Fact-Checking The Fact Checkers About Coronavirus & Vitamin C Treatment – Is It Really “Fake News”?
In Brief
- The Facts:The idea that vitamin C can have some potential in treating and preventing the new coronavirus is being invalidated and even labelled as 'fake news' by some. If this was true, why are clinical trials for intravenous vitamin C underway in China?
- Reflect On:Can we rely on our
medical system to provide the best possible solutions, or will profit
always come first? How much trust have they lost among the general
population over the years?
An article published by LiveScience,
a mainstream science website, states that “Vitamin C is extremely
unlikely to help people fight off the new coronavirus.” Mainstream media
has been attacking the idea that vitamin C could have some potential to
prevent or even treat the new coronavirus. This rhetoric follows
statements that have come out from government health regulatory
agencies. Take Health Canada, for example, who recently tweeted that
there are no natural health products “that are authorized to protect
against” the new coronavirus. They go on to state that “any claims
otherwise are false.”
This is a problem that’s plagued our
world since the introduction of the mainstream medical industry. Arnold
Seymour Relman, a former Harvard professor of medicine and former
Editor-in-Chief of The New England Medical Journal, states this
problem clearly:
“The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.” (source)
The question people need to be asking
is, where does government loyalty lie? Perhaps it’s with the industry
that spends two times more than any other lobby in congress. This
is why nothing can be used as a treatment, for any disease, unless it’s
patented and presented to us by a pharmaceutical company. “Alternative”
treatments are always branded as ‘fake’ and even ‘dangerous’.
Vitamin C Trials and Treatment
This recent coronavirus outbreak might provide the latest insight into this matter. Going back to the statement above from LiveScience
that states “Vitamin C is extremely unlikely to help people fight off
the new coronavirus”: if this is really the case, then why would China
start multiple clinical trials to examine whether or not intravenous
vitamin C can be helpful in treating people with coronavirus?
The article in LiveScience did
not acknowledge this originally, but they added an update stating
that researchers at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University had launched a clinical trial with
140 patients in February to test whether ultrahigh doses of vitamin C,
delivered intravenously, could treat the viral infection more
effectively than a placebo. The test group will receive infusions twice a
day for seven days, with each infusion containing 12g of vitamin C.
(The daily recommendation for an adult man is only 90mg.) The trial will
be completed in September, and no results are yet available, according
to ClinicalTrials.gov.
advertisement - learn more
That being said, Dr. Richard Cheng, MD,
has been updating everyone via his YouTube channel about vitamin C
treatment cases out of China. We have been covering his updates as he is
in direct contact with this treatment and isn’t simply an armchair
scientist at the moment. We feel at this time this is a very important
detail as he is seeing and hearing results first hand, not simply
theoretically. Dr. Cheng is a US board-certified anti-aging specialist.
He claims that vitamin C is now in the Shanghai Government treatment
plan.
Dr. Cheng was paramount in bringing
high-dose vitamin C to the table as part of potential treatment and
prevention measures. Unfortunately in the West, this option is still
being denied by much of mainstream media and governments are not talking
about it. Instead, it’s fear and chaos which we do not feel helps
anyone to stay healthy or get better.
According to Cheng, 50 moderate to severe cases of
Covid-19 infection were treated with high-dose IVC. Dosing of IVC
ranged from 10,000 – 20,000 mg a day for 7-10 days, with 10,000 mg for
moderate cases and 20,000 for more severe cases. The first bit of good
news was that all patients who received IVC improved and there has been
no mortality. Secondly, as compared to the average of a 30-day hospital
stay for all Covid-19 patients, those patients who received high dose
IVC had a hospital stay of about 3-5 days shorter than the
other patients.
In one particularly severe case where
the patient was deteriorating rapidly, an extra dose of 50,000 mg IVC
was given over a period of 4 hours and it caused the patient’s pulmonary
(oxygenation index) status to stabilize and improve as the critical
care team observed in real time. You can watch all of the updates from
Cheng via his Youtube Channel.
Related CE Articles: Good Coronavirus News: High Dose Vitamin C Shows Good Results In China Hospital
How To Take Vitamin C Orally. It MAY Help Protect Against VirusesEnjoy This Free Conscious Breathing Course To Bring Peace & Heightened Immunity
So, at the very worst we can officially
say that we don’t know, but there are some positive signs thus far,
which again, is obvious due to the fact that they would even begin a
clinical trial, and the explanation as to why such a hypothesis exists
is explained within the clinical trial website listed earlier. To say that it’s false or extremely unlikely is, in fact, the false news.
Looking For Some Vitamin C?
For anyone looking for a
high-quality vitamin C, we have been using and recommending liposomal
vitamin C. There are many brands out there. We are using this one from PuraThrive as it is very high quality and has an incredible clinically proven absorption rate.
The Takeaway
Is it really safe and truthful to make
the claim that “Vitamin C is extremely unlikely to help people fight off
the new coronavirus”? This is the rhetoric we’ve been hearing from
mainstream media sources for quite a while, and articles posted on
social media providing evidence that it may show some promise are being
flagged by fact checkers as fake news. Again, if it was extremely
unlikely, why use so many resources that are required to start a
clinical trial in the first place? Why are we getting a completely
different perspective from an MD in China that’s providing the world
with updates? These are important questions to ask, as this example
simply highlights one of the biggest problems that plagues the
mainstream medical industry, which is a complete denial of the potential
of natural treatments. Because these treatments cannot be patented and
turned a profit, they are ridiculed, ignored and brushed off.
No comments:
Post a Comment