Suppose one of the most intense "safety practices"---wearing a mask---actually inflates the number of COVID diagnoses?
Needless
to say, it would be a bombshell. Suppose PCR and antibody tests turn
out false positive results because people are wearing masks every day?
How is that possible?
Actually,
it's quite simple. A person wearing a mask is breathing in his own
germs all day long. He breathes them out, as he should, but then he
breathes them back in.
It seems evident that this unnatural
process would increase the number and variety of germs circulating and
replicating in his body; even creating active infection.
Along
with this, a decrease in oxygen intake, which occurs when a mask is
worn, would allow certain germs to multiply in the body---germs which
would otherwise be routinely wiped out or diminished in the presence of
an oxygen-rich environment.
Here's the key: Both the PCR and
antibody tests are known for registering false-positive results, since
they cross-react with germs which have nothing to do with the reason for
the test.
If wearing a mask increases the number and variety of
germs replicating in the body, and also increases the chance of
developing an active infection...then the likelihood of a false-positive
PCR or antibody test is increased.
In other words, masks would promote the number of so-called COVID cases. This would, of course, have alarming consequences.
People labeled "COVID" face all sorts of negative consequences. I don't have to spell them out.
In
past articles, I've shown that both PCR and antibody tests DO register
false-positives because they react with irrelevant germs.
For
example, let's consider the PCR: From the World Health Organization
(WHO): "Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory
testing for 2019-nCoV in humans":
"Several assays that detect the
2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house
and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID]
and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are
genetically similar."
Translation: Some PCR tests register
positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing to do with
COVID---including plain old coronas that cause nothing more than a cold.
From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, "SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit":
"...non-specific
interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata),
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3,
type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia
Pneumoniae, etc."
Translation: Although this company states the
test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY positive
if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his
body. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.
Now let's consider the antibody test---
Business
Insider, April 3, 202: "Some tests have demonstrated false positives,
detecting antibodies to much more common coronaviruses."
Science
News, March 27: "Science News spoke with...Charles Cairns, dean of the
Drexel University College of Medicine, about how antibody tests work and
what are some of the challenges of developing the tests."
"Cairns:
'The big question is: Does a positive response for the antibodies mean
that person is actively infected, or that they have been infected in the
past? The tests need to be accurate, and avoid both false positives and
false negatives. That's the challenge'."
That's just a
sprinkling of sources on both the PCR and antibody tests---revealing
that both of these tests DO spit out false-positive results. Many of
those false-positives are the result of cross reactions with irrelevant
germs.
And as I stated at the top of this article, if wearing
masks increases the number and variety of germs circulating and
replicating in the body, then it's quite likely that masks will, in
fact, contribute to false diagnoses of COVID.
Now, we come to a
different angle on this story. Everyone is aware that governors and
other politicians are ramping up orders to wear masks to new insane
levels. If indeed this order will result in more diagnosed COVID
cases...
How can we avoid looking at the financial incentives?
It turns out that the states are receiving federal money for EVERY COVID case.
The reference here is Becker's CFO Hospital Report, April 14, 2020, "State-by-state breakdown of federal aid per COVID-19 case":
"HHS
recently began distributing the first $30 billion of emergency funding
designated for hospitals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act..."
"Below is a breakdown of how much funding per
COVID-19 case each state will receive from the first $30 billion in aid.
Kaiser Health News used a state breakdown provided to the House Ways
and Means Committee by HHS along with COVID-19 cases tabulated by The
New York Times for its analysis."
"Alabama
$158,000 per COVID-19 case
Alaska
$306,000
Arizona
$23,000
Arkansas
$285,000
California
$145,000
Colorado
$58,000
Connecticut
$38,000
Delaware
$127,000..."
The article goes on to list every state and the money it will receive for EACH DIAGNOSED COVID CASE.
If
mask wearing increases the likelihood of a COVID diagnosis, then: those
states forcing new widespread mask dictates will be multiplying their
federal $$$.
And if you really want to cover the bases, every
method of fake case-counting will have the same ballooning $$$ effect
for the states.
ALL the so-called containment measures---masks,
quarantine, isolation, distancing, lockdowns, economic
destruction---bring on fear, stress, loneliness...lowering immune-system
function...leading to more infections...which means more germs
replicating in the body...which means more false-positive COVID
diagnostic tests...and more human destruction...and more $$$ for the
states.
SOURCE:
beckershospitalreview[dot]com/finance/state-by-state-breakdown-of-federal-aid-per-covid-19-case.html |
No comments:
Post a Comment