Our Republican Form of Government: Section 59 — Lessons in Sovereignty from Anna Von Reitz
Section 59 — Lessons in Sovereignty
First of all,
sovereignty is inherited. It is not something that simply devolves upon us by
virtue of winning a war. You have all inherited “sovereignty in your own right”
and the right to own property — as opposed to being considered property — by
being born on the land and soil of your State of the Union.
Second of all, the
Delegation of Powers under the Constitutions would not be possible if the
Americans had not established Sovereignty. A King can delegate powers to a
Queen, or to another King, to exercise in his behalf, but no one of lesser
standing can do this. The simple fact that the
British Monarch has been in receipt of Delegated Powers of
ours since 1787 is all the evidence needed to prove that we possessed
sovereignty prior to the establishment of the Constitutions.
Third, our actual
claim to sovereignty is based upon the Norman Conquest and a particular kind of
They were still “Barons” in France, and owed Williams’s heir fealty in France; but in England, they were kings with permanent hereditary holdings of land. In England, King John was just one among many kings, and the only distinction of his office was that he was responsible for the maintenance and preservation of the Church’s properties and the “Commonwealth” land.
The Commonwealth was co-administered by the Church and amounted to waste land and property that the King entrusted to the Church to develop and manage for the benefit and support of the Paupers, the Sick, and others not able to support themselves.
The Church took over these “commonwealth” properties and used them for good purposes in the communities they served. They used these properties to create common grazing fields, to establish orchards, apiaries, and herb and medicinal gardens, community vegetable gardens, and cemeteries. Rarely, the Church inherited “good wooded ground” — woodlots, and more rarely still, they were able to convert swamps into arable land via installing drainage ditches, dikes, and dams. The profits were used to support the Church’s charity efforts.
So, it was King John’s position as “the” King involved in these activities that gave him any special position in England at the time of the Magna Carta; if John had been King of the country in truth and fact, then he could not be held to the Magna Carta longer than the ink was dry and he denied his free-willing consent to it.
The fact that the Magna Carta has stood on the land and soil jurisdiction until this day is again testimony to the fact that the French Norman Barons and their progeny, acting at the time of the Magna Carta — basically a 128 years after The Settlement of the Norman Conquest, were certainly in possession of “sovereignty in the own right” and as equal kings on the land and soil of England were able to impose their demands lawfully upon King John despite whatever he wanted and despite what the Pope wanted, either.
The Belle Chers, the family of William the Conqueror — his Cousins and other relatives who remained in England, intermarried and settled in, all as sovereigns in their own right. Their names became Anglicized to “Belcher” and they formed a special alliance with the Clintwoods, a noble English family, an alliance that endured for many generations and followed them to America.
Updated: May 22, 2019 Table of Contents Page 203 of 209
The Jural Assembly Handbook By: Anna Von Reitz
In
early America, one branch of the Belchers acted as the Royal Governors of areas
that would one day become three States of the Union, but this branch — headed
by Governor Jonathan Belcher, founder of Princeton University, died out; the
Belchers who remained in America retained both their ties to England and their
ties to the Clintwood family.
William Belcher (the
name “William” is retained for many, many generations and derives from William
the Conquer and Guilleroi de Lancelot du Lac the son of King Ban of Gaul, our
common ancestor) was here and sided with the Colonists against George III, and
as he possessed sovereignty in his own right, inherited from his Norman French
ancestors, he was fully competent to stand toe-to-toe with George III, just as
the Norman Barons were competent to stand down King John.
Sovereignty operates
in the national and international jurisdictions. When sovereignty is changed
upon the soil, that is, the national jurisdiction, we see total regime change.
The names of countries change. Their systems of government change. Most of the
time, challenges to sovereignty occur in the international jurisdiction of the
land and sea, with pushing and shoving over trade policies and offshore fishing
rights and those sorts of things.
In both cases,
whether national or international (domestic or non-domestic) sovereignty is
exercised according to the demands of the jurisdiction. On the soil, the
sovereign acts as the personification of the people. In the international
jurisdiction of the land, the sovereign acts as the Lawful Person personifying
the People of a country. In the international jurisdiction of the sea, the
sovereign acts a the Legal Person personifying the Legal Personages of a
nation.
But what happens when
“sovereignty in one’s own right” is bequeathed to many people, instead of just
one? As William the Conqueror did, and as William Belcher did? Then every man
and woman in inheritance of such sovereignty, becomes equal to the King or
Queen of any other country, and the entire system of Monarchy is overwhelmed.
From the standpoint
of the British Monarchs and the Popes, this is the most damaging part of both
the Normal Conquest and the American War of Independence, because it serves to
destroy the elitist system of Feudalism (including Corporate Feudalism) upon
which they depend. According to their reasoning, for one man to be king, all
others must be in subjection.
According to the
Williams — men whose names mean “Resolute Protector” — this is hogwash.
According to them, all Mankind can earn their sovereignty and as far as
Americans are concerned, we need only seize upon our birthright and refuse the
Nanny State options offered by the Queen and the Popes.
As a result of our
unique history and our unique Constitutional system, it has been very hard for
them to weasel in and make false claims to the effect that we have knowingly
and voluntarily “gifted” our Good Names and Estates to them in exchange for being
taken care and bossed around and exploited as property by the Kings and/or the
Popes.
It has taken decades
and not a little prevarication and clandestine undisclosed contracting
processes, plus falsification of records, for them to establish the current
system of Corporate Feudalism on our shores — but all it really takes is for
Americans to wake up and remember their inheritance, claim back their
birthright political status, and take up the job of being sovereigns in their
own right again.
On the soil jurisdiction
all such sovereigns are one of the people of the soil, on the land jurisdiction
they are one of the People known to be Lawful Persons, and on the international
jurisdiction of the sea, they are Legal Persons.
Updated: May 22, 2019 Table of Contents Page 204 of 209
The Jural Assembly Handbook By: Anna Von Reitz
When
you return your Legal Person to the land and soil jurisdiction, it becomes a
Lawful Person — owed all the guarantees and protections of the Constitutions.
You come back into your birthright inherited status as a “sovereign in your own
right”.
When you return all
the derivative names, including the STRAWMEN to the land and soil and declare
their permanent domicile on the land and soil of an American State, they are
lawfully converted and they, too, are owed all the guarantees of the
Constitutions.
Because sovereignty
is inherited from other sovereigns, you cannot avoid being a sovereign in your
own right from the moment of your birth, but you can (if it is done consciously
and voluntarily — which in our case, it never is) “pledge” allegiance to other
sovereigns or symbols, and become subjected to them as a result.
Generations of
American school children have been taught to pledge their allegiance to an
inanimate symbol — the Federal War Flag — without realizing that they are
presumed to be subjecting themselves to the Queen who is flying our own flag
under our delegated powers.
Various means of
entrapment and identity theft have been used to “capture” and “seize upon”
American sovereigns and to unlawfully convert them into US Citizens who are
subjects of the Queen and into Citizens of the United States who are subjects
of the Popes, but all this activity has been without disclosure, rendering all
such pretended citizenship obligations moot and unenforceable so long as you
are prepared to stand up and exercise the sovereignty that is your inheritance
and birthright — the sovereignty in your own right — of all Free Men and Women.
Many questions have
been raised about James Clinton Belcher and his role in all this. During the
Theodore Roosevelt Administration the Scottish Interloper doing business as
“The United States of America, Inc.” founded in 1868, was preparing to go
bankrupt. James’ Great-Uncle, Clintwood Belcher, rode to Washington, DC, to
take possession of the Great Seals — The Great Seal of the United States of
America and The Great Seal of the United States.
On his way home, as
he crossed over into Maryland, he was viciously attacked by men waiting to
ambush him. In the resulting fight, he killed six of his attackers. His own
horse was killed also. He grabbed one of the dead men’s horses and rode off
into the night, making for the western Frontier to save his life.
They stole the Great
Seals and they lied about the whole circumstance and branded Clintwood Belcher
as a “horse thief” — neatly omitting their own grand theft under deadly force,
their intent to murder, their killing of his horse, and all the rest of it. He
spent the rest of his life “on the lam”, always looking over his shoulder,
always moving from place to place to place. Theodore Roosevelt considered him
“a danger to our government” — self-evidently meaning the foreign Territorial
usurpers on our shores.
Clintwood died
without issue, so the torch passed to his younger brother, James, and from
James to his son Orville, and from Orville to his son, James Clinton Belcher.
At the time my husband was born in 1941, Federal Agents were still hunting and
harassing members of the family. Orville Belcher moved his young son twelve
times in the first ten years of his life, constantly moving just as Great-Uncle
Clintwood had to move and keep moving to avoid being arrested on false charges
or be murdered outright.
This is not a
glamorous story. It’s a painful, scary, shameful story, in which good men were
replaced by bad men, honorable men replaced by crooks, and innocent people who
were the victims of crime were portrayed as criminals — while the actual
criminals sat at ease on the White House lawn. The Belchers have lived poor and
they have lived rough, but through it all,
Updated: May 22, 2019 Table of Contents Page 205 of 209
The Jural Assembly Handbook By: Anna Von Reitz
they
remembered who they are. They remembered their hereditary offices. They
remembered their lineage. They never ceased the search to recover the Great
Seals.
The Great Seals
surfaced briefly in New York City in the possession of the Federal Reserve
Board of Governors. They have now surfaced again in Indonesia. From our
perspective, the Belchers are still the owners of the Seals no matter how many
generations of pirates may possess them — under mandate and Maxim of Law:
“Possession by pirates does not change ownership.”
Nor, obviously, do
any documents that have been impressed with those seals since their theft
during the first Roosevelt Administration have any validity or power to bind
us, as they have been exercised without our knowledge or consent.
The custodians of the
Great Seals in Indonesia are under demand to return them to us as stolen
property. If these heirlooms are not returned, we shall have them re-cast in
their original form.
It should be noted
that the Office of Hereditary Head of State is not a Public Office. It is a
Private Trust Office, a Lawful Person, and while it is an Office which James
Clinton Belcher claims by direct descent, the reason for doing so is to prove
to the Queen that yes, we still exist. It is not only those who received
sovereignty at the hands of our ancestor: it is also those who received life
from his body and soul who are still here on these shores.
There is no plausible
excuse for the Queen or the Pope to continue their pillaging on our shores.
Now, you are being
called upon to remember who you are, too. Americans. Sovereigns in your own
right. Not “United States Citizens” who are subjects of the British Queen. Not
“Citizens of the United States” who are subjects of the Roman Pontiff.
—Posted: May 22, 2019
Updated: May 22, 2019 Table of Contents Page 206 of 209
The Jural Assembly Handbook
By: Anna Von Reitz
Postscript
Each individual
“Section” of this document can also be found under the following numbered
articles as listed below at Anna’s base website here: www.annavonreitz.com
——————————
Use the direct links
below for access to individual documents in each “Section” of this document.
Section
1
Section 2 Section 3
Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Section
11 Section 12 Section 13 Section 14 Section 15 Section 16 Section 17 Section 18
Section 19 Section 20 Section 21 Section 22 Section 23 Section 24 Section 25
Section 26 Section 27 Section 28 Section 29 Section 30 Section 31 Section 32
Section 33 Section 34 Section 35 Section 36 Section 37 Section 38 Section 39
Section 40
—
#1501
— #1502 — #1503 —
#1506 — #1507 — #1509 — #1510 — #1511 — #1513 — #1514 — #1515 — #1516 — #1518 —
#1526 — #1528 — #1530 — #1539 — #1548 — #1552 — #1553 — #1554 — #1556 — #1559 —
#1560 — #1566 — #1568 — #1569 — #1570 — #1571 — #1572 — #1574 — #1575 — #1576 —
#1580 — #1592 — #1608 — #1614 — #1615 — #1616 — #1620
Link:
Link: Link: Link:
Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link:
Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link:
Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link: Link:
For
All the Jural Assemblies
Law and Religion
This is not “Opinion”
Jural Qualifications
and Membership
Mission Statement and Membership
Pointers
and Questions
Discipline
A Nation of Bastards?
Grand Theories and
“Responses” Debunked
Existing Contracts
Committees of Safety
Record-keepers
Judges, Justices, and
Hired Jurists
Sheriffs, Militias,
and Marshals
Coroners
Notaries
Clerks and Bondsmen
Jurors and
Citizenships
The Public and
Organic Law
Jurisdiction of the
People
Capacity of the
People
Overcoming
Indoctrination
Prior and Concurrent
Assemblies
The American
Government
State Electors, State
Nationals, and State Citizens
The National
Jurisdiction: Soil
International
Jurisdiction
Global Municipal
Jurisdiction
The Confederation of
States
The Constitutions
Mandatory Citizenship
Requirements
The Federal States of
States
The American Civil
War
Reconstruction: Your
Mission
Lawful Persons
State Assemblies
The Interface
The American
Government Structure
Parting of the Waters
Grocery Shopping
Updated: May 22, 2019
Table of Contents
Page 207 of 209
The Jural Assembly Handbook
By: Anna Von Reitz
Section
41 —
Section 42 —
Section 43 —
Section 44 —
Section 45 —
Section 46 —
Section 47 —
Section 48 —
Section 49 —
Section 50 —
Section 51 —
Section 52 —
Section 53 —
Section 54 —
Section 55 —
Section 56 —
Section 57 —
Section 58 —
Section 59 — ——————————
Link:
Who Owns What
Link: The United
States Raj
Link: Legal Persons
Link: Legal Persons
and Territorial Courts
Link: Religion and
State Assemblies
Link: No Pledges Ever
Link: Actual
Constitution and Codicils
Link: Banking
Corrections
Link: Republic or
Republican, Civil or Civilian
Link: Congresses
Link: NAMES and Debts
Link: Committees of
Safety
Link: The Actual
Legislative History
Link: Two Courts
Systems, Neither One Ours
Link: MUNICIPAL
COURTS, DEATH and TAXES
Link: The United States of America
Link: Expatriation
and Repatriation
Link: Reading the
Constitutions Correctly
Link: Lessons in
Sovereignty
#1624
#1633
#1655
#1656
#1682
#1682
#1766
#1767
#1772
#1773
#1774
#1777
#1779
#1780
#1781
#1810
#1811
#1813
#1827
Updated: May 22, 2019
Table of Contents
Page 208 of 209
The Jural Assembly Handbook By: Anna Von Reitz
Special Acknowledgments
A sincere thank you
to Ann Von Reitz for her tireless efforts and her work on behalf of the
American People for every article found within this document. It is an
inspiration to us all. Where would we be without her and the work of the
“Living Law Firm”?
A special thanks also
goes out to Paul Stramer for managing Anna’s website and keeping it up to date
with all her Articles.
This compilation of
the “The Jural Assembly Handbook” was assembled from all of Anna’s articles on
Jural Assemblies and put into a single PDF format as a one stop document for
all, by: Max Emmons Taylor Jr. ©, 4VFK20629.
Original production
was done on an iMac using “Pages” © by Apple, Inc. ——————————
Updated: May 22, 2019 Table of Contents Page 209 of 209
No comments:
Post a Comment