First, a few updates. Things are moving fast.
The Chinese government has locked down Wuhan, a city of 11 million
people, owing to the "threat of the coronavirus." There are also travel
restrictions in several other Chinese cities. What does all this
prove?
Answer: Nothing.
It proves the Chinese government wants to install tighter controls. It
doesn't lead to the conclusion that a coronavirus is making people sick
or killing them.
During the so-called Zika Virus crisis of 2015, women in several
countries were told not to get pregnant, because the virus might cause
brain damage in their babies. That was a form of lockdown, too. If it
were instituted for good reason, we would now be
seeing massive numbers of babies all over the world born with
microcephaly (smaller heads and brain damage), as the virus spreads. We
aren't seeing that. I covered the Zika story extensively, and proved
it was a scientific fraud. A dud.
The measures government authorities enact do not constitute proof of a
harmful virus. Otherwise, presidents and kings could write science all
day long simply by issuing orders.
We are now seeing photos of "people lying in the street" in Wuhan, and
perhaps other Chinese cities, so-called victims of the coronavirus.
What does this prove?
Answer: Nothing.
So far, I've seen pictures of four or five people lying in the street or
on a hospital floor. In a city of 11 million people. If this, all by
itself, were proof that a new coronavirus is a killer, then Los Angeles
and New York---with their homeless street
populations---would have no people left.
The text of a patent for a coronavirus is circulating wide and far on the Web. What does this prove?
Answer: Nothing.
Patents for many viruses are obtained all the time. More specifically,
these patents discuss ways of weakening viruses or extracting material
from them for the purposes of developing vaccines. I've read excerpts
from two different coronavirus patents, one
in the US and one in the UK. They both refer to vaccine development.
They aren't, as some people assume, slam-dunk evidence that researchers
are cooking up a virus in a lab or weaponizing it.
Well, here is a comforting development. The Chinese researcher, Zhong
Nanshan, who "discovered the SARS virus" in 2003, is now at the
forefront of pronouncements about the "new coronavirus" that is shaking
up China and other parts of the world.
His mere presence on the scene is a warning sign: take a grain of salt, try a pound.
Zhong Nanshan's 2003 SARS "pandemic" was a dud. A WHO (World Health
Organization) advisory against traveling to "infected" Toronto cost
merchants in the city several billion dollars. Meanwhile, a Canadian
WHO biologist, Frank Plummer, told the press he was
shocked by the fact that fewer and fewer SARS patients had the virus in
their bodies. Actually, "fewer and fewer," he said, was approaching
ZERO. Hoax. THE PURPORTED CAUSE OF THE DISEASE WASN'T THERE. People
had ordinary flu symptoms.
What do you do when this sort of embarrassment occurs? Do you confess
the whole business was a mistake or a con or a hustle? Do you own up to
the fact that, when people are said to be suffering from ordinary flu
symptoms, and you're calling it a new disease
with a new cause, you're wrong and you're very, very, very sorry? Do
you point out that people who don't have the cause of a new disease in
their bodies don't have the new disease?
Of course not. You just move ahead and pray no one notices.
When you claim the grand death total from the SARS "epidemic,"
worldwide, is 800 out of seven billion, and you can't even prove those
800 died from the "SARS virus," do you, the World Health Organization,
admit your whole program of epidemic detection is a
fraud? Do you pay Toronto several billion dollars for their troubles?
Of course not. You keep calling SARS an epidemic forever. You write
fake histories. You do whatever is necessary to maintain your phony
reputation.
And when a new possible-maybe-could-be virus surfaces in China, now, you
bring the same researcher who "discovered SARS" out of mothballs, and
you put him front and center.
Here's the capper. Read carefully. The World Health Organization
claims that, every year, there are between three and five million cases
of ordinary run-of-the-mill flu in the world, resulting in 290,000 to
650,000 deaths. The symptoms are indistinguishable
from SARS. But for some reason, they don't declare ordinary flu an
ongoing epidemic. No, they choose SARS, for which the cause is
absent---and they call THAT an epidemic. It caused 800 deaths, versus
290,000-650,000 deaths.
Does this make any kind of sense? Actually, it does, if they want to:
increase control over the population; condition them to expect and pray
for a (watch-out TOXIC) vaccine to save them; shoot up pharmaceutical
profits; scare the pants off people; induce
them to willingly accept greater surveillance wherever they go; step up
police and military presence; enact quarantines; hypnotize populations
with the idea that they're lifelong patients under the supervision of
the medical cartel; teach "safety and security"
above freedom.
Just realize how right and good and true THE AUTHORITIES are, get down
on your knees and thank your lucky stars they're here protecting the
health of everyone on the planet. They're the Church of Biological
Mysticism, and they want you as a devoted member.
Amen.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment