We’re being warned that a new Ebola outbreak is spreading.
Yahoo
News (February 26, 2021): “On Feb. 17, the World Health Organization
reported a cluster of Ebola cases in Guinea…The Biden administration is
moving forward with plans to screen airline passengers from two African
countries arriving in the U.S. for Ebola…”
Before yet another lunatic pandemic story takes off, people need to understand the multiple hoaxes behind Ebola.
I covered the story in 2017 and 2014. Here are the essential quotes from my pieces. Buckle up:
~~~
There
is one predictable outcome: at Congo clinics and hospitals, frightened
people who arrive with what are labeled “early signs” of Ebola will be
diagnosed as probable cases. What are those symptoms? Fever, chill, sore
throat, cough, headache, joint pain. Sound familiar? Normally, this
would just be called the flu.
Here’s another point you won’t see discussed on the mainstream news: the reliability of tests used to diagnose Ebola.
Two of those major tests---antibody and PCR---are notoriously unreliable.
Antibody
tests will register positive for disease because they ping on factors
that have nothing to do with the disease being looked for. And even when
the test is accurate, a positive reading merely shows that the patient
came in contact with the germ in question. It says nothing about whether
he’s ill or is going to become ill.
In
fact, before 1985, when the science was turned on its head,
antibody-positive status was taken to mean the patient’s immune system
had successfully warded off the germ.
The
PCR test is a sophisticated way of amplifying tiny, tiny bits of what
are assumed to be viral material, so they can be observed. The problem
here is this: if only tiny bits of material could be found in the
patient’s body in the first place, there is no reason to suppose they’re
enough to cause disease. Very, very large amounts of virus are
necessary to begin to suspect the patient is ill or is going to become
ill.
Bottom line: huge numbers of people on whom these tests are done are going to be falsely diagnosed with Ebola.
You
“show” people a germ and you tell them what it is and what it does, and
people salute. They give in. They believe. They actually know nothing.
But they believe.
The
massive campaign to make people believe the Ebola virus can attack at
any moment, after the slightest contact, is quite a success.
People are falling all over themselves to raise the level of hysteria.
And
that is preventing a hard look at Liberia, Sierra Leone, and the
Republic Guinea, three African nations where poverty and illness are
staples of everyday life for the overwhelming number of people.
The command structure in those areas has a single dictum: don’t solve the human problem.
Don’t
clean up the contaminated water supplies, don’t return stolen land to
the people so they can grow food and finally achieve nutritional health,
don’t solve overcrowding, don’t install basic sanitation, don’t
strengthen immune systems, don’t let the people have power---because
then they would throw off the local and global corporate juggernauts
that are sucking the land of all its resources.
In order not to solve the problems of the people, a cover story is necessary. A cover story that exonerates the power structure.
A cover story like a germ.
It’s all about the germ. The demon. The strange attacker.
Forget everything else. The germ is the single enemy.
Forget
the fact, for example, that a recent study of 15 pharmacies and 5
hospital drug dispensaries in Sierra Leone discovered the widespread and
unconscionable use of beta-lactam antibiotics.
These drugs are highly toxic. One of their effects? Excessive bleeding.
Which just happens to be the scary “Ebola effect” that’s being trumpeted in the world press.
(J
Clin Microbiol, July 2013, 51(7), 2435-2438), and Annals of Internal
Medicine Dec. 1986, “Potential for bleeding with the new beta-lactam
antibiotics”)
Forget
the fact that pesticide companies are notorious for shipping banned
toxic pesticides to Africa. One effect of the chemicals? Bleeding.
Forget that. It’s all about the germ and nothing but the germ.
Forget
the fact that, for decades, one of the leading causes of death in the
Third World has been uncontrolled diarrhea. Electrolytes are drained
from the body, and the adult or the baby dies. (Diarrhea is also listed
as an “Ebola” symptom.)
Any
sane doctor would make it his first order of business to replace
electrolytes with simple supplementation---but no, the standard medical
line goes this way:
The diarrhea is caused by germs in the intestinal tract, so we must pile on massive amounts of antibiotics to kill the germs.
The
drugs kill off all bacteria in the gut, including the necessary and
beneficial ones, and the patient can’t absorb what little food he has
access to, and he dies.
Along the way, he can also bleed.
But no, all the bleeding comes from Ebola. It’s the germ. Don’t think about anything else.
Forget
the fact that adenovirus vaccines, which have been used in Liberia,
Guinea, and Liberia (the epicenter of Ebola), have, according to
vaccines[dot]gov, the following adverse effects: blood in the urine or
stool, and diarrhea.
Reporter
Charles Yates uncovered a scandal in Liberia centering around the
Firestone Rubber Plantation—chemical dumping, poisoned water.
And skin disease.
“Rash” is listed as one of the Ebola symptoms.
Liberia Coca Cola bottling plant: foul black liquid seeping into the environment---animals dying.
Chronic
malnutrition and starvation---conditions that are endemic in Liberia,
Sierra Leone, and Guinea---are the number-one cause of T-cell depletion
in the world.
T-cells
are a vital component of the immune system. When that system is
compromised, any germ coming down the pipeline will cause epidemics and
death.
Getting the picture?
In email correspondence with me, David Rasnick, PhD, announced this shocking finding:
“I
have examined in detail the literature on isolation and Ems [EM:
electron microscope pictures] of both Ebola and Marburg viruses. I have
not found any convincing evidence that Ebola virus (and for that matter
Marburg) has been isolated from humans. There is certainly no
confirmatory evidence of human isolation.”
Rasnick
obtained his PhD from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and spent 25
years working with proteases (a class of enzymes) and protease
inhibitors. He is the author of the book, The Chromosomal Imbalance
Theory of Cancer. He was a member of the Presidential AIDS Advisory
Panel of South Africa.
The
real reasons for the “Ebola outbreak” include, but are not limited to:
industrial pollution; organophosphate pesticides (causes bleeding); vast
overuse of antibiotics (causes bleeding); severe and debilitating
nutritional deficiencies (which can cause bleeding); starvation; drastic
electrolyte loss; chronic diarrhea; grinding poverty; war; stolen farm
land; vaccination campaigns (in people whose immune systems are
compromised, vaccines can easily wipe out their last shreds of health).
Doctors
and nurses in West Africa are working in very high temperatures, in
clinic rooms likely sprayed with extremely toxic organophosphate
pesticides. These workers are sealed into hazmat suits, where
temperatures rose even higher, causing the loss of up to five liters of
body fluid during a one-hour shift. Then, recovering, they need IV
rehydration, and they are doused with toxic disinfectant chemicals. They
go back into the suits for another round of duty. One doctor reported
that, inside his suit, there was (toxic) chlorine. These factors alone
could cause dangerous illness and even death, and, of course, the basic
symptoms of “Ebola.”
People
diagnosed with Ebola outside West Africa? Again, the diagnostic tests
are completely irrelevant and unreliable. Illness, if any, could come
from a variety of causes. The “Ebola symptoms” are similar, for example,
to the flu.
Repackaging a set of common symptoms under different disease labels is a standard practice of the medical cartel.
Even
assuming the Ebola virus exists, the experts were expressing grave
doubts all the way back in 1977. Right at the beginning of Ebola
hysteria.
The
1977 reference here is: “Ebola Virus Haemorrhagic Fever: Proceedings of
an International Colloquium on Ebola Virus Infection and Other
Haemorrhagic Fevers held in Antwerp, Belgium, 6-8 December, 1977.”
This
report is 280 pages long. It’s well worth reading and studying, to see
how the experts hem and haw, hedge their bets, and yet make damaging
admissions:
For
example, “It is impossible to consider the virological diagnosis of
Ebola virus infection loose [apart] from the diagnosis of haemorrhagic
fevers in general. The clinical picture of the disease indeed is too
nonspecific to allow any hypothesis as to which virus may be responsible
for any given case.”
Boom.
[...]
Irrelevant
or non-existent viruses function as cover stories to conceal actual and
inconvenient causes of illness, such as industrial pollution, ag
pesticides, GMO food, fracking chemicals, radiation, etc.
The
medical cartel and its government allies move a step closer to being
able to mandate all vaccines for the population, with no exemptions
permitted.
The overall toxifying and weakening of populations, through vaccines and drugs, thus moves forward. Weakened=easier to control.
Selective
quarantines further establish unconstitutional government control over
the people. A phony epidemic can trigger the wide declaration of martial
law.
Under the aegis of “tracking carriers of the virus,” the Surveillance State expands.
Combining
the epidemic op with open borders, the government and medical
authorities can assert there are now vast numbers of unvaccinated people
in the US (immigrants)---and they must be protected, through “herd
immunity,” by vaccinating everyone in the US with every conceivable
vaccine.
Under
the cover of “a global pandemic,” toxic modern medicine can expand its
reach into every corner of the globe as a necessary platform for
treating ‘infected populations’.”
The DOD and DHS expand their operations, because “every pandemic is a threat to national security.”
The
Globalist view of one world under one controlling management system is
enhanced---“every epidemic threatens all of us, we’re all in this
together, we need, among other innovations, one coordinated medical
system for the whole planet.”
Travel to and from any point in the world can be cut off arbitrarily---more top-down control.
Through
declaring “infected zones,” economic attacks can be leveled by
isolating and quarantining those zones. Loss of business, loss of
money---the IMF and World Bank step in and make draconian deals for
loans, in exchange for surrender to mega-corporate control of those
territories.
In
the wake of “fear of the epidemic,” all national health insurance
programs on the planet, including Obamacare, can assert more power over
the people---“we’re here to protect you from illness and death, so
accept all diagnoses and treatments; no opting out, no resistance…”
Further
attacks can be launched at traditional and natural solutions to
illness---“how dare people try to treat Ebola with anything except
(unproven and toxic) drugs and vaccines.”
Further propaganda covertly characterizes “deepest darkest Africa” as the place where terrible things come from.
“The
killer virus” functions as a cover story, concealing the centuries-long
campaign to weaken and decimate the populations of Africa through
starvation, wars, contaminated water supplies, overcrowding, theft of
fertile farm land and other natural resources, toxic vaccine campaigns.
To
those who point out there is a history of hemorrhagic (bleeding) fevers
in parts of Africa, there is also a history of horrendous malnutrition,
one aspect of which is scurvy, which also causes bleeding from all
mucous membranes.
Scurvy
is far from the complete explanation for “Ebola,” but it exemplifies
how easy it is to overlook and intentionally ignore non-germ factors.
Bottom line: no need for a virus to explain the bleeding.
Then we have pesticides.
The
reference here is “Measuring pesticide ecological and health risks in
West African agriculture…” Feb. 17, 2014, published in Philosophical
Transactions of The Royal Society, by PC Jepson et al.
“The
survey was conducted at 19 locations in five countries and obtained
information from 1704 individuals who grew 22 different crops. Over the 2
years of surveying, farmers reported use of 31 pesticides…
“…certain
compounds represented high risk in multiple environmental and human
health compartments, including carbofuran, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate,
endosulfan and methamidophos.
“Health
effects included cholinesterase inhibition, developmental toxicity,
impairment of thyroid function and depressed red blood cell count…”
The
study also notes that “[p]esticide imports to West Africa grew at an
estimated 19% a year in the 1990s…well ahead of the growth in
agricultural production of 2.5%…” In other words, pesticides have
flooded West Africa.
Here
is another vital observation made in the study: “The distribution and
sale of pesticides in West Africa is not effectively regulated. Multiple
channels of supply commonly include the repackaging of obsolete or
illegal stocks [extremely toxic] and the correspondence between the
contents of containers to what is stated on the label is poor…”
Pesticide
suppliers conceal banned pesticides—which they are taking a loss on,
because they can’t sell them—and put them inside containers labeled with
the names of legal pesticide.
Let’s consider the pesticides specifically mentioned in the study.
[...]
These pesticides can and do produce a number of the symptoms called “Ebola:”
Bleeding, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, rash, stomach pain, coma.
But all this is swept aside in the hysteria about The Virus.
[...]
So let’s look at the level of antibiotic use in West Africa and the Third World.
Voice of America, February 26, 2014, “…antibiotics have become the automatic choice for treating a child with a fever.”
AAPS
(American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists): “For instance, in
most areas of West Africa, antibiotics are commonly sold as
over-the-counter medications.”
TWN
(Third World Network): “…a survey carried out in 1999 showed that
nearly one out of two antidiarrheal products in Third World countries
contained an unnecessary antibiotic [and chronic diarrhea in the Third
World is a leading cause of death, so you can be sure that these
antidiarrheal drugs are consumed in great quantities].
“…75
products (including some antibiotics) which had been pulled out or
banned in one or more European countries were identified in the Third
World in 1991.”
Of course, banned antibiotics would be exceptionally toxic.
In West Africa, antibiotic use is sky-high…and antibiotics do cause bleeding.
Bleeding where? In the digestive tract.
In light of that, consider the following excerpt from the healthgrades[dot]com article, “What is vomiting blood?”
“Vomiting blood indicates the presence of bleeding in the digestive tract…
“Vomiting
blood may be caused by many different conditions, and the severity
varies among individuals. The material vomited may be bright red or it
may be dark colored like coffee grounds…”
Yes,
it turns out that any source of internal bleeding in the digestive
tract---such as overuse of antibiotics---can cause a person to vomit
blood.
“The uniqueness” of “Ebola-blood-vomiting” is a fairy tale.
[...]
What about vaccines?
A
number of vaccination campaigns have been carried out in West Africa. I
have found no in-depth independent investigations of the ingredients in
these vaccines. But for example, a simple flu vaccine, Fluvirin,
carries the risk of “hemorrhage.”.
Several other routine vaccines can cause vomiting. The HiB, for example.
[...]
A
further investigation in West Africa could well turn up even more
reasons for bleeding---none of which has anything to do with a virus.
The region is rife with industrial operations which produce major
pollutants---mining, offshore oil exploration and drilling,
rubber-tapping, etc.
Then
we come to the frightening press stories about the “Ebola-stricken,
collapsing” doctors and health workers, who are treating patients in the
Ebola clinics in West Africa.
But
wait. These health workers have been wearing hazmat suits. Sealed off
from the outside world, working shifts inside those boiling suits, where
they are losing 5 quarts of body fluid an hour, they come out for
rehydration, douse themselves with toxic chemicals to disinfect, and
then go back in again.
One
doctor told the Daily Mail he could smell intense fumes of chlorine
while he was working in his suit. That means the toxic chemical was
actually in there with him.
No wonder some health workers are collapsing and dying. No virus necessary.
From the Daily Mail, August 5, 2014, an article headlined, “In boiling hot suits…”:
“Doctor Hannah Spencer revealed how she wills herself to feel safe inside a boiling hot air-sealed Hazmat suit…”
“Boiling:
Doctors and nurses lose up to five litres in sweat during an hour-long
shift in the suits and have to spend two hours rehydrating after…”
“To
minimise the risk of infection they have to wear thick rubber boots
that come up to their knees, an impermeable body suit, gloves, a face
mask, a hood and goggles to ensure no air at all can touch their skin.”
“Dr.
Spencer, 27, and her colleagues lose up to five litres of sweat during a
shift treating victims and have to spend two hours rehydrating
afterwards.”
“At their camp they go through multiple decontaminations which includes spraying chlorine on their shoes.”
“Dr.
Spencer: ‘We would like to keep a [patient] visit between 45 minutes
and one hour, but now, we’re stretching it to almost two hours. We put
ourselves through a very strong physiological stress when we’re using
personal protection gear.'”
“‘We sweat, we’re losing water; we’re getting hotter and it wreaks havoc on the body. Our own endurance starts to wear down.'”
From
another Daily Mail article (“What’s shocking is how Ebola patients look
before they die…”), Dr. Oliver Johnson describes working in protective
gear: “The heat of the suits is quickly overwhelming, as your goggles
steam up and you feel the sweat dripping underneath. And the smell of
chlorine is intense.”
Getting
the picture? Imagine losing five quarts of water from your body in an
hour. While you’re trapped inside a bulky hazmat suit. While you’re
treating a patient who, for example, might want to escape the clinic
because he’s afraid of you and your Western medicine.
Imagine
needing two hours after you climb out of your suit to rehydrate. Then
you go back for more. Of course you also decontaminate yourself with
toxic chemicals, including chlorine.
But
of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with why you might fall
ill. No. If you fall ill, or collapse, or suddenly die, it’s Ebola. The
virus.
Sure it is.
No
need to wonder. Don’t ask questions. Believe the World Health
Organization and the Centers for Disease Control. They always tell the
truth.
~~~~
As
I wrote at the top of this article, I’ve been quoting my own reporting
from 2017 and 2014 here. Everything you’ve just read about Ebola comes
from my published pieces in those two time periods.
Now we have the harsh lesson of COVID. And we have 2021 announcements about another Ebola outbreak.
Another EXTREME outbreak of lies.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment