Journal
of 9/11 Studies Volume 34, November 2012
Were
Explosives the Source of the Seismic Signals Emitted from New
York on
September 11, 2001?
By Dr.
André Rousseau
1
We
would like to thank Tod Fletcher, who provided
editorial assistance by revising
an
earlier
version of this article.
ABSTRACT
The
seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001, recorded at
Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of
Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning
their sources. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves,
their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official
explanations
which
imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses
of
the
three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.
First of all, we show
the contradictions in the official explanation between the seismic data and the
timing of the events. Then we point out that it is strange that identical
events (percussions of identical towers on the one hand, and collapses of identical
towers on the other hand) at the same location would have generated seismic sources
of different magnitudes. We demonstrate that only strong explosives could be
the cause of such seismic waves, in accordance with the observed low
frequencies.
According to the nature of
the recorded waves (body and surface waves), we can propose
a
location of each explosive source. According to the presence of shear waves or
the
presence
of Rayleigh waves only, we hypothesize a subterranean or a subaerial explosion.
The magnitude of an aerial explosion is insufficient to provide seismic waves
at 34 km.
The
witnesses and video observation confirm our conclusions of subaerial explosions
close to the times of aircraft impacts on WTC1 and WTC2, a strong
subterranean
explosion closely correlated
with
the WTC1 collapse,
and
subaerial
explosions
closely correlated
with
the WTC2 and WTC7 collapses,
WTC7
not having
been
hit by a plane. As a consequence, we draw the conclusion that the three buildings
were
demolished
by a controlled process.
1
Dr.
Rousseau is a
former
researcher in
geophysics
and geology at the National Center
for
Scientific
Research
(CNRS)
of France
and
a
specialist in acoustic waves. He is also a
m
ember
of Scientists for 9/11 Truth.
Journal
of 9/11 Studies
Volume
34, November 2012
2
IN
TRODUCTION
When
major shocks occur at the Earth'
s
surface or at depth, waves of different types,
magnitudes
and speeds may move out from the source location. Such waves can be
detected
by seismometers located at recording stations and the data from the rec
ordings
can be
analyzed to learn many details of the source events. Seismic signals were
recorded
at
stations in New York and four neighbouring states on September 11, 2001 during
the
period
when the North and South Towers (WTC1 and WTC2, respectively) wer
e
struck
by
airliners and collapsed, as well as during the collapse of Building 7 of the
WTC,
which
had not been hit by a plane.
Data
from the Palisades, NY recording station, located 34 km north
-
north
-
east of
Manhattan,
published by the Lamont
-
Doherty
Ear
th
Observatory of Columbia University
(LDEO),
provide the most detailed seismic waveforms for analysis, particularly for the
determination
of the locations (surface or underground) and timing of the events that
created
the seismic waves.
Some
authors have
been
puzzled in their analysis of signals recorded for the events at the
World
Trade Center, as the contradictions are significant. They are particularly
intrigued
by the
presence of seismic "
peaks"
before
the collapses. (
S
ee
MacQueen, 2009). This text
fo
cuses
on the study of the seismic signals from Palisades. The new interpretation
presented
here renders the assertions of the seismic analysis of the events at the WTC,
as
presented
by the government in the NIST and other reports, null and void. On the
co
ntrary,
all the documented evidence points to explosions as the source of the recorded
seismic
signals.
COMPOSITION
OF DIFFERENT WAVEFORMS
Five
waveforms will be analyzed below. They are attributed by the LDEO team to
specific
causes, as follows:
1.
the sig
nals
that, according to LDEO, match the moment when the planes hit
WTC1
and WTC2, respectively, shown in figures 1a and 1b;
2.
the
signals that match the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2, respectively, shown in
figures
2a and 2b; and
3.
the
signal that shows the col
lapse
of WTC7, shown in Figure 2c.
The
analysis presented here will question LDEO'
s
identifications of the causes of the
waveforms.
No comments:
Post a Comment