UAF 9/11 Study Concludes “Fires in WTC Could Not Have Caused” Building 7 To Collapse
In Brief
- The Facts:The final report of an extensive four-year computer modeling simulation that was followed by a robust peer review process concludes that WTC 7 could not have collapsed as a result of office fires, as the official NIST explanation claims.
- Reflect On:Does it seem like full disclosure in many areas, including 9/11 truth, are being held back in order to burst into public awareness simultaneously?
The Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth announced on March 25th that the final report from researchers
at the University of Alaska Fairbanks on the destruction of the
47-story World Trade Center Building 7 in New York City late in the
afternoon of September 11, 2001 has been completed. And as expected, it
debunks the official story:
The UAF team’s findings, which were the result of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse, contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building ever to collapse primarily due to fire.“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”
The final report, entitled A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 – Final Report,
includes clarifications and supplemental text based on public comments
submitted in response to a draft report released by UAF and AE911Truth
on September 3, 2019.
The UAF team’s final report is the
result of an extensive four-year computer modeling effort that was
followed by a robust peer review process. The peer review included
dozens of public comments as well as external review by two independent
experts, Dr. Gregory Szuladzinski of Analytical Service Company, a
leading expert in structural mechanics and finite element modeling, and
Dr. Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster
University and a fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
What’s Next?
Richard Gage, president and founder of
AE911Truth, said that “It is now incumbent upon the building community,
the media, and government officials to reckon with the implications of
these findings and launch a new full-scale investigation.”
advertisement - learn more
Of course, asking for a new full-scale
investigation has always been the mandate for AE911Truth. One would
suspect that if an investigation has not been launched by now, when a
majority of the public believe something is being hidden from them about
9/11, no amount of proof about the falsity of the official statement
will be able to get the ball rolling.
Still, the work that continues to be
done by AE911Truth and its allies among the 9/11 victims’ families keeps
this issue in the spotlight, and reminds us that important facts about
9/11 have yet to be revealed, facts that question the very nature and
motivations of our government and other powerful institutions. The 9/11
activists will now use the findings in the report as part of a formal
“request for correction” that the group plans to submit to NIST in the
coming days. Richard Gage noted,
“The indisputable errors documented in our request for correction will give NIST no way out of correcting its deeply flawed report and reversing its conclusion that fires were the cause of the collapse.”
An admission by NIST that their
conclusions about the reasons for the WTC 7 collapse is tantamount to an
admission that explosives had been pre-planted in this building for
this event, so we shouldn’t hold our breath. It would bring down the
entire house of cards that is the official 9/11 narrative.
As I mentioned in a previous article ‘The Implosion Of Building 7 Remains The Irrefutable “Smoking Gun” Of A 9/11 Inside Job,’ the
presumption of a controlled demolition would dictate that WTC Building 7
must have been slated to be hit by a plane like the other 2 towers, as
part of the master plan of the perpetrators. When that was part of the
plan was botched, they decided to ‘pull it,’ in the recorded words of the building’s owner Larry Silverstein.
The lame “offices fires” explanation, something that had never happened
before in the world to a high-rise building, was the only one that was
left for them to use.
The Takeaway
Truth is coming, about 9/11, about JFK,
about hidden technology, ETs and about a hundred other things. It seems
to me that full disclosures of all of these have been held up, or are
creeping along very slowly, as if they were being loaded into a cannon
for one huge explosion of truth that is set to have a profound impact on
our collective consciousness. Rather than being impatient for one
particular disclosure or another, I believe it’s best to try to see a
pattern that relates to the readiness of the collective mind, and do our
part to prepare ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment