COVID-19 Fatality Rate “Worst Miscalculation” in Human History – PhD Student in Epidemiology
By
Arjun Walia
Arjun Walia
In Brief
- The Facts:Ronald B. Brown, Ph.D., from the the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada says, based on his research, that the coronavirus fatality rates we were/are given represents “Worst Miscalculation in Human History."
- Reflect On:Why do perspectives and evidence that are presented in this article never see the light of day in big media? Why are we beamed with a specific perception/narrative when so much other information and data clearly opposes it?
What Happened: Ronald B. Brown,
Ph.D., from the School of Public health and Health Systems at the
University of Waterloo, Canada, recently stated that the COVID-19
fatality rate is the “worst miscalculation in the history of humanity.”
Brown is currently completing his second doctorate degree this time in
epidemiology at the University of Waterloo.
Not long ago, Brown published a paper in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, titled “Public health lessons learned from biases in coronavirus mortality overestimation.”
--> Help Support Collective Evolution: Become a member of CETV and get access to exclusive news and courses to help empower you to become an effective changemaker. Click here to join.
In the paper he provides data and
information he collected from his research, he compared informational
texts from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to data from independent scientists
and Congressional testimony. He states that “Results of this critical
appraisal reveal information bias and selection bias in coronavirus
mortality overestimation, most likely caused by misclassifying an
influenza infection fatality rate as a case fatality rate.”
Below is a statement Brown recently gave to John C. A. Manley, a journalist who was the first to cover the story:
The subject of this article is disruptive, to say the least, although it is not as obvious from the title. The manuscript cites the smoking-gun, documented evidence showing that the public’s overreaction to the coronavirus pandemic was based on the worst miscalculation in the history of humanity, in my opinion. My manuscript underwent an intensive peer-review process. You are the first media guy who has responded to my invitation.
Dr. Brown added that CDC and WHO
documents show that the case fatality rate for influenza was similar to
the coronavirus, implying that the lockdowns were pointless. His paper
questions why the 2017-2018 influenza season in the United States did
not “receive the same intensive media coverage as COVID-19.”
Ads by Revcontent
advertisement - learn more
He points out that “the accuracy of
coronavirus tests rushed into production during the pandemic were
unknown.” And he explores how the media began focusing on an increase in
coronavirus cases while ignoring the decrease in death rates.
The Bulgarian Pathology Association has taken the stance that the
testing used to identify the new coronavirus in patients is
“scientifically meaningless.” They cite an article explaining the
science. You can read more about that here.
Why This Is Important. Dr.
Brown is not the only one raising these points, yet it seems nobody
really knows these facts because they are constantly ignored by
mainstream media, who is simply presenting us with one perspective that
doesn’t seemed to be based on science and data at all in my opinion. It
makes one wonder, what’s really going on here?
Why are deaths not a result of the coronavirus being marked as
coronavirus deaths, even when it’s clear that that the coronavirus was
not the cause? This has been observed across the globe.
A number of the world’s doctors and top
experts in the field have been raising their concern with regards to the
measures taken to combat the novel coronavirus. For example, Michael
Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford
University recently criticized the WHO as well as Facebook for
censoring different information and informed perspectives regarding the
pandemic. You can read more about that here.
More than 500 German doctors &
scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called
the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee” to investigate what’s
happening on our planet with regards to COVID-19, expressing the same
sentiment. They came together to investigate the severity of the virus,
and whether or not the actions taken by governments around the world,
and in this case the German government, are justified and not causing
more harm than good.
You can access the full english transcripts on the organizations website if interested.
This group has been giving multiple conferences in Germany, in one of the most recent, Dr. Heiko Schöning, one of the organizations leaders, stated that “We
have a lot of evidence that it (the new coronavirus) is a fake story
all over the world.” To put it in context, he wasn’t referring to the
virus being fake, but simply that it’s no more dangerous than the
seasonal flu (or just as dangerous) and that there is no justification
for the measures being taken to combat it. You can read more about the
story here.
Another example would be a recent report published
in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures
in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have
already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak
of the virus.
Reported case fatality rates, like the original official 3.4% rate
from the World Health Organization, caused horror, panic and hysteria
and were also meaningless.
Many scientists and doctors in North
America are also expressing the same sentiments. For example, The
Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) recently published a report
titled “Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to
Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.” According to them, the
infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26%. You can read more about
that and access their resources and reasoning here.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in
microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German
history is also part of Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee
mentioned above and has also expressed the same thing, multiple times
early on in the pandemic all the way up to today.
Implementation of the current draconian measures that are so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19? I assert that the answer is simply, no. – Bhakdi. You can read more about him here.
John P. A. Ioannidis, a professor of
medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said that the
infection fatality rate “is close to 0 percent” for people under the age
of 45 years old. You can read more about that here. He and several
other academics from the Stanford School of Medicine suggest that
COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza,
and published their reasoning in a study last month. You can find that
study and read more about that story here.
This list goes on, and on, and on, and
on..So why don’t we hear anything about it? Why are scientists, doctors
and experts being heavily censored for sharing this information? Why are
media outlets like us being punished and demonetized for writing about
it? What’s going on here? Is there another agenda at play? Is NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden right
about the fact that governments are using this pandemic to place more
measures upon the population that take away our rights, all under the
guise of good will? Why haven’t these measures been taken for other
respiratory viruses that infect just as many, and kill just as many
people and more than Covid-19 every single year?
These are important questions to ask and
have a discussion around, especially when our right to even speak is
slowly being taken away.
Facebook fact-checkers have made it quite clear that any information
that does not come from the WHO or federal health regulatory agencies
should not be considered as reliable.The Takeaway
Why is there so much information being
shared that completely contradicts the narrative of our federal health
regulatory agencies and organizations like the WHO? Is there a battle
for our perception happening right now? Is our consciousness being
manipulated? Why is there so much conflicting information if everything
is crystal clear? Why are alternative treatments that have shown tremendous amounts of success being
completely ignored and ridiculed? What’s going on here, and how much
power do governments have when they are able to silence the voice of so
many people? Should we not be examining information openly,
transparently, and together?
Is the new coronavirus, like 9/11, a catalyst for a shift in human consciousness. Are people ‘waking up’ as a result of what has, is and will transpire?
Become Part of CE's Inner Circle
Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.
Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!
No comments:
Post a Comment