Sunday, January 12, 2025
5213-5214: Belief Systems: Contracts Versus Law --- Meet Jacquie Figg from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
We
often acknowledge our debts to other researchers and today, we honor
Jacquie Figg, one of the most indefatigable and kindest heroes in the
fight to reclaim and/or retain our right to travel freely in our own
country and to own and control our own property assets --- specifically,
our trucks and automobiles used as private conveyances.
We
first met Jacquie almost twenty years ago, when she burst on the scene
and began bull-dogging this particular aspect of the illegal military
occupation and forced "subscription" system (one of many) imposed on our
freedom to travel and to own our own property.
First, some notes about licensure. In law, a license is permission to do something that would otherwise be illegal.
Is traveling from one place to another in this country an illegal act?
No, it is not.
However,
if you walk into a DMV Office and apply for a license, you admit that
it is required for you. Why else would you apply for a license and pay a
fee, if you weren't required to have a license?
What's happened is that millions of Americans have assumed that they needed a license, when they don't.
Having once applied for a license, however, it is assumed that you knew what you were doing and that you did need a license.
So
when you apply for a license --- any kind of license --- you submit and
subscribe and consent to the idea that for you, the licensed activity
is a privilege, not a right.
This
is important, because some people actually do need a Driver License ---
specifically, those who make commercial use of the public roads and
public employees driving motor vehicles owned by government agencies and
departments.
Americans
naturally have the right to travel anywhere they please on public roads
and in public areas, but if you give up that right by applying for a
Driver License (thereby admitting to being a "Driver" subject to the
Motor Vehicle Code), you unwittingly subject yourself to the endless
stream of codes and rules that are applied to "Drivers" of "Motor
Vehicles".
Similarly,
if you register your privately owned automobile or truck, you
"subscribe" to the idea that you are using it in commercial capacities
and are subjecting it and yourself to the Motor Vehicle Code, or
alternatively, that you are a public employee driving a government-owned
car.
So,
having once mistaken yourself as someone who needed a Driver License,
you are entrapped and are standing there with no idea how to get out of
the box.
The
best solution, as Jacquie Figg admits, is to never make that mistake,
never apply for a license in the first place, and go from there.
Failing that, and realizing your mistake, you can fill out Federal Form
DL 142 and correct your mistake and turn in the license.
The
actual Law, as Jacquie points out, is on your side; however, there are a
lot of people including members of the Highway Patrol and the Court
System who don't know the law and who firmly believe that they are doing
the right thing when they impound private cars and trucks, arrest
people that they only presume to be "Drivers", and engage in other
illegal and coercive acts.
Convincing
these people of the limits of their authority and forcing reforms to
bring systemic remedy for these deceptive and misapplied registration
contracts is our job.
Start the conversation in your circle of family and friends.
This
video interview with Jacquie is most informative for those living in
California, but the same principles apply nationwide. If you are Joe
Average American, you never needed a Driver License and never needed to
register any car or truck of yours as a "Motor Vehicle".
This
is just one example of how improper undisclosed and misrepresented
adhesion contracts have been used to entrap Americans who have suffered
from lack of full disclosure.
The
Driver License, the Marriage Licenses, and Physician's Licenses, and so
on, are all part and parcel of the same scheme to trick people into
"voluntarily" converting their own rights into privileges.
If
you are a young person who isn't employed by a government agency and
isn't engaged in commercial use of the roads for your private gain (taxi
services, courier services, dray lines, etc.) you have no reason to
apply for a Driver License. So don't do it. Don't volunteer to give
away your rights in exchange for privileges and don't create any "Legal
Presumption" that you are someone who is required to have a Driver
License when you aren't.
This
is an issue that we all need to address and push back upon the Federal
Subcontractors and their various franchises, such as "the State of New
Jersey, Inc." and their Congresses and Legislatures, which have been
operating without full disclosure so as to entrap and defraud Americans
of their basic rights, including occupational rights.
To
more effectively pursue these topics, we need to gather steam and
discuss these issues in our Assembly Litigation Committees and bring
them forward for Public Review.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: Playback of the Pushback
By Anna Von Reitz
People have noticed that the rich are being targeted.
Yes,
the rich. The powerful. The pampered and paid off are being targeted.
Hollywood stars. Sports stars, Media Mobsters. Silicon Valley
investors. The list goes on.
If
this current behavior was allowed to continue, Southern California
would be burned to the ground in fake firestorms, and Northern
California would be sunk beneath the waves by induced collapse of the
San Andreas Fault. The fifth largest economy on the planet would be
destroyed, and who would that benefit?
Competitors? Idiots? Complete brainless maniacs? Certainly not Americans or any living people on the planet.
We
object and accuse the Perpetrators of misrepresenting these "exercises"
and "tests" as being conducted against their own domestic targets----
which would have to be Legal Fictions. Instead, these Vermin are
targeting living people.
We
are not part of their "domestic population" and they do not own the
assets they are targeting, so it is not in any way acceptable for them
to promote anything that harms our country, our assets, our health, our
credit, our food, our natural resources or anything else that is ours by
natural right.
The corporations responsible need to be shut down immediately.
We
are pursuing these Perpetrators as common criminals and we ask for all
reasonable and customary assistance to shut them down and bring them to
justice.
The
pushback now being witnessed is not merely for "tax equality" between
rich and poor; the real context of the pushback is being increasingly
recognized as corporations versus living people, and the backlash
against corporate officers follows.
The
corporations have been foisting off their taxes and diluting their tax
burdens using the backs of living people for six generations in our
country and twelve generations in England.
The
Perpetrators have used various tricks to do this, beginning with
undisclosed and unconscionable registration contracts used to traffic
babies into foreign jurisdictions so as to latch onto their Good Names
and assets under False Pretenses, securitizing these assets under color
of law, and using them as collateral for corporate spending and also
using the living people as underwriters protecting the same guilty
corporations under public bankruptcy provisions.
Thus
the victims of this outrageous fraud have been made to pay both coming
and going--- which has the end result of making every corporation
engaged in this fraud our property, whether those corporations are
municipal or commercial, national or territorial.
Beginning
with the moment when we first realized and reported this fraud and
stepped back into our natural birthright political status, these
corporations have been subject to us lawfully, legally, and morally ---
whether they knew it or not.
We
hear about how Mark Zuckerberg "stole" the 2020 election for Joe Biden,
or how Elon Musk "stole" the 2024 election for Donald Trump by
"investing" in these candidates.
By
what right do corporations have the ability to skew elections like
this? They legalized this by passing unilateral private corporate
policies allowing corporations to give political candidates however much
money (or in their case, credit) as they wish.
And
why not? As these elections are actually private elections for
corporate offices, why shouldn't franchise corporations be able to
donate to their chosen candidates?
Neither
this change in campaign finance laws nor any of the various unilateral
"Amendments" these similarly named corporations have made to their
Constitutions have been ratified by the States of the Union, and
generally speaking, their policies and elections don't pertain to us and
naturally, possess no force of law or authority related to us.
They
are foreign corporations acting as Successors to Contract. Their
internal affairs, their laws and policies and elections, are theirs.
That's why we don't vote in their elections, and don't mistake their elections for the public elections we owe ourselves.
There
are those who are confused by all of this, but it is self-evident on
the available public records, that while millions of Americans have been
deceived into thinking that the glitzy political party-driven elections
are our elections --- they are in fact elections involving our Federal
Subcontractors and their foreign citizenries.
To
expedite their fraud against us, they colluded in their own
power-sharing agreements early on. George Washington would act as the
"President" of the United States -- meaning the Municipal United States
Government --- while functioning as a British Territorial Naval
Officer, a "President" of a different kind.
Thus,
one man would control both the foreign military mercenaries hired under
The Constitution of the United States of America (British Territorial
Subcontractor) and the Federal Civil Service being run by the HRE
Subcontractor acting under The Constitution of the United States.
That
is, more or less, what they had been doing for five hundred years prior
to George Washington, because the Brits have been operating as
Overseers for the Pope and collecting his debts and acting as his Muscle
under contract since the days of King John. For them, it was all
status quo, business as usual, and all under one roof.
While
we know George Washington as the leader of the victorious Continental
Army, most Americans remain unaware that he subsequently switched hats
to act as a British Territorial / Municipal HRE "Federal Dual Citizen"
controlling the British Territorial Subcontractor as an Officer, and
controlling the HRE Subcontractor as an elected Official.
It
has continued on in this way ever since. This is the origin of the
foreign office of "Commander in Chief" --- notice that Commander is a
Naval Office --- and "President" is the CEO of a company, whether that
company is foreign or domestic.
This
collusive power-sharing was further formalized in 1937 with The
Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The United States.
None of it has anything to do with us, the actual American Government.
Now,
how is it that we own these corporations, when we didn't charter them
or incorporate them? We own them because we are their Preferential and
Priority Creditors by many country miles and many decades, too. We
have paid all their debts and claimed all their debts, so there can be
no doubt that we own them and are owed control of them and all assets
that they have rat-holed away in trusts and foundations and slush funds
and encumbered funds and so on.
This
has nothing to do with any "class struggle" nor any contest between the
rich and the poor, though some deluded people might try to explain away
what they are seeing in terms of Marx's Red Herring --- an earlier
attempt to intellectualize the evidence of the corporate crimes
committed in the late 1800's and first couple decades of the 1900's,
without actually addressing the issue in terms of corporations.
This
is no more a matter of class struggle or trade unionism than a melee of
crime victims blaming each other for their losses is the cause of the
crime or the loss.
Nor
is this a matter of "legal identity"--- we note that the Perpetrators
and the Clueless Victims are all scrambling trying to incorporate new
Legal Fiction Persons they can operate "as" our Republic and trying to
get other Persons to incorporate other False Representations of our
Federal Republic as, for example, the Republic of Texas, Inc., or the
Texas Republic, Inc., and so on.
What part of -- "Stop. You've been caught."-- is hard to grasp?
These
are neither States nor Nations nor are they Republics nor any part of
our American Federal Republic, which was granted The Constitution for
the united States of America in 1787.
We are informed that J.D. Vance just stepped down as Vice-President of yet another corporation calling itself USA.Gov.Inc.
Are you all seeing the crooked, duplicitous, fictional nature of all this sea jurisdiction chicanery?
There is a country officially called The United States.
In
international jurisdiction, this country operates as The United States
of America, acting through its own unincorporated Federation of States,
and exercising their Mutual Powers as States of the Union. This
instrumentality, The United States of America, is a Lawful Person and
Assign and it has always been Unincorporated, as it must be, to serve in
this capacity.
The United States also operates in global commercial jurisdictions as the States of America, another instrumentality.
None of these entities are incorporated.
They cannot be incorporated and retain their sovereign status in any jurisdiction of Law.
In
1787, we did charter an American Federal Subcontractor under The
Constitution for the united States of America. This entity became known
as "the Federal Republic" or "Republic United States", which was
assigned the task of exercising the bulk of our delegated powers in
international jurisdictions.
The
citizenry of our Federal Republic was defined as "United States
Citizens" as described under the First Naturalization and Immigration
Act.
None of those persons now claiming that they have "restored the Federal Republic" are acting as State Citizens.
These
Persons, James Geiger and Tim Turner and various others, are acting as
British Territorial U.S. Citizens and/or unaffiliated
American State Nationals, and they certainly haven't met the
requirements to be considered United States Citizens in any case.
Our
States would have to change our Public Law to allow them to immigrate
into our Federal Republic, and anything else is just another British
ruse.
The
excuses we have heard in favor of allowing this substitution scheme to
take place include a presumption that we are too fragile to hear the
truth when we have carried the burden of the truth for sixteen decades;
the idea that Americans will go insane and kill vast numbers of people
if they are told the truth about their British employees -- when history
has shown that the reckless killing is all on the part of the British,
not the Americans; the idea that a "Noble Lie" would save everyone so
much inconvenience, all the Federal Services could just continue on
without a ripple, etc.,
No
doubt these same arguments have been used repeatedly in the past to
justify the ongoing deceit and dishonesty that has infested every corner
of --- not only our government --- but the British Government and many,
many more.
It
seems that in the minds of some people, one good lie deserves another,
and the lies themselves breed and proliferate until what is good is bad
and what is bad is good, and what is profane is mistaken for what is
sacred and what is sacred is considered profane.
We do not yield our right to be fully informed and to make our own decisions on the basis of reliable information.
Clearly,
it's down to us, ourselves, mowing our own lawns and trimming our own
hedges, and one Federal Subcontractor, the British Territorials, who
have been the most dishonorable and feckless of them all, still
squirming and spinning narratives.
We
are owed "good faith service" and as numerous statements and
restatements of the obvious have provided, even among their own
franchises, that includes being told the truth:
Quote, California Government Code, Title 5, Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 9, Section 54950:
"The
people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies
which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their
public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know
and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining
informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have
created."
(Added by Stats. 1953, Ch. 1588.)
This
was on the occasion of settling yet another "public bankruptcy" of a
foreign subcontractor that had fraudulently seized upon American assets
to serve as their collateral, and also named the American victims as
their Underwriters.
The
people of California were, self-evidently, never informed, much less
"fully informed" by anyone, despite this fine sounding bit of corporate
code retaining their right to be informed by their employees and to make
their own decisions.
Similar
code and references are found throughout the States, so this is not an
aberration in the administration of the bankruptcy courts and not
anything peculiar to California.
The
verbal contract and statement of intent is always good, and the actual
performance is always bad. We see this same pattern throughout the
Federal Code, which maintains a proper intent toward the employers on
paper, and then, consistently fails to follow through in fact.
Federal
Title 12 and the Emergency Banking and Securities Acts are all fine
examples of this; while retaining our "reversionary trust interest" in
trusts we never authorized and were not made aware of, no actual process
was ever stipulated or even outlined for people to exercise this
admitted interest, and even the identity of the responsible Department
was obscured, so that years of research were required to determine that
the U.S. Secretary of State was the Executive Officer under the British
Naval Dispositions Act.
Why
should an American suspect in their wildest dreams that their Given
Name has been copyrighted by the British Crown Corporation and used to
rubber stamp all manner of cozy accommodations benefiting these
thieves? And after that, a concocted British Territorial Seaman's
Estate --- intestate, of course --- has been salvaged and set up as a
Public Trust benefiting a non-existent King of a non-existent country?
All vigilantly guarded by a King's Court, operated under a Scottish
version of Roman Civil Law by Undeclared Foreign Agents (Bar Attorneys)
and Hired Jurists?
Of
course, no American was ever informed about any of this, much less
"fully informed" by any of their Federal Employees, who have instead
treasonously and in bad faith promoted their own unjust enrichment via
defrauding their employers.
This
is the Con Game promoted by the infamous "Colonel" House, who convinced
the weak-minded Woodrow Wilson that it was the only way to finance the
"government" --- that is, the foreign services corporations, in the face
of the bankruptcy of the Scottish Commercial Corporation duplicitously
doing business as "The United States of America" (Incorporated, 1868, in
Scotland).
It
was this crooked bankruptcy and the fallout from it that triggered the
events leading to the First World War, in which America's sons and
daughters were unwittingly hired as mercenaries to fight for the
criminals that defrauded them.
Sadly,
these clueless Americans defeated the German Government and stood by
and allowed the defeat of the Russian Government that befriended them
and tried to protect their interests against the British Crown thieves.
It's
time for America and for the entire world to recognize the British
Crown Corporation and the British Government(s) in sum total, for the
reckless, selfish, criminal, predatory, piratical, and profoundly
dishonest institutions that they are.
It's
also time to recognize the well-hidden relationship between these
failed institutions and the Roman Catholic Church--- as they have acted
as Overseers, Enforcers, and Bill Collectors for the Popes since the
days of King John; also, it's time to recognize the relationship between
the Roman Catholic Church and the Roman Empire that continues its pagan
ways and predatory habits protected under the Roman Catholic Church's
skirts, including the practice of slavery and peonage on a worldwide
basis.
They
have even attempted to defraud and denature the members of the "Native
American Tribes" and claimed that these Americans voluntarily pay
tribute (Note: tribes are conquered people who pay tribute to Rome) to
the veiled Roman Empire when they become members of the Roman Catholic
Church.
Paganism,
lies, "legal fictions", corporations, "legalized crimes", black magic,
fraud upon fraud, licensing of basic rights and occupations, human
trafficking, unlawful conversion of land assets using false assumptions
and unconscionable contracts to impersonate people, undisclosed illegal
occupation of sovereign countries, propaganda, television
"programming", unknowing subjection to foreign courts and foreign
systems of law, it all adds up to what it is --- a sprawling criminal
"empire" of corporations that "His Imperial Majesty" Charles the III is
now attempting to lead and is condoning.
As
the Monarchy has been storefront for the British Crown, and as the
Roman Catholic Church has been the storefront for the modern day Roman
Empire, "America" has been used, unwittingly, as the storefront for the
various US Corporations and USA Corporations, and the United Nations
Organization has been used as the storefront for the filthiest of the
filthy Nazi-Era Roman Municipal Corporations, the UN CORP, first
incorporated in France in 1943, as a means to save Nazis, conduct
business for Nazis, and rat-hole stolen money and treasures in Swiss
Banks and other institutions.
Trainload
after trainload after trainload of plundered Russian and Prussian and
Eastern European wealth passed through Vichy France to Switzerland
beginning in 1942. Much of it was brokered into sovereign treasury
accounts benefiting corporations, and not actual sovereign governments
at all.
The
stupid and defrauded Americans who spent their blood and resources to
obtain this "victory" were largely content with their pay as cheap
mercenaries and were prevented via legal chicanery from claiming the
bulk of the benefits they were owed.
This
is the "real" = "royal" world these monsters have created "for" us, and
still there are those who don't want to be bothered with managing their
own affairs. They apparently think that these responsibilities are so
onerous that it is better to let criminals and truly brainless
politicians run the world.
We
disagree and firmly believe that any average family man or worker with a
firm grasp on the value of life is better prepared to make good
decisions for the people of this planet than any politician we have seen
in the past three hundred years.
Let those who have ears, hear; let those who have eyes, see.
We
have asked for the Truth to be upheld and for the peaceful defeat of
these corporate criminals, such that no other innocent people have to
suffer to get rid of them or defend against them or spend decades
studying their duplicitous con games in order to countermand them in
rigged courts and public forums.
May
our freewill and Universal Law prevail against the interests of these
Liars and Tricksters and collapse these deceitful legal fictions, remove
these False Leaders, and bring a swift end to this Evil in High
Places.
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.
The
banks are advised that accounts opened for corporations and for dead
man trusts are all equally claimed as: (1) property belonging to the
living people as private interests and (2) claimed by the lawful
institutions created by the living people of each sovereign
nation-state, as public interests.
The
banks are also advised that all "National Debt" owed by the defunct and
various governmental services corporations is in fact "National Credit"
owed to the living people of each sovereign nation-state, and that the
probate courts are required to go back to the very beginning of this
fraud against the living people and their lawful governments, to render
remedy, cure, maintenance, and full and free restitution to them across
all jurisdictions.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
January 11th 2025
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment