We can produce shit news with humans or with AISo why shouldn't we go with AI? Therefore, my new quiz show
Mainstream news is heading away from human reporters like a Beverly Hills wife married to a fat ugly movie producer with four flops in a row is heading for her divorce lawyer. The AI news product itself will remain the same. The overhead costs will drop. The messy day to day interactions with human reporters will go bye bye. On top of that, more and more sources for reporters’ stories will be AI. So why not hook up AI journalists with AI sources and let them work it out. “This is CBS. We’re a machine. We deal with machines.” The only challenge: making sure the public, who watch and read the news, respond as if THEY’RE AI, too. This is one reason I keep writing about WRITING. Which is different from “providing content” or “transmitting information” or “summarizing facts.” What’s the difference between NBC News anchor Lester Holt and an AI Lester Holt? Almost nothing. The transition would be seamless. The lies and obfuscations would remain the same. The machine effect, in either case, would be identical. Bring together 10 good technical people, and in a jiffy they could produce a David Muir AI, a Wolf Blitzer AI, a Chris Wallace AI, a Reuters wire service AI. With photos. With video footage. AI is here. It’s queer. Get used to it. Hence, my new quiz show: IS IT REAL, OR IS IT AI? Every week, contestants try to distinguish between human and AI writing, speaking, and physical appearance. “OK, contestants, here is Congressman Adam Schiff presenting his signature glassy frozen stare and commenting on the pristine innocence of Joe Biden. Is Schiff real or is he AI?” We’ve got to shake things up. Demonstrate to the public the major shift underway. “You viewers at home…is this Madonna after her 43rd plastic surgery, or is this an AI?” “All right, we’re down to our final two contestants. The top prize is an all expenses paid six week tour of war torn countries in the Middle East and Africa. The final question: Are you looking at a real Joe Biden delivering a speech to the Women for Delaware Sex Change, a Biden with an AI face filter, or a complete AI? Three choices. Which one is correct?” “Bonus question: Is this a human testicle or an AI fabrication?” “Another question for our viewers at home. As you know, we scrape up our studio audience off the street with offers of free burgers and fries. But now, as our cameras pan these truly morbid and unsettling faces, ONE morbid face will be AI. Which one is it?” “Is this actual footage of President Donald Trump retracting his promise to declare the murderous Mex drug cartels terrorist organizations…or is it a Trump AI? And do MAGA people care?” “Here’s Hunter Biden smoking crack in bed with two whores in a seedy motel room while typing an email to a Burisma executive on his infamous laptop…or is it a fabrication? Would Merrick Garland care?” “This is official QAnon underground cave footage of four alien dragons from Orion munching on the corpse of an ex-President. Are they real? What about the small Japanese guy squirting mustard on the ex-President’s toes?” OK, maybe we have to delete that one from the show. I’m reasonably sure Bill Gates is AI at least half the time. He’s a prime example of an information provider. Always keeping people up on the latest developments. Why do we need a human for that, especially when the developments are major felonies and war crimes? Just plug in a talking image... Subscribe to Jon Rappoport to read the rest.Become a paying subscriber of Jon Rappoport to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content. A subscription gets you:
|
No comments:
Post a Comment