In
my current series of articles on fake epidemics---Ebola, Zika, Swine
Flu---I’ve established that all the symptoms of these so-called diseases
can be explained without invoking a virus.
This is a key.
It was my method, when I wrote my first book, AIDS INC., in 1988.
At
that time, I looked into the AIDS “high-risk groups” listed by the
CDC---Africans, Haitians, IV drug users, gay men, hemophiliacs, and
blood-transfusion recipients---and I showed that the immune-system
collapse (the hallmark of AIDS) in these groups could be explained
without the need to refer to HIV at all.
“AIDS” was not one condition.
It
was immune-deficiency caused, in various people, by a variety of
factors. The hypnotic medical trick was welding all these sick and dying
people together under one umbrella label: “AIDS.”
But
the truth was---depending on which “AIDS group” and which individuals
you were looking at---you had debilitating medical and street drugs
destroying immune systems; you had devastating hunger and starvation;
lack of basic sanitation; grinding poverty and war; vaccination
campaigns; adrenal collapse...
Likewise,
today, with a vast relabeling effort, any patient with any sort of lung
problem, or flu-like illness, can be diagnosed and repackaged as a case
of “COVID-19.” The loose set of so-called COVID symptoms allows for
such fraudulent and deceptive diagnosis.
This is the central con.
Back
in 1988, after combing through medical journals, I found that the
number-one cause of T-cell depletion (immune-system collapse) in the
world was malnutrition/hunger/starvation. Yet, in Africa and Haiti, and
even in certain Western patients surviving on junk-food diets, T-cell
depletion was routinely called HIV/AIDS.
Suddenly, a virus was invoked to substitute for malnutrition.
In
fact, in Africa, the earlier label for AIDS was “slim disease.” That
fatuous idea was invented via a deeply flawed investigation in Uganda,
where the patients were “slim” simply because they were malnourished and
starving, and consequently losing weight.
In
New York and San Francisco, some gay men were inhaling a brutally
dangerous street drug called “poppers.” Severe lung damage was just one
of the drug’s many devastating effects. Profound immune-system
deficiency was sure to follow.
In AIDS INC.,
I lay out a whole parade of immune-system destroyers in the high-risk
groups; and none of these destroyers has anything to do with a virus.
---Just
as in Wuhan, in 2019, the deadly chronic air pollution hanging over the
city and causing pneumonia---the original hallmark of so-called
COVID-19---had nothing to do with a virus.
So
when uninformed people bleat, “People are dying, it must be the virus,”
whether they’re talking about AIDS or COVID, they’re completely off the
rails and on the wrong track.
Here is another parallel between AIDS and COVID: the test for the virus.
I’ve
spent many articles detailing how the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 spits out
false-positive results like water from a fire hose. A doctor will tell a
patient he’s infected simply because the sensitivity of the test is so
jacked-up it’ll register positive on a speck of dust on the moon. This
is artificial case-number building at its finest.
Well,
back in 1988, there was a similar situation. The HIV antibody test was
turning out a Niagara of false-positive results. I devoted a chapter in
my book to the results of my extensive medical-journal search.
The
evidence was undeniable. Both basic types of HIV antibody tests---the
Elisa and the Western Blot---were, admittedly, deeply flawed. There was
no gold standard for testing.
Cross-reactions
were abundant: the test for HIV would come up positive for a whole host
of reasons that had nothing to do with HIV, or any other virus. One
reason? A person had received the hepatitis B vaccination. Well, in the
1980s, a campaign was launched to recruit gay men into a large study of
the new vaccine.
A
third parallel between AIDS and COVID: expanding the definition of the
“disease” in order to rope in as many patients, and build up as many
case numbers, as possible.
The
1987 CDC definition of AIDS, which I printed in my book in full, took
up 15 pages. With a bit of rigmarole, a doctor could diagnose AIDS in a
person who had almost any kind of bacterial infection.
The
CDC definition of COVID-19 allows a diagnosis when the patient has
nothing more than a cough, or chills and fever, accompanied by a
positive PCR test.
There are other parallels between AIDS and COVID I could list, but you get the picture. In both instances, the hoax is rampant.
A few years after I published AIDS INC.,
I became aware of a new argument: the very existence of HIV was in
doubt. Consulting the independent literature on the subject, I became
convinced no one had proved HIV existed. In these pages, I’ve published,
several times, an illuminating interview journalist Christine Johnson
conducted with Australian biophysicist, Eleni Papadopulos, about HIV
isolation. Papadopulos makes a compelling case that, according to
rigorous rules laid down by mainstream researchers, HIV hasn’t been
isolated.
As
my readers know, for the past year I’ve been offering compelling
evidence that SARS-COV-2 has never been proven to exist. Researchers
twist and reverse the meaning of the word “isolation,” in order to
“demonstrate” the virus is real.
The
non-existence of HIV and SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t surprise me. After all, the
so-called symptoms of both “conditions” can be explained without
reference to a virus.
In both cases, the reality, which lights up like a giant neon sign in the darkness, is FRAUD.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment