Tuesday, July 8, 2025
5447-5449: International Public Notice: Request for Prompt Assistance. from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
It
may not be easy for people in many other countries to imagine that
America is not the Oppressor they have been led to believe, and that
instead, we have been the Victims and Scapegoats of a cruel and
insidious system of Corporate Colonialism along with everyone else.
While
it is easy to see the blue collar evils of lingering and merely
rebranded Colonialism in Africa, pretending to be Territorial
Protectorates and masquerading as philanthropic "Development Funding
Initiatives", the white collar version of it that we have suffered here
is Colonialism nonetheless. The jackboots on our necks feel the same.
The
lawfare applied against our interests and used to purloin our assets
and steal our identities are just the same; the foreign control of our
money, our natural resources, and our trade policies are just the same.
The abyss between our rich and our poor is widening by the day, as the
crooked bankers and colluding corporate raiders siphon off more value,
and extract more labor and more natural resources.
Our sons and daughters are still being lied to and tricked into serving as dirt cheap mercenaries for hire.
Every
day, Americans are fed a steady diet of polluted water and rotten
denatured food. We have suffered "vaccination" just like the rest of
you. Our people are sick and dying. Our "Armed Forces" have been
weaponized against us.
After
decades of False Narratives about overpopulation, the news agencies are
suppressing the headlines proclaiming that we and all Western European
nations, plus Japan, are all facing population collapse.
After
decades of opportunistic narratives preaching "global warming" as a
False Gospel (and convenient excuse for Draconian "carbon taxes") we
now hear the truth --- the Earth isn't warming, it's cooling.
It's always the exact opposite of what these Vermin are pushing through all their mass media outlets.
And now, we have weather warfare and unauthorized geoengineering projects: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wscdZXywAQY&t=9s
We
recently reported on ongoing weather warfare projects being conducted
in Texas and North Carolina and other targeted States, with no
permission from the people who live there and who happen to be the
actual owners of the property interests being destroyed in violation of
the Perpetrator's "good faith" service contracts.
In
the name of "defense", also known as flagrant mercenary war
profiteering, the majority of our economy has been reduced down to
producing weapons and poisons and technologies that have only one real
purpose --- to kill every living thing on this planet at least a hundred
times over.
That's all these madmen know: perennial war for profit, kill, kill, kill.
Kill
and maim to make profits off a healthcare industry that isn't about
health or caring, either one. Kill the babies in their cradles and
steal their identities and assets on paper, wait eighteen years and kill
them in fact, in God forsaken places murdering other confused and
innocent people over illicit drugs, money laundering, and other criminal
enterprises, all in the name of "preserving our democracy".
America
has never been a democracy. Ever. That should be a clue right there,
shouldn't it? Hidden in plain sight, shoved in everyone's face for
years and years and years?
"America"
has been commandeered by British Territorial Mercenaries for over 160
years, and then, it turns out that the Brits are taking the same
punishment as we are --- at the hands of the Holy Romans.
Rome
commandeered the Brits and the Brits commandeered us, and the whole
shiteree, all this death and destruction, is all headquartered and
stemming from and orchestrated by guys running around in cassocks
singing hymns, banging on Bibles and Law Books, and lying their rumps
off to anyone who will listen.
We're not listening anymore. We're looking.
England
doesn't have a single king or sovereignty on land, but instead has had
an oligarchy of kings since 1087 A.D. and they haven't taken action and
spoken to the world as a group since 1215 A.D. Turns out that England
lost the Napoleonic Wars despite General Blucher, and by 1714, lost
their standing at sea, too.
England is totally legless and has been for over three hundred years. Take that in.
There is no England, no Britain as we have previously thought of it.
We
require prompt assistance to prosecute the corporations that have been
used to promote these grotesque deceits, wars for profit, and other
frauds and violent crimes promoting unjust enrichment, national-scale
identity theft, democide, inland piracy and crimes too numerous to
mention.
This
is not a matter of politics, but is instead a matter of gross
criminality, breach of trust, fraud, and deceit. Let every living man
and woman reading this sit bolt upright and understand -- the "Enemy"
has infiltrated our lives and our institutions, our governments and our
laws.
The
real enemy didn't shout at us from the streets of Baghdad. The real
enemy has been domestic all along, tatted up as our treaty Allies and
governmental services providers, NATO and the USA, Inc.
And the kicker is, for the most part, the Enemy doesn't even know it's the Enemy.
All
the billions we have spent on dozens of law enforcement agencies and
surveillance grids and spy networks and organizations from the FBI to
DHS and CIA and DIA , scalar weapons, and all the rest of it, have not
availed and have not protected us; quite the opposite. Their
dereliction of duty is self-evident.
The
single thread they have in common is that they are all corporations and
they are all ultimately tied in one way or another to the "Holy Roman
Empire" -- which, as Voltaire observed, isn't holy, isn't Roman, and
isn't an empire.
We are returning this criminal information to the sources of it, reflecting it and all the evil they have wrought.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
July 8th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Please Cease and Desist -- That's THEIR Law, Not Ours
By Anna Von Reitz
I
am in receipt of the latest teaching video entitled "The Elements of a
Republican Assembly" sponsored by something calling itself "The
Federation of America" --- which is self-evidently not our Federation of
States--- and most of the information is either wrong or
disingenuously focused on foreign law that has nothing whatsoever to do
with republican assemblies.
Administrative
law is the internal law of corporations, as the name might suggest, and
the entirety of Administrative Code and the Administrative Tribunal
system has recently been gutted by United States Supreme Court rulings
reminding the Territorial Congress that they have no ability to delegate
their own legislative powers.
So
the only persons subject to Administrative courts and Administrative
law are those employed by or dependent upon the corporations in
question. We should not be wasting our time beyond setting up an
effective and brief response procedure for our people to refuse summons
and other inappropriate solicitations from administrative tribunals.
Administrative
law has nothing whatsoever to do with "The Elements of a Republican
Assembly" and everything to do with the rightful role of a Litigation
Committee within a republican Assembly --- wherein we work out
strategies to rebuff attempts to subject us to foreign corporate law
(codes, rules, statutes, regulations, policies, etc.).
Due
Process is primarily a commercial process which is basically all that
remains for general society as a means of remedy until we get our own
courts up and rolling, but we can't achieve remedy by entering their
courts which are barely described as "courts" and more closely resemble
collection agencies for predetermined creditors.
We
have to redirect our people to international commercial courts, give
them means to avoid "District" Courts and work out the procedures to
make counterclaims and appeals directly to unprejudiced UCC judges
outside the US system.
There
are numerous points that I have to take exception to; Doug's teaching
on the Supremacy Clause is mistaken and gives a totally inappropriate
emphasis on the Federal Constitutions as if they alone define "the Law
of the Land". This is a grave error.
The
reason that the Constitutions make such a big deal of being "the Law of
the Land" is that they are primarily written as guides for Sailors. Not Landsmen. The Supremacy Clause is there to give a proper reminder to the Sailors that while they are on land this is the Law of the Land for them, not us.
Our Law of the Land goes far beyond the Federal Constitutions and
embraces the entirety of International Land Law, including
international treaties, and our own American Public Laws pertaining to
Land Law, including but not limited to Amendments to the Federal
Constitutions which were created from 1787 to 1861.
Remember
always that only about 8% of all Federal Law legitimately pertains to
us, and only when we are engaged in federally regulated activity or we
find ourselves in a legitimate federal enclave, like the District of
Columbia or a Post Office or a military base.
Doug's
teaching that our State and County Assemblies are subject to delegated
authorities found in the Constitution are suggestive in ways that are
not adequately explained and narrowed down to the two or three instances
where our State Assemblies have delegated responsibilities -- such as
paying for Federal Services in gold and silver coin, while our County
Assemblies have absolutely NO INTERFACE with the Federal Subcontractors
at all and don't operate in any international jurisdiction whatsoever.
Don't
give anyone, least of all our people, the impression that they are
"generally subject" to the delegation of their own powers, especially
when the Subcontractors are in default. The Federal Constitutions are service contracts and
our States contracted for those services, so we do have a few
responsibilities which are simply stated, but otherwise and apart from
the 8% of circumstances cited above, neither our States nor our Counties
nor our people are subject to delegated powers which exist ONLY in
international jurisdictions.
The
pervasive presence of the Federal Subcontractors in the Union States is
unnatural and not part of the intent of the Federal Constitutions. They
are here as part of an illegal mercenary occupation --- not a military
occupation, and we are in the process of putting an end to that gravy
train.
Doug's
statements that Time Outs issued by Assemblies are "illegal" and
"unlawful" for lack of Due Process is a plain misunderstanding of Due
Process and where Due Process applies (contracts) and where it does not
apply.
We are not under contract within the context of our participation in our own public government affairs and we do not require
a court process to determine and publish and enforce standards of
behavior and processes such as agenda setting, at our own public
meetings.
Anyone
who says that we are subject to ANY administrative process or
commercial code foreign to our own in the conduct of our own assembly
business has gotten "lost" in the maze of foreign law and no longer
clearly sees and understands our own law and prerogatives.
The
members of an assembly are equal in standing to anyone else in that
assembly and the bulk of the members as represented by their direct
votes in any matter do not have to suffer attacks and disruptions and
the misplaced polemics of confused people who think that they have the
"right" to waste everyone else's time and energy.
This
may apply to meetings where people are addressing their public
servants, but it does not ---emphatically does not -- apply to meetings
among equals.
Let's
make this blindingly and forever clear to everyone reading this. I have
the absolute right to appoint, direct, discipline, hire and fire, and
otherwise train all Coordinators. I do not offer any volunteer an
employment contract and therefore do not owe them any commercial "Due
Process" --- if that isn't clear it sure as hell ought to be.
The
six California Coordinators were given clear and fair instructions from
the first and were given multiple chances to get their heads screwed on
prior to being fired. THAT "opportunity to correct" is the essence of
Due Process and fairness -- not any arbitrary commercial rote. They
were told to let the past be past and work together as a team. They had
the choice. They couldn't stop attacking Michelle and insisted on
creating more drama and disruption instead.
So
they are gone and that was my executive decision based on my direct
experience and observation. Anyone who is told to let bygones be gone
and who stands there and nods or remains silent in apparent agreement
--- and then proceeds to do exactly the opposite for two months, is
clearly operating in bad faith. They got three chances and I ground to a
halt on the fourth. I gave them the "Due Process" I owed them, which
is not a commercial due process, but a patient and kindly and repeated
explanation of what they were doing wrong. The decision not to correct
was theirs and theirs alone.
"Unrebutted affidavits" are foreign law, not American---again, you are focusing on the wrong law and failing to put that law in proper context as a sidebar issue we
have to deal with in the Litigation Committees. Americans acting as
Americans can't even make "affidavits" -- they aren't officers acting in
any international capacity and instead must offer "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit".
Our real job as Americans is to learn and apply our own law. Our goal is to set up our own courts. We
now have a proper standard in the form of the "American Law and
Procedure" multi-volume set, and that and the related American Common
Law reference books we have identified are what we need to be studying primarily and promoting to our Assembly members.
It
isn't our purpose in any Jural Assembly to muck about in foreign equity
courts, learn commercial law, or statutory law or administrative law. The only purpose in
studying THEIR law is finding the best means to set aside their
presumptions and make them stay in their box --- and that is a purpose
best suited to discussions within the limited purview of the Litigation
Committees.
Please
cease and desist until such time as you can better focus your efforts
and define the context of your statements, as in the present form, they
will simply detract from the main thrust of our effort to restore our
American Common Law Courts.
Anna Maria
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: Dangerous -- and Untrue -- Patriot Myths
By Anna Von Reitz
From
the beginning, our efforts have been fraught with misunderstandings,
conjectures that are plausible, but ultimately incorrect, and outright
lies spun to create confusion and division.
One
such obfuscation is the idea that "the original thirteen" colonies and
later the Estates/States derived from them, had some special standing or
material or ownership interest in the States that were formed later in
our country's history.
Any
such ownership interest was short-lived, and pertained only to that
period of time when, under the rules of the Northwest Ordinance, the
incipient States were defined as territories and were temporarily under
the control of the British Territorial Federal Subcontractor.
Once
sufficiently populated and defined, these "territorial states" were
enrolled as full-fledged Union States under the Equal Footing Doctrine
which allowed that all States enjoyed the same status and authority and
benefit as all the other States in the Union.
Remember
now that when we say "Union" in this context, we are not talking about
the Northern Confederacy that was involved in the so-called Civil War.
We are talking about the Union States formed from the patchwork of
Counties which together control the soil jurisdiction of each State.
This
same misbegotten theory that the "original Thirteen" retained some
special cachet or special status or ownership interest in the States
that joined the Union in the years after The War of Independence,
maintains that the "progeny" mentioned in the Preamble of the Federal
Constitutions referred to the specific sons and daughters of the
Founding Fathers.
We
now know that the Preamble was written by Americans acting in their
capacity of Lawful Persons and State Citizens -- "People" -- and the
only "progeny" that such People have, are not of flesh and blood, but
instead are those brave souls who take up the torch and accept the
responsibility and hard work involved in being a State Citizen.
A
somewhat related myth maintains that this country is only owned and
only belongs to those who have served in the military in defense of our
independence, and therefore, only the members of the Continental Army
and Navy and their direct progeny have any ownership interest.
While
it is true that veterans of the Continental Army and Navy were given
special recognition for their service, that recognition was limited to
establishing their absolute and insofar as mortal life allows--eternal
right to live here and own land and enjoy the freedoms they earned.
At
the same time, a similar blessing was conferred on their children and
granted to all those who were born on our land and soil in all the years
afterward, and even on those who, via a lawful process of immigration
and naturalization, freely choose to adopt the nationality of one of our
States.
We
will note that our American Government has always maintained the
special status of Native Americans and their numerous nationalities and
has readily agreed that they are and should forever be free of taxation
of any kind. This is a recognition in its own right that they are Dual
Nationals with a pre-existing right to be here and to be free from the
financial burdens and conventions of our government.
So,
the "original Thirteen" and the Continental soldiers and sailors alike,
did not seek any special or different consideration for themselves
above any other State or person; instead, they opted for egalitarian and
communal rights and principles throughout.
A
third pernicious theory is that because Bar Association members drafted
and signed The Unanimous Declaration of Independence published July 4th
1776, and because Bar Members also participated in drafting and signing
the Federal Constitutions, that their assumed conflict of interest
voided the proceedings and invalidated the actions taken.
Like
any license or union membership, the members of a foreign professional
guild may exercise that license or membership or not, depending on the
circumstance and jurisdiction in which their action is taken. For
example, a license to operate a motor vehicle does not affect one's
ability to walk. Being qualified to practice law in an Admiralty Court
does not impact one's ability to practice Common Law.
As
none of the actions taken pursuant to the issuance of The Unanimous
Declaration of Independence nor the Federal Constitutions, either, were
addressed as the peculiar subject matter of the international
jurisdiction of the sea, we may be sure that the men who drafted and
bravely signed them were not acting as the King's Esquires, and were
instead acting under the provisions of American Common Law to which they
were equal heirs.
The
Unanimous Declaration of Independence and all three Federal
Constitutions are executed under American Common Law, so no, the fact
that some of the men signing them also had the facility to act as Bar
Attorneys doesn't matter at all. And never did.
A
fourth misconception arises from the idea that a Confederate State is
the same as a Federation State is the same as a Union State is the same
as a Territorial State.
Each
one of these forms of Statehood carries with it a jurisdiction and a
responsibility and set of authorities not shared by any of the others.
Our Founders were very familiar with abuses of power and took great
pains to separate powers and counterbalance them.
In
recent days, people who have grown up in the British Territorial System
have made the mistake of thinking that the Union States are the holders
of all "power" and they are busy populating the County Assemblies
before finishing the work of building the State Assemblies, because they
expect to be able to crack the whip over the Federation States once the
Union States are in order.
Such
assumptions about political power and empowerment are foreign to our
country and our government. In our country, the powers of the soil
jurisdiction-- though vast within the boundaries of each County-- are
not designed to overwhelm or compete with the powers of the land. The
powers are separate.
Anyone
who has any difficulty understanding this needs to study Separation of
Powers and take in the information we have already provided concerning
the isolation of our Union States as a protection against foreign
interference and intrigue.
Yet
another dangerous and untrue Patriot Myth is the idea that the "Act of
1871" which was repealed four years later, or the "Organic Act of 1871"
were the crux of the problem we face in this country; on the one hand, a
new Municipal Corporation was created, and that in itself was not
prohibited; on the other, no "organic" act was possible for the British
Territorial U.S. Congress, so that was fraud and null and void from the
outset.
The
problem is that on February 2nd of 1871 the British Territorial U.S.
Congress claimed the assets of our Federal Republic (doing business as
"the United States") including its corporations and assets and most
importantly, it's doing-business-as name and contracts, as abandoned
property --- all without the nicety of providing Public Notice outside
the District of Columbia in places where the American Public would be
likely to respond.
This
failure to provide Due Notice and disclosure owed to their Employers
was a self-interested act and was managed like a sleight of hand trick.
Unfortunately
for them, the actual owners have returned home as the rightful
inheritors and in view of what we have suffered at the hands of our
Subcontractors, we are not inclined to let them pull a Substitution
Fraud and pass off their version of "a" Federal Republic as if it were
our "restored" American Federal Republic.
The
actual problem -- beyond the total lack of Due Notice and Disclosure to
the American Public -- with the Organic Act of 1871, is that Great
Britain had already lost its substantive standing and powers as of 1714,
which meant that its Territories were similarly disempowered and
reduced to the status of corporations.
It
now becomes clear exactly why the Great Overhaul of both English Common
Law and British Admiralty Law under Lord Mansfield was necessitated in
the mid-1700's. Without substantive standing on land or sea, only the
air jurisdiction and Maritime commerce remained. So-called Equity Law
was the law of the Creditors and their "courts" were transformed into
glorified collection agencies.
Although
this was clearly known by the Founding Fathers and the situation in
England prompted their actions as much or more than the long list of
abuses detailed in The Unanimous Declaration of Independence, the
portion of British debt that could be assessed against the former
colonies was not discussed in public.
This
led to misunderstanding about which public and which debts were being
referenced in the years immediately after the Revolution -- a confusion
that has lingered into modern times.
Our
Tory neighbors inhabiting the British Territorial United States, most
especially, Puerto Rico, were saddled with all their own debt left over
from the cost of supporting Britain in The War of Independence and this
was then supplemented by their portion of later British war debts until
finally, the G-5 declared bankruptcy via treaty at the Geneva
Conventions in May of 1930.
The
representative of the United States of America (Incorporated) at these
negotiations was Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who was elected President of
the British Territorial Crown Corporation doing business as the United
States of America (Incorporated) in 1933.
Thus,
when FDR announced to the Conference of Governors that the United
States of America (Incorporated) was bankrupt in early March of that
same year, the Governors all knew exactly which public and which debt
was being referenced --- and they answered by "pledging" the full
support of their "citizenry" and "states".
A
pledge is a feudal act, a promise made to a king by a loyal subject;
these Governors pledged the support of their "citizenry" -- meaning the
U.S. Citizens under their command, and their "states" -- meaning the
British Territorial States-of-States that had usurped the position of
their American predecessors and the assets of the State Trusts that they
created and commandeered.
Nobody
mentioned this to the Americans, and left to their own imaginations,
many Patriots have assumed that they were the "citizens" being
referenced and that their States of the Union were on the hook to pay
off three centuries worth of British War Debt--- most of which was owed
to the Pope by the Pope.
The
trick was getting the dumbed down Americans to accept this debt as if
it was legitimately their debt instead of debt owed by the British
Monarch and the British Crown. In the spring of 1933, the Internal
Revenue Service was all organized and in place throughout the fifty
States, purportedly to address all the U.S. Citizens working here and
"residing" among us, but actually intending to entrap and fleece as many
American "volunteers" as possible.
Being
able to discern the difference between "these" United States and
"those" United States simply from context is no small feat; realizing
that Americans are not naturally any form of United States citizenry is
another leap forward toward understanding. And finally, realizing that
the various Federal Constitutions are service contracts and not Sacred
Cows, results in the proper orientation and skill set that American
patriots need to reclaim their birthright status and enforce their
constitutional guarantees.
We
are now engaged in a great struggle to discern and employ the truth on
our behalf, to sort through the cobwebs of history and the layers of
self-interested deceit, and deal with the many red herring issues set
like traps in our way.
Neither
the Municipal minions of Rome nor the officers of the British
commercial "fleet" want us to succeed; it is much more convenient and
profitable for them that we remain asleep or become endlessly entangled
in divisive misapprehensions.
And
it is much better for us and for all mankind, if we sit up sputtering,
like a man who has just been awakened by a bucket of ice cold water
dumped over his head.
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
July 8th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment