Monday, March 4, 2019
1643-1646: The Reason Why from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
The reason all these defamatory hit
pieces are suddenly being pelted at me is because I am taking on the
corrupt Generals who set up the Nevada Corporation to run the phony
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and who are trying to run another round of the
Great Fraud on us.
These --- Sun-Tzu and Destry et alia
--- are the guys trying to sell the French Rothschild "Neu Republique"
to us---and if they can't sell it honestly, are trying to bring it in
the back door. These same bunch of Freebooters have been running all the UN-DOD-NWO scams.
It's not me who is the "Cabal Agent". Remember: it's always the pot
calling the kettle black. It's their MO to accuse their enemies of what
they are doing themselves.
Just watch and see who the actual Cabal Agents are ---- those who are
spreading a LOT of disinfo about me and about other things, too ----
telling Notaries that they could lose non-existent "bonding" if they
Witness our expatriation paperwork, telling people that Tim Turner's
"Act of State" will protect them, when it didn't protect Tim Turner (he
got an 18 year prison sentence because he relied on an "Act of State" he
had no capacity to do).
All sorts of crazy crap coming out of those boys now, but manure is
manure and it costs those who spread it as well as those who listen to
it.
The Thinking People will see the logic and abandon the fake stuff, and
all the Dunderheads who can't think beyond their Eighth Grade
indoctrination into La-La-Land, will be left behind. I am sorry for
them, but--- goats to the left, sheep to the right. It isn't as if I
haven't spent eight years trying to educate everyone.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Act of State is Insufficient
By Anna Von Reitz
Now we have more Disinformation
hitting the streets--- people saying that you don't have to expatriate,
and that an "Act of State" is sufficient.
Tell that to Tim Turner, presently serving ---- is it 18 years? ----in Federal Prison.
Ever play with an Oriental Puzzle Box when you were a kid?
These wooden boxes are often
intricately carved and have all sorts of hidden locks and slides and cut
out "keys" that are part of the box. My Dad would give me one of these
things that appeared to be solid blocks of intricately carved wood -- a
bit like a Rubik's Cube -- and see how long I had to fiddle with it to
get it open. Inside, he would have hidden some little treat....
What our Employees have done is similar to the Puzzle Box. They have set things up so that "you can't get there from here".
You can't do an "Act of State" until you have a "State" and you don't have a "State" if you are any kind of "US Citizen".
US Citizens live, work, breathe, and
have their being in the world of "inchoate" States of States. They
can't access or operate actual States. They are by definition
"stateless".
So when a US Citizen attempts to do an "Act of State", the courts just laugh at him and ignore him---- and rightly so.
Tim Turner was trying to act in a
capacity he couldn't act in. He couldn't access any "State" because as a
US Citizen he wasn't on the land and soil to begin with.
He hadn't done the groundwork of
re-conveying his Proper Name to the land and soil and hadn't expatriated
from US Citizenship, so, he couldn't do a valid Act of State.
Tim will spend 8 to 10 years of his
life in jail for making that mistake, and now members of the Michigan
General Jural Assembly are telling you that an "Act of State" without
returning to the land and soil and without expatriating from US
Citizenship is sufficient?
They want you to make the same mistake Tim Turner already made--- ? Hello? Houston.....
----------------------------
See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Correction: Notaries Cannot Lose Their Bonds
By Anna Von Reitz
Among the other Disinformation being
spread is the idea that Notaries could "lose their bonds" if they
Witness our Acts of Expatriation.
Those making such comments are in true La-La-Land.
All your life, you have been signing for a fictional entity --- your Person.
In fact, no "State of State" Notary
has ever Witnessed anything but people signing as Persons, so you are
not doing anything unusual or wrong or even questionable by signing our
paperwork, and neither is the Notary doing anything questionable by
witnessing it.
Here's what you've got to know:
In international jurisdiction there
are Lawful Persons and Legal Persons, but no living people at all. So,
Question One---- which one are you? Lawful Person or Legal Person?
We settle the first question --- Lawful Person or Legal Person? -- with the Act of Expatriation and the Deed of Re-conveyance.
We record the fact and create the
evidence that our Proper Name is a Lawful Person standing on the land
and soil of our State, so that it is no longer open to any
interpretation and we are not subject to being mistaken for Legal
Persons and attacked as such.
In municipal jurisdiction there are
also only commercial corporations functioning as LEGAL PERSONS. Again,
no living people at all.
Question Two: where those PERSONS domiciled on Earth and who do they belong to?
We settle the second question
regarding LEGAL PERSONS with the Certificate of Assumed Names and the
Form 56, which re-flags the PERSON as an American PERSON (not Puerto
Rican) and then Form 56 makes the Secretary of the Treasury responsible
for paying ITS debts. Not us.
Everyone (including the Notaries)
needs to realize that "State of State" Notaries, like State of State
Sheriffs, don't have any public bonds associated with what is in fact
a private corporate office providing a public service as a paid or
unpaid contractor.
Instead, the State of State
corporations "self-insure" and have risk management departments. In
reality what that means is that they carry private liability insurance
like any big corporation.
You can't lose bonding you don't have.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Red Alert - Which Came First?
By Anna Von Reitz
The Michigan General Jural Assembly
and Destry Payne have claimed that you can retain "US Citizenship" and
be a member of a State Jural Assembly.
I called them out on it and
basically said ----no, you have to be an American State Citizen to
operate an American State Assembly.
Go figure, right?
To date, they haven't come up with a
single shred of evidence in support of their position: no evidence that
any State of the Union ever accepted Dual Citizenship.
This issue is too important both for
your own safety and for the validity of all your work on an Assembly to
bypass and leave to hand-waving.
If it were "no big deal" I wouldn't be objecting.
Now that their claims that I was
responsible for what happened to the Colorado Nine have also been
thoroughly debunked, and it has been proven that instead, I gave the
Colorado Nine good advice that they ignored ---just like I am giving you
now--- it's time to further consider the facts.
"US Citizens" are Federal Employees
or Dependents by definition. The condition of "US Citizenship" arises
from Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2 and Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3
of the Federal Constitutions. A very complete discussion of these
issues appears in the United States Supreme Court Case Hooven and
Allison v. Evatt.
US Citizens have no "constitutional
rights or guarantees" because they are subjects defined by the
Constitutions and they are adopting a political status created by the
Constitutions, so logically, they are not Parties to the Constitutions,
never were and cannot be.
That's why "Equal Civil Rights"
exist and what the whole Civil Rights Movement was about. US
Citizens have no recognizable "Natural and Unalienable Rights" and never
have had.
The Municipal Congress was forced to
give them privileges known as "Civil Rights" to make up for this -- but
they remain only privileges, something the Master gives and the Master
can take away.
We, the People, Lawful Persons
living in the actual States of the Union, are Parties to the
Constitutions via the participation of our States and enjoy a completely
different status and stand in a completely different jurisdiction.
Once we expatriate from any
Territorial or Municipal citizenship obligation-- a status that was
merely "conferred" and "presumed" upon us without our knowledge or
consent, we are free to operate as American State Nationals or as
American State Citizens. Not until.
US Citizens can be arrested for
doing what we are doing, so it is an urgent matter of concern that
people be given the facts up front and be given the tools to extract
themselves from US Citizenship presumptions.
I will also point out that it makes
no sense whatsoever to retain any tie to such a political status as a
"US Citizen" if you are not currently a Federal Employee or Dependent.
Federal Service is a condition of
"voluntary servitude", as in indentured servitude. You sign a labor
contract that requires you to function as a "US Citizen" for a period of
years.
Once you retire or leave the US
Military or Federal Civilian Service, you are no longer required to
function in that capacity---and why would you, considering that it
obligates you to many unpleasant duties, including paying Federal Income
Tax on every penny you earn?
Loss of your private property rights?
Loss of your Constitutional guarantees?
Why would anyone in their right
mind claim such a foreign and subservient political status, if they
didn't have to as a condition of employment?
The vast majority of us don't have
to, and for the work at hand --- actually assembling the States of the
Union --- we can't. We have to come home and dig our own ditches.
We cannot remain "at sea" in Federal jurisdiction and accomplish work on the land---- and vice versa.
So if you do NOT want to stumble
into the same jurisdictional trap as the Colorado Nine and quite
possibly suffer the same fate, look at the logic and the facts and lead
the stampede to get your paperwork done.
Retirees from Federal Services and
those who have earned their Social Security Benefits and Military
Retirement benefits from Federal Employment are still welcome and able
to return home to the land and soil jurisdiction.
They may still have to pay federal
income tax on the portion of their retirement that is based on federal
income, but they are otherwise free to collect -- have their pensions
and their freedom, too.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment