Breakthrough in explosive lawsuit against Monsanto
By Jon Rappoport
A San Francisco lawsuit against Monsanto and its weedkiller,
Roundup, is moving forward. And it's just received a new green light
from the judge in the case.
Monsanto's lawyers are bracing for a deep level of attack,
which they were hoping to avoid. The judge has ruled the jury can hear
testimony on this issue: Monsanto suppressed evidence that Roundup
causes cancer.
Reporter Carey Gillam has the story (The Guardian, 5/22): "At
the age of 46, DeWayne Johnson is not ready to die. But with cancer
spread through most of his body, doctors say he probably has just months
to live. Now Johnson, a husband and father of three in California,
hopes to survive long enough to make Monsanto take the blame for his
fate."
"On 18 June, Johnson will become the first person to take the
global seed and chemical company to trial on allegations that it has
spent decades hiding the cancer-causing dangers of its popular Roundup
herbicide products - and his case has just received a major boost."
"Last week Judge Curtis Karnow issued an order clearing the
way for jurors to consider not just scientific evidence related to what
caused Johnson's cancer, but allegations that Monsanto suppressed
evidence of the risks of its weed killing products. Karnow ruled that
the trial will proceed and a jury would be allowed to consider possible
punitive damages."
"'The internal correspondence noted by Johnson could support a
jury finding that Monsanto has long been aware of the risk that its
glyphosate-based herbicides are carcinogenic ... but has continuously
sought to influence the scientific literature to prevent its internal
concerns from reaching the public sphere and to bolster its defenses in
products liability actions', [Judge] Karnow wrote." [Yes, the Judge in
the case wrote that statement.]
"Johnson's case, filed in San Francisco county superior court
in California, is at the forefront of a legal fight against Monsanto.
Some 4,000 plaintiffs have sued Monsanto alleging exposure to Roundup
caused them, or their loved ones, to develop non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
Another case is scheduled for trial in October, in Monsanto's home town
of St Louis, Missouri."
"How the Johnson lawsuit plays out could be a bellwether for
how other plaintiffs proceed. If Johnson prevails, there could be many
more years of costly litigation and hefty damage claims. If Monsanto
successfully turns back the challenge, it could derail other cases and
lift pressure on the firm."
"According to the court record, Johnson had a job as a
groundskeeper for the Benicia unified school district where he applied
numerous treatments of Monsanto's herbicides to school properties from
2012 until at least late 2015. He was healthy and active before he got
the cancer diagnosis in August 2014. In a January deposition, Johnson's
treating physician testified that more than 80% of his body was covered
by lesions, and that he probably had but a few months to live."
How will Monsanto proceed? First, they'll argue that
Johnson's cancer could have been caused by other factors. They'll throw
the kitchen sink at the jury. It could have been genetics. It could have
been lifestyle. It could have been causes that are still unknown to
researchers. It could have been starlight from a galaxy far, far away.
Monsanto's lawyers will try to bury the jury in reams of supposition.
Second, they'll show the jury an EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) finding that Roundup does not cause cancer. Like the
FDA, the EPA has sided with major corporations in efforts to protect
them. Monsanto will claim: "The federal government has asserted Roundup
is safe, and that's the end of our responsibility. The federal
government is the final arbiter." Which is to say: the truth isn't the
final arbiter.
Third, Monsanto will execute a series of acrobatic moves to
prove they never suppressed evidence that Roundup causes cancer. They
were simply "considering all relevant safety issues." They were "posing
various scenarios." Their internal memos were "temporary work product"
on the way to making a final judgment about Roundup's safety. They were
raising valid concerns about flawed studies that claimed Roundup was
dangerous.
If all else fails, Monsanto might try to settle with
Johnson---and then claim the $$ payout was simply a way to show
compassion for his unfortunate condition---and move on---continuing to
offer the public a fine and safe product (Roundup). No guilt admitted.
In the extreme---and I need to raise this question---might
Monsanto, behind the scenes, secretly and illegally offer Johnson's
lawyer and his client a very large sum to present a weak case in court
and let Monsanto win the case?
You decide.
If Monsanto has intentionally hidden the dire effects of
Roundup for decades, while people have gotten sick and died, what
wouldn't they do?
Among the myriad scandals and crimes of Monsanto, here is one
that sheds light on the mindset of the company. Axisoflogic.com reports
(3/22/12): "In 2001, 3,600 inhabitants of the city of Anniston,
Alabama, attacked Monsanto for PCB [a chlorine chemical] contamination.
According to a report, declassified by the U.S. Agency of Environmental
Protection (EPA), Monsanto for almost forty years dumped thousands of
tons of contaminated waste in a stream and an open garbage dump in the
heart of a black neighborhood in the city."
"The way The Washington Post reported the story is instructive: 'Monsanto
documents -- many emblazoned with warnings such as 'CONFIDENTIAL: Read
and Destroy' -- show that for decades, the corporate giant concealed
what it did and what it knew. In 1966, Monsanto managers discovered that
fish submerged in that creek turned belly-up within 10 seconds,
spurting blood and shedding skin as if dunked into boiling water. They
told no one."
"Monsanto was finally convicted in 2002 of having polluted
'the territory of Anniston and the blood of its people with the PCB'.
The firm was ordered to pay $ 700 million in damages and to guarantee
the cleaning-up of the city. No legal action was brought against the
company officials."
No comments:
Post a Comment