by PETER AND GINGER BREGGIN Sept 14, 2023
Article and comments are open on the Breggins' Substack column.
It
seems to have started in September 2021 with this inspiring headline:
Secretary-General Unveils Vision for Future-Oriented UN.1 But the first of the “story highlights” beneath the heading sounds more like a brewing conspiracy: “Global
governance may sound lofty or abstract; it is not,” said UN
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, presenting his report to the UN
General Assembly on 10 September 2021. Global governance through the UN?
In
reality, the UN has been making multiple attacks on the sovereignty of
the world’s nation-states, trying to force them under its authority.
Now, step by step, they are exposing the world to their plans in a
series of articles and Policy Briefs. In the beginning, they talked
nonspecifically about developing an emergency platform. The UN is
carving out its new niche, and it turns out to be governing the world.
For
those of us who still doubt the existence of an elite striving to rule
the world, what can be made out of Secretary-General Guterres’s plans
described in this paper? Can we dismiss this as the Secretary-General’s
own private delusion of a conspiracy with him in the starring role? Or
is there a touch of envy between the Secretary-General of the UN and his
employee, the Secretary-General Tedros of the World Health
Organization, which has been mounting its own strategy to use dangers to
public health as a way to dominate the nations?
Our
Common Agenda is the UN’s overall concept within which it describes its
plans for the emergency platform. The UN recommendations are scheduled
to be discussed at The Summit of the Future in 2024. The new strategy
indicated by “global governance” focuses on the centrality of the UN and
organizing the world when faced with “global shocks:” Major global shocks in recent years – including the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ukraine war,
and the triple planetary crisis, among others – have challenged our
international institutions. Unity around our shared principles and
common goals is both crucial and urgent.2 [Emphasis added.] The “triple planetary crisis” was announced on “International Mother Earth Day” at the UN, observed on April 22, 2022.3 This
crisis is a threatening package of “climate disruption, nature loss,
and pollution.” Combine these crises with pandemics and the war in
Ukraine, and it appears that the UN wants to run its own global empire.
The
original announcement about the UN emergency plan was published as an
unnumbered initial Policy Brief and made clear it was a power grab by
the Secretary-General: In
conclusion, the report recommends that Member States consider several
elements for inclusion in the Pact for the Future. These include
recognizing that “a strengthened international response to complex
global shocks must be flexible” and deciding that “the Secretary-General
has a standing authority to automatically convene and operationalize an
Emergency Platform” should a significant global shock occur. Agreeing
that “once activated, an Emergency Platform should be convened for a
finite period” and that the Secretary-General may extend it “for such
time as necessary” is also among the recommended elements.4 While
suggesting he will consult with others, the plan, if approved in the
2024 UN conference, gives the decision-making power entirely to the
Secretary-General. He will have “a standing authority to automatically
convene and operationalize an Emergency Platform,” and he can extend it
“for such time as necessary.” The Continued Evolution of the Emergency Platform
Then
came Our Common Agenda: Policy Brief 2, in which UN Secretary-General
Guterres details the kinds of global shocks his emergency platform will
deal with: Some of the kinds of global shocks that we may encounter in the future include: a) Large-scale climatic or environmental events that cause major socioeconomic disruptions and/or environmental degradation; b) Future pandemics with cascading secondary impacts; c) High-impact events involving a biological agent (deliberate or accidental); d) Events leading to disruptions to global flows of goods, people, or finance; e) Large-scale destructive and/or disruptive activity in cyberspace or disruptions to global digital connectivity; f) A major event in outer space that causes severe disruptions to one or several critical systems on Earth. g) Unforeseen risks (“black swan” events).5 The
addition at the end of the list of “Unforeseen risks (“black swan”
events) makes clear what the UN list of global shocks is trying to
communicate. Any global shock you can imagine, and even ones you cannot
imagine (the black swans)—can arbitrarily come under the control of the
United Nations. The UN Vastly Increases Its Powers Under Our Common Agenda
Combining
progressive trigger words like “the principles of equity and
solidarity” with Schwab’s World Economic Forum aims like “shareholders”
of the world, the UN declares it must be “at the center” of organizing
the world against whatever global crisis it can identify. It seeks to
have powers not previously within its realm to punish nations if they
resist, that is, to “Ensure that all participating actors make
commitments that can contribute meaningfully to the response and that
they are held accountable for delivery on those commitments.”
Then,
in a stunning “Conclusion,” the Secretary-General, in effect, declares
that he and the UN are the only legitimate heir to the throne of the
world: “The United Nations is the only organization with the reach and
legitimacy to convene at the highest level and galvanize global action.”6
In
his groundbreaking analysis on April 11, 2023, in The Epoch
Times titled “IN-DEPTH: UN Seeks Vast New Powers for Global
Emergencies,” journalist Alex Newman explained how Secretary-General
Guterres’ warped words indicated that the UN might intervene even if the
threat is not global:7 However,
the document states that crises without “global consequences” would
“not necessarily” be categorized as an emergency requiring U.N.
intervention. In other words, some crises that don’t have global
consequences might trigger a U.N. response. Our Common Agenda: Policy Brief 2
A
follow-up report from UN Secretary-General Guterres is titled: Our
Common Agenda: policy brief 2: Strengthening the international response
to complex global shocks—an Emergency Platform. The brief by the
Secretary-General specifically refers to the UN “strengthening the
global governance for both present and future generations” with a
radical new addition to its powers, the Emergency Platform.8 The
platform would be established by the UN to be run by the UN, organizing
the world in response to almost any kind of “complex global shocks” to
be determined by UN Secretary-General Guterres. According to the
Secretary-General: The
Emergency Platform would not be a standing body or entity but a set of
protocols that could be activated when needed. … Once activated, it
would bring together leaders from Member States, the United Nations
system, key country groupings, international financial institutions,
regional bodies, civil society, the private sector, subject-specific
industries or research bodies, and other experts.” … I stated, “The
platform would not be a new permanent or standing body or institution.
It would be triggered automatically in crises of sufficient scale and
magnitude, regardless of the type or nature of the crisis involved. Once
activated, it would bring together leaders from Member States, the
United Nations system, key country groupings, international financial
institutions, regional bodies, civil society, the private sector,
subject-specific industries or research bodies, and other experts.” This
proposal would allow the convening role of the United Nations to be
maximized in the face of crises with global reach and should be
“agnostic as to the type of crisis,” as we do not know what type of
global shock we may face in the future, although the probability of
their occurrence is growing. Notice
that any “type of global shock” would justify the UN taking over, even
“shocks” that are unanticipated and cannot now be described. The idea of
being “agnostic” or not knowing about the nature of the crisis leaves
it up to the UN to decide when it can and should intervene in the
affairs of sovereign nations.
Policy Brief 7: UN Further Explains Its Imperial Aspirations
On May
1, 2023, the Secretary-General issued Our Common Agenda Policy Brief
7: For All Humanity – The Future of Outer Space Governance. It began:9 International
cooperation is needed more than ever, yet our collective
problem-solving mechanisms do not match the pace or scale of the
challenges we face. Today’s complex, interconnected, and rapidly
changing world requires a more effective multilateral system – with the
United Nations at its core. [Emphasis added.] Having
established the UN itself as “the core” authority in matters of “global
shocks,” the UN Secretary-General elaborated, “At the Summit, Member
States have committed to adopting a Pact for the Future to cement
collective agreements and to showcase global solidarity for current and
future generations.” Notice the phrases “collective agreement” and “global solidarity,” which are taken from the Marxist playbook.
The
UN will undoubtedly be issuing many more Our Common Agenda Policy
Briefs, short declarations of intention by the Secretary-General about
how he wants to reign over his version of the New World Order. The Biden Administration Gives Its Support
Will
any nation be so self-defeating or stupid as to agree to this UN
proposal? The Biden administration has already enthusiastically
supported the UN’s aspirations to take over the world. On March 10,
2023, Ambassador Chris Lu, U.S. Representative for UN Management and
Reform, gave support for Our Common Agenda, specifically including the
radically new emergency platform: We
also appreciate the Secretary-General’s out-of-the-box thinking about
how to institutionalize these efforts, including a focus on future
generations, the emergency platform, the digital compact, elevation of
gender equality and human rights; improved UN governance; enhanced
efforts to fight climate change; and a greater focus on anti-corruption
efforts, among other issues.10 Inevitable Domination by the Chinese Communists
Although
it wants to sit atop the pyramid of authority over humanity, the UN is
much more like a stumbling puppet of global predators. From Bill Gates
to Xi Jinping, the global predators, when it proves useful to them, can
pull the strings that control the UN as the face of globalism. In
his breaking news story on April 11, 2023, in The Epoch Times, one of
Alex Newman’s concerns was how the Chinese Communists would influence
the Secretary-General and the UN when responding to threats. Newman
observed: Other critics who spoke with The Epoch Times expressed concern about the influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
within the U.N., the global organization’s well-documented corruption
problems, and its track record of dealing with previous emergencies. Newman
draws on an interview of with former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State
for International Organizations Kevin Moley, who told The Epoch Times,
“Allowing the U.N. to deal with this is the equivalent of putting the
CCP in charge of global emergencies.” Newman’s
summary of the interview provides insights into the UN and the
Communist Chinese that are critical to understanding globalism: The
powerful influence of the CCP and its mostly “authoritarian” and “crony
democracy” allies over the U.N. system represents a major danger when
it comes to proposals to grant the global outfit more power, Moley said. “As
long as the controlling interests of the U.N. are in the hands of the
CCP and aided and abetted by the G77 [an alliance of 134 governments
including the CCP], this cannot be allowed,” he said. As
a result of the CCP’s well-documented control over key U.N. agencies
and even its powerful influence over most member states, approving the
emergency protocol plan would be tantamount to putting the communist
regime in charge of global crises, according to Moley. Considering
that the CCP is a “criminal conspiracy” more than a government and the
fact that its agents now dominate vast swaths of the U.N., this is a
“recipe for disaster,” he said. We
agree with these observations and conclusions about the Chinese
Communists and the UN, which we reached in 2021 when writing COVID-19
and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey. We also agree with Justin
Haskins’ concluding remarks in his essay in The Federalist about the
platform being proposed by the UN Secretary-General:11 If
the emergency platform is approved, the United States as we know it
could cease to exist. That sounds dire, but it’s true. We either stand
for freedom now or risk everything come September 2024. Bill Gates Backs the Plans of the Secretary-General Guterres
Alex
Newman points out that Bill Gates has given his endorsement to the UN’s
emergency platform in a March 23, 2023, op-ed in The New York Times.12 Fortune magazine — and indeed fortunes are to be made — added its support: Albeit
concerned, Gates says he’s optimistic about the World Health
Organization’s announcement of a Global Health Emergency Corps that
could “spring into action at a moment’s notice when danger emerges.” He
sees the success of this team as constantly practicing drills for
different potential emerging pathogens, being able to implement
widespread global testing, preventative sewage testing, and seamless
coordination with governments across the world, he writes. Gates has always been a big supporter of the UN and its agencies, especially the WHO,
much as he is a big albeit somewhat quieter supporter of the Chinese
Communists. He benefits from the global predatory strategies of the UN,
the WHO, and the Chinese Communists. Bill
Gates was already pushing for more and more investments in dealing with
a future pandemic at least as far back as 2010 when he announced the
Year of the Vaccine, as if he knew it was on the way. As the moment drew
near in 2018, he prepared the heart of the medical establishment: And
back in 2018, Billionaire Bill Gates gave a warning that the world
wasn’t prepared for pandemics, which should “concern us all.” Speaking at an event hosted by the Massachusetts Medical Society and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on April 27, 2018, Gates said he believed “the world needs to prepare for pandemics in the same serious way it prepares for war.” “This
preparation includes staging simulations, war games, and preparedness
exercises so that we can better understand how diseases will spread and
how to deal with responses such as quarantine and communications to
minimize panic,” Gates said.13 When
Bill Gates makes plans, other global predators go on alert, trying to
increase their fortunes by getting a piece of the action. That was how
the Decade of the Vaccines morphed into the largest rip-off of humanity
in the history of the world, with genetic pseudo-vaccinations sapping
people of their wealth, freedom, and health. Humanity turns a blind eye
to the aspirations of Secretary Guterres and the United Nations at grave
peril for those alive and in the future.
Gates’
comparison of pandemic preparation and response to war is not without
greater meaning. Nothing compared to war in generating money and power
for the global elite until COVID-19’s fraudulent policies and practices,
which generated unprecedented increases in wealth and global control in
the hands of the elite. Remember that the Western and Eastern Empires
do collaborate with each other to their own advantage, and so Bill Gates
and Xi Jinping will both be supporting the planned emergency platform.
But ultimately, the Chinese Communists probably have more control over
the UN than does Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, the European Union, and the
entire Western Global Empire.
The
UN’s emergency platform would probably supersede or become integrated
with plans already being promoted by the WHO as its agency. As already
mentioned, we even wondered if there’s a competition for Totalitarian of
the World going on between the UN and its health agency. But more
likely, the UN is firing multiple harpoons at the sovereign nations of
the world, hoping one or more will penetrate and destroy them like
helpless whales.
1 Secretary-General Unveils Vision for Future-Oriented UN | News | SDG Knowledge Hub | IISD 2 Summit of the Future | United Nations 3 https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21243.doc.htm 4 Policy Brief: Responding to Global Shocks: UNSG’s Emergency Platform | SDG Knowledge Hub | IISD 5 https://bahrain.un.org/en/240578-our-common-agenda-policy-brief-2-strengthening-international-response-complex-global-shocks- 6 All the emphases in this paragraph have been added. 7 https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/un-seeks-vast-new-powers-for-global-emergencies-5186457 8 https://bahrain.un.org/en/240578-our-common-agenda-policy-brief-2-strengthening-international-response-complex-global-shocks- 9 https://bahrain.un.org/en/240580-our-common-agenda-policy-brief-7-all-humanity-%E2%80%93-future-outer-space-governance 10 Remarks
at the UN General Assembly Thematic Consultations on “Our Common
Agenda” – United States Mission to the United Nations (usmission.gov) 11 https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/04/the-u-n-is-planning-to-seize-global-emergency-powers-with-bidens-support/ 12 Opinion | Bill Gates: How to Prepare for the Next Pandemic – The New York Times (nytimes.com) 13 Bill Gates in 2018: World needs to prepare for pandemics just like war (cnbc.com). Here is the PDF of his speech as it appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine: Innovation for Pandemics (nejm.org)
Find us at X— formerly known as Twitter: @GingerBreggin @AmericanMD Find us at our website: www.Breggin.com Find us at www.AmericaOutLoud.com Find us on Substack at: Peter and Ginger Breggin Exposing the Global Predators Find our legal defense fund here: GiveSendGo - Dr Peter and Ginger Breggin Legal Defense
Primary Author Peter R. Breggin MD First published on AmericaOutLout.news Sept. 13, 2023
Continue Reading and see the footnotes and comment on the Breggin Substack here.
Peter R. Breggin MD and Ginger Breggin have written the bestselling new book, COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey with
introductions by top COVID-19 scientists and physicians, Peter A.
McCullough MD, MPH; Elizabeth Lee Vliet MD; and Vladimir "Zev" Zelenko.
The book is available everywhere.
| 
No comments:
Post a Comment