----------------------------------------
Chapter Five
How the Secret Society formed a Coalition With
the Communist-Socialist Conspiracy Groups
Dr. Quigley bluntly confesses that the International Bankers who had set out to remake
the world were perfectly confident that they could use their money to acquire the cooperation and
eventual control of the Communist-Socialist conspiratorial groups. In
fact, John Ruskin of
Oxford had persuaded the original Rhodes-Milner Round Table Groups that the way to federate
the world was along socialistic lines, i.e., by having all property, industry, agriculture,
communications, transportation, education and polit
ical affairs in the hands of a small cadre of
financially-controlled political leaders who would organize the world and its peoples in a way
which would compel everyone to do what was good for the new, world-society.
It may seem somewhat contradictory that the very people whom Marx identified as the
epitome of "Capitalism" should be conspiring with the followers of Marx to overthrow
traditional Capitalism and replace it with Socialism. But the record supports the Quigl
ey
Power from any source tends to create an appetite for additional power. Power coming
from wealth tends to create an appetite for political power and visa versa. It was almost
inevitable that the super-rich would one day aspire to control not only their ow
n wealth, but the
wealth of the whole world. To achieve this, they were perfectly willing to feed the ambitions of
the power-hungry political conspirators who were committed to the overthrow of all existing
governments and the establishments of a central w
This, of course, was a risky business for the Anglo-American secret society. The
orld-wide dictatorship along socialist lines.
super-rich were gambling on the expectation that when the violence and reconstruction had been
completed by the political conspirators, the super-rich would then take over (l
ike Plato's
philosopher-kings, or ruling class), to guide mankind hopefully and compulsively into a whole
new era of universal peace and universal prosperity.
To take such a risk, the cadre of the super-rich had to ignore the most elementary aspects
of the ferocity of the left-wing conspiratorial
[page 39]
mentality. Mao Tse-tung has articulated
the basic Communist conviction that political power comes from the
they seize control it is their expressed intention to use the gun to prevent the super-rich or anyone
them years ago if it had not been for the most sinister kind of depraved maneuvering behind the
barrel of a gun and once
else from taking that control away from them.
Nevertheless, the secret society of the London-Wall Street axis elected to take this risk.
The master-planners have attempted to control the global conspiratorial groups by feeding them
vast quantities of money for their revolutionary work and then financ
ing their opposition if they
seemed to be getting out of control. This policy has required the leaders of London and Wall
Street to deliberately align themselves with dictatorial forces which have committed crimes
against humanity in volume and severity un
and support international intrigue by the most ruthless kind of political psychopaths.
precedented in history. It has required them to finance
Studies show that many of these totalitarian political demagogues never would have come
to power without the financial support of the super-rich. Studies further show that in many
countries where the conspirators have taken over, the people would have ris
en up and overthrown
scenes by the agents of these wealthy master planners.
But for all this, Dr. Quigley pleads that these London-Wall Street manipulators had the
best of intentions and were really angels in disguise. Here is the way he says it:
"The chief aims of this elaborate, semi-secret organization were largely commendable: to
coordinate the international activities and outlooks of the English-speaking world into one
(which would largely, it is true, be that of the London group); to work to
maintain peace; to help
backward, colonial, and underdeveloped areas to advance toward stability, law and order, and
prosperity
along lines somewhat similar to those taught at Oxford and the University of London
(especially the school of Economics and the
schools of African and Oriental studies)
." 1(57)
In this quotation emphasis is added so the reader will not miss Dr. Quigley's admission
that the remaking of the world by the super-rich was to be along the socialist lines taught at those
British institutions which look upon global Socialism as the hope
blacker with each Congressional investigation:
of the world.
Dr. Quigley then continues his defense of these men whose record has been growing
[page 40]
"These organizations and their financial backers were in no sense reactionary or Fascistic
persons, as Communist propaganda would like to depict them. Quite the contrary. They were
gracious and cultured gentlemen of somewhat limited social experience who
were much
concerned with the freedom of expression of minorities and the rule of law for all, who
constantly thought in terms of Anglo-American solidarity, of political partition and federation,
and who were convinced that they could gracefully civilize th
e Boers of South Africa, the Irish,
the Arabs, and the Hindus, and who are largely responsible for the partitions of Ireland, Palestine,
and India, as well as the federations of South Africa, Central Africa, and the West Indies.
Their desire to win over the opposition by cooperation worked with Smuts but failed with
Hertzog, worked with Gandhi but failed with Menon, worked with Stresemann but failed with
Hitler, and has shown little chance of working with any Soviet leader. If th
eir failures now loom
larger than their successes, this should not be allowed to conceal the high motives with which
they attempted both."
2(58)
Having covered up the sins of his comrades-in-arms with the cloak of good intentions,
Dr. Quigley returns to his role of historian:
How the Secret Society Became the Main Support For the Communists
"It was this group of people, whose wealth and influence so exceeded their experience
and understanding, who provided much of the framework of influence which the Communist
sympathizers and fellow travelers took over in the United States in the 1930's.
It
must be
recognized that the power that these energetic left-wingers exercised was never their own power
or Communist power but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie
Of course, members of the dynastic banking families had been financing the
Russian-oriented revolutionists for many years. Trotsky, in his biography, refers to some of these
loans from British financiers going back as far as 1907. By 1917 the major subsid
ies for the
revolution were being arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred Milner (of the
Morgan-Rothschild-Rhodes confederacy). Milner, it will be recalled, was the founder of
England's secret "Round Table" group which started the Royal Institute f
or International Affairs
in England and the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States.
One American source gave Trotsky, Lenin and the other Communist leaders around
twenty million dollars for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia. This was Jacob Schiff of
Kuhn, Loeb and
[page 41]
Company.
4(60)
Other international bankers involved in the financing of the Communist take-over of
Russia were Olaf Aschberg of the Nye Banken of Stockholm, the Rhine Westphalian Syndicate,
and a wealthy banker named Jivotovsky whose daughter later married Leon Trotsky.
However,
the chief European funding came from Max Warburg of Germany whose two brothers, Felix and
Paul Warburg, had moved to New York. Felix Warburg had become Jacob Schiff's son-in-law
and Paul Warburg became Solomon Loeb's son-in-law. They both became
partners in the Kuhn,
Loeb and Company. (Paul Warburg, it will be recalled, had also been the principal promoter of
the Federal Reserve System in the United States.)
Between the Warburgs and Schiffs the money flowing to the Communist revolutionaries
must have been substantial. Between 1918 and 1922 Lenin is supposed to have sent more than
600 million rubles in gold to Kuhn, Loeb and Company, Schiff's firm.
5(61)
How the American Branch Of the Secret Society Barely Escaped Being
...." 3(59)
Exposed
"... once the anger and suspicions of the American people were aroused, as they were by
1950, it was a fairly simple matter to get rid of the Red sympathizers. [Congressional committee
reports show that they didn't get rid of them at all. The master plann
ers just reshuffled and
reassigned them. As soon as the Supreme Court had made shambles of the U.S. internal security
laws, the hard-core came out of the woodwork again -- WCS]. Before this could be done,
however, a congressional committee, following backw
ard to their source the threads which led
from admitted Communists like Whitaker Chambers, through Alger Hiss, and the Carnegie
Endowment to Thomas Lamont and the Morgan Bank, fell into the whole complicated network
of the interlocking tax-exempt foundatio
ns.
"The Eighty-Third Congress in July 1953 set up a Special Committee to investigate
Tax-Exempt Foundations with Representative B. Carroll Reece, of Tennessee, as chairman. It
soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigat
ion went too
far and that the 'most respected' newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of
wealth, would not get excited enough about any revelations to make the publicity worthwhile,
[page 42]
in terms of votes or campaign contributions. An interesting report showing the
Left-wing associations of the interlocking nexus of tax exempt foundations was issued in 1954
rather quietly. Four years later, the Reece Committee's general counsel, Rene A. Wormser, wrote
a shocked, but not shocking book
Influence
." 6(62)
on the subject called
Foundations: Their Power and
Rationale Behind the Support Of Communism
"More than fifty years ago the Morgan firm decided to infiltrate the Left-wing political
movements in the United States. This was relatively easy to do, since these groups were starved
for funds and eager for a voice to reach the people. Wall Street suppl
not to destroy, dominate, or take over but was really threefold: (1) to keep informed about the
ied both. The purpose was
thinking of Left-wing or liberal groups; (2) to provide them with a mouthpiece so that they could
'blow off steam,' and (3) to have a
final veto on their publicity and possibly on their actions, if
they ever went 'radical.' There was nothing really new about this decision, since other financiers
had talked about it and even attempted it earlier."
"To Morgan all political parties were simply organizations to be used, and the firm
always was careful to keep a foot in all camps. Morgan himself, Dwight Morrow, and other
partners were allied with the Republicans; Russell C. Leffingwell was allied with
7(63)
the Democrats;
Grayson Murphy was allied with the extreme Right; and Thomas W. Lamont was allied with the
Left. Like the Morgan interest in libraries, museums, and art, its inability to distinguish between
loyalty to the United States and loyalty to Englan
d, its recognition of the need for social work
among the poor, the multi-partisan political views of the Morgan firm in domestic politics went
back to the original founder of the firm, George Peabody (1795-1869).
"To this same seminal figure may be attributed the use of tax-exempt foundations for
controlling these activities, as may be observed in many part of America to this day, in the use of
inclu
Peabody foundations to support Peabody libraries and museums. Unfortun
"In fact, all the evidence would indicate that Tom Lamont was simply Morgan's apostle to
ately, we do not have
space here for this great and untold story, but it must be remembered that what we do say is part
of a much larger picture."
8(64)
Lamont Represented Morgan In Various Communist Projects
"Our concern at the moment is with the links between Wail Street and the Left, especially
the Communists. Here the chief link was the Thomas W. Lamont family. This family was in
many ways parallel to
[page 43]
the Straight family. Tom Lamont had been brought into the
Morgan firm, as Straight was several years later, by Henry P. Davison, a Morgan partner from
1909. Lamont became a partner in 1910, as Straight did in 1913. Each had a wife who became a
patroness of Leftish causes, and two sons, of which the e
lder was a conventional banker, and the
younger was a Left-wing sympathizer and sponsor.
the Left in succession to Straight, a change made necessary by the latter's premature death in
1918. Both were financial supporters of liberal publications, in Lamont
's case The Saturday
Review of Literature, which he supported throughout the 1920's and 1930's and the New York
Post, which he owned from 1918 to 1924."
9(65)
The Lamonts Helped Set Up Communist Front Organizations
"The chief evidence, however, can be found in the files of the HUAC [House
Un-American Activities Committee] which show Tom Lamont, his wife Flora, and his son
Corliss as sponsors and financial angels to almost a score of extreme Left organizations,
ding the Communist Party itself. Among these we need mention only two. One of these was
a Communist-front organization, the Trade Union Services, Incorporated, of New York City,
which in 1947 published fifteen trade-union papers for various CIO unions.
"Among its officers were Corliss Lamont and Frederick Vanderbilt Field (another link
between Wall Street and the Communists). The latter was on the editorial boards of the official
Communist newspaper in New York, the
Daily Worker
, as well as its magazine
,
The New
Masses
, and was the chief link between the Communists and the Institute of Pacific Relations in
1929-1947. Corliss Lamont was the leading light in another Communist organization which
started life in the 1920's as the Friends of the Soviet Union,
American-Soviet Friendship."
10(66)
but in 1943 was reorganized, with
Lamont as chairman of the board and chief incorporator, as the National Council of
The Lamonts Defied the U.S. Government In Its Attempt
to Expose Their Operations
"During this whole period of over two decades, Corliss Lamont [Tom Lamont's son], with
the full support of his parents, was one of the chief figures in 'fellow traveler' circles and one of
of
the chief spokesmen for the Soviet point of view both in these org
anizations and also in
connections which came to him either as son of the most influential man in Wall Street or as
professor of philosophy at Columbia
[page 44]
University....
"In January, 1946, Corliss Lamont was called before HUAC to give testimony on the
National Council of American-Soviet Friendship. He refused to produce records, was
subpoenaed, refused, was charged with contempt of Congress, and was so cited by the House
Representatives on June 26, 1946.... The adverse publicity continued, yet when Thomas Lamont
rewrote his will, on January 6, 1948, Corliss Lamont remained in it as co-heir to his father's
fortune of scores of millions of dollars."
11(67)
Morgan-Rockefeller-Carnegie Foundations Operated Through the IPR
to Push China Into the Communist Camp
"In 1951 the Subcommittee on Internal Security of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the
so-called McCarran Committee, sought to show that China had been lost to the Communists by
the deliberate actions of a group of academic experts on the Far East and Comm
unist fellow
travelers whose work in that direction was controlled and coordinated by the Institute of Pacific
Relations (IPR).
The influence of the Communists in IPR is well established, but the patronage of
Wall Street is less well known.
"The IPR was a private association of ten independent national councils in ten countries
concerned with affairs in the Pacific. The headquarters of the IPR and the American Council of
IPR were both in New York and were closely associated on an interlockin
about $2.5 million dollars over the quarter-century from 1925 to 1950 of which about half, in
g basis. Each spent
each case, came from the Carnegie Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation (which were
themselves interlocking groups controlled by an allian
ce of Morgan and Rockefeller interests on
Wall Street). Much of the rest [of the money], especially of the American Council, came from
firms closely allied to these two Wall Street interests, such as Standard Oil, International
Telephone and Telegraph, Int
ernational General Electric, the National City Bank, and the Chase
National Bank....
"The financial deficits which occurred each year were picked up by financial angels,
almost all with close Wall Street connections. The chief identifiable contributions here were
about $60,000 from Frederick Vanderbilt Field over eighteen years, $14,700 f
member of Lee, Higginson in Boston who seems to have been Jerome D. Greene."
rom Thomas
Lamont over fourteen years, $800 from Corliss Lamont (only after 1947) and $18,000 from a
12(68)
[page 45]
How the IPR Acquired Control Of U.S. Policies In the Far East
"In addition, large sums of money each year were directed to private individuals, for
research and travel expenses from similar sources, chiefly the great financial foundations.
East
"Most of these awards for work in the Far Eastern area required approval or
recommendation from members of IPR. Moreover, access to publication and recommendations to
academic positions in the handful of great American universities concerned with the Far
required similar sponsorship. And, finally, there can be little doubt that consultant jobs on Far
Eastern matters in the State Department or other government agencies were largely restricted to
IPR-approved people.
"The individuals who published, who had money, found jobs, were consulted, and who
were appointed intermittently to government missions were those who were tolerant of the IPR
line. The fact that all these lines of communication passed through the Ivy Lea
their scattered equivalents west of the Appalachians, such as Chicago, Stanford, or California,
gue universities or
unquestionably went back to Morgan's influence in handling large academic endowments."
Dr. Quigley Admits the Facts But Tries to Obscure the
Devastating Consequences of Outright Betrayal
"There can be little doubt that the more active academic members of the IPR, the
professors and publicists who became members of its governing board (such as Owen Lattimore,
Joseph P. Chamberlain, and Philip C. Jessup of Columbia, William W. Lockwood of P
rinceton,
John K. Fairbanks of Harvard, and others) and the administrative staff (which became, in time,
the most significant influence in its policies) developed an IPR party line. It is, furthermore,
fairly clear that this IPR line had many points in com
mon both with the Kremlin's party line on
the Far East and with the State Department's policy line in the same area.
"The interrelations among these, or the influence of one on another, is highly disputed.
Certainly no conclusions can be drawn. Clearly there were some Communists, even party
members, involved (such as Frederick Vanderbilt Field), but it is much less clea
r that there was
any disloyalty to the United States. Furthermore, there was a great deal of intrigue both to help
those who agreed with the IPR line and to influence United States government policy in this
direction.
"
But there is no evidence of which I am aware of any explicit plot or conspiracy to direct
American policy in a direction favorable either to the Soviet Union or to international
communism.
14(70)
Efforts of the
[page 46]
radical Right to support their convictions about these last
points undoubtedly did great, lasting, and unfair damage to the reputations and interests of many
people."
What Did Government Investigations Reveal Concerning IPR?
Dr. Quigley's shift of hats from historian to apologist pops up frequently throughout his
1,300-page volume, but nowhere is it more vividly evident than in the passage just quoted.
13(69)
In this passage Dr. Quigley has tried to present the IPR party line, the State Department
party line and the Soviet party line as three separate entities which just happened to coincide on
the China issue. But barely ten pages earlier Dr. Quigley had been
States Congress and the investigations of IPR by th
For example, toward the close of World War II, the office of the
e FBI.
boasting how the IPR, a Soviet
agent like Alger Hiss and top managers of the U.S. State Department were all interlocked
through the London-Wall Street global control groups. He wrote: "Dean Rusk, Secretary of State
after 1961, formerly president of the Ro
ckefeller Foundation and Rhodes Scholar at Oxford
(1931-1933), is as much a member of this nexus as Alger Hiss, the Dulles brothers, Jerome
Greene, James T. Shotwell, John W. Davis, Elihu Root, or Philip Jessup."
And what was the "party line" the members of this "nexus" had evolved which just
15(71)
happened to coincide with that of the Soviet Union? It was simply that 600,000,000 Chinese
should be turned over to the Communist bloc after the U.S. had fought the Japanese
free. It was not the "radical right" who damaged the reputation of these particular gentlemen by
to keep them
exposing their "nexus" of IPR-State Department-Soviet intrigue, but the findings of the United
Amerasia
magazine
published by IPR was ordered investigated by the Attorney General. June 6, 1945, FBI agents
searched the Amerasia headquarters and found over 1,800 top-secret documents whi
ch had been
stolen from government files. Dr. Quigley claimed that he could find no evidence that IPR had
engaged in any "plot or conspiracy to direct American policy in a direction favorable either to the
Soviet Union or to International Communism." To re
ignore the findings of fact by the bi-partisan Congressional committee which were as follows:
ach such a conclusion he had to completely
"During the period 1945-1949, persons associated with the Institute of Pacific Relations
were instrumental in keeping United States policy on a course favorable to Communist objectives
in China.
[page 47]
Persons associated with the IPR were influential in 1949 in giving United
States far eastern policy a direction that furthered Communist purposes."
The Reece report listed whole columns of IPR members involved in Soviet intrigue,
16(72)
many of them officers of the U.S. State Department.
Dr. Quigley asks us to believe that even though there were "some Communists, even
party members involved" in IPR, "it is much less dear that there was any disloyalty to the United
States."
17(73)
Here is what the Reece Committee found:
"The IPR has been considered by the American Communist Party and by Soviet officials
as an instrument of Communist policy, propaganda and military intelligence. The IPR
disseminated and sought to popularize false information including information originat
ing from
Soviet and Communist sources....
"Owen Lattimore was, from some time beginning in the 1930's, a conscious articulate
instrument of the Soviet conspiracy. Effective leadership by the end of 1934 established and
implemented an official connection with G.N. Voitinski, Chief of the Far Easte
Communist International....
admitted:
One of the singular and amazing things about Dr. Quigley's book is his willingness to
rn Division of the
"The net effect of IPR activities on United States public opinion has been such as to serve
internal Communist interests and to affect adversely the interests of the United States."
Not to mention the interests of 600,000,000 Chinese!
frankly and unashamedly confess some of the most serious acts of subversion by his
comrades-in-arms and then think nothing of turning around and flatly denying that they
have had a hand in such a foul and dirty business as betraying people like the Chinese to
would
Communism.
We have observed above how shrewdly Dr. Quigley tried to obscure the catastrophic
consequences of the betrayal of the Chinese, and yet, just over twenty pages earlier he had
"There is considerable truth in the [Nationalist] China Lobby's contention that the
American experts on China were organized into a single interlocking group which had a general
consensus of a Leftish character. It is also true that this group, from its c
ontrol of funds, academic
recommendations, and research or publication opportunities, could favor persons who accepted
the established consensus and could injure, financially or in professional advancement, persons
who did not accept it.
"It is also true that the established group, by its influence
[page 48]
on book reviewing in
The New York Times
, the
Herald Tribune
, the
Saturday Review
, a few magazines, including the
'liberal weeklies,' and in the professional journals, could advance or
career. It is also true that these things were done in the United States in regard to the Far East by
hamper any specialist's
Institute of Pacific Relations, that this organization had been infiltrated by Communists, and
by Communist sympathizers, and
that much of this group's influence arose from its access to and
control over the flow of funds from financial foundations to scholarly activities
." 18(74)
In just a moment we will take a look at some of these secret, behind-the-scenes
manipulators who poured millions of dollars into pro-Communist, pro-Socialist subversion of the
United States and her allies.
Dr. Quigley Says Anti-Communists
Shoot Below the Real Target
Throughout his book, Dr. Quigley ridicules the stupid "Radical Right" (his favorite
epithet for ordinary Americans trying to preserve their Constitutional prerogatives) and says they
are missing the real target when they blame all the subversion and chica
nery on the Communists.
the
19(75)
One would expect him to go ahead and flatly deny that any genuine conspiracy exists, but
not Dr. Quigley.
His attack on the "Radical Right" is primarily because of their "ignorance" in failing to
recognize the vast, secret network of master planners for whom the Communists are working,
particularly in Europe and the United States. in this connection and as pa
philanthropic work for two years, then trustee to the Rockefeller In
rt of his "confessional,"
Dr. Quigley describes with obvious satisfaction the antics of a notorious behind-the-scenes
operator named Jerome D. Greene.
How Jerome Greene Rose to Power in the London-New York Axis
"One of the most interesting members of this Anglo-American power structure was
Jerome D. Greene (1874-1959). Born in Japan of missionary parents, Greene graduated from
Harvard's college and law school by 1899 and became secretary to Harvard's president a
corporation in 1901-1910. This gave him contacts with Wall Street which made him general
nd
manager of the Rockefeller Institute (1910-1912),
[page 49]
assistant to John D. Rockefeller in
stitute, to the Rockefeller
Foundation, and to the Rockefeller General Education Board until 1939.
"For fifteen years (1917-1932) he was with the Boston investment banking firm of Lee,
Higginson, and Company, most of the period as its chief officer, as well as with its London
branch. As executive secretary of the American section of the Allied Maritime
Council, stationed in London in 1918, he lived in Toynbee Hall, the world's first settlement
International Affairs.
" 20(76)
New York branch of Lionel Curtis's Institute of
Transport
house, which had been founded by Alfred Milner and his friends in 1884. This brought him in
contact with the Round Table Group in England, a contact whi
he was secretary to the Reparations Commission at the Paris Peace Conference. Accordingly, on
his return to the United States he was one of the early figures in the
ch was strengthened in 1919 when
establishment of the Council
on Foreign Relations
, which s
erved as the
Jerome Greene Is Identified As the Spider In the IPR Web
"Greene is of much greater significance in indicating the real influence within the
Institute of Pacific Relations than any Communists or fellow travelers. He wrote the constitution
for the IPR in 1926, was for years the chief conduit for Wall Street fund
s and influence into the
organization, was treasurer of the American Council for three years, and chairman for three more,
as well as chairman of the International Council for four years.
"Jerome Greene is a symbol of much more than the Wall Street influence in the IPR. He
is also a symbol of the relationship between the financial circles of London and those of the
eastern United States which
reflects one of the most powerful influences in twentieth-century
American and world history
. The two ends of this English-speaking axis have sometimes been
called, perhaps facetiously, the English and American establishments.
"There is, however, a considerable degree of truth behind the joke, a truth which reflects a
very real power structure. It is this power structure which the radical right in the United States
has been attacking for years in the belief that they were attac
king the Communists.
This is
particularly true when these attacks are directed, as they so frequently are, at 'Harvard Socialism,'
or at 'Left-wing newspapers' like
The New York Times
, and the
Washington Post
, or at
foundations
Education."
[page 50]
21(77)
and their dependen
t establishments, such as the Institute of International
There Is a Conspiracy Bigger Than the Communist Conspiracy
"There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network
which
operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right believes the Communists act
. In fact,
this network which we may identify as
aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of i
the Round Table groups
with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of
, has n
o aversion to cooperating
this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the
early 1960's, to examine its papers and
secret records.
I have no aversion to it or to most of its
ts instruments.
have quoted this passage earlier, but repeat it here because it pertains most significantly to the
ct we are discussing.)
----------------------------------------
Chapter Six
The Council on Foreign Relations
Now it is time to take a closer look at the actual conspiratorial machinery of the global
network of secret power, particularly as it relates to the domestic and foreign policy of the United
States. As we have already discovered, the Secret Society set up
with Rothschild, Morgan, Carnegie, Rockefeller, et al., was directed by a small highly secret
by Cecil Rhodes in conjunction
Round Table Group. This secret group then set up fronts for the purposes of carry
No comments:
Post a Comment