Buffalo mass shooting---say what?
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
The Drudge Report effect: a dumpster of social engineering and mind control
|
In reporting on the Buffalo shooting, Drudge prints a series of headlines at the upper left of the page:
* Buffalo shooter targeted Black neighborhood...
* Was inspired by racist theory underpinning global carnage...
* Scene like Armageddon...
* Terrified shoppers jumped in freezers...
* Gov. calls for social media crackdown; 'Instruments of evil'...
* Copycats becoming deadlier... Grim chronology...
* UPDATE: One dead, multiple injured in CA church shooting; Taiwanese congregation...
The key phrases are “inspired by racist theory underpinning,” and “social media crackdown.”
The whole point is convincing people to believe in the INCITEMENT narrative, when it comes to free speech:
“You
see, we have to limit what people can post and write and say, because
OTHER PEOPLE will be inspired by words to commit evil and violent
crimes.”
This is the preferred method of social engineering and mind control these days.
Of
course, it’s selective. No “liberal” in his right mind would suggest
that leaking the Supreme Court opinion to overturn Roe v Wade incited
people to gather at Justices’ homes to try to try to intimidate the
Court. Of course not.
But racist posts online incited a white man to commit mass murder of black people in Buffalo. Sure. Right.
Taking
the incitement narrative further, we’re supposed to blame the content
of online racist posts for the mass murder, instead of focusing on the
single shooter himself and saying he is solely responsible for the
murders he committed.
Because putting responsibility on his head takes away the effect of the social engineering con.
We
have to clamp down hard on social media and censor until the cows come
home---to prevent mass murders. That’s what we’re supposed to believe.
Of course, any language in any context can be blamed for inciting someone else.
You
write a series of tweets---and a few months later, a print-out of the
tweets is found in a locker along with 6000 pages of other material; and
the locker was rented by a man who just killed six shoppers in a
mall---so you’re guilty of inciting.
Drudge
goes for the tabloid effect. He could have posted links to any number
of statements about free speech and the Constitution recently posted by
authors…but where is the lurid payoff in doing that?
Here’s
the picture you’re supposed to see: out there in the country, there are
hundreds of men just waiting for the verbal trigger that will set them
off. Without those triggers (posts, tweets), they would NEVER cause
harm. It’s the triggers that are the problem. The triggers must be
eliminated. Censored.
That’s
what you’re supposed to see and believe, instead of realizing that a
few men out there are already inclined to commit mass murder, and come
hell or high water, they’ll FIND a reason to go on a rampage. And no
amount of censorship will stop them.
And
guess what? This is exactly the situation that applies to rabid
censors. No matter what, they will find a reason to impose censorship on
the population. They’ll find a reason, and it will align with their
political and social agendas.
That’s called reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment