John Whitehead: The Attack on Civil Liberties in the Age of COVID-19
You can always count on the government to take advantage of a crisis, legitimate or manufactured.
This coronavirus pandemic is no exception.
Not only are the federal and state
governments unraveling the constitutional fabric of the nation with
lockdown mandates that are sending the economy into a tailspin and
wreaking havoc with our liberties, but they are also rendering the
citizenry fully dependent on the government for financial handouts,
medical intervention, protection and sustenance.
Unless we find some way to rein in the government’s power grabs, the fall-out will be epic.
Everything I have warned about for
years—government overreach, invasive surveillance, martial law, abuse of
powers, militarized police, weaponized technology used to track and
control the citizenry, and so on—has coalesced into this present moment.
The government’s shameless exploitation
of past national emergencies for its own nefarious purposes pales in
comparison to what is presently unfolding.
Deploying the same strategy it used with
9/11 to acquire greater powers under the USA Patriot Act, the police
state—a.k.a. the shadow government, a.k.a. the Deep State—has been
anticipating this moment for years, quietly assembling a wish list of
lockdown powers that could be trotted out and approved at a moment’s
notice.
It should surprise no one, then, that the Trump Administration has asked Congress to allow it to suspend parts of the Constitution whenever it deems it necessary during this coronavirus pandemic and “other” emergencies.
It’s that “other” emergencies part
that should particularly give you pause, if not spur you to immediate
action (by action, I mean a loud and vocal, apolitical, nonpartisan
outcry and sustained, apolitical, nonpartisan resistance).
In fact, the Department of Justice (DOJ)
has been quietly trotting out and testing a long laundry list of
terrifying powers that override the Constitution.
We’re talking about lockdown powers (at
both the federal and state level): the ability to suspend the
Constitution, indefinitely detain American citizens, bypass the courts,
quarantine whole communities or segments of the population, override the
First Amendment by outlawing religious gatherings and assemblies of
more than a few people, shut down entire industries and manipulate the
economy, muzzle dissidents, “stop and seize any plane, train or automobile to
stymie the spread of contagious disease,” reshape financial markets,
create a digital currency (and thus further restrict the use of cash),
determine who should live or die…
You’re getting the picture now, right?
These are powers the police state would desperately like to make permanent.
Bear in mind, however, that these powers the Trump Administration, acting on orders from the police state, are officially asking
Congress to recognize and authorize barely scratch the surface of the
far-reaching powers the government has already unilaterally claimed for
itself.
Unofficially, the police state
has been riding roughshod over the rule of law for years now without any
pretense of being reined in or restricted in its power grabs by
Congress, the courts or the citizenry.
This current pandemic is a test to see
whether the Constitution—and our commitment to the principles enshrined
in the Bill of Rights—can survive a national crisis and true state of
emergency.
Here’s what we know: whatever the
so-called threat to the nation—whether it’s civil unrest, school
shootings, alleged acts of terrorism, or the threat of a global pandemic
in the case of COVID-19—the government has a tendency to capitalize on
the nation’s heightened emotions, confusion and fear as a means of
extending the reach of the police state.
This coronavirus epidemic, which has brought China’s Orwellian surveillance out of the shadows and caused Italy to declare a nationwide lockdown threatens to bring the American Police State out into the open on a scale we’ve not seen before.
Every day brings a drastic new set of restrictions by government bodies (most have been delivered by way of executive orders) at the local, state and federal level that are eager to flex their muscles for the so-called “good” of the populace.
This is where we run the risk of this whole fly-by-night operation going completely off the rails.
It’s one thing to attempt an experiment
in social distancing in order to flatten the curve of this virus because
we can’t afford to risk overwhelming the hospitals and exposing the
most vulnerable in the nation to unavoidable loss of life scenarios.
However, there’s a fine line between strongly worded suggestions for
citizens to voluntarily stay at home and strong-armed house arrest orders with penalties in place for non-compliance.
More than three-quarters of all Americans have now been ordered to stay at home and that number is growing as more states fall in line.
Schools have canceled physical classes, many for the remainder of the academic year.
Many of the states have banned gatherings of more than 10 people.
At least three states (Nevada, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania) have ordered non-essential businesses to close.
In Washington, DC, residents face 90 days in jail and a $5,000 fine if
they leave their homes during the coronavirus outbreak. Residents of
Maryland, Hawaii and Washington state also risk severe penalties of up
to a year in prison and a $5,000 fine for violating the stay-at-home
orders. Violators in Alaska could face jail time and up to $25,000 in fines.
Kentucky residents are prohibited from traveling outside the state, with a few exceptions.
New York City, the epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak in the U.S., is offering its Rikers Island prisoners $6 an hour to help dig mass graves.
In San Francisco, cannabis dispensaries were included among the essential businesses allowed to keep operating during the city-wide lockdown.
New Jersey’s governor canceled gatherings of any number,
including parties, weddings and religious ceremonies, and warned the
restrictions could continue for weeks or months. One city actually
threatened to prosecute residents who spread false information about the virus.
Oregon banned all nonessential social and recreational gatherings, regardless of size.
Rhode Island has given police the go-ahead to pull over anyone with New York license plates to record their contact information and order them to self-quarantine for 14 days.
South Carolina’s police have been empowered to break up any public gatherings of more than three people.
Of course, there are exceptions to all of these stay-at-home orders (in
more than 30 states and counting), the longest of which runs until June
10. Essential workers (doctors, firefighters, police and grocery store
workers) can go to work. Everyone else will have to fit themselves into a
variety of exceptions in order to leave their homes: for grocery runs,
doctor visits, to get exercise, to visit a family member, etc.
Throughout the country, more than 14,000 “Citizen-Soldiers” of
the National Guard have been mobilized to support the states and the
federal government in their fight against the coronavirus.
Thus far, we have not breached the
Constitution’s crisis point: martial law has yet to be overtly imposed
(although an argument could be made to the contrary given the
militarized nature of the American police state).
It’s just a matter of time before all hell breaks loose.
If this is not the defining point at
which we cross over into all-out totalitarianism, then it is at a
minimum a test to see how easily we will surrender.
Generally, the government has to show a
compelling state interest before it can override certain critical rights
such as free speech, assembly, press, search and seizure, etc. Most of
the time, it lacks that compelling state interest, but it still manages
to violate those rights, setting itself up for legal battles further
down the road.
These lockdown measures—on the right of
the people to peaceably assemble, to travel, to engage in commerce,
etc.—unquestionably restrict fundamental constitutional rights, which
might pass muster for a short period of time, but can it be sustained
for longer stretches legally?
That’s the challenge before us, of course, if these days and weeks potentially stretch into months-long quarantines.
At the moment, the government believes
it has a compelling interest—albeit a temporary one—in restricting
gatherings, assemblies and movement in public in order to minimize the
spread of this virus.
The key point is this: while we may
tolerate these restrictions on our liberties in the short term, we
should never fail to be on guard lest these one-time constraints become a
slippery slope to a total lockdown mindset.
What we must guard against, more than
ever before, is the tendency to become so accustomed to our prison
walls—these lockdowns, authoritarian dictates, and police state tactics
justified as necessary for national security—that we allow the
government to keep having its way in all things, without any civic
resistance or objections being raised.
Most of all, don’t be naïve: the government will use this crisis to expand its powers far beyond the reach of the Constitution.
That’s how it starts.
Travel too far down that slippery slope, and there will be no turning back.
As I make clear in my book “Battlefield America: The War on the American People,” if you wait to speak out—stand up—and resist until the government’s lockdowns impact your freedoms personally, it could be too late.
Just because we’re fighting an unseen
enemy in the form of a virus doesn’t mean we have to relinquish every
shred of our humanity, our common sense, or our freedoms to a nanny
state that thinks it can do a better job of keeping us safe.
Whatever we give up willingly
now—whether it’s basic human decency, the ability to manage our private
affairs, the right to have a say in how the government navigates this
crisis, or the few rights still left to us that haven’t been
disemboweled in recent years by a power-hungry police state—we won’t get
back so easily once this crisis is past.
The government never cedes power willingly.
Neither should we.
Feature Photo | A member of the Maryland
National Guard in a Humvee outside a COVID-19 testing facility in a
parking lot of FedEx Field, March 30, 2020, in Landover, Md. Andrew
Harnik | AP
John W. Whitehead is a constitutional attorney, author and founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His book “Battlefield America: The War on the American People”
is available online at www.amazon.com. Whitehead can be contacted at
johnw@rutherford.org. Information about The Rutherford Institute is
available at www.rutherford.org.
This article was originally written at and published by MintPressNews.com, posted here with permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment