In a recent article, I accepted public health stats on ordinary flu and
COV, and showed the insane contradictions in numbers and in government
containment strategies.
In this article, I take another angle. The CDC has been lying about
ordinary flu for decades. So why wouldn't they continue their fine
tradition of lying about COV? Why should you believe ANYTHING they say
about COV? Why should you accept their case numbers,
their ominous warnings, their insistence on lockdowns which wreck
economies?
It's simple. If a boy shows up at a grocery store the first six days of
the week and steals an apple every time, when he shows up on the
seventh day, why wouldn't he steal an apple? And if that boy were the
de facto president of the United States---enabling
him to impose draconian measures on the population---should you trust
him?
The first issue is: how many people in the US die every year from the flu?
The CDC reshuffles its estimates. It used to parrot an annual figure of
36,000. Recently, it claimed 12,000-61,000 deaths per year.
In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published a
shocking report by Peter Doshi, which created tremors through the halls
of the CDC.
Here is a quote from Doshi's report, "Are US flu death figures more PR than science?" (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):
"[According to CDC statistics], 'influenza and pneumonia' took 62,034
lives in 2001---61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257
to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified."
Boom.
You see, the CDC created one overall category that combines both flu and
pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously
assume the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.
But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.
Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18
Americans died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.
Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics:
"Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths
per year (range 257 to 3006)." These figures refer to flu separated out
from pneumonia.
This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.
However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to
actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths would
plummet even further.
In other words, it's promotion and hype.
"Well, uh, we've said that 36,000 people die from the flu every year in
the US. But actually, it's probably closer to 20. Who knows? However,
we can't admit that, because if we did, we'd be exposing our gigantic
psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into
getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people
to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story
windows...and, by the way, we'd be put in prison for fraud."
[Note: Prior to Doshi publishing the above piece about flu deaths, I
engaged in a series of emails with him about that issue, and independent
researcher, Martin Maloney, made a major contribution to uncovering the
CDC deception.]
The second big issue is: how many people diagnosed with the flu really have the flu?
Peter Doshi again, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals another monstrosity.
As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory
samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here
is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the
presence of a flu virus.
This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.
So they don't have the flu.
Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it
couldn't possibly prevent all those "flu cases" that aren't flu cases.
The vaccine couldn't possibly work.
The vaccine isn't designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Here's the exact quote from Doshi's BMJ review, "Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease" (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
"...even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating
strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses,
can only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem because most 'flu'
appears to have nothing to do with influenza.
Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested
across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza
positive."
"...It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."
Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren't the flu.
So even if you're a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you're on the short end here. They're conning your socks off.
Let me give you a gigantic example of this massive flu-case-counting
deception. It involved a flu "epidemic" you might remember called Swine
Flu.
In the late summer of 2009, the Swine Flu epidemic was hyped to the sky
by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine
Flu vaccine.
The problem was, the CDC was concealing a scandal.
At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was
working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly
stopped counting US cases of the illness---while, of course, continuing
to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.
Understand that the CDC's main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.
What was the Agency up to?
Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:
Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu
pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for
Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped
counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued
to stir up fear about the "pandemic," without having any real measure
of its impact. Wasn't that another investigation of yours that was shut
down? Wasn't there more to find out?
Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We
discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously
stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of
the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in
fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story
from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was "the most
original story" he'd seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others
pushed to stop it [after it was published on
the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news]
broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the
idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light
on all the hype. It [Attkisson's article] was fair,
accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping
the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took
and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been
necessary.
---end of interview excerpt---
It was routine for doctors all over America to send tissue samples from
patients they'd diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the "most likely" Swine Flu
patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were
coming back with the result: not Swine Flu,
not any kind of flu.
That was the big secret. That's what the CDC was hiding. That's why they
stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That's what Attkisson had
discovered. That's why she was shut down.
But it gets even worse.
Because about three weeks after Attkisson's findings were published on
the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double
down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.
Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC's response:
"Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents - the CDC's best
guess is 22 million - came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009]."
("22 million cases of Swine Flu in US," by Daniel
J. DeNoon).
Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.
In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases
in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely
Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.
There is no Swine Flu epidemic.
Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.
So...the premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters
like, oh, a vaccine causing autism...you can lay that one to rest.
The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.
It will completely ignore its mandate to care about human health, and it
will get away with it---as long as people are willing to accept
falsehoods instead of the truth, as long as people would rather cling to
what authority figures tell them.
And now, with the CDC spearheading the operation called COVID-19---from
confirmation of the discovery of a "new virus," to guidelines for
diagnostic testing in patients, to case number counts, to containment
policies, lockdowns that wreck economies and lives---do
you really want to believe what they say?
They went to the grocery store and stole an apple every day. Then they
turned around and said the grocery store could only admit ten people at a
time. Then they shut down the city around the grocery store.
They sit high above the city looking out the window while they eat the apples.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment