"Stop arguing about the existence of the virus"
|
The headline of this article has become a battle cry among some “alternative journalists,” activists, lawyers, and doctors.
As
my readers know, I’ve devoted considerable space, over the past two
years, to presenting evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is a scientific fairy
tale, a con, and the virus doesn’t exist.
So when I hear this battle cry, I’m motivated to mention a few significant points.
Let me start by countering the claim that debating the existence of the virus is wasting time.
Here’s
a shocker. A person can do more than one thing at the same time. For
example, he can expose/oppose the toxic vaccine. He can expose the
murderous COVID treatments (ventilators, sedatives, antiviral drugs). He
can expose using simple flu-like illness to create fraudulent COVID
case numbers.
And he can ALSO expose the fact that the virus has never been isolated (discovered) or sequenced.
So highlighting the non-existence of the virus doesn’t rule out dealing with other vital concerns.
This
may come as a surprise, but it’s even possible to go to court to
challenge a vaccine mandate, while ALSO arguing elsewhere that the virus
doesn’t exist. I know. Amazing, right?
Those
alarmed by “the virus doesn’t exist” also say: making that statement
leaves us open to being called whackos, and leaves us unable to convince
people that all our other criticisms of the pandemic are true.
I
would counter that in two ways. Millions of people already believe
we’re whackos, even those of us who take a sacred blood oath that the
virus is real.
And
second, people going against the grain, when their vital issue is still
in the budding stage, are always called nuts. Trust me, there was a
time when criticizing vaccines made people look like total whackos in
the eyes of the general public---and it took decades of fighting the
consensus to bring that criticism into the open, where many people saw
the truth about jabs.
Here’s
another fun fact. The entire medical cartel thrives on the insane
proposition---launched with fervor more than a hundred years ago---that
people suffer from thousands of distinct diseases, each of which is
caused by a single germ, which must be treated by a toxic drug and
prevented by a toxic vaccine.
It is this great lie that that has killed millions upon millions upon millions of people.
Therefore, the very real question about the existence of viruses in general is more than a weird preoccupation.
Next,
those who claim, “OF COURSE viruses exist,” don’t know what the hell
they’re talking about. They’re merely PARROTING what they learned in
school or what researchers baldly claim in studies.
“Well, all virologists can’t be wrong.”
Yes,
Virginia, they can all be wrong. Just as vaccinologists can all be
wrong about “the remarkable safety and efficacy of vaccines.”
Some
of the OF COURSE VIRUSES EXIST people are new to the way blogs and
videos work. They’ve never encountered commenters in any great numbers
before. So when a few dozen committed people suddenly tell them they
should examine their premises more carefully and consider what really
goes on in virology labs, these OF COURSE people are annoyed and
irritated. They don’t like being challenged on basic issues. They don’t
like feeling that the floor might suddenly shift under their feet. So
they turn on their arrogance machines.
So be it.
The issue isn’t going away. Nor should it.
Despite
growing digital censorship, the internet is still the Wild West in
certain respects. People are going to say THE VIRUS DOESN’T EXIST, and
VIRUSES DON’T EXIST.
And foundations will shake.
Foundations of the medical cartel, and foundations underlying people’s cherished assumptions.
In any area of human life, there are conflicts between “this is strategy” and “this is the truth.” There always will be.
Trying to shortchange the truth or casually say the truth is a lie doesn’t work.
NO
ONE who is reading this article has ever been in a virology lab and
witnessed the step by step process of “discovering a new virus.” I find
that stunning. And yet all sorts of people are quite ready to assert
with great finality that they know all about isolating viruses.
If
by chance, someone reading this article HAS actually been in a lab and
“discovered a virus,” you can bet your bottom dollar he won’t let you or
me in there with a full film crew and our outlier experts asking very
pointed questions about each “scientific” move he makes, as he “isolates
a virus.”
To which somebody might reply: “Well, I’ve never seen a car being made in a factory, but I drive one with full confidence.”
Yes,
but when the “virus discovered in a lab” results in you or someone you
love being dosed with a drug or vaccine that maims you or kills your
family member, you damn well should want to get into “that factory where
the car is made.”
But you can’t. They won’t let you…
…Despite
the fact that, as I’ve documented many times, the US medical system
kills, by a very conservative estimate, 225,000 people a year, or 2.25
million people per decade.
Chew on THAT for a while.
Here is one of my articles on the subject of virus isolation:
---Dr.
Andrew Kaufman refutes “isolation” of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step
analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the
virus exists---
The global medical community has been asserting that “a pandemic is being caused by a virus, SARS-Cov-2.”
But what if the virus doesn’t exist?
People have been asking me for a step-by-step analysis of a mainstream claim of virus-isolation. Well, here it is.
“Isolation”
should mean the virus has been separated out from all surrounding
material, so researchers can say, “Look, we have it. It exists.”
I
took a typical passage from a published study, a “methods” section, in
which researchers describe how they “isolated the virus.” I sent it to
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and he provided his analysis in detail.
I found several studies that used very similar language in explaining how “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated.” For example, "Severe
Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus
Disease, United States, (Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 26, No. 6 --
June 2020)".
First, I want to provide a bit of background that will help the reader understand what is going on in the study.
The
researchers are creating a soup in the lab. This soup contains a number
of compounds. Human cells, monkey cells, antibiotics, other chemicals,
random genetic material.
The
researchers assume, without evidence, that “the virus” is in this soup,
because they’re dropped a mucus sample from a patient in the soup. At
no time do they separate the purported virus from the surrounding
material in the soup. Isolation of the virus is not occurring.
They
set about showing that the monkey (and/or human cells) they put in the
soup are dying. This cell-death, they claim, is being caused by “the
virus.” However, as you’ll see, Dr. Kaufman dismantles this claim.
There is no reason to infer that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup at all, or that it is killing cells.
Finally,
the researchers assert, with no proof or rational explanation, that
they were able to discover the genetic sequence of “the virus.”
Here are the study’s statements claiming isolation, alternated with Dr. Kaufman’s analysis:
STUDY: “We used Vero CCL-81 cells for isolation and initial passage [in the soup in the lab]…”
KAUFMAN:
“Vero cells are foreign cells from the kidneys of monkeys and a source
of contamination. Virus particles should be purified directly from
clinical samples in order to prove the virus actually exists. Isolation
means separation from everything else. So how can you separate/isolate a
virus when you add it to something else?”
STUDY:
“…We cultured Vero E6, Vero CCL-81, HUH 7.0, 293T, A549, and EFKB3
cells in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (5% or 10%)…”
KAUFMAN:
“Why use minimal essential media, which provides incomplete nutrition
[to the cells]? Fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic
material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from
viruses.”
STUDY:
“…We used both NP and OP swab specimens for virus isolation. For
isolation, limiting dilution, and passage 1 of the virus, we pipetted 50
μL of serum-free DMEM into columns 2–12 of a 96-well tissue culture
plate, then pipetted 100 μL of clinical specimens into column 1 and
serially diluted 2-fold across the plate…”
KAUFMAN: “Once again, misuse of the word isolation.”
STUDY:
“…We then trypsinized and resuspended Vero cells in DMEM containing 10%
fetal bovine serum, 2× penicillin/streptomycin, 2×
antibiotics/antimycotics, and 2× amphotericin B at a concentration of
2.5 × 105 cells/mL…”
KAUFMAN:
“Trypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that digests proteins. Wouldn’t that
cause damage to the cells and particles in the culture which have
proteins on their surfaces, including the so called spike protein?”
KAUFMAN:
“Why are antibiotics added? Sterile technique is used for the culture.
Bacteria may be easily filtered out of the clinical sample by
commercially available filters (GIBCO) [3]. Finally, bacteria may be
easily seen under the microscope and would be readily identified if they
were contaminating the sample. The specific antibiotics used,
streptomycin and amphotericin (aka ‘ampho-terrible’), are toxic to the
kidneys and we are using kidney cells in this experiment! Also note they
are used at ‘2X’ concentration, which appears to be twice the normal
amount. These will certainly cause damage to the Vero cells.”
STUDY: “…We added [not isolated]
100 μL of cell suspension directly to the clinical specimen dilutions
and mixed gently by pipetting. We then grew the inoculated cultures in a
humidified 37°C incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed for
cytopathic effects (CPEs) daily. We used standard plaque assays for
SARS-CoV-2, which were based on SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory
syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) protocols...”
STUDY: “When CPEs were observed, we scraped cell monolayers with the back of a pipette tip…”
KAUFMAN:
“There was no negative control experiment described. Control
experiments are required for a valid interpretation of the results.
Without that, how can we know if it was the toxic soup of antibiotics,
minimal nutrition, and dying tissue from a sick person which caused the
cellular damage or a phantom virus? A proper control would consist of
the same exact experiment except that the clinical specimen should come
from a person with illness unrelated to covid, such as cancer, since
that would not contain a virus.”
STUDY:
“…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for
confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate
to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”
KAUFMAN:
“How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist?
What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the
origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture
containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows,
and monkeys?”
---end of study quotes and Kaufman analysis---
My
comments: Dr. Kaufman does several things here. He shows that
isolation, in any meaningful sense of the word “isolation,” is not
occurring.
Dr.
Kaufman also shows that the researchers want to use damage to the cells
and cell-death as proof that “the virus” is in the soup they are
creating. In other words, the researchers are assuming that if the cells
are dying, it must be the virus that is doing the killing. But Dr.
Kaufman shows there are obvious other reasons for cell damage and death
that have nothing to do with a virus. Therefore, no proof exists that
“the virus” is in the soup or exists at all.
And
finally, Dr. Kaufman explains that the claim of genetic sequencing of
“the virus” is absurd, because there is no proof that the virus is
present. How do you sequence something when you haven’t shown it exists,
and you don’t have an isolated specimen of it?
Readers
who are unfamiliar with my work (over 375 articles on the subject of
the “pandemic” during the past year) will ask: Then why are people
dying? What about the huge number of cases and deaths? I have answered
these and other questions in great detail. The subject of this article
is: have researchers proved SARS-CoV-2 exists?
The answer is no.
~~~
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment