Thursday, February 15, 2024
4663-4665: Remember -- No Act of Legislation from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Remember---
no act of legislation applies to the General Public. It only applies
to public officials, public employees, and their dependents.
Also
remember that they have falsely registered us all as British
Territorial U.S. Citizens as babies using unconscionable registration
contracts foisted off on your Mothers--- that you have to become aware
of and refuse in order to recoup your status as a member of the American
General Public.
Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.org to learn more.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: Plain Speaking
By Anna Von Reitz
We
and the living people we represent and those unincorporated
institutions of the living people that we own and represent, are the
long-lost owners and possessors, the Donor-Beneficiaries, the ones who
hold the only survivorship interest in all these named Estates, Trusts,
and Legacies.
We own the Federal Reserve Banks -- all of them.
They
were all in gross debt to us and still are. They are insolvent by
definition and we foreclosed and we hold all the cured UCC-liens and
other options regarding them.
There
is, therefore, no need for any "correspondence bank" as all banks in
the system are by definition our banks and we hold superior concurrent
general jurisdiction. We can operate freely on air, land, and sea.
We,
the living people, own all survivorship interest in all the off-ledger
assets that are the asset backbone of all 63 member banks of record in
the Bank of International Settlements.
Trying to impersonate us has not succeeded and will not succeed in future.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
February 15th 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Meat of the Subject - Money and Not Money
By Anna Von Reitz
The
citations below are from Melvin Stamper, via a faithful reader; I am
simply melding this into a process for you to follow when dealing with
their courts.
But first....
I
do not want to confuse people so I will remind everyone that in the
Hidden Caste System, there are (1) people known as men and women, sons
and daughters, people have Natural and Unalienable Rights and protected
by the Constitutions and there are (2) Persons known as Humans, both
male and female, boy and girl, who have only Human Rights and who must
obey the Constitutions but have no guarantees or rights under them, and
there are (3) Things -- slaves and corporations that are Unisex and give
rise to a child or franchise, and have only Civil Rights which are
actually privileges that can be taken away. They also have no
protections under the Constitutions.
Men
and women are above any statutory law or code or regulation, so any
rule that accrues via any act of legislation does NOT pertain to them
unless they contract otherwise.
So
when we are discussing Federal Code or Federal Court Cases (except for
the 8% of Federal Law that is made part of the Federal Congressional
Record and which may apply to men and women under specific
circumstances) the Federal Code pertains only to Persons.
Okay?
So when I am citing "Federal Code" it is (92% of the time) for the
benefit of our public employees, who are Federal Dual Citizens. This is
what you need to show them about their obligations and the realities
about what, for them, passes for money.
Money
has to have value in-and-of-itself. A gold coin has value
in-and-of-itself, because gold has value apart from whatever form it
takes.
Everything
else that passes for money is commercial scrip -- some form of bill,
credit certificate, promissory note, warehouse receipt, bill of lading,
etc. This "commercial paper" has no value in-and-of-itself.
This
means that Federal Reserve Notes which are "promises to pay" at some
uncertain future date or upon demand, are not money. They are I.O.U.s.
If
you are brought into one of their courts or have to reply to one of
their courts on a "money" issue, mortgage, lien, tax debt, etc., the
first thing you want to do is ask if any attorney has been assigned to
represent you, and fire them. You are "present against your will and
require nobody to represent you" -- which should be apparent but has to
be said.
Next
step: "Nothing I say may be regarded as a pleading. I am here to inform
the court. I am not a corporation and not representing a corporation. I
am here as a living Elector and the only holder of the survivorship
interest in the estate of (name of Defendant/DEFENDANT"
Next
step: "I also object to the mandatory use of Federal Reserve Notes. I
reject any role as a Tort Feasor against the Federal Constitutions,
Article 1, Section 10."
"Federal reserve notes are legal tender in absence of objection thereto." MacLeod v. Hoover (June 22, 1925) 159 La 244, 105 So. 305, ---but I object.
I
will also remind the court that the Gold Bullion Act of 1985 makes it
clear that Americans, such as myself, are no longer obligors or grantors
with respect to the Federal Reserve Banks and their Notes. Please
see: Public Law 99-185, December 17, 1985, 99 Statutes 1177.
I also wish to remind the Court that for purposes of any U.S. Citizens or citizens of the United States brought before it, Title
31 USC Section 408 prohibits the redemption of any currency into gold
and Title 31 USC Section 405(a)-3 prohibits the redemption of any United
States currency dollar for dollar into gold and silver. Also, for
a check to be a negotiable instrument, it must contain an unconditional
promise to pay a sum certain in money and be payable on demand or at a
definite time (UCC 3-103 (b) (c)), a condition which no check issued in
the current system can meet.
Thus
the Moving Party (bank, IRS, Municipality, etc.) is itself prohibited
from using so-called "money of account" and cannot reference me in this
matter or make demands based upon it.
I believe they have acted in contempt of court and the law which pertains to them.
A
quick examination of the reasoning yields the obvious -- the owner of
the asset is also owed all the credit derived from the asset and cannot
possibly owe a debt to himself for the use of his own credit.
I wish to remind the court that for its own purposes: "An Appearance induced by Fraud (legal coercion, physical duress, or in regard to a fictitious party) has no efficacy" (Stultz v. Stultz, 94A.2d 527, 24 N.J.Super, 354, 6 C.J.S. §18).
I
will note for further reference of the court the following instances
proving the nature of Federal Reserve Notes and Money of Account and its
limitations:
"Money" does not include treasury notes". Foquet v. Headley, 3 Conn. 534, 536. And,
"In legal acceptation, "money" means current metallic coins; therefore an indictment for embezzling "money" is not sustainable by proof of embezzling greenbacks or national currency notes." Block v. State, 41 Tex. 620, 622. And,
"The term "money" does not include bank notes. They pass as cash, and constitute a part of the circulating medium, and for many purposes are to be considered as money; but, in the strict sense of the term, they are not included therein." Dowdle v. Corpening, 32 N.C. 58,60. And,
"Money," as used in Crimes Act, section 13, providing that any person stealing any money, the property of another, shall be guilty of larceny, cannot be construed to include bank bills, for strictly bank bills are not money, though for many purposes they are treated as such." Johnson v. State, 11 Ohio St. 324,325. And,
"The term "money," in the statute defining robbery as taking from the person of another any money or personal property of any value whatsoever, with force and violence, and with intent to steal or rob, does not include bank notes." Turner v. State, 1 Ohio St. 422,426. And,
"Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars." U.S. Treasury, General Counsel, Munk. And,
"Both notes and checks are acknowledgments of indebtedness and promise of payment." Hegeman v. Moon, 131 N.Y. 462, 30 N.E. 487. Smith v. Treuhart et al, 223 N.Y.S. 481.
So,
both the Moving Party and this Court are prohibited from making a
demand upon my Estate or claiming the existence of any debt based on
Federal Reserve Notes or other fiat Notes posed as the indebtedness of a
foreign corporation or other Legal Fiction, for I own the whole of it,
both the assets and the credit these legal fictions extend.
Fictional money results in fictional debts.
I hold the only substantive right and possession of interest in any case.
As
my court holds superior concurrent General Jurisdiction in this matter I
expect to be obeyed and for this and any other claim of this nature
brought against my estate to be dismissed with prejudice."
There
you have a complete example of "fully informing the court" and
basically telling them and the bank or agency, etc., where to get off
your merry-go-round.
The
truth of the matter is that they gained a purported but not actual
interest in "your estate" via means of securities fraud and by
misrepresenting you as a corporation engaged in interstate commerce.
Shove
it and any claim of "indebtedness" based on Federal Reserve Notes or
United States Notes or any other kind of "note" right back down their
throats.
And have a good day.....
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment