In the recent propaganda campaign, designed to use a measles
outbreak as an example of what happens when parents don't vaccinate
their children,
commentators have stated that, prior to the "epidemic,"
measles cases in the area had shrunk to zero---as if
eliminating the disease were a proper goal of vaccination.
This is bluster and nonsense. At one time, before the obsession to give
shots took hold, parents would take their children to the home of a
child who had come down with measles, so these kids could catch the
illness and be done with it.
Zero reported measles cases is no sign that all is well. Vaccines can
and do cause other very serious disease problems, and because the
symptoms don't resemble measles, other names are given to these
conditions, and no connection is made to the effects of
vaccines.
The true goal of immunization has nothing to do with vaccination. It
has to do with strengthening a child's immune system so he/she can stage
an acute and full inflammatory response when illness occurs, after
which the child gains lifelong immunity from measles,
mumps, chickenpox, and the like.
A child with a weak immune system will become ill from a number of
causes, regardless of vaccinations. One of these major causes is poor
nutrition. No vaccine can cure that. Good clean food can.
But these simple facts are ignored as "conspiracy theory" by doctors.
If a mainstream doctor gives any credence to the idea of making the
immune system stronger, he'll deny this reduces or eliminates the need
for vaccination.
Of course, the medical attacks leveled at "anti-vaxxers" are, at the
highest level, nothing more than an insistence that chemical drugs and
vaccines must continue to sell. These power players are quite aware
that a sensible and natural approach to healthcare
does, as a matter of course, vastly reduce the interest in their
products.
When it comes to fundamental politics, the medical cartel has, for a
hundred years---backed by government and huge media operations-been
engaged in the process of holding the planet hostage to chemical
treatments. This is an example of why the Founders never
permitted government to engage in commercial operations.
The result would be enforced monopoly.
No comments:
Post a Comment