Saturday, June 10, 2023
4217: Nomenclature and Ownership, Again from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Some
people are confused by the fact that both the foreign corporations
residing in the District of Columbia are "Municipal Corporations".
A Municipal Corporation is a kind of corporation just like a "Red Delicious" is a kind of apple.
A
Municipal Corporation structure can be used to organize and administer
military services just as well as it can be used to organize and
administer civil services, so that is what we have going on here.
The
District of Columbia as a whole is operated by a Municipal Corporation
dba "the United States of America, Incorporated" while a separate
enclave within the District of Columbia is carved out and operated as
another Municipal Corporation dba "the United States, Incorporated".
One,
the District Government, is devoted to military operations and military
personnel populations, and the other, the Municipal Government within
the Municipality of Washington, DC, is devoted to civil service
operations and non-military populations providing government services.
So
you have two Municipal Corporations organized for two different
purposes and two different classes of "citizens" that are attached to
the two different Municipal Corporations. Additionally, each of these
Municipal Corporations are operated as franchises by different foreign
governments.
The
British Territorial United States Government and its U.S. Citizens
attached to the United States of America, Incorporated, are engaged in
military concerns and operations as a "community" within the District of
Columbia.
The
Municipal Government of Washington, DC, was originally chartered by the
Continental Congress as the City of Washington, DC, and functioned
under the direction of the American Federal Congress until 1860; it has
since been run as a for-profit Municipal Corporation operated by the
City of Rome, and its "citizens of the United States" are all the
Federal Civil Service and Agency personnel, plus their dependents.
So
while the District Government and the Municipal Government are separate
and are run by separate parent corporations and have fundamentally
different purposes and personnel, both are organized as Municipal
Corporations.
The word "Municipal" is an adjective describing what kind of "Corporation" we are referring to.
This is the best, simplest definition of "municipality" that I have run across:
"The
definition of a municipality is a community with a local government and
specified boundaries. This includes towns, cities, or villages. These
areas are formally organized by the larger state where they are located.
They are given the authority to have their own laws and standards, as
long as they are in line with the state's laws as well."
The
definition demonstrates that we could call any organized local
government a municipality, but in practice, the State of State
organizations which have been busily defining "municipalities" always
incorporate them as franchises of their own business organization and it
is this enfranchisement that enforces loyalty to the parent
corporation.
Thus,
a municipality owes fealty to the corporation that creates it or the
sovereign that charters it, even though it is technically organized and
operated by the local people.
Now
step back a moment and look at the world around you. Do you have any
reason to suppose that a Municipal Corporation in Japan is different in
character or purpose than a Municipal Corporation in Venezuela?
How
about a C-Corp that sells shares and trades on stock exchanges -- is
Mitsubishi, Inc. fundamentally different in structure or purpose than
Ford Motor Company, Inc.?
The
answer in both cases is, no, they are the same....all over the world,
wherever you look, the various kinds of corporations that people use to
organize their businesses and even their philanthropic activities are
standardized.
A
trust is a trust in China, just as it is a trust in Belgium. A
foundation in Germany has the same characteristics as a foundation in
South Africa.
This
is because all of these business models have been defined and developed
under the care and guidance of the Roman Curia. They are the same on a
global basis because the Jurisdiction of the Air to which these Legal
Fictions belong is global in nature.
At the end of the day, all these various entities belong to the Pope and are administered under Ecclesiastical Law.
The
fact that this vast plethora of corporations ultimately belong to the
Pope and that he has the sovereign right and responsibility to oversee
their operations always comes as a shock, but there it is.
Who rules the Jurisdiction of the Air? The Pope.
A
network of treaties makes this possible in a practical sense with the
Treaties of Ghent and the Treaties of Utrecht being the principal
agreements involved.
No chartered thing is sovereign. No incorporated thing is sovereign.
And
when incorporated entities -- Municipal Corporations, for example --
function as governments, those governments are not sovereign, either.
So
it boils down to which sovereign power (Principal) are these Municipal
Corporations standing under? Ultimately, they are all standing under
the Pope, by definition.
Our
nation-states are unincorporated and sovereign entities. Their States,
by which they carry on international and global business, are also
sovereign and unincorporated entities in those venues.
The
States' unincorporated Federation of States, doing business as The
United States of America since 1776, is not itself a sovereign entity,
but acts as an agent or instrumentality of the sovereign States to
conduct mutually beneficial business in international and global
jurisdictions.
Our
nation-states are the sovereign powers that our American Government
stands under, and their States operating individually or severally as
the case may be, are the sovereign powers that we, Americans, stand
under in international and global jurisdictions.
Thus,
when it comes to the ultimate administration and ownership of Municipal
Corporations run amok, we, acting on behalf of the American Principals,
that is, our States --- bypass the operators, the British Crown and the
City of Rome, respectively, and go directly to the Pope.
People
who are used to thinking of the Office of the Pope in terms of his
sacred offices and administration of the Roman Catholic Church miss the
point. He is also by far the wealthiest man on Earth and the busiest
business executive. All incorporated entities belong to him and are
subject to him, whether he takes an interest in their day-to-day
administration or not.
His
right and his responsibility to liquidate corporations that engage in
unlawful activities is ironclad, fully and clearly stated in
Ecclesiastical Law, and implemented by contracts and treaties.
Thus,
when we have exhausted our remedies and grow tired of bad behavior on
the part of incorporated entities, especially entities created as
franchises of foreign Municipal Corporations, it's time to take it up
with the Pope and with the Vatican Chancery Court, which decides issues
of ownership.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment