MORE ABOUT THOSE CALIFORNIA FIRES…
Before we get to today's main blog, and the first blog of 2025, please allow me to say thank you to all of your for your patience and well-wishes during my Christmas-birthday vacation. 2025 is upon us, and sadly we are starting the year off with more tragedy in California, home of the (un)necessary wild fire.
I've seldom seen such a steady stream of articles about a story as this one, as I think it fair to say that I've had more articles about this than even about the hurricane that struck North Carolina and eastern Tennessee, and a feature of both of these streams has been the galloping government incompetence and corruption that constitute backgrounds of both stories, from Bai Den Jao's gutting of the finances of FEMA to "help" the illegal migrants, to the same sort of thoughtless supply of firefighting trucks - from California(!) - to that country. Many of the articles have also drawn attention to the fact that State Farm and other large insurers simply refuse to underwrite home owners policies in the LA area, and here is where I must part company from some of the articles I have received. These have with but one or two exceptions all opined that the California fires were deliberately set, and that they serve some hidden agenda, such as forcing people into fifteen minute cities.
In support of this view, some of the articles have alleged that Der Hochklaus Freiherr von Blohschwab-und-Bloviation and the creatures of his ilk at the gigantic grifters' club that is the World Economic Forum has exhibited his normal ghoulish behavior and welcomed the fires as another grand crisis to exploit to further his sick and twisted visions of the future (article shared by V.T. with our thanks):
While I've not seen any corroborative source for Der Hochklaus' or the World Economic Forum's alleged sentiments, suffice it to say it would not surprise me. The man is a ghoul and a grifter, presiding over a gaggle of ghouls and grifters. My real point is that virtually none of the articles I've seen is viewing these fires as "just another fire season in Looneyfornia." Most, without question, take the view that the fires were deliberately set, either by conventional arson, or by other more exotic means (with our old friend, "directed energy weapons" being the cultprit, which we'll get back to in a moment). But back to main main point: many of these articles have focused on the withdrawal of many insurers refusing to insure California home owners against the fire danger as being proof of the deliberateness of the action, and that these fires were deliberately set. However, the two - withdrawal of insureres, and deliberately set fires - are not logically related.
If there is any factor about this whole tragedy that is logically related to the insurers refusing to insure California homeowners, it is that the insurers are rational actors, and the policies of the party running California - including many of the unfortunate home owners who continue to vote for that party and its policies - have made it impossible for the insurers to stand by and continue to insure in a state (1) that has cut back on the funding and building reservoirs in order to protect some obscure endangered species of smelt; (2) that will not permit and does not support controlled burns of its underbrush; (3) that cuts its local city, county, and state firefighting budget while shipping some of those fire-fighting resources to the Ukraine; and finally, (4) that has a collection of some of the most dim-witted and irresponsible politicians one can imagine, but thank goodness, both Gavin and Nancy at least have good haircuts. If you were an insurance company, knowing all these actuarial risks, would you insure in California? I doubt that even Lloyds of London with all of its money would would do so, even at outrageous premiums.
So the departure of other insurers from California is not proof that these fires, like so many others we've seen in recent years, are or were deliberately set. They are merely proof of the inevitabilities that follow from colossally stupid and bad policy.
For proof we have to look elsewhere, and I'm certain that all of you following this story are aware that there have already been reports of suspected arsonists and their arrests. I do not discount the possibility that some of these fires may have been deliberately started by criminal elements. After all, we have the goobernment itself informing us that many of the migrants entering the country illegally have terrorist and/or other criminal backgrounds. We might, as a possibility, be looking at all sorts of cells trained in the use of incendiaries.
But like the other California fires, there are anomalies being reported, and they follow the now familiar pattern of burned buildings and melted cars, right next to trees and other shrubbery that is unburned (this video from RT courtesy of KM):
Melted cars and unburned trees
What phenomenon accounts for this odd fire behavior? Again I revert to the hypothesis I advanced on this website some years ago that this is typical of microwave interferometry and resonance, perhaps getting an "ignition assist" from aerosolized aluminum oxide that has allegedly been in the chemical spraying that has been going on. As I also recorded on this website, for many years I was somewhat skeptical about this spraying, until I was traveling with two friends, up through the San Joaquin Valley to the Secret Space Program Conference in San Mateo, over ten years ago. As we came down into the valley outside of Bakersfield, we noticed a low-lying brownish-gray cloud which we assumed was fog lying in the valley. As we entered the cloud, however, its chemical nature became apparent, for there was a burnt, metallic, brackish smell to the cloud. On top of all of this, as we exited the cloud, we noticed in the distance a very low and slow flying aircraft that looked very much like the cargo version of the old McDonnell-Douglas DC-10 jumbo jet. Other aircraft were at altitude, flying a checkerboard criss-cross pattern, and leaving the usual "chemtrails" in their wake. (Q.v. this story:
So add a little aerosolized aluminum oxide, and a microwave or fanatical and criminal migrant with a torch, and voila, one has an instant wild fire, able to burn out hundreds of unfortunate people, and to seize their land for pennies on the dollar and just in time for the upcoming LA summer Olympics. (Q.V. this story, also shared by V.T.: With temps in the 60’s, what they’re calling a “wildfire” was the planned annihilation of Pacific Palisades, to make LA a “smart city” in time for the Olympics)
And I would be remiss if I did not post the following video that "demonstrates" that directed energy weapons were also supposedly involved in the ignition of these fires:
https://x.com/wherefami/status/1877003780304068923
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1042327904318883
The video is, again, intriguing, but proof of nothing. There is no indication as to the location it was made nor when, though the skyline in the background might be enough to indicate if indeed it is from the Los Angeles-Pacific Palisades area. I do not know, and as I have not been to that area in many years, I cannot say. A man is clearly visible in the glass reflection recording the video, but again we do not know who he is, nor where he is. There is no provenance for the video. The only thing that does raise the suspicion that this is an eyewitness video of something extraordinary going on somewhere, are the bursts of blue-green laser light and sparks seen in the video suggesting an argon or other similarly-frequencied chemical laser, the exact type of laser that has been alleged to have been put into the fuselage of some of the Air Forces flying laser aircraft weapons, while the sparks are what one might expect from a laser interacting with a target prepared for ignition by aerosolized aluminum oxide.
So what's the bottom line for this, the first of my high octane speculations for 2025? While I absolutely do not rule out the possibility of several ignition mechanisms in play here, from sheer Looneyfornia nutty leftist incompetence and corruption and the resulting "policies" (q.v. the state's Supreme Hair Cut, or the studied evasions of the Mayorette of Los Angeles), and while I do not rule out the exotic methods of ignition we've see potentially indicated in previous California fires, for the moment I am opting for the "combination" of methods, with the weight of that combination being due to the sheer corruption and incompetence of the party running that city and state.
Perhaps we need to take a page from the North Carolina disaster relief, and send in the people who can actually help, rather than rely on the even more corrupt, criminal, and incompetent feds....
.... perhaps it's time, in other words, to send in the shock troops. Perhaps it's time to send in the Amish...
... See you on the flip side...
No comments:
Post a Comment