5442-5443: About the Land Recording Office Function (LRO) from Lincoln County Watch
We
started the Land Recording Office (LRO) and created the different State
LRO sections as a training wheels program that would allow us to create
a public database where people could publish their declarations safely
and each State could gain the experience of running such a service.
It
was always anticipated that each State would eventually develop its own
separate and independent Land Recording Office that isn't dependent on
any jointly shared database and which would be under its own control and
be part of that State's own program responsibilities.
It
was also anticipated that people would continue to have as many
reliable options as possible to publish their claims in addition to the
LRO functions.
We
were living in a reality where all the State of State Land Recording
Offices were closing down and many County Land Recording Offices were
going dark, too. Fewer and fewer options remained.
It
was to everyone's advantage to establish our own recording service,
and, also to everyone's advantage to not let that service become a
monopoly.
Monopolies
are evil and coercive by nature, and although those who start a service
may be the salt of the Earth, the nature of a monopoly interest is
coercive and corrupting over time.
The
danger of letting the State LRO have a Public Monopoly on recording and
publishing status declarations is that it could easily become
politicized and used to limit and dictate who can come home and who is
left adrift.
We've
seen enough of the world to know that State Assemblies are potentially
subject to political manipulation and cronyism and we don't want to go
there.
Also,
although the State LRO functions are international in nature, they
voluntarily and necessarily limit their functions to State business
within the borders of their State.
This
means that there is also a need for and use for an International Land
Recording and Publishing Service. That function was originally provided
by the LRS and is now being provided by the Global Family Bank's Land
Recording and Publishing Service.
Why
is this needed? Because (1) we could foresee a time and situation
where the State LROs would be completely overwhelmed with people
desperate to get their paperwork recorded and there would be very little
or no other help available; (2) we also have to take care of those
Americans who are working or living offshore in other countries -- an
international office gives them an online means to get their status
corrected even from overseas; (3) people from other countries are even
less able to find places to publish their status corrections than we
are, and at least from a Fiduciary standpoint, I have to be able to open
that doorway for them, too.
Later
on, others who are working the land repatriation effort and the need to
publish our interests in Federal Land Patents and pre-existing grants
have developed the Bucolic Law website for that special purpose, but
because we have to be on the land to claim the land patents, they also
offer the status correction process so that people can declare, record,
and publish their status correction at the same time as they publish
their land patent interests.
That
makes three solid recording services operating on our land jurisdiction
and under our Public Law. If more such services are needed, we will
welcome their development and encourage them to appreciate the gravity
of the responsibility they are undertaking to secure and preserve these
records for their fellow man.
Having
these public records available on electronic databases is a great thing
and I certainly encourage everyone to use them and yes, you can use
more than one such service and record more than one time --- which will
only help you gain access to more services and provide multiple records
you can use to demonstrate that you've made your political status
choice.
That
said, I have to observe that we didn't have searchable public databases
in 1860, so there is no requirement that you have to have your records
on such a database.
The
actual requirements are very simple. Your declaration has to be in
writing, must have a couple appropriate Witnesses, and has to be
published at least locally. And you need to have reasonable proof of
publication --- a newspaper ad, photos of you on different days in front
of a public bulletin board with your notice, etc.
This
is not as convenient nor as accessible as any of the three services,
but it does work and it is lawful and sufficient to establish your
chosen political status.
These
topics have recently come up in California so I thought I would go over
it all again, so that everyone understands why these functions are not
unique to State LRO's and what the requirements actually are.
Granna
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Two Hundred and Fifty Year Recap
By Anna Von Reitz
Often,
very often, we've had cause at the Federation level to stop and
contemplate the failures of our American Government. How did something
so brilliantly conceived and bulwarked in every way, fall into such
disrepair and forgetfulness?
There
were certainly evil and conspiratorial forces allied against us,
betrayal from within our Federal Subcontractors and their workforce,
treachery from Treaty Partners --- yet what fundamental flaws led to
this present circumstance?
We've
thought long and hard about this topic, above and beyond the actions of
other interests seeking our downfall. What did we fail to do? What
mistakes were made that need to be addressed going forward.
(1) Failure to properly educate and indoctrinate our children.
The
Founding Fathers knew what they were doing and they knew why in great
detail. This is demonstrated by Thomas Jefferson's listing of
grievances provided in The Unanimous Declaration of Independence, and
later in the protective provisions provided in the federal Constitutions
and the discussions leading up to their adoption.
Unfortunately,
the Sons and Grandsons who escaped the evils enumerated, didn't
sufficiently understand and value the protections that their Fathers
earned for them. This is most evident in the case of John Quicy Adams,
who allowed foreign interests to unduly influence him throughout his
career.
(2) Failure to pay sufficient attention to banking and bank activities.
Although
a boring and odious topic for most people, banking is unavoidably one
of the most important aspects of maintaining a sound currency and
economy --- and if we as a government are to protect our people and
their assets, we must pay attention to it.
Coming
out of the Revolutionary War, the British Territorial population left
within our borders was struggling under a great war debt levied on them
by the British Monarch.
These
people had fought bravely for King George in both the French and Indian
War and the War of Independence and had spent lavishly on armaments and
supplies to support the King's forces in both cases. With the
conclusion of the War of Independence, they were saddled with the costs
of both Wars.
This
led to them entering into repeated loans and associations with foreign
banks and the banks hiring bill collectors to ride herd on their
"American" investments. The Federal Reserve of that era was engaged to
manage this debt, but the Tories have never been able to pay off these
war debts, much less their share of the British Crown's subsequent
"wars". This is part of their National Debt to this day.
The
new American Government had significant war debts, too, that led to
mortgaging land assets held by the various new States and the creation
of the "United States Bank" as a means to manage and repay this debt.
President Andrew Jackson managed to pay off this obligation and "kill
the bank", so that American landholdings and sovereignty were preserved
going into the 1840's.
Over
the years of usurpation and deliberate efforts to impersonate us and
substitute British Territorial government for American Government, the
interlopers have, of course, misrepresented their debts as our debts.
Avoiding
this kind of malfeasance and fraud requires keeping a sharper eye on
finances and especially on any borrowing that is necessary and the
collateralization of any assets encumbered by such borrowing.
(3) Greater attention to contracts and contract language and natural limitations built into jurisdictions.
One
of the "Great Faults" pointed out by Jefferson Davis, who served as the
President of the Confederate States of America, and who was
arguably one of the greatest legal scholars to ever live in this
country, was the language used in The Articles of Confederation.
These
Articles presumed to create a "perpetual union" -- an aim that was and
is beyond the scope of the air jurisdiction to maintain in the same
sense that it applied to the natural union of land and soil. It was
this self-evident flaw that the Union Army enforced--- but the
enforcement in no way legitimizes the failed contract.
As
Davis pointed out, the union between land and soil is unavoidable and
reciprocal in nature, but no such binding force can be found to justify a
perpetual union of business interests. The contract itself, meaning The
Articles of Confederation, was fatally flawed and the Southern States
were not obligated to honor it as a result.
We
wouldn't argue with Jefferson Davis on this point; his suppositional
analysis of the subject matter is deadly accurate to this day, and if we
are faced with rewriting new Articles of Confederation as a part of
reconstruction of the missing cylinders of our governmental engine, we
will have to pay far more attention to the language and the practical
limitations of such a contract.
(4) Stipulated periodic review of Treaty performances and alteration of legal jargon.
Our
Forefathers accepted that if something isn't broken, don't fix it;
accordingly, they waited for Treaty violations to occur and for some
harm to come from the violation before addressing it.
They
were managing a land and soil based government and were not very
attuned to the shifting, wheedling, constantly changing Law of the Sea
-- so they underestimated the power of this seemingly alien form of law
and its ability to creep up upon the land -- which is how a large part
of the evils practiced against us came to be.
If,
every two to four years, our government had disciplined itself to
review contract performance by the Federal Subcontractors, and if we had
published this review and required corrections, we wouldn't be in the
present circumstance because the Public would have been expecting the
result of the review and would have been alerted to the fact that a
third of the total intended government was missing.
It
was the lack of such a periodic review and publication of it for Public
cognizance that allowed the remaining foreign-based Federal
Subcontractors to usurp upon us so successfully and for so long.
This
is also how the Federal Subcontractor's performance continued to erode
until we have been faced with the specter of corporate "public policy"
being allowed to overstand the Federal Constitutions.
Without
Public Review of performance and public knowledge of the Treaties and
contracts under review, the Federal Subcontractors were left to their
own reconnaissance and the foxes were indeed in charge of the hen
house.
A
similar periodic review of legal jargon to forestall its use to
redefine parties to contract and other abuses would have been very
useful in forestalling many of the specific evils visited upon us.
Constant redefinitions of the words "United States" and "United States
of America", obfuscations resulting from failure to add words like
"Incorporated", and redefinitions of words like "person" to function as
legal terms, have promoted the frauds against us. We obviously need to
closely scrutinize the Law of the Sea and changes in legal jargon that
are detrimental to us.
(5) A thorough and Public understanding of the crimes of unlawful conversion, impersonation, barratry, and monopolization.
The
only way for a crime to be committed without consequence is: (1)
failure by the public to recognize it as a crime; and (2) lack of a
means to enforce against it.
The
personage crimes of impersonation and barratry leading to the further
crimes of unlawful conversion and monopolization have featured heavily
in the current malaise.
When
Congressman Louis T. McFadden first raised the alarm during the early
years of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt administration and called out the
"unlawful conversion" being pursued by the British Territorial and
Municipal Corporations acting as our Federal Subcontractors and Service
Providers --- hardly anyone in the Public knew what he was talking
about.
Going
forward, every housewife and school child must have a firm grasp of
"impersonation", "identity theft", "enfranchisement", "barratry",
"unlawful conversion" and "monopoly".
Some
would argue that the board game "Monopoly" has taught us all we need to
know about how monopoly works; but what it does not teach sufficiently
are the evils of monopoly and the way monopolies lead to the exercise of
coercive power.
(6) Enforcement against monopolies failed.
There
are reasons why monopolies are both illegal and unlawful, but we have
been seduced by the Siren Song of Monopoly -- especially Public
Monopolies -- and have succumbed far too readily to their evil charms.
The
argument in favor of Public Monopolies like the Post Office includes
standardization of service and expeditious regulation of that service.
This comes at the cost of ever-increasing cost creep and expansion of
the "service" -- whatever it is -- amid the perils of self-regulation.
Monopolies
of public services unavoidably makes the public dependent on the
Service Provider. The servant becomes the master in such a scenario and
the public suffers accordingly. Competition from other delivery
services such as Federal Express and DHL in this country and worldwide
helps keep the Post Office in bounds, but other Public Monopolies have
flourished and gone astray and caused harm to an unbelievable extent.
The
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is one example. They are an "agency"
-- a hired subcontractor of our Federal Subcontractors --
with
virtually no competition or meaningful oversight. This private,
unelected, and unaccountable entity has been allowed arbitrary and
inappropriate power to decide food and drug safety issues.
Not
surprisingly, the FDA has also been paid to look the other way -- to
approve food and drugs and additives and practices that should have
never been approved by a rational being.
For
example, in a recent FDA public service notice campaign, people are
being warned that tobacco manufacturers have been allowed to add
addictive substances to their products. That much is true-- but the FDA
is still painting "nicotine", which is naturally found in tobacco, as
the addictive substance, and that is untrue. Nicotine isn't addictive.
It's other separate compounds that don't naturally occur in tobacco
which are deliberately added to tobacco products to make them addictive
--- and the FDA approved this practice.
Millions
of Americans have been hooked on tobacco products and suffered harm to
their pocketbooks and physical health as a result; why would an agency
watchdog permit the tobacco companies to add known addictive substances
to their naturally un-addictive product?
Answer: the Federal Government gets a cut of the profits from its ability to regulate alcohol, tobacco, and firearms.
This
kind of dirty dealing against the Public Interest and in favor of the
profiteering of incorporated entities, has become commonplace, while
corrupt privatized organizations are entrusted to perform actual service
to the Public --- like outlawing the purposeful addition of addictive
substances to foods, drinks, and drugs.
Inevitably,
the creation of monopoly interests like the Food and Drug
Administration imbued with coercive regulatory powers that are abused or
omitted against the Public Interest, start out with the premise of:
we're good people, we wouldn't ever abuse the Public....
Throughout
our history, this same naive premise has infiltrated key decisions and
the temptation to establish monopolies in an effort to control various
functions has repeatedly won out over more sober and realistic means of
oversight.
Just
because we are good people and we mean well and we would never harm the
Public Interest doesn't mean that fifteen years from now our
replacements have the same moral character and devotion. Thus,
monopolies, especially Public Monopolies, must be viewed with a
jaundiced eye that takes in the possibility of future corruption and
abuses of monopoly power, even if the present crew is impeccable.
Even
worse than straight up privatized monopolies like the Food and Drug
Administration are the self-regulatory bodies that have been entrusted
with the oversight of entire sectors of the industrial economy.
Where
profit is involved, and may be adversely impacted by such trivial
concerns as public health, no industry can be trusted to discipline
itself. And no industry should be protected from liability for its acts
and omissions.
As we go forward we must overhaul all the means of public oversight currently in existence and find better answers.
(7) Proliferation of private insurance and insurance companies.
The lust to profit from actuarial tables has been unmatched since the days of Rome.
Private insurance is legalized gambling.
When
the "government" service providers seize upon private or public
property and mortgage it to generate credit for them to spend, those
same service providers should be responsible for ensuring the safe
return of such property. Instead, they impose on the private owner to
provide them with insurance for their risk management and their unseen
use of the victim's property asset.
This filthy little quid pro quo --- forcing
people to buy private insurance for assets that have been
surreptitiously "securitized" for use as government
contractor collateral --- has created a huge, burgeoning insurance
sector economy.
The
victims, of course, don't know that their house or their car has been
seized upon as collateral by the criminal corporations acting as
government service providers. The victims think they are buying
insurance to protect their own assets, but instead, they are buying
insurance to protect assets the governmental services contractors have
purloined --- and should be insuring themselves.
This
entire fraud scheme brought to us by our erstwhile "governmental
service providers" --- both their undisclosed use of our private assets
as collateral benefiting them and their demand that we insure the assets
they are using against loss --- are outrageous impositions that have
created the private insurance industry out of thin air.
This
entire scenario is criminal. The undisclosed use of private property
assets as collateral for commercial debt, like the demand that the
victims pay for insuring the purloined collateral against damage or loss
-- is insufferable.
This
points out the need to closely examine and potentially outlaw private
insurance and certainly to outlaw undisclosed securitization of private
assets -- including the securitization of our labor as a public asset,
which amounts to either peonage or slavery -- going forward
This
critique of our American Government and its "United States" Federal
Subcontractors' practices reveals a prevailing theme -- failure to
adequately inform and educate the American Public by failure to
establish consistent notification, review, and reporting requirements,
along with failure to establish periodic review of treaty and contract
performance published for Public Review.
We won't make the same mistakes again.
Granna
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment