|
|
Contents
|
|
Chapter
1: War Is A Racket
|
|
Chapter
2: Who Makes The Profits?
|
|
Chapter
3: Who Pays The Bills?
|
|
Chapter
4: How To Smash This Racket!
|
|
Chapter
5: To Hell With War!
|
Smedley Darlington Butler
· Born: West
Chester, Pa., July 30, 1881
· Educated:
Haverford School
· Married:
Ethel C. Peters, of Philadelphia, June 30, 1905
· Awarded two
congressional medals of honor:
1. capture of
Vera Cruz, Mexico, 1914
2. capture of
Ft. Riviere, Haiti, 1917
· Distinguished
service medal, 1919
· Major
General - United States Marine Corps
· Retired
Oct. 1, 1931
· On leave of
absence to act as
director of Dept. of Safety, Philadelphia, 1932
director of Dept. of Safety, Philadelphia, 1932
· Lecturer --
1930's
· Republican
Candidate for Senate, 1932
· Died at
Naval Hospital, Philadelphia, June 21, 1940
· For more
information about Major General Butler,
contact the United States Marine Corps.
contact the United States Marine Corps.
CHAPTER ONE
War
Is A Racket
WAR is a
racket. It always has been.
It is
possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is
the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits
are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
A racket
is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the
majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is
about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the
very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
In the
World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least
21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during
the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax
returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one
knows.
How many
of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench?
How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How
many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel
and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy?
How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?
Out of war
nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take
it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few -- the
selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public
shoulders the bill.
And what
is this bill?
This bill
renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies.
Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and
all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and
generations.
For a
great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not
until I retired to civil life did I fully realize it. Now that I see the
international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak
out.
Again they
are choosing sides. France and Russia met and agreed to stand side by side.
Italy and Austria hurried to make a similar agreement. Poland and Germany cast
sheep's eyes at each other, forgetting for the nonce [one unique occasion],
their dispute over the Polish Corridor.
The
assassination of King Alexander of Jugoslavia [Yugoslavia] complicated matters.
Jugoslavia and Hungary, long bitter enemies, were almost at each other's
throats. Italy was ready to jump in. But France was waiting. So was
Czechoslovakia. All of them are looking ahead to war. Not the people -- not
those who fight and pay and die -- only those who foment wars and remain safely
at home to profit.
There are
40,000,000 men under arms in the world today, and our statesmen and diplomats
have the temerity to say that war is not in the making.
Hell's
bells! Are these 40,000,000 men being trained to be dancers?
Not in
Italy, to be sure. Premier Mussolini knows what they are being trained for. He,
at least, is frank enough to speak out. Only the other day, Il Duce in
"International Conciliation," the publication of the Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace, said:
"And above all, Fascism, the more
it considers and observes the future and the development of humanity quite
apart from political considerations of the moment, believes neither in the
possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace. . . . War alone brings up to
its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the
people who have the courage to meet it."
Undoubtedly
Mussolini means exactly what he says. His well-trained army, his great fleet of
planes, and even his navy are ready for war -- anxious for it, apparently. His
recent stand at the side of Hungary in the latter's dispute with Jugoslavia
showed that. And the hurried mobilization of his troops on the Austrian border
after the assassination of Dollfuss showed it too. There are others in Europe
too whose sabre rattling presages war, sooner or later.
Herr
Hitler, with his rearming Germany and his constant demands for more and more
arms, is an equal if not greater menace to peace. France only recently
increased the term of military service for its youth from a year to eighteen
months.
Yes, all
over, nations are camping in their arms. The mad dogs of Europe are on the
loose. In the Orient the maneuvering is more adroit. Back in 1904, when Russia
and Japan fought, we kicked out our old friends the Russians and backed Japan.
Then our very generous international bankers were financing Japan. Now the
trend is to poison us against the Japanese. What does the "open door"
policy to China mean to us? Our trade with China is about $90,000,000 a year.
Or the Philippine Islands? We have spent about $600,000,000 in the Philippines
in thirty-five years and we (our bankers and industrialists and speculators)
have private investments there of less than $200,000,000.
Then, to
save that China trade of about $90,000,000, or to protect these private
investments of less than $200,000,000 in the Philippines, we would be all
stirred up to hate Japan and go to war -- a war that might well cost us tens of
billions of dollars, hundreds of thousands of lives of Americans, and many more
hundreds of thousands of physically maimed and mentally unbalanced men.
Of course,
for this loss, there would be a compensating profit -- fortunes would be made.
Millions and billions of dollars would be piled up. By a few. Munitions makers.
Bankers. Ship builders. Manufacturers. Meat packers. Speculators. They would
fare well.
Yes, they
are getting ready for another war. Why shouldn't they? It pays high dividends.
But what
does it profit the men who are killed? What does it profit their mothers and
sisters, their wives and their sweethearts? What does it profit their children?
What does
it profit anyone except the very few to whom war means huge profits?
Yes, and
what does it profit the nation?
Take our
own case. Until 1898 we didn't own a bit of territory outside the mainland of
North America. At that time our national debt was a little more than
$1,000,000,000. Then we became "internationally minded." We forgot,
or shunted aside, the advice of the Father of our country. We forgot George
Washington's warning about "entangling alliances." We went to war. We
acquired outside territory. At the end of the World War period, as a direct result
of our fiddling in international affairs, our national debt had jumped to over
$25,000,000,000. Our total favorable trade balance during the twenty-five-year
period was about $24,000,000,000. Therefore, on a purely bookkeeping basis, we
ran a little behind year for year, and that foreign trade might well have been
ours without the wars.
It would
have been far cheaper (not to say safer) for the average American who pays the
bills to stay out of foreign entanglements. For a very few this racket, like bootlegging
and other underworld rackets, brings fancy profits, but the cost of operations
is always transferred to the people -- who do not profit.
CHAPTER TWO
Who
Makes The Profits?
The World
War, rather our brief participation in it, has cost the United States some
$52,000,000,000. Figure it out. That means $400 to every American man, woman,
and child. And we haven't paid the debt yet. We are paying it, our children will
pay it, and our children's children probably still will be paying the cost of
that war.
The normal
profits of a business concern in the United States are six, eight, ten, and
sometimes twelve percent. But war-time profits -- ah! that is another matter --
twenty, sixty, one hundred, three hundred, and even eighteen hundred per cent
-- the sky is the limit. All that traffic will bear. Uncle Sam has the money.
Let's get it.
Of course,
it isn't put that crudely in war time. It is dressed into speeches about
patriotism, love of country, and "we must all put our shoulders to the
wheel," but the profits jump and leap and skyrocket -- and are safely
pocketed. Let's just take a few examples:
Take our
friends the du Ponts, the powder people -- didn't one of them testify before a
Senate committee recently that their powder won the war? Or saved the world for
democracy? Or something? How did they do in the war? They were a patriotic
corporation. Well, the average earnings of the du Ponts for the period 1910 to
1914 were $6,000,000 a year. It wasn't much, but the du Ponts managed to get
along on it. Now let's look at their average yearly profit during the war
years, 1914 to 1918. Fifty-eight million dollars a year profit we find! Nearly
ten times that of normal times, and the profits of normal times were pretty
good. An increase in profits of more than 950 per cent.
Take one
of our little steel companies that patriotically shunted aside the making of
rails and girders and bridges to manufacture war materials. Well, their
1910-1914 yearly earnings averaged $6,000,000. Then came the war. And, like
loyal citizens, Bethlehem Steel promptly turned to munitions making. Did their
profits jump -- or did they let Uncle Sam in for a bargain? Well, their
1914-1918 average was $49,000,000 a year!
Or, let's
take United States Steel. The normal earnings during the five-year period prior
to the war were $105,000,000 a year. Not bad. Then along came the war and up
went the profits. The average yearly profit for the period 1914-1918 was
$240,000,000. Not bad.
There you
have some of the steel and powder earnings. Let's look at something else. A
little copper, perhaps. That always does well in war times.
Anaconda,
for instance. Average yearly earnings during the pre-war years 1910-1914 of
$10,000,000. During the war years 1914-1918 profits leaped to $34,000,000 per
year.
Or Utah
Copper. Average of $5,000,000 per year during the 1910-1914 period. Jumped to
an average of $21,000,000 yearly profits for the war period.
Let's
group these five, with three smaller companies. The total yearly average
profits of the pre-war period 1910-1914 were $137,480,000. Then along came the
war. The average yearly profits for this group skyrocketed to $408,300,000.
A little
increase in profits of approximately 200 per cent.
Does war
pay? It paid them. But they aren't the only ones. There are still others. Let's
take leather.
For the
three-year period before the war the total profits of Central Leather Company
were $3,500,000. That was approximately $1,167,000 a year. Well, in 1916
Central Leather returned a profit of $15,000,000, a small increase of 1,100 per
cent. That's all. The General Chemical Company averaged a profit for the three
years before the war of a little over $800,000 a year. Came the war, and the
profits jumped to $12,000,000. a leap of 1,400 per cent.
International
Nickel Company -- and you can't have a war without nickel -- showed an increase
in profits from a mere average of $4,000,000 a year to $73,000,000 yearly. Not
bad? An increase of more than 1,700 per cent.
American
Sugar Refining Company averaged $2,000,000 a year for the three years before
the war. In 1916 a profit of $6,000,000 was recorded.
Listen to
Senate Document No. 259. The Sixty-Fifth Congress, reporting on corporate earnings
and government revenues. Considering the profits of 122 meat packers, 153
cotton manufacturers, 299 garment makers, 49 steel plants, and 340 coal
producers during the war. Profits under 25 per cent were exceptional. For
instance the coal companies made between 100 per cent and 7,856 per cent on
their capital stock during the war. The Chicago packers doubled and tripled
their earnings.
And let us
not forget the bankers who financed the great war. If anyone had the cream of
the profits it was the bankers. Being partnerships rather than incorporated
organizations, they do not have to report to stockholders. And their profits
were as secret as they were immense. How the bankers made their millions and
their billions I do not know, because those little secrets never become public
-- even before a Senate investigatory body.
But here's
how some of the other patriotic industrialists and speculators chiseled their
way into war profits.
Take the
shoe people. They like war. It brings business with abnormal profits. They made
huge profits on sales abroad to our allies. Perhaps, like the munitions
manufacturers and armament makers, they also sold to the enemy. For a dollar is
a dollar whether it comes from Germany or from France. But they did well by
Uncle Sam too. For instance, they sold Uncle Sam 35,000,000 pairs of hobnailed
service shoes. There were 4,000,000 soldiers. Eight pairs, and more, to a
soldier. My regiment during the war had only one pair to a soldier. Some of
these shoes probably are still in existence. They were good shoes. But when the
war was over Uncle Sam has a matter of 25,000,000 pairs left over. Bought --
and paid for. Profits recorded and pocketed.
There was
still lots of leather left. So the leather people sold your Uncle Sam hundreds
of thousands of McClellan saddles for the cavalry. But there wasn't any
American cavalry overseas! Somebody had to get rid of this leather, however.
Somebody had to make a profit in it -- so we had a lot of McClellan saddles.
And we probably have those yet.
Also
somebody had a lot of mosquito netting. They sold your Uncle Sam 20,000,000
mosquito nets for the use of the soldiers overseas. I suppose the boys were
expected to put it over them as they tried to sleep in muddy trenches -- one
hand scratching cooties on their backs and the other making passes at scurrying
rats. Well, not one of these mosquito nets ever got to France!
Anyhow,
these thoughtful manufacturers wanted to make sure that no soldier would be
without his mosquito net, so 40,000,000 additional yards of mosquito netting
were sold to Uncle Sam.
There were
pretty good profits in mosquito netting in those days, even if there were no
mosquitoes in France. I suppose, if the war had lasted just a little longer,
the enterprising mosquito netting manufacturers would have sold your Uncle Sam
a couple of consignments of mosquitoes to plant in France so that more mosquito
netting would be in order.
Airplane
and engine manufacturers felt they, too, should get their just profits out of
this war. Why not? Everybody else was getting theirs. So $1,000,000,000 --
count them if you live long enough -- was spent by Uncle Sam in building
airplane engines that never left the ground! Not one plane, or motor, out of
the billion dollars worth ordered, ever got into a battle in France. Just the
same the manufacturers made their little profit of 30, 100, or perhaps 300 per
cent.
Undershirts
for soldiers cost 14¢ [cents] to make and uncle Sam paid 30¢ to 40¢ each for
them -- a nice little profit for the undershirt manufacturer. And the stocking
manufacturer and the uniform manufacturers and the cap manufacturers and the
steel helmet manufacturers -- all got theirs.
Why, when
the war was over some 4,000,000 sets of equipment -- knapsacks and the things
that go to fill them -- crammed warehouses on this side. Now they are being
scrapped because the regulations have changed the contents. But the
manufacturers collected their wartime profits on them -- and they will do it
all over again the next time.
There were
lots of brilliant ideas for profit making during the war.
One very
versatile patriot sold Uncle Sam twelve dozen 48-inch wrenches. Oh, they were
very nice wrenches. The only trouble was that there was only one nut ever made
that was large enough for these wrenches. That is the one that holds the
turbines at Niagara Falls. Well, after Uncle Sam had bought them and the
manufacturer had pocketed the profit, the wrenches were put on freight cars and
shunted all around the United States in an effort to find a use for them. When
the Armistice was signed it was indeed a sad blow to the wrench manufacturer.
He was just about to make some nuts to fit the wrenches. Then he planned to
sell these, too, to your Uncle Sam.
Still
another had the brilliant idea that colonels shouldn't ride in automobiles, nor
should they even ride on horseback. One has probably seen a picture of Andy
Jackson riding in a buckboard. Well, some 6,000 buckboards were sold to Uncle
Sam for the use of colonels! Not one of them was used. But the buckboard manufacturer
got his war profit.
The
shipbuilders felt they should come in on some of it, too. They built a lot of
ships that made a lot of profit. More than $3,000,000,000 worth. Some of the
ships were all right. But $635,000,000 worth of them were made of wood and
wouldn't float! The seams opened up -- and they sank. We paid for them, though.
And somebody pocketed the profits.
It has
been estimated by statisticians and economists and researchers that the war
cost your Uncle Sam $52,000,000,000. Of this sum, $39,000,000,000 was expended
in the actual war itself. This expenditure yielded $16,000,000,000 in profits.
That is how the 21,000 billionaires and millionaires got that way. This
$16,000,000,000 profits is not to be sneezed at. It is quite a tidy sum. And it
went to a very few.
The Senate
(Nye) committee probe of the munitions industry and its wartime profits,
despite its sensational disclosures, hardly has scratched the surface.
Even so,
it has had some effect. The State Department has been studying "for some
time" methods of keeping out of war. The War Department suddenly decides
it has a wonderful plan to spring. The Administration names a committee -- with
the War and Navy Departments ably represented under the chairmanship of a Wall
Street speculator -- to limit profits in war time. To what extent isn't
suggested. Hmmm. Possibly the profits of 300 and 600 and 1,600 per cent of
those who turned blood into gold in the World War would be limited to some
smaller figure.
Apparently,
however, the plan does not call for any limitation of losses -- that is, the
losses of those who fight the war. As far as I have been able to ascertain
there is nothing in the scheme to limit a soldier to the loss of but one eye,
or one arm, or to limit his wounds to one or two or three. Or to limit the loss
of life.
There is
nothing in this scheme, apparently, that says not more than 12 per cent of a
regiment shall be wounded in battle, or that not more than 7 per cent in a
division shall be killed.
Of course,
the committee cannot be bothered with such trifling matters.
CHAPTER THREE
Who
Pays The Bills?
Who
provides the profits -- these nice little profits of 20, 100, 300, 1,500 and
1,800 per cent? We all pay them -- in taxation. We paid the bankers their
profits when we bought Liberty Bonds at $100.00 and sold them back at $84 or
$86 to the bankers. These bankers collected $100 plus. It was a simple
manipulation. The bankers control the security marts. It was easy for them to
depress the price of these bonds. Then all of us -- the people -- got
frightened and sold the bonds at $84 or $86. The bankers bought them. Then
these same bankers stimulated a boom and government bonds went to par -- and
above. Then the bankers collected their profits.
But the
soldier pays the biggest part of the bill.
If you
don't believe this, visit the American cemeteries on the battlefields abroad.
Or visit any of the veteran's hospitals in the United States. On a tour of the
country, in the midst of which I am at the time of this writing, I have visited
eighteen government hospitals for veterans. In them are a total of about 50,000
destroyed men -- men who were the pick of the nation eighteen years ago. The
very able chief surgeon at the government hospital; at Milwaukee, where there
are 3,800 of the living dead, told me that mortality among veterans is three
times as great as among those who stayed at home.
Boys with
a normal viewpoint were taken out of the fields and offices and factories and
classrooms and put into the ranks. There they were remolded; they were made
over; they were made to "about face"; to regard murder as the order
of the day. They were put shoulder to shoulder and, through mass psychology, they
were entirely changed. We used them for a couple of years and trained them to
think nothing at all of killing or of being killed.
Then,
suddenly, we discharged them and told them to make another "about
face" ! This time they had to do their own readjustment, sans [without]
mass psychology, sans officers' aid and advice and sans nation-wide propaganda.
We didn't need them any more. So we scattered them about without any
"three-minute" or "Liberty Loan" speeches or parades. Many,
too many, of these fine young boys are eventually destroyed, mentally, because
they could not make that final "about face" alone.
In the
government hospital in Marion, Indiana, 1,800 of these boys are in pens! Five
hundred of them in a barracks with steel bars and wires all around outside the
buildings and on the porches. These already have been mentally destroyed. These
boys don't even look like human beings. Oh, the looks on their faces!
Physically, they are in good shape; mentally, they are gone.
There are
thousands and thousands of these cases, and more and more are coming in all the
time. The tremendous excitement of the war, the sudden cutting off of that
excitement -- the young boys couldn't stand it.
That's a
part of the bill. So much for the dead -- they have paid their part of the war
profits. So much for the mentally and physically wounded -- they are paying now
their share of the war profits. But the others paid, too -- they paid with
heartbreaks when they tore themselves away from their firesides and their
families to don the uniform of Uncle Sam -- on which a profit had been made.
They paid another part in the training camps where they were regimented and
drilled while others took their jobs and their places in the lives of their
communities. The paid for it in the trenches where they shot and were shot;
where they were hungry for days at a time; where they slept in the mud and the
cold and in the rain -- with the moans and shrieks of the dying for a horrible
lullaby.
But don't
forget -- the soldier paid part of the dollars and cents bill too.
Up to and
including the Spanish-American War, we had a prize system, and soldiers and
sailors fought for money. During the Civil War they were paid bonuses, in many
instances, before they went into service. The government, or states, paid as
high as $1,200 for an enlistment. In the Spanish-American War they gave prize
money. When we captured any vessels, the soldiers all got their share -- at
least, they were supposed to. Then it was found that we could reduce the cost
of wars by taking all the prize money and keeping it, but conscripting
[drafting] the soldier anyway. Then soldiers couldn't bargain for their labor,
Everyone else could bargain, but the soldier couldn't.
Napoleon
once said,
"All men are enamored of
decorations . . . they positively hunger for them."
So by
developing the Napoleonic system -- the medal business -- the government
learned it could get soldiers for less money, because the boys liked to be
decorated. Until the Civil War there were no medals. Then the Congressional
Medal of Honor was handed out. It made enlistments easier. After the Civil War
no new medals were issued until the Spanish-American War.
In the
World War, we used propaganda to make the boys accept conscription. They were
made to feel ashamed if they didn't join the army.
So vicious
was this war propaganda that even God was brought into it. With few exceptions
our clergymen joined in the clamor to kill, kill, kill. To kill the Germans.
God is on our side . . . it is His will that the Germans be killed.
And in
Germany, the good pastors called upon the Germans to kill the allies . . . to
please the same God. That was a part of the general propaganda, built up to
make people war conscious and murder conscious.
Beautiful
ideals were painted for our boys who were sent out to die. This was the
"war to end all wars." This was the "war to make the world safe
for democracy." No one mentioned to them, as they marched away, that their
going and their dying would mean huge war profits. No one told these American
soldiers that they might be shot down by bullets made by their own brothers
here. No one told them that the ships on which they were going to cross might
be torpedoed by submarines built with United States patents. They were just
told it was to be a "glorious adventure."
Thus,
having stuffed patriotism down their throats, it was decided to make them help
pay for the war, too. So, we gave them the large salary of $30 a month.
All they
had to do for this munificent sum was to leave their dear ones behind, give up
their jobs, lie in swampy trenches, eat canned willy (when they could get it)
and kill and kill and kill . . . and be killed.
But wait!
Half of
that wage (just a little more than a riveter in a shipyard or a laborer in a
munitions factory safe at home made in a day) was promptly taken from him to
support his dependents, so that they would not become a charge upon his
community. Then we made him pay what amounted to accident insurance --
something the employer pays for in an enlightened state -- and that cost him $6
a month. He had less than $9 a month left.
Then, the
most crowning insolence of all -- he was virtually blackjacked into paying for
his own ammunition, clothing, and food by being made to buy Liberty Bonds. Most
soldiers got no money at all on pay days.
We made
them buy Liberty Bonds at $100 and then we bought them back -- when they came
back from the war and couldn't find work -- at $84 and $86. And the soldiers
bought about $2,000,000,000 worth of these bonds!
Yes, the
soldier pays the greater part of the bill. His family pays too. They pay it in
the same heart-break that he does. As he suffers, they suffer. At nights, as he
lay in the trenches and watched shrapnel burst about him, they lay home in
their beds and tossed sleeplessly -- his father, his mother, his wife, his
sisters, his brothers, his sons, and his daughters.
When he
returned home minus an eye, or minus a leg or with his mind broken, they
suffered too -- as much as and even sometimes more than he. Yes, and they, too,
contributed their dollars to the profits of the munitions makers and bankers
and shipbuilders and the manufacturers and the speculators made. They, too,
bought Liberty Bonds and contributed to the profit of the bankers after the
Armistice in the hocus-pocus of manipulated Liberty Bond prices.
And even
now the families of the wounded men and of the mentally broken and those who
never were able to readjust themselves are still suffering and still paying.
CHAPTER FOUR
How
To Smash This Racket!
WELL, it's
a racket, all right.
A few
profit -- and the many pay. But there is a way to stop it. You can't end it by
disarmament conferences. You can't eliminate it by peace parleys at Geneva.
Well-meaning but impractical groups can't wipe it out by resolutions. It can be
smashed effectively only by taking the profit out of war.
The only
way to smash this racket is to conscript capital and industry and labor before
the nations manhood can be conscripted. One month before the Government can
conscript the young men of the nation -- it must conscript capital and industry
and labor. Let the officers and the directors and the high-powered executives
of our armament factories and our munitions makers and our shipbuilders and our
airplane builders and the manufacturers of all the other things that provide
profit in war time as well as the bankers and the speculators, be conscripted
-- to get $30 a month, the same wage as the lads in the trenches get.
Let the
workers in these plants get the same wages -- all the workers, all presidents,
all executives, all directors, all managers, all bankers -- yes, and all
generals and all admirals and all officers and all politicians and all
government office holders -- everyone in the nation be restricted to a total
monthly income not to exceed that paid to the soldier in the trenches!
Let all
these kings and tycoons and masters of business and all those workers in
industry and all our senators and governors and majors pay half of their
monthly $30 wage to their families and pay war risk insurance and buy Liberty
Bonds.
Why
shouldn't they?
They
aren't running any risk of being killed or of having their bodies mangled or
their minds shattered. They aren't sleeping in muddy trenches. They aren't
hungry. The soldiers are!
Give
capital and industry and labor thirty days to think it over and you will find,
by that time, there will be no war. That will smash the war racket -- that and
nothing else.
Maybe I am
a little too optimistic. Capital still has some say. So capital won't permit
the taking of the profit out of war until the people -- those who do the
suffering and still pay the price -- make up their minds that those they elect
to office shall do their bidding, and not that of the profiteers.
Another
step necessary in this fight to smash the war racket is the limited plebiscite
to determine whether a war should be declared. A plebiscite not of all the
voters but merely of those who would be called upon to do the fighting and
dying. There wouldn't be very much sense in having a 76-year-old president of a
munitions factory or the flat-footed head of an international banking firm or
the cross-eyed manager of a uniform manufacturing plant -- all of whom see
visions of tremendous profits in the event of war -- voting on whether the
nation should go to war or not. They never would be called upon to shoulder
arms -- to sleep in a trench and to be shot. Only those who would be called
upon to risk their lives for their country should have the privilege of voting
to determine whether the nation should go to war.
There is
ample precedent for restricting the voting to those affected. Many of our
states have restrictions on those permitted to vote. In most, it is necessary
to be able to read and write before you may vote. In some, you must own
property. It would be a simple matter each year for the men coming of military
age to register in their communities as they did in the draft during the World
War and be examined physically. Those who could pass and who would therefore be
called upon to bear arms in the event of war would be eligible to vote in a
limited plebiscite. They should be the ones to have the power to decide -- and
not a Congress few of whose members are within the age limit and fewer still of
whom are in physical condition to bear arms. Only those who must suffer should
have the right to vote.
A third
step in this business of smashing the war racket is to make certain that our
military forces are truly forces for defense only.
At each
session of Congress the question of further naval appropriations comes up. The
swivel-chair admirals of Washington (and there are always a lot of them) are
very adroit lobbyists. And they are smart. They don't shout that "We need
a lot of battleships to war on this nation or that nation." Oh no. First
of all, they let it be known that America is menaced by a great naval power.
Almost any day, these admirals will tell you, the great fleet of this supposed
enemy will strike suddenly and annihilate 125,000,000 people. Just like that.
Then they begin to cry for a larger navy. For what? To fight the enemy? Oh my,
no. Oh, no. For defense purposes only.
Then,
incidentally, they announce maneuvers in the Pacific. For defense. Uh, huh.
The
Pacific is a great big ocean. We have a tremendous coastline on the Pacific.
Will the maneuvers be off the coast, two or three hundred miles? Oh, no. The
maneuvers will be two thousand, yes, perhaps even thirty-five hundred miles,
off the coast.
The
Japanese, a proud people, of course will be pleased beyond expression to see
the united States fleet so close to Nippon's shores. Even as pleased as would
be the residents of California were they to dimly discern through the morning
mist, the Japanese fleet playing at war games off Los Angeles.
The ships
of our navy, it can be seen, should be specifically limited, by law, to within
200 miles of our coastline. Had that been the law in 1898 the Maine would never
have gone to Havana Harbor. She never would have been blown up. There would
have been no war with Spain with its attendant loss of life. Two hundred miles
is ample, in the opinion of experts, for defense purposes. Our nation cannot
start an offensive war if its ships can't go further than 200 miles from the
coastline. Planes might be permitted to go as far as 500 miles from the coast
for purposes of reconnaissance. And the army should never leave the territorial
limits of our nation.
To
summarize: Three steps must be taken to smash the war racket.
1. We must
take the profit out of war.
2. We must
permit the youth of the land who would bear arms to decide whether or not there
should be war.
3. We must
limit our military forces to home defense purposes.
CHAPTER
FIVE
To Hell With War!
I am not a fool as to believe that war is a thing of
the past. I know the people do not want war, but there is no use in saying we
cannot be pushed into another war.
Looking back, Woodrow Wilson was re-elected president
in 1916 on a platform that he had "kept us out of war" and on the
implied promise that he would "keep us out of war." Yet, five months
later he asked Congress to declare war on Germany.
In that five-month interval the people had not been
asked whether they had changed their minds. The 4,000,000 young men who put on
uniforms and marched or sailed away were not asked whether they wanted to go
forth to suffer and die.
Then what caused our government to change its mind so
suddenly?
Money.
An allied commission, it may be recalled, came over
shortly before the war declaration and called on the President. The President
summoned a group of advisers. The head of the commission spoke. Stripped of its
diplomatic language, this is what he told the President and his group:
"There
is no use kidding ourselves any longer. The cause of the allies is lost. We now
owe you (American bankers, American munitions makers, American manufacturers,
American speculators, American exporters) five or six billion dollars.
If
we lose (and without the help of the United States we must lose) we, England,
France and Italy, cannot pay back this money . . . and Germany won't.
So
. . . "
Had secrecy been outlawed as far as war negotiations
were concerned, and had the press been invited to be present at that
conference, or had radio been available to broadcast the proceedings, America
never would have entered the World War. But this conference, like all war
discussions, was shrouded in utmost secrecy. When our boys were sent off to war
they were told it was a "war to make the world safe for democracy"
and a "war to end all wars."
Well, eighteen years after, the world has less of
democracy than it had then. Besides, what business is it of ours whether Russia
or Germany or England or France or Italy or Austria live under democracies or
monarchies? Whether they are Fascists or Communists? Our problem is to preserve
our own democracy.
And very little, if anything, has been accomplished
to assure us that the World War was really the war to end all wars.
Yes, we have had disarmament conferences and
limitations of arms conferences. They don't mean a thing. One has just failed;
the results of another have been nullified. We send our professional soldiers
and our sailors and our politicians and our diplomats to these conferences. And
what happens?
The professional soldiers and sailors don't want to
disarm. No admiral wants to be without a ship. No general wants to be without a
command. Both mean men without jobs. They are not for disarmament. They cannot
be for limitations of arms. And at all these conferences, lurking in the
background but all-powerful, just the same, are the sinister agents of those
who profit by war. They see to it that these conferences do not disarm or
seriously limit armaments.
The chief aim of any power at any of these
conferences has not been to achieve disarmament to prevent war but rather to
get more armament for itself and less for any potential foe.
There is only one way to disarm with any semblance of
practicability. That is for all nations to get together and scrap every ship,
every gun, every rifle, every tank, every war plane. Even this, if it were
possible, would not be enough.
The next war, according to experts, will be fought
not with battleships, not by artillery, not with rifles and not with machine
guns. It will be fought with deadly chemicals and gases.
Secretly each nation is studying and perfecting newer
and ghastlier means of annihilating its foes wholesale. Yes, ships will continue
to be built, for the shipbuilders must make their profits. And guns still will
be manufactured and powder and rifles will be made, for the munitions makers
must make their huge profits. And the soldiers, of course, must wear uniforms,
for the manufacturer must make their war profits too.
But victory or defeat will be determined by the skill
and ingenuity of our scientists.
If we put them to work making poison gas and more and
more fiendish mechanical and explosive instruments of destruction, they will
have no time for the constructive job of building greater prosperity for all
peoples. By putting them to this useful job, we can all make more money out of
peace than we can out of war -- even the munitions makers.
So...I say,
TO HELL WITH WAR!
No comments:
Post a Comment