Video: The Non-existent “2019 New Coronavirus”: Michel Chossudovsky
Michel Chossudovsky’s video interview focusses on the identity of the “novel coronavirus” allegedly detected in Wuhan, Hubei Province in December 2019. The text below constitutes a summary focussing on key issues and relevant concepts. See the author’s full text click here.
.
.
.
Introduction
Destabilizing the social, political and economic structure of 190 sovereign countries cannot constitute a “solution” to combating a novel coronavirus which mysteriously emerged in Wuhan, Hubei province (PRC) in late December 2019. That was the imposed “solution” —implemented in several stages from the very outset–, leading to The March 2020 Lockdown and the Rollout of a so-called Covid 19 “Vaccine” in December 2020, which since its inception has resulted in an upward trend in excess mortality.
.
Fake science was supportive of this devastating agenda. The lies were sustained by a massive media disinformation campaign. 24/7, Incessant and Repetitive “Covid alerts” in the course of more than three years.
The historic March 11, 2020 lockdown triggered economic and social chaos Worldwide. It was an act of “economic warfare”: a war against humanity.
The New Virus: 2019-nCoV
The official story is that a dangerous NEW VIRUS was detected in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in December 2019. It was entitled 2019-nCoV which stands for “2019 New (n) Corona (Co) Virus (V)”.
On January 1, 2020, “the Chinese health authorities closed the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan following Western media reports claiming that wild animals sold there may have been the source of the virus.
As of early January 2020, it was the object of extensive media coverage and an unfolding Worldwide fear campaign. Media disinformation went into high gear.
“The Chinese authorities (allegedly) “identified a new type of virus” on January 7, 2020, using the RT-PCR test. No specific details were provided regarding the process of isolation of the virus.
The Mysterious “Identity of the New Virus”
The name of the virus was first identified in December 2019 as: 2019 novel coronavirus: 2019 nCoV
And then mysteriously a change in the name of the virus took place on February 11, 2020.
The 2019 novel coronavirus: 2019-nCoV designation was abandoned. Henceforth the “2019 New Virus” would be designated as:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2: SARS-CoV-2
which stands for “SARS – Corona (Co) Virus(V)-2″.
There was no longer a “n” prefix (suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 is not a NEW VIRUS). The “n” prefix was replaced by a “2” suffix
What is the meaning of SARS-CoV-2.
More specifically what is the meaning of the mysterious “2” suffix?
It pertains to a 20 year old virus entitled:
2003-Novel Coronavirus Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: 2003-SARS-CoV
“The Novel Coronavirus Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” broke out in Guangdong, Province, PRC in 2002.
“We received clinical specimens from patients in seven countries and tested them, using virus-isolation techniques, electron-microscopical and histologic studies, and molecular and serologic assays, in an attempt to identify a wide range of potential pathogens.”
While 2003-SARS-CoV, was categorized as a New Virus in 2002-2003. it can by no means be categorized as a New Virus in 2020-2023.
“New Virus” versus “Old Virus”: the 2002-2003 “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” (SARS)
SARS-CoV-2 –which since February 11, 2020 has become the official name of the 2019 novel coronavirus– cannot be categorized as a A NEW VIRUS.
The text above provides a summary. It is based on a more detailed article entitled:
There Never Was a “New Virus”, There Never was a Pandemic
By , November 29, 2023
Video: The Non-existent “New Virus”
Note: Minor technical problem.
The video starts at 0.34″. Go to 0.34″ manually. To access Rumble and/or comment click the lower right hand corner of the screen.
No comments:
Post a Comment