New York Times Denies Health Consequences of 5G & Then Blames Russia
By
Arjun Walia
from Collective Evolution
Arjun Walia
from Collective Evolution In Brief
- The Facts:A number of
scientists, doctors and published peer reviewed research have clearly
shown the health effects of EMF radiation. So why is it being ridicule
by the mainstream? Why does it
continued to go ignored? - Reflect On:How are these technologies able to be approved without any safety . testing, what's going on here?
Is
this another story that will be heavily censored, and possibly even
branded as fake news? It’s not unlikely, and it’s quite reminiscent of
George Orwell’s 1984, a classic book depicting a populace ruled by a
political regime that persecutes individualism and independent critical
thinking as “thoughtcrimes” that must be enforced by the “thought
police.” Today, the thought police are the global elite, who are using
social media platforms like Facebook to censor information, no matter
how well presented, sourced and truthful the information is. This is
because information, in several different areas, is threatening multiple
corporate, political and elitist interests.
So, who are these fact checkers? Well,
NewsGuard is one of them, which is funded by Clinton donors as well as
big pharma and the Council on Foreign Relations. These organizations are
also heavily tied to mainstream media outlets like The New York
Times. Mainstream media outlets are owned by a small group of powerful
people. These groups also have very close ties to multiple corporations
and intelligence agencies like the CIA. Although these days it doesn’t
seem very hard to recognize this, mainstream media is still used to sway
the minds of the masses on certain topics by ridiculing them and
failing to address and counter the points made by others. The latest
example of this is with regards to 5G.
The 5G wireless technology rollout has
been happening for a long time. We’ve seen a lot of marketing and
information detailing how this type of technology will make our lives
better and speed up the process of anything wireless. President Donald
Trump recently described the 5G rollout as a “race” that “America must
win.” The Canadian Prime Minister has also been quite outspoken about
5G, but has completely ignored anything regarding the health
consequences, like most politicians have done so far.
A recent article in The New York Times, a
major mouthpiece for the establishment, is a fiction piece on the
topic of 5G masquerading as news. The piece was written by William Broad titled, “Your
5G Phone Won’t Hurt You But Russia Wants You To Think Otherwise.” The
paper claims that the health risks associated with 5G technology are a
crazy “conspiracy theory” without even acknowledging all of the concerns
being brought up by hundreds of scientists and doctors, not to mention
all the peer-reviewed research and the considerable number of papers
that have been published on the subject over the years. If 5G technology
is so safe, why don’t we simply put it through appropriate safety
testing to ease everyone’s minds? The answer is simple: It’s an obvious
threat to human health, and if the corporations who control this
technology, which unfortunately seem to control our government health
regulatory agencies, actually did put it through transparent safety
testing, there is no way these technologies would be allowed to come
out. It’s truly a crime against humanity.
Furthermore, it’s quite comical how the
essay blames Russia. Too long has Russia been used as a tool to simply
cast blame on, the latest example would be hacking the 2016 US
presidential election. There was no evidence for that, and it seems to
be a narrative that was made up out of thin air by the elite, using
mainstream media as their tool.
A Belgian government minister recently announced that Brussels is halting its 5G plans due to health concerns.“As a patriotic loyalist of Russo-paranoia, Broad has dreamed up a hallucination that Russia is preparing to outpace the US’s strategy to dominate the global “internet of everything” in the race to launch 5G technology globally. Aside from Broad’s otherwise corporate friendly stances supporting hydrofracking, genetically modified foods, and the myth that vaccines do not contribute to neurological disorders, he has produced some excellent work about Yoga culture and North Korea. Yet these are hardly topics that would enable a person to speak intelligently about electromagnetic frequency’s (EMFs) biomolecular effects on living organisms.” – Richard Gate, Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries, & Dr. Gary Null, the host of the nation’s longest running public radio program on alternative and nutritional health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director including Poverty Inc and Deadly Deception (source)advertisement - learn more
The statement was made by Céline Fremault, the Minister of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region, responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy. From an interview last Friday, with L’Echo:
“I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt.”
– Céline Fremault, Minister of the Government (Brussels-Captial Region)
There are more than 10,000 peer-reviewed
studies that confirm 5G’s measurable adverse effects on human biology.
Again, the Times completely ignored this and simply implied that these
health concerns are a conspiracy theory. Meanwhile, as far back as 2011,
the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified EMFs as
possibly carcinogenic to humans. This was based on research showing a
direct correlation between glioma tumors — a malignant brain cancer —
and wireless mobile phone use. The
Agency falls under the umbrella of the WHO, a cesspool compromised of
corporate conflicts of interests and biased influence. It’s important to
mention that the former chair of the IARC group, Anders Ahlbom,
who’s also the co-founder of Gunnar Ahlbom AB, a Belgian lobbying firm
providing public relations services to the telecom industry, was
responsible for evaluating the epidemiology and carcinogenicity of
mobile phone radiation. The IARC is completely biased, yet it still
admits that 5G is “possibly” carcinogenic, even though the science shows
that it clearly is carcinogenic.
Between August 2016 and September 2018, over 400 new studies on electromagnetic radiation risks were compiled by public health professor Joel Moskowitz at
the University of California at Berkeley. These studies cover earlier
generation technologies, whereas 5G will be everywhere and far less
safe. Compared to 4G technology, which is commonly used today, every 5G base station will
contain hundreds of thousands of antennas, each aiming lasers like
microwave beams to all devices. In an urban area, base stations could be
installed as little as 100 meters (328 feet) apart.
Those studies show a myriad of risks,
including damage to DNA, damage to sperm, neuropsychiatric damage, and
much more. For example, a study titled “Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression”
published in the Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy outlines this quite
clearly, and it’s only one of thousands of peer-reviewed studies raising
multiple concerns in regards to this type of technology.
Dr. Martin L. Pall, PhD and Professor
Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State
University, is another academic who has gathered a number of studies and
compiled them together. Taken from his report titled “5G:
Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence
for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic
Field(EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them,” he states that:
“Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.”
According to Dr. Marin Blank from Columbia University’s Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, with regards to wireless radiation in general:
“We have created something that is harming us, and it is getting out of control. Before Edison’s light bulb there was very little electromagnetic radiation in our environment. The levels today are very many times higher than natural background levels, and are growing rapidly because of all the new devices that emit this radiation. Putting it bluntly they are damaging the living cells in our bodies and killing many of us prematurely.”
If you want to dive deeper into the
science of this stuff and see just how obvious it is, you can find a lot
of research that’s been published over the years linked at the Environmental Health Trust. It’s a great resource.
Furthermore, we’ve covered this topic in
depth, and you can read some of our other related articles if you’re
interested. They’re listed below:
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Completely Ignores Serious 5G Health Hazards5G: “The Most Censored Story of 2018” – Journalist Masterfully Educates Houston City Council
The Takeaway
Do we really need to use these technologies? Why do politicians and mainstream media continue to talk about 5G without ever addressing the health concerns, and why do mainstream media outlets simply ridicule all of the health concerns that are being brought up by the public? What is going on here? Can mainstream media really convince people that 5G technology is completely safe, and that those who claim it’s not have no idea what they are talking about?At the end of the day, all we can do is lower our exposure to EMF radiation. We can choose a faster wired connection. There are products available on the market, like paint for your home as well as clothing, that can block this radiation. Most importantly, you can utilize a healthy lifestyle as well as the mind-body connection to mitigate the effects. Awareness without fear/worry is our best tool, but at the end of the day we must continue to raise our voice in an age of massive censorship.
Help Support Collective Evolution
In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!
SUPPORT CE HERE!
No comments:
Post a Comment