With my coverage of the China epidemic, we are seeing many new readers
showing up and paying attention. So I want to expose a few facts about
the modern medical system---facts I've presented many times over the
past 10 years.
I do this because of a little thing called REPUTATION. If the track
record of major medical officials is really understood, people would
view their unproven pronouncements with considerable skepticism.
Pronouncements like: THE VIRUS IS SPREADING; THIS IS
A MAJOR EPIDEMIC; WE'RE RUSHING A NEW VACCINE INTO PRODUCTION; EVERYONE
MUST TAKE IT.
I also expose facts because MEDICALLY CAUSED DEATH is routinely swept
under the carpet by the mainstream press. Actually, as a result of
media silence, the subject of medical harm is where the subject of
grossly poisoned food was in the 19th and early 20th
centuries. At that time, giant food processors had created their own
Wild West, where they could sell lethal poison (eat, fall down dead)
hidden in products. The press helped expose these crimes and transfix
the public, which led to partial reforms.
Now, in the medical arena, the press is a partner in capital crimes.
Major medical officials have been sitting on a time bomb of
information. The range of medical maiming and killing is astonishing.
Imagine a Congressional hearing held before media cameras, with
reporters all over the US and Europe ready with shocking articles about
one of the leading causes of death---
SENATOR: Sir, I have the medical death numbers in front of me. How can you keep this secret from the public?
FDA COMMISSIONER: It's not a secret, sir. Many experts know about it.
SENATOR: I'm looking through the trillion-dollar federal budget. I'm
looking for the money allocated to fix this horrible situation. Where
are those funds?
FDA COMMISSIONER: Nowhere. Don't blame us.
I know major media won't investigate medically-caused death numbers,
because I've published reports for years, and I've contacted news people
with the facts; and nothing happens.
So we begin with a few citations.
July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr.
Barbara Starfield, revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins
School of Public Health;
"Is US health really the best in the world?"
Starfield reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans a
year. 106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as
a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the
numbers to a decade: that's 2.25 million deaths.
You might want to read that last number again.
I interviewed Starfield in 2009. I asked her whether she was aware of
any overall effort by the US government to eliminate this holocaust, and
whether she had ever been contacted by any government agency to consult
on such an effort. She answered a resounding
NO to both questions.
Here is another citation: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author,
Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe
Medication Practices: "It [the Institute] calculated that in 2011
prescription drugs were associated with two to four
million people in the US experiencing 'serious, disabling, or fatal
injuries, including 128,000 deaths.'"
The report called this "one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity."
The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA's own database of "serious adverse [medical-drug] events."
Therefore, to say the FDA isn't aware of this finding would be absurd.
The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn't saying anything about it,
because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs
that are routinely maiming and killing Americans.
Here is another citation: The article is, "The Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs."
The author is Donald Light, who teaches at Rowan University, and was
the 2013 recipient of ASA's [American Sociological Association's]
Distinguished
Career Award for the Practice of Sociology. Light is a founding fellow
of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. In 2013,
he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard. He
is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford
University.
Donald Light: "Epidemiologically, appropriately prescribed, prescription
drugs are the fourth leading cause of death, tied with stroke at about
2,460 deaths each week in the United States. About 330,000 patients die
each year from prescription drugs in the
United States and Europe. They [the drugs] cause an epidemic of about
20 times more hospitalizations [6.6 million annually], as well as falls,
road accidents, and [annually] about 80 million medically minor
problems such as pains, discomforts, and dysfunctions
that hobble productivity or the ability to care for others. Deaths and
adverse effects from overmedication, errors, and self-medication would
increase these figures." (ASA publication, "Footnotes," November 2014)
The statistics I'm quoting reveal a problem on the level of a tsunami sweeping across the whole of America and Europe.
Why won't major media report these facts?
The obvious reason: their big-spending pharmaceutical advertisers would drop them like hot potatoes.
But there are other reasons.
Every medical bureaucrat or medical shill or medical expert who jumps
aboard the media train, to assure the public that drugs and vaccines are
remarkably safe, is sitting on the time bomb I have described above.
If this bomb were widely recognized, who would continue to believe these
professional pundits? Who would accept anything they say? How could
they possibly sustain their credibility?
"Well, the system I represent kills 2.25 million people per decade,
and maims between 20 and 40 million more people per decade, but I want
to assure you this vaccine presents no problems at all. It's incredibly
safe."
Every single pronouncement, on any subject, issued via the medical
cartel's Ministry of Truth, would fall on disbelieving ears, and only
increase general outrage.
Mainstream reporters and editors and publishers are well aware that telling the truth
and continuing to pound on it would undermine a basic institution of society.
The media are there to give credibility to society and its structures. That's why they're called "major" instead of "minor."
When hard rains fall, the media are there with an umbrella to hold over
organized society's head. To walk away in the middle of a downpour
would leave the status quo unprotected.
"Defending the Crown" is another way to put it. The King may make
mistakes, he may commit heinous offenses, but he is the King, and
therefore his position must remain secure.
Young journalists learn this point quickly. If in their zeal, they
cross the threshold and attempt to expose a central myth, fairy tale,
legend, they're put back in their place. They absorb the message.
Journalism has limits. Certain truths are silent truths.
Over the years, I've talked to reporters who are solidly addicted to
obfuscations. Like any addict, they have an army of excuses to
rationalize their behavior.
The medical experts are worse. Their pretense of idealism knows no
limits, and is matched only by their claim to bullet-proof knowledge.
When you peel the veneer away, they are enablers, persons of interest, co-conspirators.
There is nothing quite like a high-minded, socially-positioned,
card-carrying member of the King's circle of protectors. The arrogance
is titanic. Because what is being hidden is so explosive.
It is the duty of the Crown to make his subjects feel safe and protected and even loved.
No wonder he needs such a large army of trained helpers in and around the press.
He has them.
But their monopoly is breaking down.
We're in a new breakout level of truth. It's called independent media.
So...on the subject of epidemics, when public health officials, and
their government enablers, and the compliant press, and doctors tell us
that a new virus is sweeping the world, a vaccine will stop it, and we
must take that vaccine...why should anyone fall
in line and accept their words?
Professional liars, professional criminals may pretend they are spouting
science, but they are merely relying on the ignorance of the public.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment