RFK Jr. Shares The Real Reason The West Is Pushing For War With Russia
We're creating viewer supported news. Become a member!
“The
statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation
that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and
refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by
convince himself the war is just, and will thank God for the better
sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception.”– Mark Twain
advertisement - learn more
The recent chemical gas attack in Syria
has once again lit a fire under the global population, a split is being
created. Every single year, the divide as to what’s really happening in
Syria gets stronger and stronger. Although division and the constant
opposing narrative’s between the mass population only creates more
conflict, drama, and confusion, in this case it’s much different,
because before it was simply believe what we hear, now, we are learning
to question it.
What we have here is a classic case of
media giants spewing opposing views. On one hand, we have the western
military alliance claiming that a chemical attack occurred in Syria and
was done so by the Syrian President, Bashar Al Assad, despite the fact
that absolutely no evidence of this being so was presented. This
narrative is dished out from intelligence agencies via western
mainstream media. Investigations are currently taking place as to what
really happened there, as the OPCW chemical weapons inspectors recently
arrived inside of Douma to do an inspection, as it would be nice to
actually have some real evidence that a chemical weapons attack
occurred.
On the other side of the coin, there are
a number of journalists, academicians and politicians who’ve voiced
their concern that this could be a “false flag” attack. In fact, after
the last supposed chemical weapons attack, Russian President Vladimir
Putin came out and said
that it was a “false” flag and that “more are being prepared in Syria.”
Not long ago, a Russian general went on Russian national T.V. letting
the citizens know that they had intel of another staged gas attack to
occur in Syria. Despite the fact that a large portion of westerners
resonate with this viewpoint, it is still greeted with a harsh response
in many cases, often deemed as “Russian propaganda.” Obviously, Assad
has denied any chemical weapons attack on his own people.
As a side note, when we say staged, we
mean just that, with crisis actors being involved. On the other hand,
there are also staged real events, where people do lose their lives and
are actually victims of weapons attack, that could be the case here in
Syria as well.
The Deep State
has a long history of labelling foreigners as dictators, sponsoring
terrorist activities in those countries and influencing a regime change
to suit their own best interests. These are facts that are hard to argue
against, and many political and military figures from around the world,
including the United States, on-top of uncountable academicians, have
all expressed their concern that this is exactly what we’re seeing in
Syria right now.
advertisement - learn more
Can you imagine? A power so strong that
they have their hands in the creation of terrorist activity, in order to
justify the invasion of another country for ulterior motives, while
looking like the humanitarian and ‘saviour?’
I don’t want to get into it here, as I
recently published an article that goes into a little more detail about
the recent chemical attack in Syria, linked below:
Evolve Your Inbox & Stay Conscious Daily
Inspiration and all our best content, straight to your inbox.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Perspective
I want to focus on long time activist,
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and zero in on his post about the chemical
weapons attack that was blamed on Assad, prior to the most recent one.
Kennedy writes,
“America’s unsavoury record of
violent interventions in Syria – Obscure to the American people yet well
known to Syrians – sowed fertile ground for the violent Islamic
Jihadism that now complicates any effective response by our government
to address the challenges of ISIS. So long as the American public and
policymakers are unaware of this past, further interventions are likely
to only compound the crisis. Moreover, our enemies delight in our
ignorance.”
Also, I believe it’s important to
mention that when the term ‘Islamic State’ or ‘Islamic Jihadism’ is
used, it in no way represents any muslim person whatsoever.
“The global war on terrorism is a US undertaking, which is fake, it’s based on fake premises. It tells us that somehow America and the Western world are going after a fictitious enemy, the Islamic state, when in fact the Islamic state is fully supported and financed by the Western military alliance and America’s allies in the Persian Gulf. … They say Muslims are terrorists, but it just so happens that terrorists are Made in America. They’re not the product of Muslim society.” – Dr. Michel Chossudovsky
This quote highlights one of many
examples of how religion is being used by the global elite to basically
create chaos, making their intervention a little easier.
Kennedy believes this is another
pipeline war, citing the fact that the world’s addiction to oil, when
oil is completely unnecessary at this point, is creating social chaos,
war, terror, the refugee crisis overseas, and the loss of democracy and
civil rights both abroad and at home.
He is no doubt correct, and obviously
has knowledge of this type of thing given who he is and what he and his
family have experienced inside the realm of geopolitics.
Kennedy states, “we
might want to look beyond the convenient explanations of religion and
ideology and focus on the more complex rationales of history and oil,
which mostly point the finger of blame for terrorism back at the
champions of militarism, imperialism and petroleum here on our own
shores.”
The truth is, plans to create dramatic political change in multiple countries have been in the works for quite some time.
Titled “Syria: Scenarios of Dramatic Political Change,” this
document was written in July of 1986 by the Foreign Subversion and
Instability Center, part of the CIA’s Mission Center for Global Issues.
It states its mission to analyze “a
number of possible scenarios that could lead to the ouster of President
Assad or other dramatic change in Syria.” Though the document is 25
years old, it shows that the U.S. plans to influence and infiltrate
Syria to create change that would suit their own interests and dates
back well over 30 years.
The document also comes with similar
testimony from insiders. One example would be former Four Star General
Wesley Clark, who was the Supreme Allied Commander of Europe of NATO
from 1997-2000. Clark said, in an interview with Democracy Now,
that the U.S. had plans to invade countries in the Middle East,
including Syria, for no justified reason at all. He offered the
sentiments of some within the American military, that they have a “good
military” and that they can “take down governments.” He spoke of a memo
that described how the U.S. had “plans to take out
seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria,
Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off, Iran” (source).
In Kennedy’s article, he explains how
long before the 2003 occupation of Iraq by the United States (which was
justified by 9/11), the US government triggered the Sunni uprising which
has now become the ‘Islamic State.’ “The CIA had nurtured violent
Jihadism as a Cold War weapon and freighted U.S./Syrian relationships
with toxic baggage,” explains Kennedy.
“The CIA began its active
meddling in Syria in 1949—barely a year after the agency’s creation.
Syrian patriots had declared war on the Nazis, expelled their Vichy
French colonial rulers and crafted a fragile secularist democracy based
on the American model. But in March of 1949, Syria’s democratically
elected president, Shukri-al-Kuwaiti, hesitated to approve the Trans
Arabian Pipeline, an American project intended to connect the oil fields
of Saudi Arabia to the ports of Lebanon via Syria. In his book, Legacy of Ashes, CIA historian Tim Weiner recounts that in retaliation, the CIA engineered a coup, replacing al-Kuwaiti with the CIA’s handpicked dictator,
a convicted swindler named Husni al-Za’im. Al-Za’im barely had time to
dissolve parliament and approve the American pipeline before his
countrymen deposed him, 14 weeks into his regime.”
Syria is one of multiple countries
currently standing that has not been completely destroyed and
transformed by the United States.
In order for these interventions to
occur, the United States and their allies desperately need to justify
reasons for intervention to their populace.
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”
– Edward Bernays (“the father of public relations”), Propaganda, 1928 (note that Bernays’ book, Propaganda, begins with the above quote).
The point is, the idea that these gas
attacks are false flag events, and the idea that the US has their hand
in such attacks to help oust Assad, while at the same time branding him a
dictator and a war criminal, is nothing new. It’s not ‘Russian
propaganda’ and it’s something that’s been happening for a long time.
The Bigger Picture
We’re obviously going to get nowhere on
any subject if human consciousness is continually divided as to what’s
really happening. Thankfully, human consciousness is changing, and the
conflict that’s been taking place in Syria right now is a great example.
If these attacks happened not but 5 years ago, maybe 10, the idea that
this was a “false flag” wasn’t even a narrative within the mainstream.
At least now we have a large portion of the population addressing
questions and concerns that weren’t really addressed in the past. This
is a great example of how humanity is waking up, and if we want to stop
these problems, we must first identify them, and that’s what’s
happening. This means that people are actually doing some critical
thinking, and doing some independent research instead of constantly
being influenced by the perspective of mainstream media.
This is an encouraging sign.
No comments:
Post a Comment