Monday, September 12, 2022
3802-3804: Your States and Their States of States from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Of
all the conundrums we have to sort out (and there are many) none is
more pernicious than the confusion caused by referring to State of State
business organizations as “States”
States of States, like the (Territorial) State of Wyoming, are not States.
States are all physically defined, have landmarks and borders and populations of living people.
States
of States are businesses. They may be unincorporated businesses owned
and run by Lawful Persons or they may be incorporated or enfranchised
corporations owned and operated by Legal Persons, but such businesses
obviously exist on paper and are not physically defined—- and are not
“States”.
The actual States had their Federation of States.
So the States of States formed their Confederation hoping to unite their business interests.
In
the process the American States of States like The State of Georgia and
The State of New York started calling themselves “Confederate
States”.
This
lapsed further into calling these entities “States” — when they are
not States — and contributing to the overall confusion that people
suffer with to this day.
Businesses are not States. Such organizations may conduct business for a State, but that does not make them a State.
And
it must be remembered that each State is perfectly able to conduct
business for itself. The States are not obligated to form or utilize
State of State business organizations.
These
“Confederate States” were created and hired to provide routine
Government services when the State Assemblies are not in Session, much
as you might hire a housekeeper while you go on vacation.
And
just as your housekeeper is not you and does not enjoy the same rights
and material interests and powers as you, the States of States do not
have the powers and prerogatives of States.
Our
current situation is exacerbated because the States of States we are
now dealing with are foreign entities overseen by foreign powers— but
the fact remains that a State always stands above a State of State.
As
an actual State Assembly Member you operate in an entirely different
capacity and occupy a separate foreign jurisdiction set apart from any
jurisdiction inhabited by a State of State business entity.
Your
position as a State Assembly Member once thoroughly understood is far
more important and carries more rights and responsibilities than any
position in State of State “Government”.
The Employer stands over the employees.
The Landlord stands over the tenant.
The House Owner stands over the Housekeeper.
It turns out that knowing the difference between a State and a State of State is absolutely crucial.
It’s what keeps the world from being turned upside down, and keeps employees from bossing around their employers.
If you have had enough of the confusion that ensues when States of States are mistaken for States—- go to:
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
About the Constitutions - Again
By Anna Von Reitz
Everything
on this page needs to be read and repeated and thoroughly digested
until it overcomes decades of indoctrination based on false assumptions
and omitted information.
When
Webster published his Dictionary in 1824 he unwittingly preserved the
meaning of the word “federal” as it was used during the Constitutional
Process.
“Federal” at that time was a well-known synonym for “Contract”.
“Federal Government” equals “Contract Government”.
The
Constitutions — all three of them — are service contracts, and they
were issued to three separate contractors in three separate years under
three separate names, so there is no use in anyone trying to interpret
this in any other way.
All
this may be Big News to you, especially as you have probably only seen
two of these Constitutions in your life, and you probably never read
these two closely enough to realize that they are two separate
documents—- The Constitution of the United States and The Constitution
of the United States of America.
I am pointing this out to you as a prelude to even more shocking information.
The Constitutions are not about us.
The Constitutions are about our Federal (Contract) Government Service Providers.
The first contract issued in 1787 went to American Subcontractors operating what was called the Federal Republic.
The
second contract which was issued in 1789 went to British Territorial
Subcontractors operating an unincorporated business calling itself “the”
United States of America (British-American Trading Company).
The
third contract was issued to the Holy Roman Empire in 1790, which was
hired to administer the postal system, customs houses, patent and
trademark offices and similar services requiring global outreach.
Your
Forefathers explicitly knew that they, through their State Governments,
were (1) setting up an American Subcontractor, the Federal Republic, to
do and oversee most of the work of their government in international
jurisdiction and (2) were hiring two completely foreign governments to
perform services for them under contract and (3) were responsible,
through their States of the Union for enforcing these constitutional
contracts and paying for these services.
There
has been a lot of misguided talk about the Constitution of 1789, which
chiefly concerns our British Subcontractors. Other than failure to
enforce it, this contract has precious little to do with us, Americans.
There
has also been misguided talk about the Act of 1871 which was repealed
in 1874. The effect of the Act, even if it had succeeded, would have
changed the form of the business providing services under the
constitutional contract from an unincorporated business to an
incorporated business.
This
presages the abuse of bankruptcy protection claimed by these business
operators , but in-and-of itself, was not prohibited. Neither was the
sale nor the merger nor the succession to contract of the Subcontractors
prohibited.
This is because the contracts themselves remained the same. The obligations remained the same.
Indeed,
the obligations are the same as they ever were, except as properly
amended and ratified by the States of the Union —- which means that
there have been no actual Amendments to any of the actual Constitutions
since 1860.
Why?
Because
the actual States of the Union were not brought back into Session after
the Civil War, it has been impossible for us to ratify any Amendments.
We
slept and our people were mischaracterized and impersonated as
foreigners in their own country, forced to pay foreign taxes, and
subjected to foreign laws— by our Federal Subcontractors operated by
foreign governments —- the Holy See, the Inner City of London—- aka,
Government of Westminster, and the British Monarch.
All three evaded their obligations and acted in Gross Breach of Trust and violation of their Commercial Service Contract.
The findings are summarized as our Final Civil Judgment issued in April 2014 at
the end of a seven year investigation and due process action by our
still-operating unincorporated Federation of States and the remaining
known People of each State at that time.
The Judgment and Orders related to it were delivered to the other Principals acting as our Employees in this matter.
The
States of the Union were Summoned into Session, and here we are, with
all fifty physically defined American States accounted for and populated
by people holding the correct provenance and adopting their birthright
political status.
Our
role as Americans is to enforce the Constitutions and exercise our
rights guaranteed by them— while fully realizing that the Constitutions
are not about us. The Constitutions are contracts which our Federal
Subcontractors (and their State of State franchises) must obey, while we
stand apart under our separate foundation, The Declaration of
Independence.
You
must realize that the Constitutions and all that arises as a result of
the existence of these contracts is at best of tangential concern to us,
Americans. Why? Because the Constitutions aren’t about us.
The
Constitutions are about our Subcontractors— their rights and
obligations, their limitations with respect to us, their operations,
their definitions, etc., just as the Federal Code is not substantially
about us, with about 92% of it never being addressed to us at all.
Stop
focusing on the guys mowing your lawn and start focusing on your own
business— your State, your Government, your land and soil, your
obligations as a Virginian, Idahoan, New Yorker or Marylander.
Your States have been called into Session and are assembling right now.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
I Stand Corrected
By Anna Von Reitz
As
my son, the hard core researcher into all historical rabbit holes has
observed, the problem with history is all the omissions. And an omission
left uncorrected often has the same effect as an outright lie, because
it leads people to make false assumptions and adopt false beliefs.
There
is so much we simply don’t know, especially as regards world history,
because the English language press and English textbooks omitted it—
almost always with the unstated intention to make the Brits and their
affiliates look better.
I
recently made the mistake of saying that Texas was the only State to
have formed a separate stand-alone Republic prior to adopting Statehood,
and noted that Hawaii was Kingdom —- which it was, however, what was
omitted from my knowledge was the existence of a brief transitional
Republic of Hawai’i .
Essentially
a junta of sugar planters eager to remove tariffs and trade
restrictions blocking them from American mainland markets overthrew the
Hawaiian Monarchy in 1893.
U.S.
Marines promptly landed on Oahu in support, and the British Territorial
United States recognized the Republic of Hawai’i under the leadership
of Sanford B. Dole — as in Dole Pineapple.
This
phony Republic run by American entrepreneurs who had moved to the
islands to exploit their agricultural potential lasted five years, until
Hawaii was “annexed” by “the” United States in July of 1898.
The
word “annexed” glosses over the hostile take over involved — but it was
at that point a take over against the Lesser American Big Fish like
Dole, who exercised a king-like authority over most of the Hawaiian work
force, and the District Government Big Fish in Washington, D.C.
For
the people of Hawaii it meant one thing— foreign oligarchies operating
under a racist British-American Imperialist scheme, taking over and
running everything.
The
American home markets were thrown wide open to Hawaiian products and a
vast amount of infrastructure began to appear — ports and roads and
electrical grids and later airfields.
So-called
American Expansionism had gained its first offshore base in the
Pacific—- but upon further consideration we have to ask was this
“American” Expansionism or actually British Imperialism at work?
The American Federal Republic fell in 1860 and still awaits Reconstruction.
Who
or what was at the political helm of this country in international
affairs during the decades following the end of the Civil War? The
Scottish Commercial Corporation impersonating us as “The United States
of America”——Incorporated.
It
wasn’t “American Expansionism” at all. It was British Expansionism by
proxy that led to the annexation of Hawaii and which had engineered the
Republic of Hawai’i five years previously, too.
The
people of Hawaii had precious little role in any of these developments
so perhaps that is why the existence of the Republic of Hawai’i — unlike
the Republic of Texas, drops through the cracks in the history books.
In
any event, I stand corrected. There was a Republic of Hawai’i run for a
period of five years by foreign Robber Barons whose progeny remain
ensconced in ill-gotten positions of political and economic power to
this day.
The
main players in this charade of freedom and democracy were Americans
only in terms of place of birth; politically, they were Tories, adopting
British Territorial United States Citizenship, and operating their
businesses in Hawaii as British Crown Corporations—- and all singing the
same tune of British Colonialism and British Imperialism, howbeit with
an American accent.
While
the actual Americans were peacefully at home, our British Territorial
Subcontractors were busy “representing” us and doing things we never
authorized them to do—- and all at our expense.
Many
people have assumed that “American Imperialism” was actually American,
but no, these actions in Hawaii were carried out “in our names” by
Scottish Commercial Corporation subcontractors who were supposed to be
providing us with good faith “essential government services” in our own
country- not ramming around the Pacific impersonating us and using our
credit to back their piracy.
America didn’t annex Hawaii—- the Scottish Interlopers annexed Hawaii while impersonating us.
And
that is quite a different thing, requiring us and everyone else
involved to look at the history of Hawaii and our relationship with the
Hawaiian people with new eyes. They have only recently, as of October
2020, been formally enrolled as an American State of the Union, owing to
the fact that our American Government wasn’t in Session in 1959 when
Hawaii entered a quasi-statehood as a British Territorial Confederate
State doing business as the State of Hawaii.
As
such, Hawaii has never been administered as a true State of the Union
and Hawaii’s people have never experienced the freedom and security they
are owed. They have instead labored under the foreign Raj-like British
Territorial United States District Government and suffered its
predation.
These
same British Interlopers are guilty of the mistreatment of the American
Indians and the genocidal practices employed against them, the
implementation of the “Reservation” system—- think: “Federal Reserve”—-
and so much more.
As
usual, Great Britain is at the bottom of the dog pile—- and both here
and elsewhere we see the same patterns of deceit, impersonation,
omission, failure to disclose, credit theft, breach of trust and
misrepresentation.
It
has been accomplished by similar means throughout the known world —
implemented by bankers headquartered in the Inner City of London, and
enforced by attorneys — also headquartered in the Inner City of London.
The
Fleet Street Banks and Temple Bar Attorneys have operated a vast
criminal conspiracy against the rest of the world, with their members
impersonating entire governments —- including ours, for decades at a
time.
Our
own people have suffered as a result and we have unwittingly been used
as mercenaries in support of criminal activities — pillaging and illegal
confiscation at home, piracy abroad.
Next,
we will consider one of the largest, bloodiest and most expensive wars
in “American” history— the Philippine-American War, which by an Act of
Omission that staggers even my imagination, has been all-but completely
forgotten.
It lasted fifteen years. It cost hundreds of millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives.
By
comparison, the Spanish-American War that precipitated the
Philippine-American War, was a ten week spat, not even a paper cut, by
comparison.
One
must ask why a war that dwarfed Viet Nam by many orders of magnitude
has been “forgotten” and omitted from the history books entirely or
given only a footnote?
Could
it be that the Government of Westminster — the epicenter of all this
criminality and it’s partner in crime, the Inner City of London, have
something to hide?
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment