The True Purpose of California Vaccine Bill SB276
In Brief
- The Facts:A bill in
California eliminates nearly all medical exemptions for kids who are
threatened by vaccines. If they want to go to school, they have to get
their shots.
- Reflect On:Freedom of choice is being taken away here, even for children who are medical susceptible to vaccines. With so much information showing that vaccines aren't completely safe, how was this bill able to pass?
California
has very strict compulsory vaccination laws for children in school, and
as a result more parents are deciding to homeschool their children. The
latest information regarding vaccines in California that’s making noise
is Senate Bill 276 by Senator Richard Pan. The bill eliminated nearly
all vaccine medical exemptions. Under this bill, politicians, not
physicians, are in charge of deciding whether or not children may
receive medical exemptions, which in turn would determine whether or not
they can attend school.
advertisement - learn more
This is, in many ways, insanity. And
mainstream media isn’t helping. Take actress Jessica Biel, for example,
who made an appearance with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Instantaneously
headlines popped up everywhere claiming that she was ‘anti-vax’ when
that wasn’t the case, she is simply a supporter of medical freedom and
freedom of choice. Mainstream media constantly uses terms like
‘anti-vax’ to label those who oppose bills like these, without ever
addressing the real science and concerns that many parents have, some of
which are listed below.
State public health officials must not
have the power to override the judgment of private physicians. SB 276
inappropriately places the granting or withholding of medical vaccine
exemptions for patients in the hands of state employees, rather than in
the hands of private physicians who personally care for patients.
Doctors must be permitted to evaluate patient susceptibility to vaccine
injuries, taking into consideration a variety of factors that cannot be
legislated. SB 276 forces healthcare professionals to adhere to
exceptionally narrow vaccine contraindications, which have been defined
by government appointed officials working for the CDC, a public health
agency. Doctors are so severely scrutinized and challenged for granting
medical vaccine exemptions that, with precious few exceptions, most are
concerned for their licenses and are no longer willing to grant them.
Doctors must have the latitude to evaluate their patients and to grant
medical exemptions when indicated.
Below is a very informative statement from Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Merck introduced its measles vaccine in 1963, claiming the vaccine would convey lifelong immunity equivalent to a natural infection, with health officials promising that 55% vaccine coverage would produce “herd immunity” sufficient to eradicate measles by 1967.Leading scientists of the day, including the world’s preeminent bacteriologist, Sir Graham Wilsonand Harvard Virologist John Enders, who first isolated measles, warned against introducing a vaccine unless it provided lifelong immunity. Measles, they cautioned, would rebound with increased virulence and mortality as the vaccine forced the evolution of more virulent strains and shifted outbreaks away from children—biologically evolved to handle measles—to the elderly who could die from pneumonia, and young infants now unequipped with maternal immunity.advertisement - learn moreA 1984 Johns Hopkins University modeling study predicted that Merck’s population-wide experiment would increase measles outbreaks by 2050, (when the last generation subject to natural immunity died off,) compared to the pre-vaccine era. This is exactly what has happened. Merck’s vaccine, with a growing failure rate has been incapable of abolishing the disease. Vaccine failure has left millions of adult Californians effectively unvaccinated. And 79% of people affected by measles in this year’s California outbreak were adults.When eradication predictably didn’t materialize and measles attacked fully-vaccinated populations, Merck simply moved the goalpost saying that herd immunity required 75% vaccination, then 85%, then 95%, then 98%. And now 99%. To distract the world’s citizens from its failed vaccine, Merck started blaming “anti-vaxxers.” (The Vaccine Safety Movement)
California’s bought or brain-dead lawmakers are proposing to “fix” Merck’s vaccine failure problem by punishing 4,000 vulnerable children with medical exemptions. In an act of legislative savagery, Democratic politicians propose to forcibly vaccinate children whose doctors have told them that a vaccine could kill or severely injure them. SB276 will not fix the measles outbreak or solve the problem of vaccine failure, it will only reward a corrupt company for a defective product.
Vaccines Aren’t Safe For Everyone
It’s no secret that vaccines are not
completely safe for everyone, it’s clearly not a ‘one size fits all’
product, and that’s evident by the fact that nearly $4 billion has been
paid out to families of vaccine injured children via the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). As astronomical as the monetary
awards are, they’re even more alarming considering that only an estimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
If the numbers from VAERS are correct – only 1% of vaccine injuries are
reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated – then up to 99%
of vaccine injuries go unreported and the families of the vast majority
of people injured by vaccines are picking up the costs, once again, for
vaccine makers’ flawed products. According to a MedAlerts search
of the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, as
of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles,
mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810
disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths.
I’m just trying to make it clear that,
again, vaccines are not safe for everybody. Furthermore, the NCVIA
sounds like it has the best interests of this nation’s young citizens in
mind, but actually serves a much different purpose. The NCVIA sets
limits on the liability of vaccine manufacturers. They don’t have to pay
a dime, in most cases, if someone is injured as a result of a product
they make. It comes out of taxpayers’ pockets, and this has been going
on for more than two decades. The act completely protects pharmaceutical
companies from any liability or responsibility for a vaccine product
that caused or causes injury. They cannot get in trouble and they cannot
be held responsible, which allows them to be completely careless with
their products. A vaccine could kill multiple people and the company
would not be held liable. It should really be called the pharmaceutical
protection act.
Aluminum is another great example of vaccine safety concerns, in fact, it’s one of many. Here’s a detailed article I
wrote that presents multiple studies as well as links to studies and a
very informative interview with Dr. Christopher Exley, a Professor in
Bioinorganic Chemistry at Keele University, who explains what happens to
aluminum when it is injected via a vaccine.
These types of studies are never
addressed or countered or even brought to light by the mainstream media.
All they simply do is trigger complete silence, while ridicule and
terms like ‘anti-vax’ and ‘conspiracy theorist’ are constantly used.
The main motivation behind compulsory
vaccine initiatives is “herd immunity.” The idea that the more people
that are vaccinated, the more protection there will be for the whole.
The public health establishment borrowed the herd immunity concept from
pre-vaccine observations of natural disease outbreaks. Then, without any
apparent supporting science, officials applied the concept to
vaccinations, using it not only to justify mass vaccinations but to guilt-trip anyone objecting to the nation’s increasingly onerous vaccine mandates as well.
The mandatory measles vaccine
initiatives are a great example, as measles outbreaks over the past
couple of years have occurred in vaccinated individuals, which suggests a
failing vaccine. In fact, highly vaccinated (measles) populations have
had a history of measles outbreaks, and studies have also shown that
vaccinated children could also be spreading/shedding the virus they’ve
been vaccinated with. You can see multiple studies and examples that go
into more detail in an article I previously published here.
An analysis in the Oregon Law Review by
New York University (NYU) legal scholars Mary Holland and Chase E.
Zachary (who also has a Princeton-conferred doctorate in chemistry),
showed that 60 years of compulsory vaccine policies “have not attained
herd immunity for any childhood disease.” It is time, they suggest, to
cast aside coercion in favor of voluntary choice.
Herd immunity can’t exist unless
vaccines are 100 percent safe. The idea that an unvaccinated child
can pose danger to other children, especially children who are
vaccinated, is completely false. If anything, the science showing that vaccinated individuals can shed their virus implies it’s the other way around.
Below is a thought provoking statement from Holland in Washington during the fight to stop mandatory measles vaccinations.
The various forms of vaccine failure not
only make herd immunity impossible to achieve but also feed the
occurrence of ‘vaccine-preventable illnesses’ in highly or even fully
vaccinated populations. Again, I provide multiple links and evidence
above that clearly show that vaccines are nowhere near as effective as
they are marketed to be, as there are many instances of vaccines
failing.
The Takeaway
The idea that politicians can force children to be vaccinated, including those deemed to be in danger of severe adverse reactions, and strip them of their rights to attend public school is insane. Freedom of choice and medical freedom should always exist, especially with regards to vaccines. If parents want to vaccinate, fine, but parents who wish to not vaccinate their children for whatever reasons should always have the freedom to do so.Mandatory vaccination is tyrannical.
Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!
Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.
Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.
No comments:
Post a Comment