treaty positions to promote a Russian-Crimean government, but there
would have been no reason for war.
International
law and diplomacy were sufficient to resolve the treaty concerns. It
was the brazen and accelerating criminality being fostered by Zelensky's
government, profiting itself by offering transnational crime syndicates
free reign and room and board, that finally prompted Russian action.
Smuggling
dangerous drugs (and precursor chemicals used to make these dangerous
drugs) into our country --- drugs that cause an estimated 100,000 deaths
per year --- are capital crimes precisely because this contraband
causes death on such a scale.
For
years now, President. Maduro has been associated with befriending both
home-grown Venezuelan drug syndicates and larger scale regional
cartel operations acting within Venezuela. These unregulated substances
wind up on American streets and kill American kids, undermine our
workforce, and harm our productivity.
The
sale of these illicit drugs nets billions of dollars in dark revenue
per year, but the losses to our country extend beyond the monetary
costs, impacting lives, employment, and GDP. For every single person
addicted to these drugs, 3.5 more people are adversely impacted, and for
every billion dollars wasted on illegal opiates and synthetic drugs,
2.8 billion more gets siphoned out of our economy.
There's a reason that the Chinese called their fight with Britain over Heroin imports "The Opium War".
We
are facing a similar "war" with the same colonialist powers --- only
it's not just Opium or barbiturate drugs anymore; now it is a whole vast
range of Cookbook and Designer Drugs, that cost thousands of lives
every year, and untold financial and social losses and suffering.
Until
we see the evidence that Mr. Trump acted upon, we are withholding
judgement concerning the action undertaken against targets inside
Venezuela.
Prevention
of civilian deaths, both American and Venezuelan, is the ultimate goal
of armed police actions, and without the existence of a clandestine
trade in deadly substances, there would be no need for and perhaps more
to the point, no excuse for such actions.
Actions
taken to restrain international cross-border trade in dangerous
substances should not be mistaken for action under the Monroe Doctrine
and should be recognized as international police action, even when those
police actions are undertaken by what appear to be military forces.
Please
remember that our military was deceitfully and secretly converted into a
private mercenary force during the tenure of Abraham Lincoln and has
remained in that status until now, when we are making efforts to
one-by-one lawfully convert military personnel back to their natural
political status and standing as members of an honorable national
military service.
The
Monroe Doctrine has a far more fluid and insidious agenda quite apart
from conventional international law enforcement, and while it may appear
similar to police action under international law, the Monroe Doctrine
is a public policy of an incorporated entity, one designed to promote
and assert armed protection of "American" business interests in foreign
countries, but actually being extended to British Crown Colonial
interests, instead.
When you say "American" you have to be clear about "which America" you are talking about.
It is not in the interests of our government to promote any form of colonialism, nor to pay for its evils and upkeep.
We
have never supported colonial enterprises and do not support peonage,
enslavement, press-ganging or forced conscription or any of the other
unlawful, illegal, and immoral practices that have been employed by the
British Crown to subject people and entire countries via a process of
aggravated identity theft.
The
British Empire did not sincerely forsake its ill-gotten colonial gains
and pursuit of colonialist enterprises; it acted in Bad Faith and simply
changed jurisdictions and began operating in the international
jurisdiction of the sea instead of operating on the land. It went from
the Commonwealth form of colonialism to the much more violent and
insidious Territorial form of colonialism.
While
outwardly conforming to the conventions outlawing both peonage and
slavery brought forward by the League of Nations and passed as
international law in 1926, the British Crown sought to evade these
obligations by redefining the playing field, and using incorporated
franchises as a means to impersonate entire countries and subject them
and their people to foreign forms of law that were never meant to be
applied to living men and actual countries.
This
gross breach of trust and violation of their service contracts led to
investigation by the American Government and their conviction by our
Courts of Record in 2014.
With
the admission by the Roman Curia that legal fictions have no standing
related to living people and actual countries, and that the law of
corporations does not apply to us, the reign of terror inflicted by the
British Empire and its Continental European adjuncts, is coming to an
end.
We
can all say good-bye to claims and obligations based on
"enfranchisement" and "registration", and claims against foreign
public trusts established "in our names", and all similar
misrepresentations and impersonations promoted by the Masters of
Deceit.
We
can also say good-bye to the Monroe Doctrine, the Fourteenth Amendment,
the Sixteenth Amendment, and all the other arbitrary, unilateral, and
unratified pretensions foisted off on us all -- not just Americans.
People
worldwide have suffered from the plague of deceit and lawlessness
unleashed by the European monarchies beginning in earnest in the
1860's.
By
these various "legal" but unlawful devices and inaccessible remedies
purportedly legalizing institutional criminality, they have continued to
practice peonage and enslavement, genocide and illegal conscription,
press-ganging, and other crimes against humanity -- on paper;
unfortunately, they have then also used their "pretend world" on paper
as an excuse to justify enforcement of their fantasies on living men and
women and actual resources.
The
result is a world devolved to the level of Dark Age Robber Barons,
hiring and misdirecting uniformed thugs to promote and protect their own
corporate interests--- and using the public purse to do it, against the
Public Interest.
This
form of renegade non-consensual government which we have dubbed
"Corporate Feudalism" makes a practice of misrepresenting living people
as corporation franchises, and waging "war" against franchises belonging
to other corporations. Although this might seem harmless, considering
that these are all legal fiction entities without actual substance, the
line between imagination and reality gets blurred and actual people and
property interests are harmed.
We
are pleased to announce that the American Government, our government,
is back in the saddle. The Law of the Land is being enforced for the
first time in over a century and a half.
Today,
we have received word that the U.S. Supreme Court has finally
overturned all gun permits nationwide. They are echoing principles of
jurisprudence set down more than two centuries ago, affirming that a
right cannot be converted into a privilege and that resulting privilege
then be used to produce licensing revenues.
Two centuries, and the court is finally backing the established jurisprudence on the subject. Be still our hearts.
We
may assume that the same provisions apply to the right to travel, which
has been unlawfully converted into a privilege to drive and obtain
private commercial profits from the use of public roads --- and then
been licensed and misapplied to millions of Americans who never
voluntarily engaged in any form of commerce at all --- much less
obtained any profit from commercial activities.
The
courts that have participated in these acts of personage and barratry
are now compelled to justify their activities and herein and elsewhere
are placed under demand to Cease and Desist enforcement of licenses
misapplied to occupations of common right, common activities such as
travel for non-commercial purposes, and exercise of common public
property rights, such as use of street side and public parking.
These
same corporate administrative tribunals are similarly enjoined from
enforcing claims of property tax, federal income tax, franchise tax, gas
tax, and utility tax; because of the widespread aggravated identity
theft that has occurred and the temptation to secure tax revenues from
people who are tax exempt, all commercial and asset claims and public
trust interests asserted by members of the International Bar Association
and American Bar Association are self-interested, in conflict of
interest, suspect and disallowed any benefit of presumed contract based
on registrations, enrollments, promissory notes, prior compliance, and
similar Third Party, undisclosed, and unstated contracts, identities,
and obligations seemingly conferred by legislative action on British
Subjects and Municipal citizens of the United States.
Misapplication of these "laws" and misidentification of Americans as persons subject to these "laws" is at an end.
Because
of the widespread misrepresentation of Americans as British Subjects
and resulting "title taking" over their lands and homes and other assets
to be included as chattel administered by and held in British
Territorial Trusts, most especially, the "Northern Trust", and Roman
Municipal TRUSTS, ;ike the US TRUST, these courts have operated in gross
and undisclosed conflict of interest.
The
"ownership" of the bulk of the Fortune 500 Companies has been purloined
from American soldiers and sailors and their progeny using the False
Presumption that they are British Subjects.
The
"ownership" of most of the land assets of this country has been
purloined in the same way. Our silver, our gold, all our substantive
and material assets have been purloined, by the same guilty parties who
owe us "good faith service" instead.
The
people responsible of managing the purloined assets for the British
Crown are members of the American Bar Association and/or International
Bar Association, and they have sat in judgement over the actual American
owners using the impersonation of these Americans as British Subjects
as a device to coerce, control, and impose non-consensual debt
obligations.
All
this has been accomplished under color of law and all without telling
the Americans one word about any of this "convenient accommodation" and
"special relationship".
They
have acted in gross, inexcusable, criminal self-interest and in
conflict of interest. They have robbed their friends and neighbors.
They have betrayed the most basic precepts of justice, human decency,
and contractual obligation. They have made "war" against their
employers and conscripted and press-ganged their employer's sons and
daughters and used them as cheap mercenaries under pretense of honorable
military service.
These
False Friends and Disloyal Allies have grossly misrepresented this
country and its people, and deliberately hid their own identities and
roles so as to unjustly enrich themselves and their "Prince" or should
we say, "Arch-Treasurer"?
The
Monroe Doctrine may be the doctrine of their foreign British Crown
corporation and part of its public policies as well; none of that has
anything to do with America or Americans; none of it is suggested by The
Constitution of the United States of America nor by any other treaty or
contractual service agreement we have with them.
We do not accept any cost associated with their application of their Monroe
Doctrine; we have no such doctrine amounting to a license to engage in
eternal meddling and coercion and mercenary "war". This doctrinal
license to bully is not what America stands for, not what America
contractually agreed to, and we can safely say, not anything that
America wishes to be associated with.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
January 5th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment