7.Putting
Pedagogy To The Question: The Underground History of American Education by John
Taylor Gatto from archive.org
Putting
Pedagogy To The Question
More than anything else, this book is a work
of intuition. The official story of why
we school doesn't add up today any more than it did yesterday. A few years before I quit, I began
to try to piece together where this
school project came from, why it took the shape it took, and why every attempt to change it has ended in
abysmal failure.
By
now I've invested the better part of a decade looking for answers. If you want a conventional history of
schooling, or education as it is
carelessly
called, you'd better stop reading now. Although years of research in the most arcane sources are reflected here, throughout it's mainly intuition that drives my synthesis. ■ 111. ll^_k «4,Ll >
called, you'd better stop reading now. Although years of research in the most arcane sources are reflected here, throughout it's mainly intuition that drives my synthesis. ■ 111. ll^_k «4,Ll >
This is in part a private narrative, the map
of a schoolteacher's mind as it tracked strands
in the web in which it had been wrapped; in part a public narrative, an
account of the latest chapter in an
ancient war: the conflict between systems which offer physical safety and certainty at the cost of suppressing free
will, and those which offer liberty at the price of constant risk. If you keep both plots in
mind, no matter how far afield my book seems
to range, you won't wonder what a chapter on coal or one on private
hereditary societies has to do with
schoolchildren.
What I'm most determined to do is start a
conversation among those who've been silent
up until now, and that includes schoolteachers. We need to put sterile
discussions of grading and testing,
discipline, curriculum, multiculturalism and tracking aside as distractions, as mere symptoms of something
larger, darker, and more intransigent than
any problem a problem-solver could tackle next week. Talking endlessly
about such things encourages the
bureaucratic tactic of talking around the vital, messy stuff. In partial compensation for your effort, I
promise you'll discover what's in the mind of a
man who spent his life in a room with children.
Give an ear, then, to what follows. We shall
cross-examine history together. We shall put
pedagogy to the question. And if the judgment following this auto dafe
is that only pain can make this monster
relax its grip, let us pray together for the courage to inflict it.
Reading my essay will help you sort things
out. It will give you a different topological
map upon which to fix your own position. No doubt I've made some factual
mistakes, but essays since Montaigne
have been about locating truth, not about assembling facts. Truth and fact aren't the same thing. My essay is
meant to mark out crudely some ground for a
scholarship of schooling, my intention is that you not continue to
regard the official project of education
through an older, traditional perspective, but to see it as a frightening chapter in the administrative organization of
knowledge — a text we must vigorously
repudiate as our ancestors once did. We live together, you and I, in a
dark time when all official history
is propaganda. If you want truth, you have to struggle for it. This is my struggle. Let me bear witness to what I have
seen.
No comments:
Post a Comment