CHAPTER TWELVE
Conclusions
We have demonstrated with documentary evidence a number of critical associations between Wall Street international bankers and the rise of Hitler and Nazism in Germany.
First:
that Wall Street financed the German cartels in the mid-1920s which in turn
proceeded to bring Hitler to power.
Second:
that the financing for Hitler and his S.S. street thugs came in part from
affiliates or subsidiaries of U.S. firms, including Henry Ford in 1922,
payments by I.G. Farben and General Electric in 1933, followed by the Standard
Oil of New Jersey and I.T.T. subsidiary payments to Heinrich Himmler up to
1944.
Third:
that U.S. multi-nationals under the control of Wall Street profited handsomely
from Hitler's military construction program in the 1930s and at least until
1942.
Fourth:
that these same international bankers used political influence in the U.S. to
cover up their wartime collaboration and to do this infiltrated the U.S.
Control Commission for Germany.
Our
evidence for these four major assertions can be summarized as follows:
In
Chapter One we presented evidence that the Dawes and Young Plans for German
reparations were formulated by Wall Streeters, temporarily wearing the hats of
statesmen, and these loans generated a rain of profits for these international
bankers. Owen Young of General Electric, Hjalmar Schacht, A. Voegler, and
others intimately connected with Hitler's accession to power had earlier been
the negotiators for the U.S. and German sides, respectively. Three Wall Street
houses — Dillon, Read; Harris, Forbes; and, National City Company — handled
three-quarters of the reparations loans used to create the German cartel
system, including the dominant I.G. Farben and Vereinigte Stahlwerke, which
together produced 95 percent of the explosives for the Nazi side in World War
II.
The
central role of I.G. Farben in Hitler's coup
d' état was reviewed in Chapter Two. The directors of American I.G.
(Farben) were identified as prominent American businessmen: Walter Teagle, a
close Roosevelt associate and backer and an NRA administrator; banker Paul
Warburg (his brother Max Warburg was on the board of I.G. Farben in Germany);
and Edsel Ford. Farben contributed 400,000 RM directly to Schacht and Hess for
use in the crucial 1933 elections and Farben was subsequently in the forefront
of military development in Nazi Germany.
A
donation of 60,000 RM was made to Hitler by German General Electric (A.E.G.),
which had four directors and a 25-30 percent interest held by the U.S. General
Electric parent company. This role was described in Chapter Three, and we found
that Gerard Swope, an originator of Roosevelt's New Deal (its National Recovery
Administration segment), together with Owen Young of the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York and Clark Minor of International General Electric, were the
dominant Wall Streeters in A.E.G. and the most significant single influence.
We
also found no evidence to indict the German electrical firm Siemens, which was not under Wall Street control. In
contrast, there is documentary evidence that both A.E.G. and Osram, the other
units of the German electrical industry — both of which had U.S. participation
and control — did finance Hitler. In
fact, almost all directors of German General Electric were Hitler backers,
either directly through A.E.G. or indirectly through other German firms, G.E.
rounded out its Hitler support by technical cooperation with Krupp, aimed at
restricting U.S. development of tungsten carbide, which worked to the detriment
of the U.S. in World War II. We concluded that A.E.G. plants in Germany
managed, by a yet unknown maneuver, to avoid bombing by the Allies.
An
examination of the role of Standard Oil of New Jersey (which was and is
controlled by the Rockefeller interests) was undertaken in Chapter Four. Standard
Oil apparently did not finance Hitler's accession to power in 1933 (that part
of the "myth of Sidney Warburg" is not proven). On the other hand,
payments were made up to 1944 by Standard Oil of New Jersey, to develop
synthetic gasoline for war purposes on behalf of the Nazis and, through its
wholly owned subsidiary, to Heinrich Himmler's S.S. Circle of Friends for
political purposes. Standard Oil's role was technical aid to Nazi development
of synthetic rubber and gasoline through a U.S. research company under the
management control of Standard Oil. The Ethyl Gasoline Company, jointly owned
by Standard Oil of New Jersey and General Motors, was instrumental in supplying
vital ethyl lead to Nazi Germany — over the written protests of the U.S. War
Department — with the clear knowledge that the ethyl lead was for Nazi military
purposes.
In
Chapter Five we demonstrated that International Telephone and Telegraph
Company, one of the more notorious multi-nationals, worked both sides of World
War II through Baron Kurt von Schroder, of the Schroder banking group. I.T.T.
also held a 28-percent interest in Focke-Wolfe aircraft, which manufactured
excellent German fighter planes. We also found that Texaco (Texas Oil Company)
was involved in Nazi endeavors through German attorney Westrick, but dropped
its chairman of the board Rieber when these endeavors were publicized.
Henry
Ford was an early (1922) Hitler backer and Edsel Ford continued the family
tradition in 1942 by encouraging French Ford to profit from arming the German
Wehrmacht, Subsequently, these Ford-produced vehicles were used against
American soldiers as they landed in France in 1944. For his early recognition
of, and timely assistance to, the Nazis, Henry Ford received a Nazi medal in
1938. The records of French Ford suggest Ford Motor received kid glove
treatment from the Nazis after 1940.
The
provable threads of Hitler financing are drawn together in Chapter Seven and
answer with precise names and figures the question, who financed Adolf Hitler?
This chapter indicts Wall Street and, incidentally, no one else of consequence
in the United States except the Ford family. The Ford family is not normally
associated with Wall Street but is certainly a part of the "power
elite."
In
earlier chapters we cited several Roosevelt associates, including Teagle of
Standard Oil, the Warburg family, and Gerard Swope. In Chapter Eight the role
of Putzi Hanfstaengl, another Roosevelt friend and a participant in the
Reichstag fire, is traced. The composition of the Nazi inner circle during
World War II, and the financial contributions of Standard Oil of New Jersey and
I.T.T. subsidiaries, are traced in Chapter Nine. Documentary proof of these
monetary contributions is presented. Kurt von Schroder is identified as the key
intermediary in this S.S. "slush fund."
Finally,
in Chapter Ten we reviewed a book suppressed in 1934 and the "myth of
'Sidney Warburg.'" The suppressed book accused the Rockefellers, the
Warburgs, and the major oil companies of financing Hitler. While the name
"Sidney Warburg" was no doubt an invention, the extraordinary fact
remains that the argument in the suppressed "Sidney Warburg" book is
remarkably close to the evidence presented now. It also remains a puzzle why
James Paul Warburg, fifteen years later, would want to attempt, in a rather
transparently slipshod manner, to refute the contents of the
"Warburg" book, a book he claims not to have seen. It is perhaps even
more of a puzzle why Warburg would choose Nazi von Papen's Memoirs as the vehicle to present his refutation.
Finally,
in Chapter Eleven we examined the roles of the Morgan and Chase Banks in World
War II, specifically their collaboration with the Nazis in France while a major
war was raging.
In
other words, as in our two previous examinations of the links between New York
international bankers and major historical events, we find a provable pattern
of subsidy and political manipulation.
Looking
at the broad array of facts presented in the three volumes of the Wall Street
series, we find persistent recurrence of the same names: Owen Young, Gerard
Swope, Hjalmar Schacht, Bernard Baruch, etc.;
the same international banks: J.P. Morgan, Guaranty Trust, Chase Bank; and
the same location in New York: usually 120 Broadway.
This
group of international bankers backed the Bolshevik Revolution and subsequently
profited from the establishment of a Soviet Russia. This group backed Roosevelt
and profited from New Deal socialism. This group also backed Hitler and
certainly profited from German armament in the 1930s. When Big Business should
have been running its business operations at Ford Motor, Standard of New
Jersey, and so on, we find it actively and deeply involved in political
upheavals, war, and revolutions in three major countries.
The
version of history presented here is that the financial elite knowingly and
with premeditation assisted the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 in concert with
German bankers. After profiting handsomely from the German hyper-inflationary
distress of 1923, and planning to place the German reparations burden onto the
backs of American investors, Wall Street found it had brought about the 1929
financial crisis.
Two
men were then backed as leaders for major Western countries: Franklin D.
Roosevelt in the United States and Adolf Hitler in Germany. The Roosevelt New
Deal and Hitler's Four Year Plan had great similarities. The Roosevelt and
Hitler plans were plans for fascist takeovers of their respective countries.
While Roosevelt's NRA failed, due to then-operating constitutional constraints,
Hitler's Plan succeeded.
Why
did the Wall Street elite, the international bankers, want Roosevelt and Hitler
in power? This is an aspect we have not explored. According to the "myth
of 'Sidney Warburg,'" Wall Street wanted a policy of revenge; that is, it
wanted war in Europe between France and Germany. We know even from
Establishment history that both Hitler and Roosevelt acted out policies leading
to war.
The
link-ups between persons and events in this three-book series would require
another book. But a single example will perhaps indicate the remarkable
concentration of power within a relatively few organizations, and the use of
this power.
On
May 1st, 1918, when the Bolsheviks controlled only a small fraction of Russia
(and were to come near to losing even that fraction in the summer of 1918), the
American League to Aid and Cooperate with Russia was organized in Washington,
D.C. to support the Bolsheviks. This was not a "Hands off Russia" type
of committee formed by the Communist Party U.S.A. or its allies. It was a
committee created by Wall Street with
George P. Whalen of Vacuum Oil Company as Treasurer and Coffin and Oudin of
General Electric, along with Thompson of the Federal Reserve System, Willard of
the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, and assorted socialists.
When
we look at the rise of Hitler and Nazism we find Vacuum Oil and General
Electric well represented. Ambassador Dodd in Germany was struck by the
monetary and technical contribution by the Rockefeller-controlled Vacuum Oil
Company in building up military gasoline facilities for the Nazis. The
Ambassador tried to warn Roosevelt. Dodd believed, in his apparent naiveté of
world affairs, that Roosevelt would intervene, but Roosevelt himself was backed
by these same oil interests and Walter Teagle of Standard Oil of New Jersey and
the NRA was on the board of Roosevelt's Warm Springs Foundation. So, in but one
of many examples, we find the Rockefeller-controlled Vacuum Oil Company
prominently assisting in the creation of Bolshevik Russia, the military
build-up of Nazi Germany, and backing Roosevelt's New Deal.
Within
the last decade or so, certainly since the 1960s, a steady flow of literature
has presented a thesis that the United States is ruled by a self-perpetuating
and unelected power elite. Even further, most of these books aver that this
elite controls, or at the least heavily influences, all foreign and domestic
policy decisions, and that no idea becomes respectable or is published in the
United States without the tacit approval, or perhaps lack of disapproval, of
this elitist circle.
Obviously
the very flow of anti-establishment literature by itself testifies that the
United States cannot be wholly under the thumb of any single group or elite. On
the other hand, anti-establishment literature is not fully recognized or
reasonably discussed in academic or media circles. More often than not it
consists of a limited edition, privately produced, almost hand-to-hand
circulated. There are some exceptions,
true; but not enough to dispute the observation that anti-establishment critics
do not easily enter normal information/distribution channels.
Whereas
in the early and mid-1960s, any concept of rule by a conspiratorial elite, or
indeed any kind of elite, was reason enough to dismiss the proponent out of
hand as a "nut case," the atmosphere for such concepts has changed
radically. The Watergate affair probably added the final touches to a long-developing
environment of skepticism and doubt. We are almost at the point where anyone
who accepts, for example, the Warren Commission report, or believes that that
the decline and fall of Mr. Nixon did not have some conspiratorial aspects, is
suspect. In brief, no one any longer really believes the Establishment
information process. And there is a wide variety of alternative presentations
of events now available for the curious.
Several
hundred books, from the full range of the political and philosophical spectrum,
add bits and pieces of evidence, more hypotheses, and more accusations. What
was not too long ago a kooky idea, talked about at midnight behind closed
doors, in hushed and almost conspiratorial whispers, is now openly debated —
not, to be sure, in Establishment newspapers but certainly on non-network radio
talk shows, the underground press, and even from time to time in books from
respectable Establishment publishing houses.
So
let us ask the question again: Is there an unselected power elite behind the
U.S. Government?
A
substantive and often-cited source of information is Carroll Quigley, Professor
of International Relations at Georgetown University, who in 1966 had published
a monumental modern history entitled Tragedy
and Hope.1 Quigley's book is apart from others in
this revisionist vein, by virtue of the fact that it was based on a two-year
study of the internal documents of one of the power centers. Quigley traces the
history of the power elite:
...
the powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less
than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to
dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a
whole.
Quigley
also demonstrates that the Council on Foreign Relations, the National Planning
Association, and other groups are "semi-secret" policy-making bodies
under the control of this power elite.
In
the following tabular presentation we have listed five such revisionist books,
including Quigley's. Their essential theses and compatibility with the three
volumes of the "Wall Street" series are summarized. It is surprising
that in the three major historical events noted, Carroll Quigley is not at all
consistent with the "Wall Street" series evidence. Quigley goes a
long way to provide evidence for the existence
of the power elite, but does not penetrate the operations of the elite.
Possibly,
the papers used by Quigley had been vetted, and did not include documentation
on elitist manipulation of such events as the Bolshevik Revolution, Hitler's
accession to power, and the election of Roosevelt in 1933. More likely, these
political manipulations may not be recorded at all in the files of the power
groups. They may have been unrecorded actions by a small ad hoc segment of the elite. It is noteworthy that the documents
used by this author came from government sources, recording the day-to-day
actions of Trotsky, Lenin, Roosevelt, Hitler, J.P. Morgan and the various firms
and banks involved.
On
the other hand, such authors as Jules Archer, Gary Allen, Helen P. Lasell, and
William Domhoff, writing from widely different political standpoints2
are consistent with the "Wall
Street" evidence. These writers present a hypothesis of a power elite
manipulating the U.S. Government. The "Wall Street" series
demonstrates how this hypothesized "power elite" has manipulated
specific historical events.
Obviously
any such exercise of unconstrained and supra-legal power is unconstitutional,
even though wrapped in the fabric of law-abiding actions. We can therefore
legitimately raise the question of the existence of a subversive force
operating to remove constitutionally guaranteed rights.
Twentieth-century
history, as recorded in Establishment textbooks and journals, is inaccurate. It
is a history which is based solely upon those official documents which various
Administrations have seen fit to release for public consumption.
But
an accurate history cannot be based on a selective release of documentary
archives. Accuracy requires access to all documents. In practice, as previously
classified documents in the U.S. State Department files, the British Foreign
Office, and the German Foreign Ministry archives and other depositories are
acquired, a new version of history has emerged; the prevailing Establishment
version is seen to be, not only inaccurate, but designed to hide a pervasive
fabric of deceit and immoral conduct.
The
center of political power, as authorized by the U.S. Constitution, is with an
elected Congress and an elected President, working within the framework and
under the constraints of a Constitution, as interpreted by an unbiased Supreme
Court. We have in the past assumed that
political power is consequently carefully exercised by the Executive and
legislative branch, after due deliberation and assessment of the wishes of the
electorate. In fact, nothing could be further from this assumption. The
electorate has long suspected, but now knows, that political promises are worth
nothing. Lies are the order of the day for policy implementers. Wars are
started (and stopped) with no shred of coherent explanation. Political words
have never matched political deeds. Why not? Apparently because the center of
political power has been elsewhere than with elected and presumably responsive
representatives in Washington, and this power elite has its own objectives,
which are inconsistent with those of the public at large.
In
this three-volume series we have identified for three historical events the
seat of political power in the United States — the power behind the scenes, the
hidden influence on Washington — as that of the financial establishment in New
York: the private international bankers, more specifically the financial houses
of J.P. Morgan, the Rockefeller-controlled Chase Manhattan Bank, and in earlier
days (before amalgamation of their Manhattan Bank with the former Chase Bank),
the Warburgs.
The
United States has, in spite of the Constitution and its supposed constraints,
become a quasi-totalitarian state. While we do not (yet) have. the overt
trappings of dictatorship, the concentration camps and the knock on the door at
midnight, we most certainly do have threats and actions aimed at the survival of
non-Establishment critics, use of the Internal Revenue Service to bring
dissidents in line, and manipulation of the Constitution by a court system that
is politically subservient to the Establishment.
It
is in the pecuniary interests of the international bankers to centralize
political power — and this centralization can best be achieved within a
collectivist society, such as socialist Russia, national socialist Germany, or
a Fabian socialist United States.
There
can be no full understanding and appreciation of twentieth-century American
politics and foreign policy without the realization that this financial elite
effectively monopolizes Washington policy.
In
case after case, newly released documentation implicates this elite and
confirms this hypothesis. The revisionist versions of the entry of the United
States into World Wars I and II, Korea, and Vietnam reveal the influence and
objectives of this elite.
For
most of the twentieth century the Federal Reserve System, particularly the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York (which is outside the control of Congress,
unaudited and uncontrolled, with the power to print money and create credit at
will), has exercised a virtual monopoly over the direction of the American
economy. In foreign affairs the Council on Foreign Relations, superficially an
innocent forum for academics, businessmen, and politicians, contains within its
shell, perhaps unknown to many of its members, a power center that unilaterally
determines U.S. foreign policy. The major objective of this submerged — and
obviously subversive — foreign. policy is the acquisition of markets and
economic power (profits, if you
will), for a small group of giant multi-nationals under the virtual control of
a few banking investment houses and controlling families.
Through
foundations controlled by this elite, research by compliant and spineless
academics, "conservatives" as well as "liberals," has been
directed into channels useful for the objectives of the elite essentially to
maintain this subversive and unconstitutional power apparatus.
Through
publishing houses controlled by this same financial elite unwelcome books have
been squashed and useful books promoted; fortunately publishing has few
barriers to entry and is almost atomistically competitive. Through control of a
dozen or so major newspapers, run by editors who think alike, public
information can be almost orchestrated at will. Yesterday, the space program;
today, an energy crisis or a campaign for ecology; tomorrow, a war in the
Middle East or some other manufactured "crisis."
The
total result of this manipulation of society by the Establishment elite has
been four major wars in sixty years, a crippling national debt, abandonment of
the Constitution, suppression of freedom and opportunity, and creation of a vast
credibility gulf between the man in the street and Washington, D.C. While the
transparent device of two major parties trumpeting artificial differences,
circus-like conventions, and the cliche of "bipartisan foreign
policy" no longer carries credibility, and the financial elite itself
recognizes that its policies lack public acceptance, it is obviously prepared
to go it alone without even nominal public support.
In
brief, we now have to consider and debate whether this New York-based elitist
Establishment is a subversive force operating with deliberation and knowledge
to suppress the Constitution and a free society. That will be the task ahead in
the next decade.
The
arena for this debate and the basis for our charges of subversion is the
evidence provided by the revisionist historian. Slowly, over decades, book by
book, almost line by line, the truth of recent history has emerged as documents
are released, probed, analyzed, and set within a more valid historical framework.
Let
us consider a few examples. American entry into World War II was supposedly
precipitated, according to the Establishment version, by the Japanese attack on
Pearl Harbor. Revisionists have established that Franklin D. Roosevelt and
General Marshall knew of the
impending Japanese attack and did nothing to warn the Pearl Harbor military
authorities. The Establishment wanted war with Japan. Subsequently, the
Establishment made certain that Congressional investigation of Pearl Harbor
would fit the Roosevelt whitewash. In the words of Percy Greaves, chief
research expert for the Republican minority on the Joint Congressional
Committee investigating Pearl Harbor:
The
complete facts will never be known. Most of the so-called investigations have
been attempts to suppress, mislead, or confuse those who seek the truth. From
the beginning to the end, facts and files have been withheld so as to reveal
only those items of information which benefit the administration under
investigation. Those seeking the truth are told that other facts or documents
cannot be revealed because they are intermingled in personal diaries, pertain
to our relations with foreign countries, or are sworn to contain no information
of value.3
But
this was not the first attempt to bring the United States into war, or the
last. The Morgan interests, in concert with Winston Churchill, tried to bring
the U.S. into World War I as early as 1915 and succeeded in doing so in 1917. Colin
Thompson's Lusitania implicates
President Woodrow Wilson in the sinking of the Lusitania — a horror device to generate a public backlash to draw
the United States into war with Germany. Thompson demonstrates that Woodrow
Wilson knew four darts beforehand that
the Lusitania was carrying
six-million rounds of ammunition plus explosives, and therefore,
"passengers who proposed to sail on that vessel were sailing in violation
of statute of this country."4
The
British Board of Inquiry under Lord Mersey was instructed by the British Government "that it is considered
politically expedient that Captain Turner, the master of the Lusitania, be most prominently blamed
for the disaster."
In
retrospect, given Colin Thompson's evidence, the blame is more fairly to be
attributed to President Wilson, "Colonel" House, J.P. Morgan, and
Winston Churchill; this conspiratorial elite should have been brought to trial
for willful negligence, if not treason. It is to Lord Mersey's eternal credit
that after performing his "duty" under instructions from His
Majesty's government, and placing the blame on Captain Turner, he resigned,
rejected his fee, and from that date on refused to handle British government
commissions. To his friends Lord Mersey would only say about the Lusitania case that it was a "dirty
business."
Then
in 1933-4 came the attempt by the Morgan firm to install a fascist dictatorship
in the United States. In the words of Jules Archer, it was planned to be a
Fascist putsch to take over the
government and "run it under a
dictator on behalf of America's bankers and industrialists."5
Again, a single courageous individual emerged — General Smedley Darlington
Butler, who blew the whistle on the Wall Street conspiracy. And once again
Congress stands out, particularly Congressmen Dickstein and MacCormack, by its
gutless refusal to do no more than conduct a token whitewash investigation.
Since
World War II we have seen the Korean War and the Vietnamese War — meaningless,
meandering no-win wars costly in dollars and lives, with no other major purpose
but to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts. Certainly these wars
were not fought to restrain communism, because for fifty years the
Establishment has been nurturing and subsidizing the Soviet Union which
supplied armaments to the other sides in both wars — Korea and Vietnam. So our
revisionist history will show that the United States directly or indirectly
armed both sides in at least Korea and Vietnam.
In
the assassination of President Kennedy, to take a domestic example, it is
difficult to find anyone who today accepts the findings of the Warren
Commission — except perhaps the members of that Commission. Yet key evidence is
still hidden from public eyes for 50 to 75 years. The Watergate affair
demonstrated even to the man in the street that the White House can be a
vicious nest of intrigue and deception.
Of
all recent history the story of Operation Keelhaul6
is perhaps the most disgusting. Operation Keelhaul was the forced repatriation
of millions of Russians at the orders of President (then General) Dwight D.
Eisenhower, in direct violation of the Geneva Convention of 1929 and the
long-standing American tradition of political refuge. Operation Keelhaul, which
contravenes all our ideas of elementary decency and individual freedom, was
undertaken at the direct orders of General Eisenhower and, we may now presume,
was a part of a long-range program of nurturing collectivism, whether it be
Soviet communism' Hitler's Nazism, or FDR's New Deal. Yet until recent
publication of documentary evidence by Julius Epstein, anyone who dared to
suggest Eisenhower would betray millions of innocent individuals for political
purposes was viciously and mercilessly attacked.7
What
this revisionist history really teaches us is that our willingness as
individual citizens to surrender political power to an elite has cost the world
approximately two-hundred-million persons killed from 1820 to 1975. Add to that
untold misery the concentration camps, the political prisoners, the suppression
and oppression of those who try to bring the truth to light.
When
will it all stop? It will not stop until we act upon one simple axiom: that the
power system continues only so long as individuals
want it to continue, and it will continue only so long as individuals try to get something for
nothing. The day when a majority of individuals declares or acts as if it wants
nothing from government, declares it will look after its own welfare and
interests, then on that day power
elites are doomed. The attraction to "go
along" with power elites is the attraction of something for nothing.
That is the bait. The Establishment always offers something for nothing; but
the something is taken from someone else, as taxes or plunder, and awarded
elsewhere in exchange for political support.
Periodic
crises and wars are used to whip up support for other plunder-reward cycles
which in effect tighten the noose around our individual liberties. And of
course we have hordes of academic sponges, amoral businessmen, and just plain
hangers-on, to act as non-productive recipients for the plunder.
Stop
the circle of plunder and immoral reward and elitist structures collapse. But
not until a majority finds the moral courage and the internal fortitude to
reject the something-for-nothing con game and replace it by voluntary
associations, voluntary communes, or local rule and decentralized societies,
will the killing and the plunder cease.
Footnotes:
1Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, op.
cit.
2There are many others; the author
selected more or less at random two conservatives (Allen and Lasell) and two
liberals (Archer and Domhoff),
3Percy L. Greaves, Jr., "The Pearl
Harbor Investigation," in Harry Elmer Harnes, Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, (Caldwell: Caxton Printers, 1953),
p, 13-20.
4Colin Simpson, Lusitania, (London: Longman, 1972), p, 252.
5Jules Archer, The Plot to Seize the White House, (New York: Hawthorn Book, 1973),
p. 202.
6See Julius Epstein, Operation Keelhaul, (Old Greenwich:
Devin Adair, 1973).
7See for example Robert Welch, The Politician, (Belmont, Mass.: Belmont
Publishing Co., 1963).
No comments:
Post a Comment