The Department Store of Negotiation/Tik Tok Rolling Stone Nanny State---Johnny Depp, Amber Heard defamation lawsuit

 

The Department Store of Negotiation

by Jon Rappoport

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

Some extraterrestrial civilization observing Earth would have issued a report to home base: “The planet is inhabited by different types of people who, basically, don’t get along with each other. They never will. Earth is some sort of mixed bag. Their elites have decided to build a single race out of this mish-mash, through propaganda, mind control, and biological experimentation. That program is destructive, and it won’t work.” The actual solution is a functioning Earth department of negotiation. But not a government entity. So I call it a department store. ---Many people at work cooking up ways for people who basically don’t get along to negotiate with each other. The subject has never been explored as extensively as it needs to be. Compromise is a slippery version of what we require, because it tends to make people abandon what they are. I’m not asking for that. Negotiation is in the vein of two fortresses agreeing to leave two roads open for travel and not blow them up. The fortresses remain. They don’t try to melt down into soft cheese. The department store would feature thousands of glass cases. Inside each case would be an illustration of a negotiation. Diplomats would stroll through the store every day. Absorbing possibilities. This is a forever enterprise. Inside a prison, a common yard for all inmates is insane. You have a black yard and a white yard and a Latin yard. And then you have a department store, for the best and brightest of the three groups. They browse, they talk to one another, they propose specific deals. They’re cautious. Circumspect. Little by little, arrangements are hammered out. Out in the world, there would have been a Russian-Ukrainian-NATO department store. For a decade or two. Zelensky wouldn’t have become President. George Soros would have been exiled from the Ukraine. NATO (the US) would have reduced the number of nuclear missiles ringing Russia. Negotiation is a method of avoiding extreme solutions. Including the extreme solution of declaring an all-out Peace, which would be alarming to all parties. Gradually, a tradition builds: people who want shooting wars and people who want to eradicate hatred suddenly and radically are widely considered to be psychotic. Hatred is a mountain of stone. During a given century, perhaps a layer one millimeter thick is worn away. Recognizing and accepting hatred between groups, however, has a beneficial and mysterious effect. Nothing changes, and yet something does change. Not through force. Not through demanding the alteration of language. Not through preaching. Not through the kind of condemnation and accusation and victim tunes we now swim in. People learn to see their hatreds of each other as money in the bank. And they cherish that money. They can count it. They can look at it every day and make sure it’s still there. Nobody is trying to seize the accounts. And they know about the department store. Which grows larger every month, but retains its careful and cautious repose and composure. A central feature of human culture is the stand-off. Against the odds, it is admired. The stand-off permits negotiation. ~~~ (The link to this article posted on my blog is here.) (Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport)

Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the worl

 

Tik Tok Rolling Stone Nanny State---Johnny Depp, Amber Heard defamation lawsuit

by Jon Rappoport

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Censorship on parade. Because we must be protected from dangerous content.

At infowars, Paul Watson has the story:

“TikTok censored numerous viral videos alleging inconsistencies in Amber Heard’s testimony after the platform was contacted by Rolling Stone magazine.”

“…seemingly keen to stop the spread of embarrassing viral videos which portrayed Heard in a bad light, Rolling Stone contacted the platform complaining that the videos ‘glorified violence or suffering’.”

“One of the videos in question, which was later deleted by TikTok, featured two cats playing the roles of Heard and Depp.”

“’In the video, Heard’s testimony is reenacted by a cat in a blond wig, with the same cat in a black wig and a Pirates of The Caribbean bandana playing Johnny Depp,’ reports Reclaim the Net. ‘When the video starts, the cat playing Heard is lightly slapped using a finger’.”

“TikTok removed several videos it was alerted to by Rolling Stone journalists, claiming they violated the platforms policies against bullying and harassment, which does not allow ‘content that disparages victims of violent tragedies’.”

Excuse me, but the whole point of the court case is deciding WHETHER THERE WAS A VICTIM OF A VIOLENT TRAGEDY.

This is not ASSUMED, prior to the trial.

Apparently, Tik Tok missed that point.

Or possibly they and Rolling Stone have already adjudicated the case and I missed the memo.

There is also the issue of how dangerous two video cats playing Johnny and Amber actually are.

But PRIOR assumption/adjudication is the Big One, because these days, that is the preferred method of analysis. “We know what the outcome should be, so we don’t have to waste time getting to it.”

Depp and Heard and their incompetent lawyers made a stupid mistake. Rather than filing a case with a court, they should have gone directly to Rolling Stone and Tik Tok to make a ruling about the violent tragedy.

According to the same logic, independent journalists should send their articles to the new Government Disinformation Board before publishing them.

I could have saved two years and over 300 articles about the COVID fraud, by simply making proper inquiries, prior to posting. Actually, prior to writing.

“Dear Sirs and Madams and Other Genders: Here is a list of conclusions I’m making about COVID. Please let me know whether I should allow any of them to see the light of day. Your faithful servant…”

Bottom line: If you or I are considering making any statement about a favored class of purported victims, regardless of circumstances or context, we should consult a preferred authority first. To see whether we are disturbing an ongoing AGENDA.

Agenda=Truth.

As we all know.

And once we do know, we can couch our remarks in a way that endears us to everyone else who also knows, up front, what the outcome of a given event ought to be.

It’s a simple way to do business and succeed in the marketplace of ideas.

Closed ideas.

~~~

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)

(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport)