Continuing my "greatest COVID hits" articles. To read my introduction to this ongoing series, go here. To support my work and get value for value, order my Matrix collections here and subscribe to my substack here.
February 23, 2020
At
the very beginning of my coverage of the “China epidemic,” I cited
evidence that the air quality in Wuhan is chronically dangerous.
Among
other sources, I referred to a Yale review which stated that the
mixture of toxic elements in the air is unprecedented in human
history. The synergistic effects of these individual toxins is unknown.
I
also mentioned the large street protests against air quality in Wuhan
that took place last summer. These protests were also carried out in
other Chinese cities. The government was obviously alarmed at the
nascent rebellion.
Those protests are now gone. Because the cities are locked down. It’s all about “the virus” as the cause of illness.
Horrific
air quality brings on lung infections of all kinds, including
pneumonia. Pneumonia is THE illness attributed to the coronavirus. How
convenient.
The
Chinese government has recently ruled that testing patients for the
coronavirus isn’t necessary for a diagnosis of “epidemic illness.” A CT
scan of the lungs is sufficient. If the patient thus shows signs of
pneumonia, he is labeled “a coronavirus case.”
Air quality? Brushed aside.
Assessing
studies of annual pneumonia deaths in China---covering years long
before the supposed emergence of the new human coronavirus---I settled
on the estimate of 300,000 deaths a year.
Assuming
this death rate is more or less constant, hundreds of thousands of
people could now be called deceased “coronavirus cases” without a
flicker of interest in the actual cause of their illness. Those CT
scans, picking up signs of pneumonia, and absurdly leading to the label
“coronavirus,” are a perfect tool for deception.
Recently, I found an article from capitalcambodia[dot]com, dated February 7, 2020: "‘Polluted air’ could be an important cause of Wuhan pneumonia". It
makes some interesting comments about Wuhan air quality. The article
also speculates that “the virus” is carried on particulate pollutants, a
claim I find completely unsupported---but the remarks about pollution
are worth repeating:
“...three
factors. First, the increase of static wind in the horizontal
direction, which is not conducive to the diffusion and dilution of
atmospheric pollutants. Second, the emergence of a temperature inversion
layer in the vertical direction, which makes it difficult for
pollutants to move upwards and are blocked at low altitudes and near the
ground. Third, the increase of suspended particulates in the air. These
three conditions are all available during the high incidence period of
Wuhan pneumonia.”
“According
to data released by the Wuhan Bureau of Ecology and Environment, the
moment when a large number of pneumonia cases emerged in Wuhan was
during the period from Jan 19, 2020, to Jan 23, 2020, and the Wuhan air
during this period was at the stage of serious pollution. The indices
are all higher than 100. This means that the outbreak period of Wuhan
pneumonia coincides with the severe period of air pollution and this is
one of the reasons. The second supporting reason is that the high
incidence areas of Wuhan pneumonia coincide with the severe air
pollution areas. We observed by randomly taking one day as a sample and
found out that the area with the highest level of air pollution in Wuhan
was Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market. This shows that even in ‘normal
weather’, the air pollution in the seafood market area was the
relatively worst area in Wuhan…Therefore, it is not accidental that
Wuhan Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market has become a high-incidence area
of Wuhan pneumonia...”
You’ll
recall that, at first, reports circulated about the coronavirus
emerging in that Market and “jumping species from animals to
humans.” These reports didn’t mention highly dangerous air pollutants
“jumping” into the lungs of humans. ~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here. For the article republished on Monday, click here.)
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport) |
No comments:
Post a Comment