Note to the reader about yesterday's article on the pfizer secret document---corrections:
After
publishing the pfizer secret document article, I discovered that the
gigantic Pfizer list of medical conditions was apparently not a report
on logged cases of adverse events, but instead a complete list of
conditions that Pfizer would be monitoring, in order to see whether they
popped up on their radar as reactions to the COVID vaccine.
Why
would Pfizer publish this extraordinary list? Because as they state,
these medical conditions have been associated with severe COVID-19 “and
vaccines in general.” In other words, vaccines in general, historically,
have carried enormous risk and dangers over an incredibly wide area of
medical conditions. This is a key confession.
Further,
if you read the full secret Pfizer document, you will come to Table 7,
which does list a number of categories of adverse reactions, all of
which WERE reported in the first three months of the Pfizer vaccine
rollout. This IS stunning.
In
the secret document, Pfizer does list 1,223 deaths occurring after just
three months of the vaccine rollout. This should have been sufficient
to cause a complete halt to the vaccination program.
Finally,
Pfizer admits that in the first three months of the vaccine rollout, it
logged a staggering 42,086 cases of adverse reactions. And as far as I
can determine from the Pfizer document, these 42,086 cases represented a
total of 139,888 adverse events. In other words, in many cases, there
were reports of multiple adverse events.
* * *
As my readers know, I’ve been proving for well over a year that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist.
Therefore, any test for it would be absurd.
However,
I frequently put on my hazmat suit and enter the crazy world where all
“the experts” claim the virus is real. I make these forays to show that,
even within their fantasy bubble, and by their own standards, the pros
are fatally contradicting themselves and lying constantly.
That’s
what I’m doing in this article. I’ve got my hazmat suit on and I’m
exploring the crazy landscape. I’ve published this piece several times,
but I want to make sure people understand how the test has been used to
manufacture the false appearance of a pandemic.
OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.
Right
from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one
COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.
Well, how about THIS?
July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”:
Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and
misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive
result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.
Here,
in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at
about the 4-minute mark): “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle
threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent
[aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a
true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.
Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.
That’s called a false positive.
What
Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test
for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not
35.
Therefore,
all labs in the US following the FDA guideline are knowingly or
unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…
Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…
The total number of COVID cases in America---which is based on the test---is a gross falsity.
The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.
Let
me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless
when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40
cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the
crime in a nutshell.
“Hello,
America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a
devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked
down.”
If
anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into
a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake
science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the
global economy and its 8 billion citizens.
All
right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written
above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document
titled: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” This
document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the
virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still
relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact
that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category
called “Emergency Use Authorization.”
FDA:
“…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all
2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the
threshold line within 40.00 cycles ([less than] 40.00 Ct).”
Naturally,
testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if
the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to
40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”
Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17, 2020) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” Here are money quotes:
“Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”
“Set-the-limit” would mean, We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.
The
Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus,
called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to
doctors and coronavirus patients.”
Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.
Get the picture?
I hope so.
If
a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay
attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and
sent to the Arctic to sell snow.
2021
CODA: Recently, Florida, a state which has remained far more open and
free from COVID restrictions and mandates than most other states, is
reporting very low COVID case numbers. Why?
Because
as of December 3, 2020, the state of Florida started doing something
unheard of. It demanded that labs report the number of cycles (“cycle
threshold”) for every test they run.
Here is the relevant wording in a release from the Florida governor, Ron DeSantis, and the state Department of Health:
“Cycle
threshold (CT) values and their reference ranges, as applicable, must
be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting
or by fax immediately.”
“If
your laboratory is not currently reporting CT values and their
reference ranges, the lab should begin reporting this information to
FDOH within seven days of the date of this memorandum.”
We
can assume there is only one reason for this order. The Florida
governor and the Department of Health are aware that tests run at 35
cycles or higher are useless and misleading, creating a mountain of
false-positives, and they want to stop this crime.
And
with the Governor’s recent appointment of a new state Surgeon General,
who is well aware of certain aspects of the COVID fraud, the requirement
for labs to start telling the truth is taking hold.
Hence, lower case numbers.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment