EPA CONFIRMS GEO-ENGINEERING PROJECTS
Last Monday you'll recall that I blogged about MacBeth Pharmaceuticals
Moderna Pharmaceuticals' latest scheme to force you into a patent lien
on your labor and production by spraying food crops with mRNA
quackcines. Well, amid all the kookery coming out of government agencies
such as the Diabolically Apocalyptic Research Projects Agency (DARPA)*
or the Environmental Poisoning Agency (EPA), we now have the Trump
Administration finally admitting what others for decades claimed was
going on, and what the Mightly Wurlitzer of the Operation Mockingbird
lamestream propotainment media always maintained was yet another "right
wing conspiracy theory" (not withstanding the fact that many maintaining
it were on the left, but after all, never let a good crisis of
opportunity go to waste, especially when one can use it to craft a
narrative). In this case, we're grateful to long-standing regular
reader-and-article-contributer V.T. for spotting this one and passing it
along:
While this is a lengthy article, one can accurately summarize it with the article's own initial summary of its main points:
- The U.S. EPA officially confirmed the existence of government-backed geoengineering programs, reversing years of denial. Administrator Lee Zeldin announced a transparency initiative detailing solar radiation modification (SRM) and its risks.
- SRM involves injecting reflective particles (e.g., sulfur dioxide) to cool the planet, but the EPA warns it may harm the ozone layer, disrupt weather, damage crops and cause acid rain. Neurological risks, like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, are also linked to nano-aluminum particles from atmospheric spraying.
- The EPA admitted tracking private actors engaged in geoengineering, suggesting undisclosed corporate or international programs. Weather modification techniques like cloud seeding (using silver iodide) were also confirmed.
- The disclosure sparked debate, with some lawmakers pushing for bans while critics dismissed extreme weather links. Skeptics argue the move distracts from broader climate policy failures, blurring lines between fact and conspiracy theories.
- The admission raises concerns about undisclosed programs and long-term consequences. While the EPA denies large-scale SRM operations, public distrust persists, leaving citizens to navigate potential health and environmental risks. The era of denial has ended, but the full impact remains uncertain.
In a dramatic shift, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has officially acknowledged the existence of government-backed geoengineering programs – a revelation that confirms what skeptics and concerned citizens have alleged for decades.
Interestingly enough, what is left out of this list is precisely the spraying of the food supply
by these means, but it does not take a Nazi rocket scientist to figure
out that if one has people like Dr. Charles Lieber working in
nano-particles and breaching the blood-brain barrier, and people like
Baal Gates or corporations like MacBeth Pharmaceuticals
Moderna Pharmaceuticals working on ingestible quackcines, then this
agenda may also with reasonable plausibility be added to the list too.
The simple conclusion that may also be reasonably reached from this list is that the government has been actively engaged on poisoning its own population and - through the neurological consequences of the activities - inducing Alzheimers and other dementias as well.
However, what is really the most intriguing admission in this list is not the admission of government programs but that the Environmental Poisoning Agency "admitted tracking private actors engaged in geoengineering", a fact that would indicate "undisclosed corporate or international" actors. Who might such actors be? Well, consider, if there are such actors, they have to have deep penetration into the corporate world that (1) produces airline fuels, such that additives can be added to said fuels with or without the knowledge of the upper management of said corporations, and then (2) a means of tracking said specially modified fuels to certain flights where the fuel is loaded on to the aircraft doing the spraying (again, with or without the knowledge of the flight crews, air traffic controllers, or management of the airline company), and (3) perhaps a considerable penetration into the ground crews of various airports in order to facilitate all the above.
This kind of personnel infrastructure suggests (4) central coordination, and (5) a lot of money to support the activity (from the fuel additives themselves, to the personnel concerns). In other words, there is a vast and covert infrastructure behind this, and as the article avers, it may be international in extent.
Hmmm... international extent, lots of money, and an implied knowledge of chemicals, additives, and fuels... I can think of a few contenders that would check off those five points...
... and one of them was finally and formally liquidated only in 2003... Its name was Interessen Gesellschaft Farbenindustrie, A.G., otherwise known as I.G. Farben.
The bad news is that its component companies - all of international extent, and with the 'requisite ideological commitments" - remain, and one of those components, Bayer, just recently bought another major player in the genetic modification of foods and organisms business, Mon(ster)santo...
But there are, as I averred, other possibilities, depending upon the primary purpose that one assumes is behind the spraying, because in addition to the purpose of the modification of organisms, there is, as the article notes, the purpose of modifying the environment. For what purpose? Ostensibly, the purpose is always to protect the environment under the cover story of climate change. But that, indeed, discloses the implication that the real purpose(s) of such alteration may be hidden: weather modification can conveniently be hidden behind, and blamed upon, "climate change." But why modify weather at all? Why modify the environment? I've said it before, and I will say it again: it appears as if "they" are trying to modify, and increase the electrical conductivity of the atmosphere and of the planet dramatically, as if they are trying to weaponize both. And in that case, one looks to another "international program" perhaps, that of "breakaway civilizations" in possession of technologies that would require such environmental tinkering.
And note well, the first possibility, and the second, are not mutually exclusive, but may indeed - and as I have argued elsewhere - significantly overlap.
Those, I would argue, are the best places to start looking...
See you on the flip side...
(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)
*(DARPA: our continued thanks to J.B. for coming up with this one, and allowing us to use it.)
No comments:
Post a Comment