Minnesota Patriot Princess Case Summary
Melissa Hanson owns MLH Enterprises, LLC, which operates The Interchange Wine and Coffee Bistro in Albert Lea, Minnesota.
On
November 20, 2020, Governor Walz signed Executive Order 20-99 under
emergency powers, which prohibited restaurants and bars from offering
food or beverages indoors through 11:59 p.m. on December 18, 2020. In
the minds of freedom-conscience People, the order order was an unlawful
exercise of government power on its face. The state and federal
constitutions as well as the Minnesota statutes harmonize to establish
that the executive orders were and are unlawful under common law,
unconstitutional under state and federal law, and illegal under
Minnesota statutes.
The
executive orders operated as law ex post facto prohibited by both the
state and federal constitutions as the legislature had established that
an executive order as issued would have the full force and effect of
law.
The law interfered with the
obligation of contracts between private sector businesses who operate
under license from the state under the statutory terms of the license as
granted altering the manner and conditions for operation of the
business —necessarily making them unprofitable.
The
governor’s authority to issue executive orders granting the power to
direct and control the conduct of persons in the state [outside of the
persons in the executive branch] is predicated upon the authority of the
governor to declare a peacetime emergency.
However, in 2005 the
legislature removed one of the conditions upon which the governor could
make the declaration — the condition of “Public Health Emergency”. Thus
his emergency executive order based on ‘Public Health Emergency’ is
unlawful and without statutory authority let alone constitutional
authority!
The language of the
governor’s power to direct and control the conduct of persons in the
state is conditioned upon a request from the “president and the heads of
the armed forces, the Emergency Management Agency of the United States
and other appropriate federal officers and agencies” to cooperate in the
manner so specified by executive order — if there exists such official
request, then the governor gave no public notice of its existence.
At
the founding of these united States of America, the People knew the
limitations of the governments that they established and ordained for
the mutual protection of their unalienable rights against enemies
foreign and domestic.
They
architected organic law to separate the power that they delegated to
their governments in order to check and balance any usurpation of that
power that would lead to the despotism and tyranny elucidated in the
Declaration of Independence.
The People have been dumbed down and
their passion for freedom and liberty has been exchanged for the false
promise of safety and security from their servant government now turned
master.
The principles of checks
and balance exist today in the architected instruments of the state and
federal constitutions by the three separate but coordinate branches of
government down to the individual executed constitutional oaths of
office binding the office holder with the duty to support, protect, and
defend any usurpation of power delegated by the People.
Any
person who holds and elected or appointed office of the public trust
has a sworn duty to execute the power delegated to office with fidelity
to their executed oath of office.
Governor Walz exercised power of
the office of the governor under color of authority and under color of
law to exert his private will against the freedoms and liberty enjoyed
by the People of the Minnesota and perjured his oath of office.
Every person elected or appointed to office in the executive branch who executed Walz’s orders perjured their oaths of office.
The checks and balance system architected in the instruments of the state and federal constitutions was wholly nullified.
“Every state legislator and executive and judicial officer is solemnly
committed by oath taken pursuant to Art. VI, cl. 3, "to support this
Constitution. No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can
war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to
support it.” (Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1,19 (1958).
“[An]
official would not be excused from liability if he failed to observe
obvious statutory or constitutional limitations on his powers or if his
conduct was a manifestly erroneous application of the statute.” Butz v.
Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 494 (1978).
"No
man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of
the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of
the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law
and are bound to obey it. ... It is the only supreme power in our
system of government, and every man who, by accepting office
participates in its functions, is only the more strongly bound to submit
to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes on
the exercise of the authority which it gives." U.S. v. Lee, 106 U.S.
196, 220 (1882).
Waging war on the Constitution for the United
States of America is an act of Treason. We are witnessing treasonous
acts by this and other governors, those persons under their charge, and
the judges who are supposed to protect us from that usurpation of power
around the country.
On
December 15, the Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
received a tip Hanson was planning to start indoor dining at The
Interchange in defiance of the Order. Decl. Angolkar, Exhibit 2:
Criminal Complaint 24-cr-21-137.
On December 16, an agent found the restaurant and bar open, with people eating and drinking.
On
Dec. 17 Agent Matthew Finkenbiner, supervisor for the Minnesota Dept.
of Health issued a letter to report that an investigation revealed
violations and threatened an ‘administrative penalty’ of up to $10,000.
On December 18 and 19, agents and inspectors also found The Interchange in violation.
On
December 21, the State filed an injunction action, and the Freeborn
County District Court issued an injunction on December 23.
Hanson continued to keep The Interchange open, as agents discovered on December 30 and January 3, 2021.
While
Lisa was in court on another matter, City Attorney Martinez personally
handed Lisa an alleged criminal complaint including three criminal
charges. Not only was the complaint not signed (a nullity) but
Martinez attempted to have the judge hold an arraignment hearing right
there on the spot giving Lisa zero time to review and prepare for
anything.
On January 25, 2021,
the City Attorney filed additional charges against Hanson for an
additional six counts of violating an emergency powers order or rule
under Minn. Stat. § 12.45 based on the December 16, 18, 19, 23, 30, and
January 3 violations.
As a
form of public protest, on January 26, 2021, Hanson advertised on
Facebook her plans to host a “Nail it to the Walz ReOpen MN Party.”. On
January 29, as anticipated, Hanson threw the party and an agent
investigated, finding people in the bar after 10 p.m.
On
February 1, 2021, the City sent a cease-and-desist public nuisance
notice to Hanson warning her to abate the nuisance within 30 days or
risk an injunction action from the City, including a motion to enjoin
use of the building and cancellation of the lease.
On
February 2, 2021, Albert Lea city attorney Kelly Martinez filed charges
for two counts of violating an emergency order or rule under Minn.
Stat. § 12.45 and public nuisance under Minn. Stat. § 609.74(1) based on
the January 29, 2021 violations. Hanson asserts on February
8, 2021, Albert Lea Detective Julie Kohl purchased a drink at her
business, and on February 9, an arrest warrant was requested of the
judge by Martinez. The judge declined issuing the warrant. Martinez
also requested the judge impose maximum bail conditions which the judge
also declined.
The court attempted to conduct an arraignment via a Zoom meeting which brought out two important points;
Lisa
was clear that she did not understand the nature and cause of the
accusations having previously entered into the record of the court a
challenge of jurisdiction and a constitutional Demand for a Bill of
Particulars as to the nature and cause of the accusations.
This
written challenge required that Martinez enter into the record, the
facts which established that Martinez had standing to bring the
complaint based on several fundamental constitutional issues as well as a
burden upon Martinez to establish that the court had personal
jurisdiction over Lisa.
Without
these facts being entered onto the record AND properly establishing
that jurisdiction was lawfully established, THE COURT HAS NO
JURISDICTION and could not proceed to adjudicate the merits of the case.
At
an intended Arraignment hearing the judge was so pre-occupied with the
different issues being discussed he forgot to get a plea entered onto
the record. Lisa still has not entered a plea as of April 15. To the
contrary, the record shows that Lisa is still waiting for answers to not
only the challenge to jurisdiction but also to a Bill of Particulars
entered onto the record which is a list of questions she requires to be
answered without which the court cannot proceed without violation of
Lisa’s constitutional right to due process of law.
One
of the fundamental challenges relates to the question of “Who is the
plaintiff who calls itself the ‘State of Minnesota’. The constitution
for Minnesota only recognizes the state of Minnesota. This is not a
minor grammatical point. It is fundamental in law. We suspect that
what we have here is a corporate imposter posing as the de jure state of
Minnesota. This is a huge issue.
So
far 3 judges have recused themselves from the case upon Lisa’s written
motion enumerating the due process violations on the record.
With
such blatant sloppiness and denial of due process Lisa then started
filing counter complaints on the civil side. However, Lisa is moving
her claims declared in the counter complaints in an action at law
according to the course of the common law — not according to the course
of statutory law or equity jurisprudence.
She
has invoked her right to set ‘Her’ court as “one of the People”
inheriting the the sovereignty that devolved upon the People in common
law upon separation from King George the Third from the Revolution.
Moving her claims ‘At Law’ is another HUGE point.
She
incorporated as an exhibit the Law and Definitions Decreed for the Case
with each of the initial counter complaints and standalone actions at
law which is a lengthy memorandum of law that established the rules of
Her Court in common law.
There
are currently 2 counter complaints on the civil side to the criminal
complaints and 4 standalone actions at law which reach a long list of
state actors who are named defendants acting in their personal capacity
and thus taking on personal liability for a sum total of nearly $200
million.
Defendants
start at the top with the tortfeasor Governor Walz down though every
tortfeasor in his conspiracy including Albert Lea City Attorney Kelly
Martinez, the City of Albert Lea, several Minnesota Dept. of Health
officials and inspectors, a host of attorneys in the Attorney General
office including the Minnesota Attorney General himself Keith Ellison,
former congressman who is a known anti-American Marxist. A couple of
judges are also named for their conspiratorial acts in all of this.
Judge
Bueltel of the Freeborm county court in the third district of Minnesota
held a bail hearing at the request of Martinez, despite neither having
established jurisdiction on the record nor responding to any of the
challenges requiring facts be put on the record.
Neither
the court, nor Martinez ever issued Lisa a proper summons according the
Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 3 to appear so she didn’t
appear. She had no legal compulsion to appear.
However,
contrary to law, to well established court rules and the personal state
and federally protected rights to due process inuring to Lisa as one of
the People, the judge issued an arrest warrant anyway and gave the
illegal warrant to Freeborn county Sheriff Kurt Freitag.
Lisa contacted Sheriff Freitag to advise him of the error and his potential liability if he executed it.
A
Sheriff Deputy showed up to Lisa’s house with the warrant to arrest her
and Lisa informed the deputy that he’d better call his boss before
executing the arrest. Recognizing the facts of the matter, Freitag
called off the arrest at that time and the deputy left without arresting
Lisa.
However, Martinez,
apparently with a personal vendetta, was unhappy that Lisa had not yet
been arrested and applied to the court for an order directed to the
Sheriff to a hearing to show cause as to why Lisa had not yet been
arrested and why he (the Sheriff) should not be held in contempt.
Freitag
showed up to the hearing with attorneys who presented a legally salient
argument that, based on Minnesota law, Freitag is entirely within his
purview to quash a judge’s warrant. Nonetheless, Freitag melted under
the pressure. He threw his attorneys and Lisa’s rights under the bus
and capitulated to the private will of Martinez and of the judge to
execute the illegal arrest warrant.
Lisa
made it personally and publicly known that she was willing to turn
herself in to the Sheriff and be arrested CONDITIONAL upon his providing
evidence that a proper summons was issued from which she was allegedly
in violation of that gave rise to the warrant in the first place AND
that Freitag establish that there was a finding fact on the record to
conclude as a matter of law that the court had jurisdiction for the
valid execution of judicial power to issue any form of legal process
upon which to compel Lisa to any act without her consent to do so.
Sheriff
Freitag has not complied with the conditions for Lisa to turn herself
in by providing any justification for the arrest warrant. In gross
error of federal law under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(2) he has labeled her a
‘Fugitive’ and has demanded that she turn in her concealed carry permit.
Lisa
sent Sheriff Freitag a Conditional Acceptance of his demand for her to
turn in her concealed carry permit expressly condition upon proof of his
claim that he could enforce 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(2) within the exterior
boundaries of Minnesota and made a counter claim against him for money
damages if he could not provide sufficient proof within 21 days for his
claim against the declarations of fact and law that Lisa declared
therein.
Likewise, Minnesota officials are conspiring to deny Lisa
the benefit of further court hearings using the Zoom meeting technology
(which is used on the premise that it’s a safer means to deal with a
hearing and the Covid threat) and they are trying to require that future
hearings will be in person in the courtroom (even though they still
don’t have jurisdiction at this point). And to top it all off,
presumably because of the Covid threat, they want to deny any observers
coming into the courtroom. This is nothing less than an attempt to set
up a ‘Star Chamber’ and is a further abomination to the constitution
they have sworn an oath to uphold.
This is pure unadulterated demonic tyranny!
Meanwhile,
The Hanson Court according to the course of the common law and the Law
Decreed for the Case was fielding demurrers as motions to dismiss Lisa’s
claims at law by the defendants to several the counter complaints and
standalone actions at law. The Hanson Court is about to enter judgment
nihil dicit in several cases for failure of the defendants to serve and
file a responsive pleading before the time expired as duly noticed in
the Summons.
Those damages on one of the cases are listed as follows;
ORDER:
OVERRULING DEMURRER
AND
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Against
City of Albert Lea, Kelly Dawn Martinez, And Detective Kohl
In the state of Minnesota district court
[Sitting for the territory of Freeborn county]
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
Judgment entered, jointly and severally, according to the
DEMAND:
A. City of Albert Lea: Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00 and Exemplary Damages in the amount of $500,000.00.
Kelly Dawn Martinez: Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00 and Exemplary Damages in the amount of $250,000.00.
Detective Kohl: Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00 and Exemplary Damages in the amount of $250,000.00.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
Judgment entered according to the DEMAND:
D. Kelly Dawn Martinez:
Direct Damages in the amount of $13,000;
Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00;
Criminal Charge 1 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 2 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 3 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 4 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 5 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 6 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 7 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 8 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 9 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
Judgment entered according to the DEMAND:
E. Kelly Dawn Martinez:
Direct Damages in the amount of $13,000;
Compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500,000.00;
Criminal Charge 1 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 2 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 3 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 4 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 5 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 6 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 7 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 8 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Criminal Charge 9 — Exemplary Damages in the amount of
$250,000.00.
Lisa continues to fight and is now labelled a ‘Fugitive’. She needs support.
Prayer support,
Publicity support,
Political Action support, and This case is about much more than Lisa and her business.
Points established:
Exposes the fraud of the corporate State of Minnesota vs. the constitutional, de jure state of Minnesota.
Exposes the issue of breaching the sworn duty to the constitutional oath of office.
Exposes the “lip service” to the principle of the Rule of Law.
Establishes the judicial, legislative, and executive conspiracy against the rights of the People.
Takes
down the Governor, the Attorney General, the AG’s underling
tortfeasors, the Minnesota Health Department, inspectors and a
malicious, vicious, rogue City Attorney in Kelly Martinez.
Shows
the world the power of the common law and will set precedent on how the
state courts can be neutered from their RICO enterprises operating in
as commercial courts for both disclosed and undisclosed revenue inuring
to those who promulgate its operation against the constitutional
principle founded on the Magna Carta (1215) that justice shall be
obtained freely and without purchase.
Re-establishes
the constitution for the united States of America and fundamental
principles established by the Rule of Law in its operation within a
republic form of government in contradistinction to the rule of a man as
a king.
Please do what you can to pray, get publicity, help financially as your means allow. This case is for all of us!
See you tomorrow night!
Mark
P.S.
The book below represents some very rare knowledge and insights you are
GUARANTEED not to find anywhere else. A lifetime of acquired knowledge
on topics few people understand, let alone talk about or share. Add it
to your treasured 'rare book' collection while you can. Click Here | 
No comments:
Post a Comment