146. Exclusive Heredity: The Underground History of
American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archive.org
Exclusive
Heredity
At
the end of the nineteenth century, an explosion in the creation of exclusive
hereditary societies took place which
couldn't have been predicted from the course of the American past. These peculiar clubs constituted the
most flagrant leading edge of a broad-based
movement to erect nothing less than a coherent national upper class
whose boundary was drawn in bloodlines.
This might be better understood as an early manifestation of the genetically charged environment of American
life at the advent of the twenty- first century. This social enclosure movement
produced orthodox factory schooling for the
masses as
one of its very first policy thrusts. It produced the licensing phenomenon which echoed the traditional right of English kings to confer a living on some loyal subjects by reserving good things for them which are denied to others. We have been wrestling with many other aspects of class- and caste-based government and society ever since we came out of this period.
one of its very first policy thrusts. It produced the licensing phenomenon which echoed the traditional right of English kings to confer a living on some loyal subjects by reserving good things for them which are denied to others. We have been wrestling with many other aspects of class- and caste-based government and society ever since we came out of this period.
Evidence that this movement was organized
to concentrate power within a Brahmin caste
stratum is caught by the sudden ostracism of Jews from the ranks of
America's leading social clubs in the
decade and a half directly following Herbert Spencer's visit to America. This was far from business as usual.
Jesse Seligman, a founder of New York's
Union League Club, was forced to resign in 1 893 when his son was
blackballed by the membership committee.
Joseph Gratz, president of the exclusive Philadelphia Club during the Civil War, lived to see the rest
of his own family later shunned from the same
place. The Westmoreland in Richmond boasted a Jewish president in the
1870s, but soon afterwards began a
policy of rigid exclusion; The University Club of Cincinnati broke up in 1 896 over admission of a Jewish member.
The point is whatever was wrong with Jews
now hadn't been wrong earlier. Who was giving the orders to freeze out
the Jews? And why?
The
striking change of attitude toward Jews displayed by Bostonian blue blood
and author Henry Adams is a clue to
where the commands might have originated, since the Adams family can be presumed to have been
beyond easy intimidation or facile
persuasion. Adams'1890 novel Democracy illustrated the author's lifelong
acceptance of Jews. Democracy featured
Jewish characters as members of Washington society with no ethnic stigma even hinted at. In 750 intimate
letters of Adams from 1858 through 1896,
the designation "Jew" never even occurs. Suddenly it shows up
in 1896. Thirty-eight years of
correspondence without one invidious reference to Jews was followed by twenty-two years with many. After 1 896 Adams
seemed to lose his faith entirely in the
Unitarian tradition, becoming, then, a follower of Darwin and Spencer, a
believer in privileged heredities and
races. H.G. Wells' The Future in America (1906) called attention to the transformation the English
writer witnessed on a visit to this country:
"The older American population," said Wells, "is being
floated up on the top of this immigrant
influx, a sterile aristocracy above a racially different and astonishingly
fecund proletariat...." That
fecundity and that racial difference dictated that a second American Revolution would be fought silently from the
Atlantic to the Pacific about a century ago,
this time a revolution in which British class-based episcopal politics
emerged victorious after a century and a
quarter of rejection.
Divinely Appointed Intelligence
No comments:
Post a Comment