Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., The Demolition of Justice in the USA

January 28, 2024 James Fetzerblog

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.

The latest affront to the administration of justice has come from the decision in the E. Jean Carroll “fantasy” trial, where a woman who appears to be obsessed with sex has won a staggering $83.3 million verdict against Donald Trump for an alleged defamation for denying her claim that he had raped her at a Bergdorf Goodman store, where she cannot even remember the year of its occurrence. A woman who has been raped (absent roofies) will not ony remember the year but the month, the week, the day and even the minute the transgression took place.

 

And in Georgia, the sanctimonious DA Fani Willia, who threatened to fire anyone working for her who slept with a coworker, turns out to have been indulging a lavish affair with her married lover, whom she has selected to prosecute Donald Trump in a complex RICO case with 19 defendants, when he was inexperienced at litigation and had not expertise with this type of law. These cases appear to manifest TDS (“Trump Derangement Syndrome”) by zealous Democrats eager to tarnish or destroy the reputation of the one-man wrecking ball they despise to the core.

 

Far more serious, however, are acts by the Supreme Court of the United States, which have been manifest most seriously in the current decision regarding the right of the Biden administration to curtail the Governor of Texas in his efforts to staunch the flood of millions of illegal migrants across our Southern Border, where the President of the United States has abdicated his role to insure that the laws are faithfully executed and that the federal government will protect the states from invasions. Abbott is doing what Biden refuses to do in defending the state–yet SCOTUS rules against him!

 

While the Carroll and Willis’ cases may be viewed as laughing matters (demonstrating the extent to which one party will go after their most influential political opponent), the border matter represents a threat to the integrity of the nation, where at least 25 other governors have now sided with Governor Abbott and we appear to be on the verge of a Constitutional crisis. While there’s talk of a civil war between the states, this development has to do with the legitimacy of the federal government and has more of the character of a revolution of the kind envisioned by the Declaration of Independence.

 

And this is not the first time that SCOTUS has failed the nation. In the wake of the (obviously fraudulent) election of 2020 (where by my best estimate, Trump earned over 100,000,000 votes and Biden around 37,000,000), the rejection of the (once again) Texas lawsuit against the swing stages of Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania) for violating their own state protocols for the selection of electors on the specious grounds of “lack of standing” was not only a massive insult to the nation but placed our future by permitting an illegitimate regime.

 

Unlike the New York and Georgia offenses, these two are enormous cases fraught with consequences for the nation. They concern the integrity of the federal election process and the security of our nation’s borders. Another case No. 21-7916 (far less familiar but which I brought to the Supreme Court) underscores the complete irresponsibility and abdication of commitment of SCOTUS–at least, if you believe as I believe that our 7th Amendment right to trial by jury may be our most important (by safeguarding the people from loss of life, liberty, or property without due process).

 

SGT REPORT: Never Speak of This (17 January 2024)

 

The Courts of Wisconsin deprived me of my right to a trial by jury by claiming that there were no disputed facts, which was an outcome manufactured by the Circuit Court simply setting aside the mass of facts I had on the ground that they were “unreasonable”. The case arose out of a suit for defamation over my declaration that a death certificate for a purported Sandy Hook victim (Noah Pozner), which had no file number and neither state nor town certification) was fake, where I introduced the reports of two forensic document experts on my behalf.

 

After my Petition for a Writ was denied, I persevered and submitted a Petition for Rehearing, which was also denied. What may escape the eye, however, is that the supporting appendices (Appendix A-D and Appendix E) were not made accessible to the public, where a note was added to the Petition, “Additional material from this filing is available in the Clerk’s Office”. If that strikes you as strange, should you take a look at their contents you will immediately discern why they had to be suppressed.

 

They include the FEMA manual for the “mass casualty exercise involving children” held at Sandy Hook on 13-14 December 2012, the CT FEMA Schedule showing the drill to be conducted on that date, a Crime Scene Investigation van in the parking lot (when the windows of Classroom 10 are not yet broken), and the affidavit of a Texas-licensed P.I., who accessed the files of the CT State Police and found proof not only that there had been no mass murder but that it was not even an operating school.

 

In 2015, I brought together 13 experts on Sandy Hook (including 6 Ph.D.s) and we determined that the school had been closed since 2008, that there were no students or teachers there, and that it had been a FEMA exercise presented as mass murder to promote gun control. The book we published was banned by amazon.com less than a month after it had gone on sale and had sold close to 500 copies. So I released it to the public for free as a PDF–but it was taken as a consequence of the lawsuit.

 

So the book was banned by amazon.com and taken by means of a lawsuit, which was (from every perspective I can bring to bear) completely improperly by setting aside my evidence as “unreasonable”–which continues to deprive the residents of WI their rightto due process under the 7th Amendment. Nobody seems to care–most certainly not the Supreme Court of the United States. But my research has continued, including communication with participants in the event that our courts do not want you to know. Not even SCOTUS stands up for our Constitutional rights.

 

Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of the University of Minnesota and now resides in Wisconsin.