Friday, January 24, 2025
5229: International Public Notice: Venal Redefinitions and Other Abuses from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Everything
has its genesis from something else in our Universe, from the
instantaneous point we call "Source" to the final jot of existence, so
that the question, "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" really
begs the question --- "Where did the chicken or the egg, either one,
come from?"
What
mysterious force has resulted in their appearance, their profound
ordering of substance within themselves, and the immense amounts of
energy required to create and build that order, maintain it, and then,
to release it, back to whence it has come?
So
it is when we embark on a study of law, which leads to a study of
religion, and then to the history of religion, that finally reveals so
much about where concepts of "government" come from.
You
have probably heard mention of "the Rule of Law", and wondered --- if
you've been following along --- what's a Rule compared to a Law? What
does "Rule of Law" mean?
More fast ones and substitutions?
The
use of Rules comes from early Church Orders, primarily Augustinian and
Benedictine, that were established as the foundational principles and
purposes of these Orders. These Rules were supposed to apply to all
members of the Order, both priests and lay members, and provided a
definition of purpose and agreement that all were expected to know and
abide by.
The
combination of the two concepts, "Rule" and "Law" in "Rule of Law" is
therefore, as we have so often seen in other settings, oxymoronic.
A
Rule is not a Law and a Law is not a Rule, and they are in fact
mutually exclusive; a rule is voluntarily accepted by individuals
according to their values, conscience, and beliefs, whereas a law is
externally imposed under force without regard for personal conscience,
values, or beliefs.
Elevating
Law to the level of a Rule suggests the slave-like subservience of the
individual conscience to whatever external authority or government is
generating whatever form of "Law".
It does in fact imply the loss of an individual conscience or will.
Let's give an example --- the issue of abortion on demand.
For
a number of years, this was "the Law" externally imposed; the exercise
of the Law, however, was left to the Rule of individual conscience.
All
this sudden talk about "the Rule of Law" and its implications has
therefore sparked considerable consternation, wonder, and debate.
It
suggests the existence of individuals either naturally not having a
conscience or will, or the creation of a population of subhumans
deprived of their right to exercise their conscience and freewill:
slaves.
Certainly,
robots have only an artificial conscience or will dependent on the
decisions and values of their programmers, and a system of law
pertaining to the operations and programming of robots might be
described as the Rule of Law, simply because they have no independent
will or conscience.
The
second, more sinister meaning could be reference to a system of law
applied to people arbitrarily defined as "subhuman" --- or as the case
actually is, "transhumans".
The
U.S. Supreme Court case, Biden v Missouri, revealed the intent of the
vaccine patent holders to claim that the people who received the mRNA
jab have been turned into Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and are
now owned by the patent holders and redefined as "transhumans" having no
natural and unalienable rights and no Human Rights, either.
This
repugnant claim was supported by the U.S. Supreme Court and is most
likely the reason that the attorneys are babbling gobbledygook about the
Rule of Law; it would apply to these Transhumans as they would be
slaves and have no ability to express their freewill or conscience.
We
suggest that it is more than past time to dissolve all these offending
corporations and put the attorneys permanently out of business.
Foreseeing
this venal agenda, our State Assemblies came together and passed
our first Public Law in over a hundred years, forbidding the exercise of
any such claims against living people on our land and soil.
We
have also moved swiftly to overturn earlier such attempts to
self-interestedly "redefine" us as British Subjects and U.S. Citizens,
and from there, to confer the crippling "citizen of the United States"
status on us, without our knowledge or consent and without our
agreement.
All these horrific and criminal activities have hinged on arbitrarily
redefining living people as something "else" --- humans, subjects, and now, transhumans, using illegal, undisclosed, unconscionable, and implied contracts, and then enforcing this gobbledygook using corrupt courts and foreign systems of law.
redefining living people as something "else" --- humans, subjects, and now, transhumans, using illegal, undisclosed, unconscionable, and implied contracts, and then enforcing this gobbledygook using corrupt courts and foreign systems of law.
Reducing a man to a "human" and then to a "transhuman" -- aka, "subhuman" is no different from what the Nazis did to the Jews.
It
is just as repugnant, just as immoral, illegal, and unlawful, only it
is being applied in a wholesale and indiscriminate fashion by commercial
corporations engaged in crimes of state.
It
has been our observation that the Roman Church has been deeply
infiltrated by immoral influences and evil men who have used the Church
as a "storefront" and cover for their heinous activities. The same
phenomenon has beset the leadership structures of other religions, too.
This has led to a broad spectrum failure of nearly all religious faiths
and institutions to oppose the burgeoning evil in our midst.
Many
people have wondered about the misuse and abuse of our public hospitals
and the weaponization of medicine to promote mass genocide. We have
pointed out on numerous occasions that medical doctors, nurses,
dentists, and other medical professionals and even hair stylists who
accept a "license" to serve federal citizens or to work in facilities
receiving federal funding, are defined as "Uniformed Officers" under
Federal Code Titles 8, 11, and 31, and not only can such officers be
conscripted against their will into the military, but are also deemed to
be part of an unseen "civilian military".
Civilian military. Another oxymoron.
This
foreign licensure of occupations of common right and the brain-washing
and coercive power of the American Medical Association operating as a
Professional Guild that is enabled to withhold credentials, has made it
easy to weaponize medical services against the Public Good, and provided
an undisclosed means to undermine public health for commercial profit.
How
did such a crooked system ever come to be? How and why would doctors
and nurses be imposed upon to function as soldiers and be looking at
average innocent people as "enemy combatants"?
Look
to Church History. At about the time of William the Conqueror's death
in 1087, things were getting increasingly difficult for the Crusaders
in Jerusalem...
Here,
linked below, is a timely reminder and insight into how our "hospitals"
were first literally defined and managed by the Order of the
Hospitaliers, who became a completely militarized Order similar to the
much-later Jesuits and earlier Templars:
Hospitals,
according to the admitted history and records of the Order, have been
militarized since 1099, twelve years after the death of William the
Conqueror.
Hospitals
were first created to serve the sick, wounded, and dying soldiers of
the Church during the Crusades, and though they have become public
institutions funded by public money, their basic nature and character as
military organizations has not changed.
The actual name of the Order is: The Military Religious Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem.
Our
"military" has actually been functioning as a mercenary organization
since the 1860s, and our "public" hospitals are organized as for-profit
corporations that are franchises of the same parent corporations as
Pfizer and Moderna and.... it does not take rocket science for us to
figure out that the mercenaries employed by the parent corporations in
the District of Columbia made use of their "Uniformed Officers" to
murder and maim and enslave people for profit during the recent events
mischaracterized as a pandemic.
Donald
Trump wasn't duped, though he may have been used as a storefront by
Fauci and the other criminals, similar to the Roman Catholic Church
being used as a storefront by the Roman Pontiff.
The
truth will be told by what happens to Fauci, Pfizer, Gates, the CDC and
the NIH and the medical services sector in days to come.
So
far all that has happened to address one of the greatest crimes in
human history and Mr. Trump's own culpability for "Operation Warp Speed"
is half a trillion dollars spent on an all-encompassing AI surveillance
grid designed to monitor our vital signs and brain activity from space,
something nobody wants except those who wish to control and
micro-manage everyone else.
This
"service" is nothing we contracted to receive and is a gross
misappropriation of our money, an endangerment to our lives, and an
unconstitutional invasion of our privacy -----and we count on everyone
reading this to get the point.
Thumbs down, Mr. Trump.
We
also don't appreciate the recently introduced bill seeking to approve
the use of Artificial Intelligence to replace our doctors. They may be
stupid and corrupt, but some of them still have a conscience, which is
more than we can guarantee from AI.
Thumbs down again, Mr. Trump.
If
we see any more phony epidemics, any more mRNA "vaccines", any moves to
claim ownership of people redefined as GMO transhumans, any more
wrong-doing or malpractice at all, any more use of "Uniformed Officers",
any weaponization of health care
--- we will all know what to think and, more importantly, what to do.
If
you continue to fist bump and yuck it up with Fauci and Bill Gates, Mr.
Trump, we'll pay attention to what you do. Mere words won't mean
anything to us.
Please
note that Commanders, as in Naval Officers, are the same exact office
as the Preceptors of Rome and the Roman Church. Please also notice that
the office of "Bailiff" --- Tip Staff in Maritime and Admiralty Courts
today -- got its start in the Church.
Many
thanks, again, to researchers in Australia, for setting flint to steel
and sparking an admirable debate here. There will be more to come.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
January 23rd 2025
Hospital Militarization of the Hospitaliers
Hospitals and Commanders
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment