4332-4333: Asset Pumping from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
My
position on Private Membership Associations (PMAs) has been dealt with
on several occasions. In articles. In webinars. In interviews.
Go to www.annavonreitz.com and use the Search Engine.
I consider PMAs to be private clubs at the best of times, and at the worst of times, they act as secret societies.
I don't belong to any PMAs myself.
So why would I tell my Readers to join a PMA in order to get an account in "my" bank?
I wouldn't. And I didn't.
Those promoting the Global Family PMA and its credit union were doing that on their own as PMA members.
The
most that was ever said to me or by me concerning that, was that they
could migrate their credit union accounts over to the Blue Dot Bilateral
Bank System when it opened up --- in the future.
The members of any credit union will be able to migrate accounts to our new bank system. The rain can fall on the ocean, too.
There was never any lack of clarity about the following issues in any of my discussions with anyone:
(1)
The Blue Dot Bilateral Bank System, aka, "my" bank, is a completely
separate endeavor from the Global Family Private Membership
Association.
(2) I never required anyone to join a PMA in order to get an account in "my" bank.
(3) I also never suggested that anyone go around opening multiple new accounts in Federal Reserve Banks all over the country.
It looks to me like the people promoting the PMA and its credit union were involved in an Asset Pumping Scheme.
Remember
the bank scandal a few years ago, where the banks were creating
multiple new accounts for depositors without telling them?
Those
"extra" accounts were used to make illicit escrow deals, money
laundering, and, what the public wouldn't realize --- asset pumping.
The more accounts a bank has, the more asset credit they can leverage from the public trusts.
And
while it is illegal for banks to purposefully create extra accounts for
themselves, it's not illegal if individual people do it for them.
Our
people were being used to pump billions of dollars of credit assets
into the Federal Reserve Bank System, including Wells Fargo, which,
last time I looked, is owned by the Department of Justice.
It wasn't any pyramid scheme benefiting me or Hunter Aki, but it was an asset pumping scheme benefiting the Federal Reserve.
So now we know why Darla, Anita, Yvonne, Xavier, and Eddie were pushing people to set up all these extra accounts.
Let's ask all the people who followed their lead--- didn't any of this hit you as strange?
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
"Special" Admiralty Courts
By Anna Von Reitz
We
have been the victims of many, many deceptions, and none greater than
the misrepresentation of Military District Courts as the courts of the
people.
The
military districts and the courts attached to them were instituted in
May of 1865 by the British Territorial United States Government ---an
institution that is only approved to exist under the terms and
conditions of the actual Constitution of the United States of America
(1789), and the Treaty of Paris (1783), which lacked the specific
implementation provided by the Constitution referenced.
There is no other basis to assume a contract.
There
are two kinds of actual courts on offer -- Maritime (British
Commercial) and Admiralty Courts that have usurped upon the land
jurisdiction courts of this country--- plus the so-called
"Administrative Courts" which aren't actual courts at all, but are
instead internal corporation tribunals.
1.
If you voluntarily enter the premises of these courts (inside the
railing separating the court from the gallery) you are presumed to be
granting them jurisdiction.
2. If you argue about anything, you are presumed to be granting them jurisdiction.
3. If you obey their judge about anything, even as simple as telling you to sit down, they assume jurisdiction.
4.
If you accept being called "Mister" or "Missus" or "Miss" or "Doctor"
or "Sir", etc. you are accepting titles, and presumed to be a British
Territorial Subject--- granting jurisdiction to their court.
5. You are considered guilty until proven innocent in these courts -- the exact opposite of our courts.
6.
If dragged into one of these courts under arrest or warrant, they give
you a choice between "guilty" and "not guilty", but this is a False
Choice which precludes the possibility that you are "innocent". So you
must know enough about their system to plead "Innocent" or, again, they
will assume jurisdiction and railroad you.
So, how else do these courts work and what are their weaknesses?
1.
They must have a contract to examine and rule upon. If there is no
contract for service, no contract in dispute, and no contract in
evidence, they have no case and no reason to address you. So ask,
politely, where's the contract?
They
may bring up the State-of-State Constitution, or even the Federal
Constitutions, but you are not a party subject to them, so, you ask,
"When was I informed and given full disclosure for my consent?"
They
won't have any answers, because in fact none of the Constitutions apply
to normal folk --- only to those who work for the government and those
who contract at a high level for the government services, and that isn't
you.
If
you press them and keep on point, asking pointed questions, they will
have no reply, because they don't have a contract with you.
2.
They have no defense against questions and questions do not allow them
to seize jurisdiction, so you bedevil them with questions. You turn
everything they claim into a countering question.
Example:
The Prosecutor claims, "The DEFENDANT owes income taxes for the years 2003 to 2019."
You ask, politely, "Where's the contract obligating me to pay taxes owed by the US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE?"
3. These courts live and die by Negative Averment -- that is, according to what should be-- and isn't-- present.
So, asking for the contract which should be there, -------and isn't, is key.
Asking for the source of purported "federal income" is key.
Whatever should reasonably be present and isn't, is what you ask about.
May I see the Prosecutor's Bid Bond?
If
he can't produce his Bid Bond on the case, there is no case, and you
can innocently ask, "If there's no Bid Bond, then, how can there be a
case?"
And there can't be, so Mr. Prosecutor has to pay the court, and the charges against YOU get dismissed.
And isn't that a good turn around?
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment