Fluoride Information

Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. When in doubt, get it out.


An American Affidavit

Tuesday, August 1, 2023

4326-4327: People need to see the other side of things from Lincoln County Watch

 

Monday, July 31, 2023

4326-4327: People need to see the other side of things from Lincoln County Watch

 By Anna Von Reitz

People need to see the other side of things— how we get set up by these Bad Actors and how they manipulate everything, how they misrepresent , and how, in the end, their own illogic exposes them. 

I told people to try to find a State Credit Union that was operated under the State Trust while waiting for our own banks to open.  

So what happens?  

These finaglers find Hunter’s old PMA Credit Union and, even though it was operated under the State of California —- not the State Trust —- they started pushing it as something I recommended.  

Pardon me? 

Since when did I ever promote using State of State credit unions?  

The only possible advantage of using Hunter’s PMA Credit Union would be his personal pledge not to bail in or bail out on people. 

And in any case, none of that had anything to do with the new system we have been working on. 

So it wasn’t something I recommended. 

It wasn’t something associated with the new banks. 

It never had anything to do with me at all, but I am being blamed for it, and so is Hunter. 

The people to blame are those who did the deeds—- those who misrepresented the nature of that credit Union and what they were doing, those who falsely associated what they were doing with me and what I  was doing.  

But so far, those are the Perps that Don is protecting.  He doesn’t want to mention who actually told him to invest in a State of California Credit Union or what they promised him. 

You sure should know it wasn’t me advocating any such thing.  All those institutions are being sold off to their creditors.  Why in blazes would I encourage anyone to invest in them?  

Answer is—- I wouldn’t.  And I didn’t.  

I am sick of being stonewalled by Don Baker who wants to gripe and blame me for something he did and who won’t divulge the names of the people who actually misled him.

Same thing with Hunter. He offered his Credit Union as a safe place to stash FRNs long term because he was willing to lock in a guaranteed return value for them.  

Faced with double digit inflation he was trying to help protect the value of people’s savings.  

Those who used it for the purpose he stated have already saved half again the value of what they put in. 

He inflation-proofed their savings for them at his own cost and they want to gripe? 

I suspect there is more to this story.  I suspect that the Perps promised people things far beyond inflation proofing,  but so far, nobody wants to talk about that. 

So I am poking Don back.  I know I didn’t recommend long term deposits in a State of California credit Union. I want to know who did. 

Inflation-proofing long term savings is what Hunter offered, but from the way people are acting it’s clear they were promised something else.   So I want to know the details, of who promised what—-but suddenly, they don’t want to talk?  

Were they knowingly engaging in something shady for profit and now don’t want to admit it? 

I want to get to the bottom of it, but my efforts are being obstructed by the very people who are yelping loudest. 

So?  What do they have to hide?  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Intended Goat

 By Anna Von Reitz

Part of self-governing is taking responsibility for what you do.   

I just asked Don Baker flat-out ---who told him that I was involved with a State of California Credit Union? 

And considering the fact that the State of California is a British Territorial franchise --- why would he or anyone else believe it?

Crickets. Not a name in reply. 

He is defending and protecting the very people who came to him and lied to him and told him I was involved and got him to invest in THEIR project by associating me with it.  

I want to get to the bottom of this episode.  I want to know who said what to whom and when, because that will tell me who the infiltrators working for the British Crown are.  

And Don, supposedly the aggrieved party, won't tell me?  

I want to know who is blackballing and blaming me for what they did --just as the Vermin always do --- blaming others for what they are doing themselves. 

What doesn't add up here?  

Does Don really want his money back?  Why isn't he griping to the people who lied to him?  Instead of ranting to me, a Third Party? 

What's wrong with this picture people?  

Come to that, now that I pointed out that his problem is with a State of California institution, why isn't he griping to them?  

If he thinks Hunter ripped him off, why isn't he lodging a complaint with the California Banking Commission?  Is it possible that Don has something to hide?

I have always told everyone --- don't just believe people who come to you in my name and say they represent me.  The morons in the Territorial Congress say the same thing and they don't represent me, either.  

If someone (me) has taught you about the evils of the British Territorial Government and what it has done here in this country, you should have sense enough to know that  person would not get in bed with the British Territorial Government and would not advocate people placing their funds in Credit Unions controlled by these crooks.  

Especially not since the British Territorial Municipal Corporation is in bankruptcy and nobody knows what will happen to their banks and credit unions.  

I say the interlopers responsible for this were Agents and always acting in bad faith. 

I say that they knew they were pushing a State of California Credit Union, not anything new being developed under my auspices. 

I say they set this ugly episode up, deliberately, with malice aforethought, to scare people and try to discredit me and the new banking system. 

I say Don is acting in bad faith, too, because nothing he says or does is logical. 

He knows I didn't tell him one word about depositing or investing his money in a State of California Credit Union.   

He knows who did. 

So what's the big secret, Don?  Who led you on?  Who told you I was involved?  What did they promise you?  

We are all ears, Don.  Especially me, the intended Goat. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

No comments:

Post a Comment