MANY women are posting reports of disrupted and unusual menstrual cycles, heavy bleeding, and miscarriages.
What’s
more, some of these women haven’t received the COVID vaccine, but
they’ve been in close contact with others who have been
vaccinated---leading to the question:
Can
the COVID vaccine (which is actually an experimental genetic treatment)
“shed” something harmful that can be passed from person to person?
Perhaps that sounds impossible, but in the world of genetics, much can go wrong.
In fact, for the past 25 years, we’ve had an illustration of shedding right in front of our eyes: GMO crops.
If
you recall, Monsanto assured one and all that these crops---genetically
engineered to survive the sprayed herbicide Roundup---would flourish,
while weeds would succumb to the chemical.
So
what actually happened? The weeds were resistant and became
super-giants. And the Monsanto genes drifted from farm to farm,
contaminating crops that were never meant to be engineered.
The Monsanto genes were “shed” and they spread.
This
spread was not only the result of obvious cross-pollination. Bacteria
in the soil, and in human digestive systems, also picked up and
incorporated the Monsanto genes.
Why couldn’t “shed and spread” occur with a genetic COVID vaccine?
The
COVID injection contains a piece of RNA. The RNA nanoparticles enter
human cells, forcing those cells to manufacture a protein similar to a
protein in the purported SARS-CoV-2 virus. The immune system mounts a
neutralizing attack against that protein, thus “rehearsing” to defeat
the virus if it comes along later.
That’s the hypothesis.
In
practice, who knows how many different dangerous and harmful processes
can be detonated in the human body---plus the drifting of those genetic
effects from person to person, whether vaccinated or not.
Yes,
I know the experts will point out the difference between inserting
genes into crops and inserting them into humans. They’ll say the GMO
crops are supposed to hold on to those new genes long-term, but the
COVID injection only has short-lived genetic effects.
Supposedly, this is true. Supposedly.
The
universe of genetic experimentation, however, is rife with problems,
mistakes, unintended consequences, as well as efforts to make weapons
that attack life at basic levels.
Consider, for example, gene drive technology, which asks the question: what species should we make extinct today?
Why are Bill Gates and the US military involved in forwarding that technology?
A
gene-drive scientist says, “I have a plan. By manipulating genes, we
can make invasive rodents extinct, on an island where humans are
living.”
In the next fraction of a second, a flurry of questions pops up.
The overarching question is: Does this mean genetic manipulation can make ANY species extinct?
Here is a passage from Gene Drive Files, a vital site with an enormous amount of referenced information on the subject:
“Gene
drives are a gene-editing application that allows genetic engineers to
drive a single artificial trait through an entire population by ensuring
that all of an organism’s offspring carry that trait. For example,
recent experiments are fitting mice with ‘daughterless’ gene drives that
will cascade through mouse populations so that only male pups are born,
ensuring that the population becomes extinct after a few generations.”
“Proponents
have framed gene drives as a breakthrough tool for eradicating pests or
invasive species. However, the Gene Drive Files reveal that these
‘conservation’ efforts are primarily supported by military funds.”
Gene
drive technology could be deployed to wipe out troublesome
plant-parasites, weeds, crops, animal pests, animals, and…humans. Mull
that over with your morning coffee.
Several
years ago, certain UN member nations were considering a recommendation
to call a moratorium on the use of gene drives. However, Bill Gates
showed up to try to squash the moratorium.
The
Gene Drive Files reports: “Documents received under Freedom of
Information requests reveal that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
paid a private agriculture and biotechnology PR firm $1.6 million for
activities on Gene Drives. This included running a covert ‘advocacy
coalition’ which appears to have intended to skew the only UN expert
process addressing gene drives…”
“Following
global calls in December 2016 from Southern countries and over 170
organizations for a UN moratorium on gene drives, emails to gene drive
advocates received under a Freedom of Information request by Prickly
Research reveal that a private public affairs firm ‘Emerging Ag’
received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to co-ordinate
the ‘fight back against gene drive moratorium proponents’.”
There’s more from the Gene Drive Files. It involves the military:
“A
trove of emails (The Gene Drive Files) from leading U.S. gene drive
researchers reveals that the U.S. Military is taking the lead in driving
forward gene drive development.”
“Emails
obtained through a freedom of Information request by U.S.–based Prickly
Research reveal that the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA) has given approximately $100 million for gene drive research,
$35 million more than previously reported, making them likely the
largest single funder of gene drive research on the planet. The emails
also reveal that DARPA either funds or co-ordinates with almost all
major players working on gene drive development as well as the key
holders of patents on CRISPR gene editing technology.”
“These
funds go beyond the US; DARPA is now also directly funding gene drive
researchers in Australia (including monies given to an Australian
government agency, CSIRO) and researchers in the UK. The files also
reveal an extremely high level of interest and activity by other
sections of the U.S. military and Intelligence community.”
As
I’ve shown in past articles, the latest and greatest gene-editing tools
(e.g., CRISPR), which are used for gene drives, are far from slam-dunk
precise, despite official assurances.
For
example, Nature Communications, May 31, 2017, “CRISPR/Cas9 targeting
events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse
genome.” That’s UNINTENDED genetic “deletions and insertions.”
And
how about this study? It was published in Genome Biology on June 14,
2017, and is titled, “CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing induces exon
skipping by alternative splicing or exon deletion.” An exon is “a
segment of a DNA or RNA molecule containing information coding for a
protein or peptide sequence.” So you can see that exon skipping or
deletion is a very bad outcome.
In
other words, ANY gene editing done on ANY species opens the door wide
to all sorts of errors and unforeseen consequences. Doomsday genetic
warfare and mutually assured destruction are the far shore of
insanity…but closer in, where more limited experiments are taking place,
there is no safety zone, either. Insanity reigns there as well.
Read what adorers of genetic experimentation have gushed:
“I
went to Monsanto, and I spent a lot of time with the scientists there,
and I have revised my outlook, and I'm very excited about telling the
world. When you’re in love, you want to tell the world.” (Bill Nye, the
Science Guy)
“I
know it's a long shot and people would say it's 'too absurd'… but I'm
doing this with hopes of making a Mickey Mouse some day.” (Arikuni
Uchimura, quoted in "Japan bio-scientists produce 'singing mouse'", The
Independent, 21 December 2010.)
On
the other hand, there is this: “Genetic engineering is to traditional
crossbreeding what the nuclear bomb was to the sword.” (Andrew Kimbrell,
executive director of Center for Food Safety)
So…we
have a new COVID vaccine, based on experimental technology that
delivers genetic instructions to cells of the body---instructions to
create a protein that would otherwise never be created.
We’re told nothing can go wrong.
We have many examples of genetic technology going very wrong.
Farms
that were supposed to be protected from Monsanto gene-drift turned into
GMO Monsanto farms. So why couldn’t unvaccinated people turn into
vaccinated people, through “shed and spread,” without ever receiving the
COVID injection?
The
problem is, the officials and experts who would answer that question
for us are riddled with conflicts of interest; and they pretend to know
what they don’t know; and they’re afraid of losing their jobs if they
contradict the party line; and they’re experienced professional liars.
They’ve
rewritten the old fable, The Boy Who Cried Wolf. These professionals
NEVER cry wolf, no matter what disasters are brewing.
So we can never believe what they say.
Now
let’s consider a key Pfizer document titled: “A PHASE 1/2/3,
PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO
EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF
SARS-COV-2RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY
INDIVIDUALS.”
On
page 67, we find a warning about potential adverse effects of the
vaccine. The abstruse term “study intervention” pops up. It surely means
“vaccination.” “Environmental exposure” means contact with elements of
the vaccine other than by injection.
Warning
of adverse effect: “A female is found to be pregnant while being
exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to
environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure
during pregnancy:”
“A
female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is
pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by
inhalation or skin contact.”
“A
male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the
study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female
partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
These
warnings, from the vaccine manufacturer, Pfizer, are shocking. They
imply that women can be harmed by breathing in, or contacting by skin,
the vaccine as it moves from person to person. Which would be
“shedding.”
And what is being transferred from person to person? What is in the vaccine? Genetic material. RNA.
---There
is a Coda to this whole business. I write it because I don’t believe in
ringing lots of alarm bells and leaving people with nothing but fear.
From
personal experience, and 83 years of living, I know that people have an
extraordinary ability to outlast elite insanity, no matter what.
Our
faith, desire for freedom, creative force, resistance, outrage,
immortal refusal to give in; these are the core of a story that has been
unfolding for centuries and millennia.
This
story goes beyond the forces arrayed against us. Regardless of the
machinations brought to bear on humanity; regardless of claims that
“there is no way out,” we find ways.
We’re
told: WELL, NO ONE CAN REMAIN HEALTHY IN THE FACE OF THAT. “That” is
the latest psychotic experiment in which we are the non-voluntary
subjects.
But
many people do retain their strength, through their inner resources and
their overriding faith, and their absolute refusal to knuckle under.
Believe that, don’t believe it; it’s real.
Permanent victimhood is not our destiny.
It never was, it never will be.
Sitting at the big table, shove in all your chips on that decision.
If you do, you’re in a community that has strengths no technocrat or secret society can begin to conceive of.
It’s not over. It’s never over. Time is very long.
We are the cure.
This is the war.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment