Keeping Unvaccinated Children From School Is Discrimination With No Medical Or Scientific Basis
December 18, 2021
NOTE: It is now clear that the vaccinators are determined to force their injections on every single person regardless of whether they need them or not. In recent months children have become one of their primary targets, and they are coming with increasingly backhanded tactics to get them injected. One of them is the policy of sending into quarantine unvaccinated children who come into contact with an infected student while at the same time allowing their vaccinated counterparts to continue with their in-school instruction. This, of course, makes no sense from a point of view of public health, since the vaccines do not protect against infection. Nevertheless, it serves the vaccinators’ purpose, because it will essentially shut out unvaccinated children from school given that infections will be very common in the next three months. Below is a sample letter you can use to push back and explain to schoolmasters and health authorities why their policy makes no sense.
*****
Dear Mr Schoolmaster,
We would like to express our deep dismay at the fact that our child was sent home along with her unvaccinated classmates after coming into contact with a child who tested positive for the coronavirus.
We understand that the vaccinated children were allowed to continue coming to school.
The policy of quarantining only the unvaccinated after exposure to infected persons has no scientific or medical basis. This is because the available data makes it very clear that the current Covid-19 vaccines are not capable of protecting their recipients from contracting the coronavirus and transmitting it to others.
This is a well-known fact that has been established by research, peer-reviewed studies, and statements by top public health officials.
On August 5 in an interview with CNN, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the Director of the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) admitted that the Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission of the coronavirus. Referring to the vaccines that are currently available against Covid-19, Dr. Walensky stated, “but what they [the vaccines] can’t do any anymore is to prevent transmission.”
The implication of Dr Walensky’s statement is that vaccinated persons are getting infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and then in turn infect others whether they are vaccinated or not. This means that a person’s vaccination status has no bearing on how prone they are to getting infected or how likely they are to transmit the virus to those around them.
Dr. Walensky’s position has been borne out by an extensive body of evidence. In the last six months, “breakthrough” infections – which are infections detected in vaccinated individuals – have been very common, and there are even some indications that vaccinated individuals are more prone to getting infected than the unvaccinated.
Last week, for example, an article appeared in the US magazine Newsweek titled Omicron Variant Found in More Vaccinated People in U.S. as Resistance Concerns Persist. The article points out that so far more Omicron cases have been detected in those who have been vaccinated than in those who have not been.
Earlier this year, health authorities at the Ben Gurion airport in Israel found that vaccinated travellers were twice as likely to test positive for Sars-Cov-2 than those who had not been inoculated. In other words, the vaccinated were 100 percent more likely to be infected than their unvaccinated counterparts.
Just this week Associated Press reported about widespread Covid outbreaks at several American universities which have vaccination rates around 98 percent. This means that nearly all of the students who tested positive have been vaccinated. The outbreaks have been so severe that they forced the universities to go back online and reinstitute measures that were place before vaccination became available. This clearly shows just how ineffective the vaccines are at containing the spread of the virus.
We can also see how frequent breakthrough infections are by looking at official government data of certain countries. According to a report issued by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), in the period between October 25th and November 21st, 61 percent of all infections in England were among fully vaccinated individuals. Not only are fully vaccinated people contracting the coronavirus on a wide scale, but they are falling seriously ill and dying in numbers that far exceed those of their unvaccinated fellow citizens. In the same period, over 80 percent of hospitalizations and deaths occurred among vaccinated individuals.
You can check the report by the UK Health Security Agency at this link. The information on cases, deaths and hospitalizations is summarized in tables 8, 10a and 10b which you can find on pages 29, 31 and 32 respectively.
The inability of the vaccines to prevent infection from spreading through communities has also been documented by peer-reviewed academic studies that show that high vaccination rates have no bearing on Covid case rates. In fact, high vaccination rates often coincide with infection surges in populations.
The most recent study on this subject appeared at the end of September in the prestigious, peer-reviewed European Journal of Epidemiology. The study is titled “Increases In COVID-19 Are Unrelated To Levels Of Vaccination Across 68 Countries And 2947 Counties In The United States.” The study’s lead author is S. V. Subramanian of Harvard. You can read it at this link.
Here is what the study found:
“At the country-level, there appears to be no discernible relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days…”
Not only do vaccines not diminish the occurrence of this disease, but they actually seem to increase it. This is what the authors observed:
“In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.”
Given that there is no evidence that vaccines provide any discernible protection against infection, keeping unvaccinated students from school on exposure to an infected child while at the same time allowing vaccinated children to continue with their education in person does not make rational sense.
Given that vaccinated children can get infected as easily – if not more so – as unvaccinated children, both groups should be treated the same way in this kind of situation.
Singling out unvaccinated children and denying them access to in-person education, amounts, in effect, to discrimination against the unvaccinated with no medical or scientific justification.
We, therefore, request that the school cease this practice until there is evidence that vaccination protects against infection or slows its spread in community.
Why we have decided not to have our child vaccinated
Given what is known at this time about the coronavirus and the vaccines, we do not intend to have our child vaccinated in the foreseeable future. We have arrived at our position after a careful consideration of the available data and scientific findings.
Here is what we know so far about the coronavirus and the vaccines:
The vaccines do not prevent or slow the spread of infection. Quite to the contrary, there is some evidence that the opposite may be the case. Therefore, taking the vaccine would protect neither our child nor her schoolmates from contracting the virus and transmitting it to others.
It is not clear what level of protection the vaccines provide against severe Covid or death. As we have seen from the official government data out of the UK, vaccinal protection does not amount to much, given that at the 70 percent vaccination rate over 80 percent of cases and severe Covid and deaths are among the vaccinated. Based on these figures, the vaccines seem to have a negative overall efficacy.
In any event, healthy children are extremely unlikely to suffer severe disease from the coronavirus. A large German study found that in the first 15 months of the pandemic, not one healthy child in the 5-18 demographic died of Covid.
Other countries are seeing similar results. According to a presentation by Fiona Havers, who is an official at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) working on the agency’s COVID-19 Response Team, “[D]uring the 12-month period October 2, 2020 through October 3, 2021, there were 66 COVID-19 associated deaths in children 5-11.”
But even this does not tell the full story, because most – if not all – of those unfortunate children suffered from serious underlying conditions, which according to Fiona Havers, included: feeding tube dependence, chronic metabolic disease, cardiovascular disease, and immunosuppressed conditions.
Even before the German study came out, the New York Times observed that for children “the danger of severe Covid is so low as to be difficult to quantify.” In other words, the risk is essentially non-existent.
While the risk from Covid to healthy children is extremely small, the risk from the vaccines is real. Only last week AstraZeneca scientists admitted that their vaccine causes blood clots. It is highly disconcerting that these vaccines are still being administered to children as the risk of blood clots far exceeds their risk of severe Covid.
Myocarditis and pericarditis as vaccinal side effects have been of special concern in young people. It is heart-breaking to see young children die of heart attacks and strokes in numbers never seen before. According to a cost-benefit analysis conducted by risk-assessment expert Toby Rogers, in the 5 to 11 age range, 117 healthy kids will have to die of vaccine-related side effects in order to save one child from dying of Covid 19.
To see how deeply all parents should be concerned about the safety of the current vaccines, please consider the chart below. This chart presents data from the VAERS database. VAERS stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which is a US government-run facility that collects information about vaccine side effects.
The chart depicts the number of yearly death reports following vaccination for the last thirty years. It shows that the numbers held relatively steady from 1990 until 2020, and they were generally under 500 cases per year. This changed dramatically toward the end of 2020 when the Covid vaccines were introduced. At that point, we see a rapid explosion of death reports. So exponential is the increase that the graph line shoots up almost vertically.
You can see the source of the chart here.
It should be a matter of grave concern that in the last 12 months there were more reports of vaccine-related deaths than in the previous 29 years combined. This should raise red flags, because it shows that the Covid vaccines may not be as safe as initially advertised.
In any case, it is quite obvious that our child’s risk from Covid is far lower than the risk of potential vaccine injury. Like many other parents, we do not wish to take any chances until the vaccines’ safety concerns are properly investigated and any problems remedied.
Conclusion
Our decision not to have our child vaccinated at this time has been guided by the best available knowledge and data. We feel fully confident that our decision is based on science and reason. As concerned parents we shall monitor the situation closely, and if things change and safe and effective vaccines that protect against infection become available, we will be happy to reconsider our decision.
In the meantime, we request that you not single out unvaccinated children for exclusion from in-person instruction on exposure to an infected pupil.
Since the vaccines provide no meaningful protection against infection, a student’s vaccination status bears no relevance to the student’s infectiousness. To act as if did is unscientific and discriminatory.
Given the present state of affairs, the only way to ensure that a school or any public space is virus-free is through testing those present regardless of their vaccination status.
Thank you for your consideration and we await your response.
Sincerely Yours,
Loving and Concerned Parents
PS
Below is a recent statement by Dr. Robert Malone regarding vaccination of children. Dr. Malone is one of the best known and accomplished vaccine scientists in the world today. Here is a brief summary of his credentials:
Dr Malone is the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines: including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.
Dr Malone has authored approximately 100 scientific publications with over 12,000 citations of his work (per Google Scholar with an “outstanding” impact factor rating). He has been an invited speaker at over 50 conferences and has sat on or served as chairperson on HHS and DoD committees. He currently sits as a non-voting member on the NIH ACTIV committee, which is tasked with managing clinical research for a variety of drug and antibody treatments for COVID-19.
Dr. Malone delivered his statement at a livestream event on December 12 at the Global Covid Summit. In the course of the conference, Dr. Malone and other leading physicians discussed their recent Physicians’ Declaration update and why healthy children should not be vaccinated due to associated risks. You can review supporting evidence at this link.
Full Text of Malone Statement
My name is Robert Malone, and I am speaking to you as a parent, grandparent, physician and scientist. I don’t usually read from a prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.
I stand by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I’m generally pro-vaccination. I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases.
Before you inject your child – a decision that is irreversible – I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created.
There are three issues that parents need to understand before they take this irrevocable decision. The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, including:
- Their brain and nervous system.
- Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots.
- Their reproductive system.
And most importantly, this vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system. The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable.
You can’t fix the lesions within their brains.
You cannot repair heart tissue scarring.
You cannot repair a genetically reset immune system, and this vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family.
The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.
We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really understand the risks associated with this new technology. The harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later.
I ask you to ask yourself, as a fellow parent, if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history.
One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie. Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents.
It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family, if not the world from this disease.
In summary: there is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of their lives.
The risk/benefit analysis is not even close with this vaccine, for children.
As a parent and grandparent, my strong recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.
No comments:
Post a Comment